False Flag Islamophobia* Conference: Live Stream from Paris on Dec. 12th
(N.B. From day one I disagree with the use of the term "ISLAMOPHOBIA"! Only sick people suffer from tat disease and they constitute a small minority! All the others are simply ignoramuses, BLOODY RACISTS, fanatics or extremists of their own Sects, Tribes, Ideologies or Religions. BAFS)
False Flag Islamophobia Conference
from Paris, France. (this is a 4 Hour live Broadcast)
Sat. Dec 12th Live Stream from Paris, France
Friday 11th of December 2015 at 8:45 AM
I WROTE, when this Conference was announced some time ago, that Fascist Zionist France will not allow this Conference as there has never been free speech for REAL MUSLIMS and TRUTH TELLERS in France! Friday 11.12.2015 BAFS
9
Courageous Scholars will brave the ongoing martial law hysteria in
France and will debunk recent false flags including the Paris attack,
Charlie Hebdo, the San Bernadino Shooting and other false flags in the
news. Do not believe the official story you hear in the mainstream
media.
Are
false flag attacks attributed to Muslims, actually committed by the
enemies of Muslims a major factor behind the spread of Islamophobia? Is
ISIS a real Muslim group or a false-flag group created, armed and
deployed AGAINST Muslims by the enemies of Islam?
Hosted
by Professor Tony Hall and Dr. Kevin Barrett, and featuring
contributors to the two books questioning both 2015 Paris attacks: We Are NOT Charlie Hebdo: Free Thinkers Question the French 9/11 and the forthcoming ANOTHER French False Flag? Free Thinkers Question the 11/13 Paris Attacks.
|
False Flag Islamophobia Conference
from Paris, France. (this is a 4 Hour live Broadcast)
6:00 pm - 10:00 pm Paris * 17:00 - 21:00 GMT
No Lies Radio
PO Box 4164
San Leandro, California 94579
US
Islamophobia is creating a global police state
It's a neocon-fabricated "state of emergency" built on demonizing Muslims
By Kevin Barrett, Veterans Today Editor, reporting from Paris
Hitler built a German police state by demonizing Jews* (and Slavs, Gypsies, communists, modern artists, and lots of other folks).
Lenin and Stalin built a Russian police state by demonizing “the class enemy.”
Today, neoconservatives and their allies are even more ambitious. They are building a global police state – a totalitarian New World Order – by demonizing Muslims.
That is the obvious takeaway from yesterday’s Islamophobia and Eroding Civil Society conference, held in Paris, France and sponsored by UC-Berkeley’s Center for Race and Gender Islamophobia Research and Documentation Project.
“Islamophobia is the mechanism for police states today – like anti-Semitism in 1930s Europe,” explained conference co-organizer and UC-Berkeley professor Ramon Grosfoguel in his closing speech.Ironically, the site of the conference – Paris, the City of Lights, world capital of “freedom, equality, and brotherhood,” whose thinkers brought us the Enlightenment – is leading the way toward the Global Islamophobic Police State (GIPS). Using the recent Friday the 13th massacre as their excuse, in the same way Hitler used the Reichstag Fire and Bush used 9/11, French leaders proposed and passed a bill putting the whole country under a State of Emergency that effectively ends liberty and the rule of law.
Today, Paris is a locked-down gulag city, like East Berlin under Communism. The population is brainwashed to live in fear, citizens are encouraged to spy on their neighbors, and peaceful political protest has been summarily banned.
As the Vice News article Surveillance, Paranoia, and Life Under a State of Emergency in France explains, peaceful activists who have never done anything wrong, much less illegal, are being put under house arrest. Life for them has become a nightmare like something out of Franz Kafka:
Police appear to know when (peaceful activist Joel Domenjoud) is planning to leave his apartment because he could see them waiting on the street outside his apartment. ‘From the moment I put on my jacket, they were waiting. The worst part is thinking about if my apartment is being listened to,'” he said.So how did the UC-Berkeley group manage to hold its Islamophobia conference in this locked-down gulag city, now the world capital of UnFreedom? By flying way, WAY under the radar.
Most academic conferences will tell you who is speaking, where, and when. They put it right on their website. After all, professors and wannabe-professors want this kind of publicity – conference presentations look good on their resumés.
