APOCALYPSE 33 - FROM THE SHADOWS, FREEMASONIC CRUSADES AGAINST ISLAM, MUSLIMS, AND ARABS.

ABDUL KARIM HATIM'S 

FROM THE SHADOWS 1998

From the Shadows: The New World

  Order 

Documentary produced by Owen 'Alik Shahadah, written by Abdul Karim Hatim and Shaid Ahmad, and distributed by Halaqah 

Media Group

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halaqah_... 

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vrC_ULq7CdU

"Blocked by BBC for copyright reasons", and they make us  pay a licence for watching ??? 

(Not me, and I do not watch television!)

 

PART 1

 

PART 2

 

PART 3

 

PART 4

 

PART 5

 

PART 6

 From the Shadows 1998 Original Video

 I have personally known Abdul Karim Hatim who told me he was cheated of his rights in the production and distribution of this documentary by the Halaqah Media Group.  We kept some telephonic correspondence for quite some time until I lost track of him completely.  

Narrated by NICHOLAS MOORE, this is a master-piece, sorry, a MISTRESS-PIECE!!! 

Erratum: Speaker seems to have misspelt FRATERNITY as "franility".

BAFS 

ASSAULT ON MY PERSON BY POLICE FOR THE SECOND TIME IN LONDON 2006 & 2016

This private video evidence is being systematically taken down!  By who?

FRÉMAUX SOORMALLY7 minutes ago Tuesday 23 August 2016 (edited)

I am a 70 year old French citizen (now nearing 73 in 2018!) going on my daily routine occupation as a grandfather of four, including a 6 months old grandson who I take regularly in a Graco pram to Walthamstow Market in London E17, Walthamstow.

On Friday 19 August 2016 I was with the same push chair on my way to my grandchildren. For unexplained reason I was assaulted in London in my own locality by a man in Police uniform. He grabbed my arm with a steel grip to near breaking my bone, tried to drag me away by force and prevented me from going on my own business peacefully. He called for support and threatened to arrest me several times despite the fact that I had put him under his oath of office as a Police constable. When asked if he understood, he said he understood, but he did not give a damn. He detained me by force for some 20-30 minutes against my will and in full view of passer-byes in Walthamstow open Market E17. 

Another man in uniform came and shouted at me: GET OUT OF THE AREA! WHEN I COME BACK AND SEE YOU STILL HERE I WILL ARREST YOU!

A third man in uniform said: I too am a freeman-on-the-land! 

 THEY WERE FOUR OR FIVE MEN OR INDIVIDUALS IN POLICE UNIFORM. 

The aggressor in uniform repeated to me some twenty times:or more "STOP SHOUTING! CALM DOWN!". I was not shouting and I was perfectly calm but very upset as my mouth had dried up completely.

He kept lecturing and threatening me preventing me from talking saying repeatedly "I HAVE NOT FINISHED" and pointing his finger at me repeatedly!   

Any thoughts on this?

Thanks

BAFS

P.S. This happened after an optician ordered me out of his shop many times after he himself had invited me in and when I was at the door leaving the shop. The video was shot by a lady passer-by (from Liverpool) who kindly sent it to me.



https://www.facebook.com/zeshan.raza/videos/vb.715580554/10154537970520555/?type=2&theater&notif_t=video_processed&notif_id=1471913143893410

Police Oath of Office:
' I (name) do solemnly and sincerely declare and affirm that I will well and truly serve our Sovereign Lady the Queen in the office of Constable, without favour or affection, malice or ill will; and that I will, to the best of my power, cause the peace to be kept and preserved, and prevent all offences against the persons and properties of Her Majesty's subjects and that while I continue to hold the said office I will, to the best of my skill and knowledge, discharge all the duties thereof faithfully according to law. '

 

"Abdul Karim would like to thank Hamza Yusuf 

Hanson for inspiration, David Musa Pidcock 

author of  Satanic Voices  and The Editors and 

staff at Halaqah Media for their time and effort"

APOCALYPSE 33

FREEMASONIC CRUSADES 

 AGAINST ISLAM, MUSLIMS, 

ARABS AND THE ARABIC 

LANGUAGE!

JUST A FEW MORE PEARLS TO THE 

SWINE!