But the Islamophobia and Eroding Civil Society conference is a rare exception. I wasn’t able to get a confirmation of the location, the time, or who would be participating from the organizers. My repeated email inquiries were ignored. Professor Tony Hall (Globalization Studies, University of Lethbridge) got the same non-response.
As a Ph.D. in Arabic with an Islamic Studies focus, I would normally be welcomed at such an event. So would Tony, whose scholarly background is also relevant to the topic.
And considering that my paper proposal was accepted by the Conference organizers, you would think they would tell me when and where to show up.
But my proposal – which focused on the way Muslims have been gagged and prevented from expressing their analysis that the major terror events since 9/11 have been false flags – was retroactively deemed “too hot to handle” by the organizers in the wake of the November 13th apparent false flag operation.
Here is my correspondence with a conference organizer:
Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 7:08 AM, [name deleted] wrote:
Dear Kevin,
On behalf of the organizing committee for the 3rd Paris
Islamophobia Conference, I would like to inform that your paper was
selected for the conference. I would like to extend an invite to you to
present your paper at the third annual conference to be held December
11th, 2015. Please prepare for a 20 minute presentation inclusive of
any media or visual materials and we look forward to receiving your
final paper in the near future. Another email will be sent details some
hotel options and other relevant logistical issues.
All the best,
[name deleted]
But then came the next big false flag – on Friday the 13th. It was an unlucky day for free speech and free thought.
November 14, 2015 at 1:26 a.m.
Dear Kevin,
I wanted to alert you that due to the development in Paris we will
not be able to have the conference in its current format and the whole
agenda has shifted. Please don’t purchase a plane ticket as things are
totally on hold with the state of emergency.
-[name deleted]Dear [name deleted]
I already purchased a non-refundable ticket. See below. I do hope the conference will take place, even if the format shifts, and will be happy to address my paper to the revised format.
Best
Kevin
Wed., Nov 18, 2015, at 10:20 AM
Dear Kevin,
Due to state of emergency in France and the on-going active
operations, the organizing committee is not able to accommodate your
paper at this point in time. Our supporters on the ground are under
extreme emergency conditions and the whole program is under stress due
to it. I wish it was different but we are taking the direction from the
people impacted directly at this time.
[name deleted]Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 9:27 AM
Dear [name deleted],
When will you be available for an interview on this? Who else is on the committee?
And when will the committee reimburse me for the plane ticket? …
Your complete transparency and honesty in this matter is expected and appreciated.
Kevin
November 18, 2015 at 7:01 pm
Dear David,
I will reimburse you from our Berkeley side of the conference and
if you can send me the actual invoice so I will put it through to be
paid. I will wait regarding this as we might end-up not having the
conference at all due to fast moving circumstances. Part of the work
in Paris involved hosting a community wide meeting with local partners
in Saint-Denis, which is the heavily populated area of Muslims and
immigrants and we are also waiting to see if his happens. If you
watched the news today the raid on the area killed two and arrested 7
and the community meeting was to be held few blocks from it.
[name deleted]
Subject header: Hope to see you in Paris
Nov. 24
Hello [name deleted]
Just letting you know that University of Lethbridge Globalization
Studies professor Anthony Hall and I will be hosting an alternative
conference in Paris on 12/12: http://falseflagislamophobia.blogspot.com .
So don’t worry about refunding my airfare.
Even though we won’t be contributing papers, Tony and I would love
to attend the Islamophobia and Eroding Civil Society Conference as
audience members. So please do keep me posted on conference plans.
No hard feelings, I appreciate the good work you’re doing within
the prescribed limits. Here’s hoping that some day you and others will
get fed up and break free from those limits.
Best
Kevin
As the date approached, I repeatedly asked for details about where and what time the conference would take place. No response.
So I flew in to Paris on Thursday the 11th. Around 9:30 a.m. on
Friday the 12th, I “just showed up” at the address listed on the
website, hoping the conference hadn’t been moved, locked down by the
gendarmes, or blown up by “ISIS” in another false flag operation.
Fortunately none of the above scenarios materialized. I simply
strolled into the venue – a pleasant Parisian bookstore – and took my
place among the assembled throng of Islamophobia Studies specialists.
The organizers favored me with nervous glances of recognition.
The first panel discussion began with “The Muslim minority to
justify the end of democracy.” Midway through the second or third
presentation, heads turned as Tariq Ramadan
– the world’s most famous “Muslim French intellectual” even though he’s
Swiss and teaches at Oxford – made his entrance. (Ramadan is living
proof that no matter how reasonable and moderate and pro-Western and
pro-democracy a Muslim tries to be, they will be hounded and demonized
by Zionist defamation specialists. Just look at the poor guy’s Wikipedia page!)
The panel focused on various ways that Western Muslims have been
confined to “spaces of exclusion” and rendered non-subjects, deprived of
real existence in the collective consciousness, endlessly talked about
(as scary, scary threats) but never listened to or acknowledged as
citizens and equals. During the Q&A I raised my hand and asked:
“I’d like to hear if any of you in your research have encountered one of the most important ‘spaces of exclusion,’ which is the mainstream Western society’s refusal to listen to what Muslims really think about 9/11 and the other big so-called ‘Islamic terror’ events. Polls show that most Muslims believe 9/11 was an inside job. Likewise with the post-9/11 follow-up events, including the recent ones in Paris. In my own experience, virtually nobody in the Muslim community believes the official story of any of these events. From 2001 through 2003, I the only Muslim in Madison, Wisconsin, as far as I know, who thought there really might have been Muslim hijackers on 9/11. Yet non-Muslims don’t know what Muslims really think. The media censors it. Even the academy censors it. And the evidence suggests the Muslim-majority analysis is right. How have the Muslims you’ve studied dealt with this?”
After some hemming and hawing, as each panelist hoped someone else
would answer, the British scholar answered. He said that British Muslims
who espouse “conspiracy theories” are put on terror watch lists and
threatened with “deradicalization programs.” Yet the millions of
non-Muslims who watch Loose Change and exhibit exactly the same
behavior as the Muslims are ignored. So this, he said, is yet another
example of the way Muslims are treated as third-class citizens.
Following that exchange, Tariq Ramadan delivered his keynote
address – and made a point of looking me in they eye and saying that he
agreed with me: We need to ask questions, and insist on our right to ask
questions. For example: Why didn’t the US accept the Taliban’s offer to
turn over Bin Laden? Why wasn’t Bin Laden charged with a crime, put on
trial, and questioned? Ramadan suggested that “some with an interest in
the Middle East are behind the dirty politics here. We have to have the
courage to ask questions.”
After his talk, I gave Prof. Ramadan a copy of We Are NOT Charlie Hebdo: Free Thinkers Question the French 9/11.
Ramadan also pointed out that France is becoming a model for
the Islamophobic police state–itself a transnational phenomenon–in part
because it has the biggest Muslim population of any Western country. The
police state, he said, is based on the false claim that “integration is
failing.” In fact, Muslims are more integrated than ever. The real
problem, he suggested, is that Muslims were becoming too integrated into society.
“The more we settle down in the West, the more they hate us”
Ramadan said. But why? Probably because Muslims are becoming normal
French citizens and fulfilling their civic duties, such as voting. 1.9
million Muslims voted for Hollande over Sarkozy, Ramadan explained,
while Hollande’s margin of victory was 1.6 million. (What Ramadan didn’t
say, didn’t need to say, was that – as all who follow French politics
know – Sarkozy is an extreme neocon Zionist and it is his people, such
as the proven liar and Charlie Hebdo suspect Jeanette Bougrabe, who are
stoking Islamophobia.)
Ramadan continued: Another reason that we’re still hearing the lie
that “integration is failing,” even though French Muslims are already
integrated, is that this discourse is becoming a business. We keep
hearing that “Europe is becoming Eurabia.” Yet the ridiculous urban
legends about “London’s Muslim-ruled no-go zones” persist. Why? The real
reason, he suggested, is that citizens with Arab/Muslim backgrounds are
influencing foreign policy. (Again, the unstated corollary is that the
hardcore neocon Zionists are terrified that voting, French-speaking,
law-abiding French citizens of Arab/Muslim heritage will undermine
French support of Netanyahu and his Greater Israel project.)
So why do so many people hear and believe the ridiculous lies about “Eurabia”?
“We can’t deny or underestimate the role of the media in the whole
process. But we cannot say the media are under control, as in a
dictatorship. The question is, who owns the media, who’s going to speak,
who’s not going to speak? There is no constructive discourse on islam.
It’s a vicious circle. The reality is, Islamophobia makes money.”