1099 - Paul Urban II, in the name of the Cross, ordered a series 

of wars to destroy the PEACEFUL AND PROSPEROUS 

MUSLIM CALIPHATE set up since 637. Women were raped, 

babies were murdered without pity, and prisoners were boiled and 

babies roasted for feeding the Anti-Christ Crusaders, and blood

ran in the Muslim, Jewish and Christian streets knee high, a feat

 decadent Christendom would repeat against Muslims and Islam 

using Mongol mercenaries to decapitate Islam and exterminate

 the Muslims for good by destroying their civilisation.

After anti-Christian European Masons had joined hands with the

 Jewish Qabbalah (DAJJAL) and destroyed Muslim Spain, Muslim

 Hindustan, occupied Muslim Indonesia, and conquered all the

Arab speaking and Muslim lands, including the Three Holy 

Sanctuaries of Islam, Jerusalem, Mecca (Makkah) and Medina 

(Madinaat-un-Nabee or the Town of the Prophet). the Judeo-

Freemasonic Wars have been raging nonstop using a bogus 

Semitic bloodthirsty tribe calling themselves Jews, the Chosen 

Ones of Lucifer, their God, while hiding in the shadows. Oy vey! 

The foolish Chrisitians call their God YAHWEH or YARVEY)! 

The British Royals (Rothschild owned) and the USA (Israel) lead

 the International Freemasonic Crusade against God, religion and 

against both Christians and Muslims by pitting the Christians 

against the Muslims globally and by promising fanatical Jews 

(Atheists, Communists, Socialists, Marxists, perverts, reformed or 

non religious Jews, and a few extremists) to rebuild their Temple 

of Solomon, which in truth is the Solomon Knights Templar's 

Freemasonic Temple of the Qabbalah. The USA, France, and the

 United Kingdom (Greater Israel) are all Freemasonic 

dictatorships 

 

Jews and Masons under the lawless UNO own and control the 

Earth and all its resources and human slave labour. They pollute 

the habitat and pervert the species at will and create diseases for 

profits: AIDS, vaccines, etc. while our greatest experts are bogged 

down in media and Freemasonic State propaganda as an addiction 

or entertainment even though it cost many of them their lives, jobs,

freedom, personal and family happiness! It happened to me; so I 

know what I am talking about! Muslims have fallen into the same 

trap and are preaching false religions, and worshipping false Gods 

while their own are being imprisoned, gassed, nuked, raped, 

murdered, tortured, persecuted, terrorised, enslaved, lethally 

vaccinated, poisoned, and destroyed by all kinds of abominations!

But, WE will never learn, we cannot, when we  have military might

and Satan against us!

BAFS

Saturday 6th of August 2016

How I allowed God to fool me!

http://muhammad-ali-ben-marcus.blogspot.co.uk/2015/07/how-i-allowed-god-to-fool-me-satanic.html

Thursday, 30 July 2015

 

LGBT EXPOSED - Hard-Hitting, Major 

 

Russian TV Film (SODOM) HD Eng Dub 

 

Russia Insider
 

83,853
 

14,340 views

Published on 3 Aug 2016

Down with Gender-bending! HD with English Subs. Blockbuster 

Russian 2015 documentary EXTREMELY CRITICAL of LGBT 

Agenda.

Full description of film below, or read this article about it: 

http://russia-insider.com/en/exclusiv...

Russia Insider website http://russia-insider.com/en

Support Russian Insider website http://russia-insider.com/en/support

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3uvWkgz1XQM

 

http://www.tomatobubble.com/id866.html

Mike,

Far from trying to take credit for your hard work, you  keep 

amazing me by your deep and truthful insight in world matters, and

 especially concerning Adolf Hitler. Despite all the evil that has

 been written about him he remains in my view the greatest leader 

Europe has ever had in modern times.  And I found that amongst 

the people who hate him by ignorance most are the most evil 

characters I have ever known  or read about!  

Thanks again.

Regards

Basheer 

 

Benjamin's influence was immense. Why has he been all but erased from history?

JUDAH BENJAMIN: THE BIG JEW OF THE CONFEDERACY By Mike King

"Judah P. Benjamin was known as "the brains of the 

Confederacy," its "court Jew," "the statesman of the Lost

 Cause," and even "the Confederate Kissinger. As, 

successively, Attorney General, Secretary of War and 

Secretary of State in the Confederate Cabinet, he was 

President Jefferson Davis' closest and most trusted 

adviser."