It also yields political popularity. “Hollande gained 20 points in
the polls from declaring the State of Emergency–just like Bush in the
US. The majority of people are happy with it. Public opinion is
supporting ‘tough decisions.’”
Ramadan mourned the victims of the recent Paris attacks – as well
as other less-celebrated massacres: “I say je suis Paris, but I also say
je suis Beirut.” (Subtext: In the West, it seems that the lives of
white Parisians are more important than those of brown-skinned Lebanese,
judging by the amount of coverage the two terror events drew.)
He also argued against the “dehumanization of young people who want
to fight in Syria.” The blanket condemnation of all such people, he
said, is a symptom of the “colonial mindset” and its insistence that
“some human beings are less human than others.” He added that the recent
equation of Salafist Islam with terrorism is unjustified, since the
vast majority of Salafists are peaceful; most, including the literalist
or so-called fundamentalist ones, are apolitical and law-abiding.
I wish he had discussed where the “ISIS threat” is really coming
from. But I suppose if you want to teach at Oxford, you have to tread
somewhat delicately in such sensitive areas; mentioning, for example,
that the Iraqi government has had to shoot down British planes bringing supplies to ISIS might not sit well with the MI-6 types there.
There were sixteen presenters at the Conference. Given the
under-the-radar aspect of the event, I will assume that many of their
identities are national security secrets.
The majority of the presentations offered horrific details
illustrating how the Global Islamophobic Police State is demeaning and
dehumanizing Muslims – a dry run for demeaning and dehumanizing
non-Muslims under ever-encroaching Orwellian authoritarianism. Here are
some of the interesting facts I learned (or was reminded of):
Zionist psychopathy: The summer 2014 Gaza massacre
brought out widespread sadism, voyeurism, exhibitionism and trophyism
among Jewish Israelis. They sold wildly popular T-shirts celebrating the sniper murders of Palestinian children, born and unborn, for which the IDF is notorious.
Sadistic captors posed for selfies with bound and blindfolded captives a
la Abu Ghaib (where Israeli advisors had created the whole pornographic
spectacle). Settlers forced Palestinian children to drink gasoline and
burned them to death – then claimed that the Palestinian parents had
killed their own children that way, due to their allegedly barbaric
nature. Huge numbers of psychopathic Zionists crowded the hilltops
overlooking Gaza, ate popcorn-style watermelon seed snacks, and cheered
wildly as Palestinian children were blown to bits and burned to death
with white phosphorous.
“Deradicalization” in the UK: More than 400 kids
have been “deradicalized” in programs reminiscent of Stalinist or Maoist
indoctrination sessions. If you have brown skin and watch Loose Change on the internet, you’re a potential target.
“Islamic terror” is a hoax: Less than 1% of all
terrorist attacks in the EU are attributed to Muslims. Yet the media,
egged on by the Islamophobia Industry, consistently ignores or downplays
terrorism by non-Muslims while wildly hyping the vanishingly few
examples of terrorism attributed to Muslims. (Had it been me, I would
have added that all of the spectacular events attributed to Muslims
appear to be, or have been proven to be, false flags.)
The Islamophobia Industry: 60 foundations are
almost entirely responsible for the billions of dollars paid to public
relations (i.e. brainwashing) experts to manufacture Islamophobia. Of
those foundations, 75% also support the criminal Israeli settlements in
what is universally acknowledged to be stolen, occupied
territory–settlements overrun by genocidal child-killing monsters. So
the people forcing Palestinian kids to drink gasoline and then burning
them to death are being paid by the same people brainwashing you to hate
Muslims. Quelle surprise!
One tense moment came when Professor Tony Hall raised his hand during the Q & A:
This is all very interesting, but I’m not hearing any of you get to the root of why there is all this Islamophobia. There is now a huge literature on the fact that these big terror attacks are contrived. It was 9/11 and all of the subsequent events that have created the wave of Islamophobia. I know it’s not a good career move, but: Why can’t we talk about this? Why can’t we –”
The woman who had been discussing Islamophobia Industry funding cut
him off with evident hostility: “That’s not a question. The subject was
already discussed.” Another panelist chimed in, saying that people who
commit political violence do so for all sorts of reasons, and that it’s
demeaning to them to say they are just patsies of intelligence services
in false flag plots.