- The New Orleans Times Picayunne / 'The Confederate 

Kissinger' / April 20, 2010 

Based on Excerpts from Planet Rothchild / Volume 1

When we think of the Confederacy, the big names that 

automatically come to mind are the three legends carved into the 

side of Georgia's Stone Mountain: President Jefferson Davis,

 General Robert E. Lee and General Stonewall Jackson. Significant 

figures for sure, but in the grander power-scheme of things, these 

men, including President Davis himself, were outranked by Judah

 P. Benjamin. The fact that Benjamin's name is so relatively 

unknown is, ironically, testament to the awesome "behind-

the-scenes" power that he wielded. Unfortunately for the South

 (and the North), Benjamin's influence served neither of the 

Americas. His loyalties lay elsewhere - in Rothschild's London!

Benjamin's image never made it to Stone Mountain, but his 'mug-shot' did appear on Confederate currency and bonds!

Before and during the War Between the States, there is Jewish influence supporting both the cause of Northern Unionism and Southern Secession. Louisiana Senator John Slidell is not Jewish (at least not outwardly), but his family ties to elite European Jewry runs deep. Slidell’s daughter is engaged to Baron Frederic Erlanger, a French Jewish financier based in Paris. Erlanger helps to fund the Confederacy, gouging the South with usurious interest rates and fees too! (here)  

Erlanger's financing of the South, as confirmed even by today’s New York Times , is directly linked to the House of Rothschild. (here)  Pappa-in-Law Slidell would later serve the Confederate States government as foreign diplomat to Great Britain and French Emperor Napoleon III.

Now the niece of the influential Senator is married to northern financier August Belmont (Schönberg)- Rothschild’s Jewish boy and Democrat boss supporting the Northern cause, at least at first. After the war, “Confederate” Slidell will make his “Unionist” nephew-in-law Belmont his political protégé.

Also hooked up with Senator Slidell in this tangled North-South-Rothschild  knot of financial-political intrigue is fellow Louisiana Senator Judah Benjamin, the Jewish big-shot who goes on to become the Confederacy’s  Attorney General, then Secretary of War, and then Secretary of State. Through the shadowy fog of 150 years of elapsed history, we can now discern a pattern of divide & conquer, balance of power conspiratorial actions being played upon both sides - and with tragic consequences.

Senator Slidell – His Jewish Son-in-Law Erlanger – His Jewish Northern Nephew-in-Law Belmont, and Jewish fellow Senator Benjamin form an incestuous North-South connection with direct links to the House of Rothschild.

BATTLE OF BULL RUN / SOUTH WINS; BUT FAILS TO FOLLOW-UP WITH ‘KNOCK-OUT BLOW'

If the South is to have any chance of gaining independence, it will have to win early, before the more industrialized and populated North can outlast them. The first battle of the war at Bull Run (Manassas, Virginia) is therefore critical. To make a long story short, the rebels force a Union retreat that soon turns into a full rout. The Battle of Bull Run will soon be referred to by some as “The Battle of Yankee Run".

The Union Capital, Washington DC, is just miles away and now essentially undefended. It is the South’s for the taking. The capture of DC and other parts north would have delivered a huge psychological blow to the North. Because many northerners aren’t in favor of the war anyway; the capture of DC might very well have ended the war that same year. But instead of finishing the job, someone has decided to spare the Capital - a decision that inflames the Southern press and leads to bitter finger-pointing.

The ‘fall-guy’ for this blunder will be War Secretary Leroy Walker. But in reality, it is the ex-war hero, ex-War Secretary and current Confederate President Jefferson Davis who calls the shots, not the young Walker. But it is also known that Davis relies heavily on the advice from the man whose intelligence and gift-of-gab he is awed by – Jewish Attorney General and former Louisiana Senator Judah Benjamin, referred to by critics as, “Davis’s pet Jew”. (here)

Was it Judah Benjamin, the man so admired by Solomon de Rothschild, (here) who may have whispered poison in Davis’s ear, telling him not to take DC and thus blowing the chance to win the game early for the South? And after Walker has been made the scapegoat and fired; who replaces him as War Secretary? None other than Judah Benjamin!

1 & 2 - After Bull Run turned into a rout, Washington DC – just 30 miles away – could have been captured. Whose idea was it to halt? That of  Davis -- or his trusted "adviser" Benjamin?

3 - Engraved portraits (from 1861) of the South's chieftains depict Judah Benjamin at the very top (!) with Jefferson Davis in a bigger circle but down lower. Sleazy Slidell with the Rothschild agents for in-laws is to the left of Davis.

Could the new War Secretary Benjamin's subsequent 1861 interference with the Generals, - acts so controversial that they would force a Congressional investigation - and his bizarre refusal to supply them as requested have been a ploy designed to prolong the war until Rothschild could bury both sides in debt, before sending the Family's British and French hit-men to divvy up' America into two spheres?

Establishment historians will later claim that Benjamin's stubborn defiance of the Generals was due to a lack of supplies in the South. But given how early it was in the war, the claim that supplies were low seems like a cover story. If "lack of supplies" had been the cause of Benjamin's decisions, Generals Stonewall Jackson and P. G. T. Beauregard would not have had reason to dislike Benjamin as they did.

Such a delaying scenario would fit perfectly with a Rothschild plan to have a long war, one in which both sides could be indebted and weakened before the British & French can arrive.

Generals Jackson, Beauregard and Wise all hated Judah Benjamin.

That in mind, let’ take a closer look at the shady Mr. Benjamin. Outwardly, the esteemed Jefferson Davis is the ‘top dog’ of the South – the President of the Confederate States of America. But behind the scenes, Judah Benjamin, with his European connections, 'gift of gab' and impressive intellect is, in the grand scheme of things, more powerful than Davis. What the banking agent Alexander Hamilton had been to George Washington, the trusted Benjamin is to Davis, and then some. Like Hamilton, Benjamin was also born a British subject (West Indies). There is simply no exaggerating the influence of Judah Benjamin.

Biographer Eli Evans wrote that Benjamin:

"...achieved greater political power than any other Jew in the nineteenth century — perhaps even in all American history." 

Historian Charles Curran, in a 1967 issue of ‘History Today" wrote:

"Judah Philip Benjamin must be bracketed with Disraeli, who was his contemporary, as the ablest Jewish politician ever born under the British flag. But his career outdid Disraeli’s in audacity. Benjamin lived three lives in one." 

Judah is a plantation owner, slave-owner and originally a Senator from Louisiana - as was the aforementioned and equally European-connected John Slidell. Although he has no military experience, Benjamin is named the South’s Secretary of War in 1861, after having served as Attorney General for several months. Many in the South will come to loath and mistrust Benjamin.  The great General  Jackson once threatened to resign over conflicts with Benjamin (here) - who was commonly referred to in the South as “Mr. Davis’s pet Jew". (here)

But certain people in Europe had a much higher opinion of Benjamin. In 1861, Salomon de Rothschild - grandson of dynasty founder Mayer Amschel Rothschild - during a visit to Louisiana describes Benjamin as: “the greatest mind in North America” (here) That pretty much tells us all we need to know about the “southern rebel” Judah Benjamin!

In the fall of 1859,  de Rothschild, the son of Baron James de Rothschild of Paris, had come to the United States as a tourist. His travels in the North and South are recorded in a series of letters to his cousin Nathaniel in London.

Rothschild met with prominent politicians (surely with Benjamin!) and commented  on the issues of the day. His views were "pro-Confederate" and his letters urged cousin Nathan to use the family's influence to gain the recognition of the Confederacy by the European powers.

Rothschilds for Dixie? - Sing it! - "Oh I wish I were in the land of Matzo..."

Solomon Rothschild (l) urged Nathan Rothschild (who resembles Judah Benjamin) to support the South.

EXCERPT: "The European states should indeed intercede in order to avoid bloodshed which would be useless and very detrimental to their commerce.....

What is astonishing here, or rather, what is not astonishing, is the high position occupied by our co-religionists, or rather by those who were born into the faith and who, having married Christian women, and without converting, have forgotten the practices of their fathers.