So apparently, at least in some quarters, it’s “Islamophobic” to reveal the truth about the Deep State denizens who orchestrate huge, professionally-executed false flag attacks designed to blame Muslims and incite Islamophobia. As Jim Dean says, you just can’t make this stuff up.
At the end of the conference, Berkeley Professor Hatem Bazian
pointed out that the global Islamophobic police state operates
worldwide, not just in the West. In fact, he said, it is even worse in
many Muslim countries, where the government intelligence services write
the sermon for Friday services in mosques – and arrest anyone who
delivers a non-police-state-written sermon! Brutal dictatorships in
Muslim-majority countries, just like Western countries, are inventing a
phantom “Islamic threat” in order to justify their demolitions of
liberty.
Such blatant “Middle Eastern” police state measures, Bazian suggested, are appearing in the West as well. Today, he said, France is sending Muslim religious leaders to Morocco to receive mandatory “tolerance training.” (Morocco is a recovering police state that may
have discontinued operations at its CIA-built-funded-and-trained
torture center in the Sahara–though the way things are going, the French
may force them to re-open it so they can torture French Muslim leaders
who question this kind of Orwellian “tolerance.”)
Professor Bazian said Muslims in the West generally react to the
horrific wave of abuse by trying too hard to put on
a compliant, acceptable face: “Like getting plastic surgery when you’ve
been hit in the face, maybe even apologizing, ‘I’m so sorry that my face
got in the way of your fist.'” He ended by suggesting that it was
today’s war-mongering, freedom-shredding West–not Muslims–that needs to
be “de-radicalized.”
I agree. And I would add that the way to de-radicalize the West is
by naming and shaming the neoconservative radicals. We need to expose
what they have done – 9/11 and the subsequent false flag atrocities –
and why they have done it: Not only in service to wars whose primary
beneficiary is Israel, but also as a natural and inevitable outgrowth of
their ultra-Machievellian, Straussian philosophy.
The Straussian neoconservatives believe that the natural elite –
themselves – has the “natural right” to rule through mass murder and big
lies. For them, this is the only right that exists. All others are
imaginary.
Strauss came to the US in 1937 and declared war on liberal
democracy. In the 1960s, Strauss and his handpicked “best students”
(mostly Jewish Zionists) stayed up late in extracurricular sessions
aimed at devising a way to overthrow liberal democracy in the USA
through a 9/11 style event, the American equivalent of Hitler’s
Reichstag Fire. This is not a “conspiracy theory”; it is direct
testimony from two then-University of Chicago students who were there,
saw it happen, and were, even then, horrified. The two witnesses are
Stanley Hilton and Professor Francis Boyle.
Likudnik Israeli geopolitics, like neoconservative philosophy,
leads directly to 9/11. Netanyahu and his friends have signed a blood
oath to never withdraw from the West Bank’s Occupied Territories,
according to Alan Hart, who heard about it first hand.
Bibi and his friends are committed to the Greater Israel project
and intend to keep killing people and stealing more and more land. They
have no interest in any viable two-state solution, no interest in peace.
They are planning for a permanent war on the entire Muslim world, which
is they only way their Greater Israel can exist. And that permanent war
must be waged by the whole West – not just Israel.
Some might say: If 9/11 didn’t exist, the neocon Zionists would have had to invent it.
Well, I’m sorry to tell you: THEY DID INVENT IT.
That’s right.
THEY DID IT.
And the whole series of follow-ups as well.
That’s why there can be no legitimate discussion of Islamophobia
that doesn’t consider the issue of false flags – proven and suspected
– and then “connect the dots.”
So a huge thank you to everyone who contributed to my GoFundMe
campaign that brought me to Paris to attend the Islamophobia and Eroding
Civil Society conference.
This evening, I will be hosting an alternative conference that focuses on the false flag issue.
To watch the conference live noon to 4 pm Eastern (or archived) just visit this link:
Related Posts:
* I am sorry, but this is not exact. BAFS
Donald Trump first jumped
onto the GOP presidential stage with the stance that immigrants from
Latin America are rapists. That’s since died down a bit, although
certainly not in the minds of Latin Americans, so Trump, trying to stay
relevant, is preaching just shy of ethnic cleansing.
At least two high-profile Muslims, Muhammad Ali and Kareem Abdul-Jabbar, both spoke out on Trump’s ugly rhetoric on Wednesday.