Judah P. Benjamin, the Attorney General of the Confederate States, is perhaps the greatest mind on this continent. H.M. Hyams, the lieutenant governor of Louisiana, Moyse, the Secretary of the Interior, etc. And what is odd, all these men have a Jewish heart and take an interest in me, because I represent the greatest Jewish house in the world."  (here)

 http://www.jewish-history.com/salomon/

JUDAH BENJAMIN's EUROPEAN PLOT

In 1862, Benjamin, under intense Congressional pressure, is forced to resign as War Secretary. Jefferson Davis then appoints his beleaguered adviser as the South’s Secretary of State! In this position, Benjamin will work with Slidell and Slidell’s French Jewish son-in-Law Erlanger to secure not just financing from the Rothschild syndicate, but also to induce the direct involvement of Rothschild’s Britain & France into the war, on the side of the South.

A joint British & French entry into the war would have tipped the scales in favor of the South, and ultimately led to two American nations, both under foreign influence. Lincoln and his Secretary of State, William Seward block Judah Benjamin's scheme by turning to Russia for help.

In a clear message to his old Rothschild-funded foes from the Crimean War, Czar Alexander II stations the better part of his Pacific fleet in San Francisco, and a portion of his western fleet in New York. The British & French instigators of the Crimean War get the message and are forced to back off. Judah Benjamin and the Rothschild financiers are thus thwarted. Together, Alex and Abe have defied the London Bankers and will both pay a heavy price for it.

After the war, in recognition of, or payback for, Russia’s help in keeping Britain & France out of the war; Seward will arrange for the purchase of Alaska from Russia after the war – an act dismissed at the time as “Seward’s Folly”. But now we know the reason for the “folly".

1- The presence of Russian fleets in San Francisco and New York kept Judah Benjamin's British and French attack dogs at bay.  

2- Seward's Folly was Union payback to Russia.

OCTOBER, 1864

THE CHICAGO TRIBUNE ACCUSES

 AUGUST BELMONT AND THE 

 ROTHSCHILDS OF PLOTTING 

AGAINST THE UNION

On 16, October 1864 on page 2, The Chicago Tribune reported,

BELMONT'S CONFEDERATE BONDS (Excerpt)

"It is perhaps somewhat flattering to our national pride to know that the Rothschilds, who hold up every despotism in Europe, have concluded that it would be cheaper to buy up one of our political parties (Democrats), and in that way secure the dissolution of the Union, than to have their agents in England and France interfere and fight us.

But Irishmen and Germans have a something, which for brevity we will all a 'crop,' and this fact sticks in their crop, that the oppressors of Ireland and Germany, the money kings of Europe, not daring to carry out their first pet project of breaking down this Government by the armed intervention, of England and France.

Let Belmont state over his own signature, if he can that he and Rothschilds have not, directly or indirectly, in their own name, or in that of others, operated in Confederate stocks during this rebellion. Until he can face the music in that style it matters little what tune any of the Copperhead penny whistles may be authorized to blow, as they are very seldom authorized to state anything that is true."

ALL CONNECTED! 

Slidell – Erlanger –  Belmont – Benjamin 

DID JUDAH BENJAMIN KILL LINCOLN?

In the closing days of the American Civil War, a massive conspiracy to decapitate the U.S. government results in the assassination of President Lincoln by an actor with ties to secret societies. John Wilkes Booth shoots Lincoln in the back of the head as Lincoln and his wife watch a play at Ford’s Theatre. Booth escapes.

On the same night of Lincoln’s murder, Lewis Powell, an associate of Booth, attacks Secretary of State William Seward in his home. Seward is stabbed in the face and neck before other men in the house subdue Powell. Seward’s wife Frances dies two months later from stress caused by seeing her husband nearly killed.

Vice President Johnson and General Ulysses S Grant were also to have been killed. The “conspiracy theorists” of the day point the finger at Judah Benjamin, (here) who burns the official papers of the Confederate Secret Service right about this time. (here)  Thanks to Bennie the Burner, the full story of Confederate clandestine services, and most likely the Lincoln assassination, may never be known.

1 & 2: Abe and Alex both paid with their lives for defying the Rothschilds. Judah Benjamin was suspected of engineering the Lincoln assassination.

3 - "Extremes Meet" - British Press mocks Abe and Alexander's cooperation.

Lincoln's alliance with the Rothschild family's most hated enemy, Russia, and his printing of interest-free 'Greenbacks" to finance the war were big "no-no's" that got him killed. John Fazio's 'Decapitating the Union' supports the belief of many during that time that Judah Benjamin was the mastermind of the plot.

BENJAMIN BUGS OUT

As the south collapses, Benjamin stays in the home of a Jewish merchant in South Carolina while final surrender negotiations drag on. Here, Benjamin abandons President Davis's plan to fight on, telling him that the cause is hopeless. When negotiations fail, Benjamin remains part of the group around Davis that moves on with the President. 

At one point, Benjamin (under suspicion for involvement in Lincoln’s assassination) tells Davis that he needs to separate from the Presidential party temporarily, and go to the Bahamas to be able to send instructions to foreign agents. He reassures Davis that he will rejoin him in Texas.  According to historian William C. Davis, "the pragmatic Secretary of State almost certainly never had any intention of returning to the South once gone".  (here)

When he bades Postmaster Reagan goodbye, the Postmaster asks where Benjamin is going. Benjamin replies: "To the farthest place from the United States, if it takes me to the middle of China." (here)

While other Confederate leaders, including the trusting fool Jefferson Davis, are being jailed and abused, Benjamin arrives in London before traveling to Paris - where his wife and daughter had been sent to live years before the war had even started.  Benjamin then moves back to England and will enjoy a very profitable career and “second life” as an attorney, until his death in 1884. Congressman John Wise, son of Confederate General and Virginia Governor Henry Wise, wrote a highly popular book about the South in the Civil War in 1899, The End of an Era. In it, he stated:

"(Benjamin) had more brains and less heart than any other civic leader in the South ... The Confederacy and its collapse were no more to Judah P. Benjamin than last year's bird's nest." (here)

Unfortunately for historians, and fortunately for the Rothschilds, Benjamin, exactly as he had done with papers pertaining to the Confederacy’s secret services in 1865, also burned his personal papers shortly before his death in 1884.

 

1 & 2 - John Wise's ‘End of an Era’ expresses the true Southern feeling toward the fleeing scoundrel Judah Benjamin, to whom the South was like "last year's bird's nest."

3 - After abandoning his Confederate colleagues and the people of the South, Benjamin the "British" Barrister went on to enjoy a hugely successful 2nd career in Rothschild’s London -- where he was a contemporary of Karl Marx and Benjamin Disraeli.

Now that you know the story of "The Confederate Kissinger"; the reason his name is so little known should no longer be a mystery.

http://www.tomatobubble.com/hitler_democracy.html

HITLER'S PROPHETIC WARNINGS ABOUT DEMOCRACY "Sooner will a camel pass through a needle's eye than a great man be 'discovered' by an election." - Adolf Hitler Illustrated by Mike King

By Adolf Hitler

The Western democracy of today is the forerunner of Marxism which without it would not be thinkable. It provides this world plague with the culture in which its germs can spread. In its most extreme form, parliamentarianism created a 'monstrosity of excrement and fire,' in which, however, sad to say, the 'fire' seems to me at the moment to be burned out. . . .

Democracy breeds Marxism

What gave me most food for thought was the obvious absence of any responsibility in a single person. The parliament arrives at some decision whose consequences may be ever so ruinous  - nobody bears any responsibility for this, no one can be taken to account. For can it be called an acceptance of responsibility if, after an unparalleled catastrophe, the guilty government resigns? Or if the coalition changes, or even if parliament is itself dissolved?

Can a fluctuating majority of people ever be made responsible in any case? Isn't the very idea of responsibility bound up with the individual? But can an individual directing a government be made practically responsible for actions whose preparation and execution must be set exclusively to the account of the will and inclination of a multitude of men?

Or will not the task of a leading statesman be seen, not in the birth of a creative idea or plan as such, but rather in the art of making the brilliance of his projects intelligible to a herd of sheep and blockheads, and subsequently begging for their kind approval?

  

Blah...blah....blah

Is it the criterion of the statesman that he should possess the art of persuasion in as high degree as that of political intelligence in formulating great policies or decisions? Is the incapacity of a leader shown by the fact that he does not succeed in winning for a certain idea the majority of a mob thrown together by more or less savory accidents?

Indeed, has this mob ever understood an idea before success proclaimed its greatness?

Isn't every deed of genius in this world a visible protest of genius against the inertia of the mass?

And what should the statesman do, who does not succeed in gaining the favor of this mob for his plans by flattery?

Should he buy it?

Or, in view of the stupidity of his fellow citizens, should he renounce the execution of the tasks which he has recognized to be vital necessities? Should he resign or should he remain at his post?

In such a case, doesn't a man of true character find himself in a hopeless conflict between knowledge and decency, or rather honest conviction?

Where is the dividing line between his duty toward the general public and his duty toward his personal honor?

Mustn't every true leader refuse to be thus degraded to the level of a political gangster?

Political gangsters: Clinton and Zionist Senators Schumer, Feinstein, Boxer, Levin

And, conversely, mustn't every gangster feel that he is cut out for politics, since it is never he, but some intangible mob, which has to bear the ultimate responsibility?

Mustn't the principle of parliamentary majorities lead to the demolition of any idea of leadership?

Does anyone believe that the progress of this world springs from the mind of majorities and not from the brains of individuals?

Or does anyone expect that the future will be able to dispense with this premise of human culture?

Does it not, on the contrary, today seem more indispensable than ever?

By rejecting the authority of the individual and replacing it by the numbers of some momentary mob, the parliamentary principle of majority rule sins against the basic aristocratic principle of Nature, though it must be said that this view is not necessarily embodied in the present-day decadence of our upper ten thousand.

The devastation caused by this institution of modern parliamentary rule is hard for the reader of Jewish newspapers to imagine, unless he has learned to think and examine independently. It is, first and foremost, the cause of the incredible inundation of all political life with the most inferior, and I mean the most inferior, characters of our time.

The Best American "democracy" has to offer? The 5 living Presidents are all fools and criminals.

Just as the true leader will withdraw from all political activity which does not consist primarily in creative achievement and work, but in bargaining and haggling for the favor of the majority, in the same measure this activity will suit the small mind and consequently attract it.

The more dwarfish one of these present-day leather merchants is in spirit and ability, the more clearly his own insight makes him aware of the lamentable figure he actually cuts - that much more will he sing the praises of a system which does not demand of him the power and genius of a giant, but is satisfied with the craftiness of a village mayor, preferring in fact this kind of wisdom to that of a Pericles.

And this kind doesn't have to torment himself with responsibility for his actions. He is entirely removed from such worry, for he well knows that, regardless what the result of his 'statesmanlike' bungling may be, his end has long been written in the stars: one day he will have to cede his place to another equally great mind, for it is one of the characteristics of this decadent system that the number of 'great statesmen' increases in proportion as the stature of the individual decreases. With increasing dependence on parliamentary majorities it will inevitably continue to shrink, since on the one hand great minds will refuse to be the stooges of idiotic incompetents and bigmouths, and on the other, conversely, the representatives of the majority, hence of stupidity, hate nothing more passionately than a superior mind.

For such an assembly of wise men of Gotham, it is always a consolation to know that they are headed by a leader whose intelligence is at the level of those present: this will give each one the pleasure of shining from time to time-and, above all, if Tom can be master, what is to prevent Dick and Harry from having their turn too?

Democracy in action: untalented clowns doing their clown act.

This invention of democracy is most intimately related to a quality which in recent times has grown to be a real disgrace, to wit, the cowardice of a great part of our so-called 'leadership. What luck to be able to hide behind the skirts of a so-called majority in all decisions of any real importance!

Take a look at one of these political bandits. How anxiously he begs the approval of the majority for every measure, to assure himself of the necessary accomplices, so he can unload the responsibility at any time. And this is one of the main reasons why this type of political activity is always repulsive and hateful to any man who is decent at heart and hence courageous, while it attracts all low characters-and anyone who is unwilling to take personal responsibility for his acts, but seeks a shield, is a cowardly scoundrel. When the leaders of a nation consist of such vile creatures, the results will soon be deplorable. Such a nation will be unable to muster the courage for any determined act; it will prefer to accept any dishonor, even the most shameful, rather than rise to a decision; for there is no one who is prepared of his own accord to pledge his person and his head for the execution of a dauntless resolve.

For there is one thing which we must never forget: in this, too, the majority can never replace the man. It is not only a representative of stupidity, but of cowardice as well. And no more than a hundred empty heads make one wise man will an heroic decision arise from a hundred cowards.

 Cowards and weaklings too afraid to

oppose the Marxists, so they join them.