Most recently, Trump is under fire for saying he would prevent Muslims from entering the country if he was President.
Sports star and Muslim Kareem Abdul-Jabbar had some pretty harsh words for Trump in an op-ed in Time Magazine.
Featured image via Twitter.
At least two high-profile Muslims, Muhammad Ali and Kareem Abdul-Jabbar, both spoke out on Trump’s ugly rhetoric on Wednesday.
Most recently, Trump is under fire for saying he would prevent Muslims from entering the country if he was President.
“Donald J. Trump is calling for a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States until our country’s representatives can figure out what is going on,” a campaign press release said.
Trump, who has previously called for surveillance against mosques and said he was open to establishing a database for all Muslims living in the U.S., made his latest controversial call in a news release. His message comes in the wake of a deadly mass shooting in San Bernardino, California, by suspected ISIS sympathizers and the day after President Barack Obama asked the country not to “turn against one another” out of fear.
Source: CNN
The President, while not addressing Trump specifically, said:
‘Muslim Americans are our friends and our neighbors are coworkers, our sports heroes. And yes, they are our men and women in uniform who are willing to die in defense of our country,’ the president said, speaking from the Oval Office. ‘We have to remember that.’To which Trump tweeted:
Sports star and Muslim Kareem Abdul-Jabbar had some pretty harsh words for Trump in an op-ed in Time Magazine.
The terrorist campaign against American ideals is winning. Fear is rampant. Gun sales are soaring. Hate crimes are increasing. Bearded hipsters are being mistaken for Muslims. And 83 percent of voters believe a large-scale terrorist attack is likely here in the near future. Some Americans are now so afraid that they are willing to trade in the sacred beliefs that define America for some vague promises of security from the very people who are spreading the terror. “Go ahead and burn the Constitution — just don’t hurt me at the mall.” That’s how effective this terrorism is.Even more significant, though, are Wednesday’s words from Trump’s real life friend who also happens to be a Muslim sports hero: Muhammad Ali. In a press statement, Ali said:
I’m not talking about ISIS. I’m talking about Donald Trump.
This is not hyperbole. Not a metaphor. Webster defines terrorism as “the use of violent acts to frighten the people in an area as a way of trying to achieve a political goal; the systematic use of terror especially as a means of coercion.”
If violence can be an abstraction — and it can; that’s what a threat is — the Trump campaign meets this definition. Thus, Trump is ISIS’s greatest triumph: the perfect Manchurian Candidate who, instead of offering specific and realistic policies, preys on the fears of the public, doing ISIS’s job for them. Even fellow Republican Jeb Bush acknowledged Trump’s goal is “to manipulate people’s angst and fears.”
“I am a Muslim and there is nothing Islamic about killing innocent people in Paris, San Bernardino, or anywhere else in the world,” Ali wrote in a statement provided to NBC News on Wednesday. “True Muslims know that the ruthless violence of so called Islamic Jihadists goes against the very tenets of our religion.”If you noticed that Ali’s statement is a bit more patient and that he stopped short of calling Trump a “terrorist,” it’s because Ali and Trump are friends, at least they were.
Ali continued: “Speaking as someone who has never been accused of political correctness, I believe that our political leaders should use their position to bring understanding about the religion of Islam and clarify that these misguided murderers have perverted people’s views on what Islam really is.”
Source: Huffington Post
Featured image via Twitter.
SENT BY MUHAMMAD AL-MASSARI
almassari <almassari@gmail.com>
Today Wednesday 16th of December 2015 at 6:17 PM
Muslim-Americans
are living in a totalitarian police state with worsening harassment,
profiling, and surveillance.
The Rise of the American-Muslim Totalitarian State
Muslim-Americans
are living in a totalitarian police state with worsening harassment,
profiling, and surveillance. The United States’ government may claim
liberty and justice for all; however, in practice, towards Muslims, it
exhibits all four major characteristics of a totalitarian state: a war
on terror that targets Muslims abroad, a totalitarian police state at
home, public executions by drones and gulags outside the rule of law,
and a strong reliance on propaganda and political demagoguery.
The
hallmark of fascism was state oppression of certain targeted
non-privileged groups. Today, Muslims are bearing the brunt of America’s
totalitarian police state.
Despite FBI records showing that since 9/11, Muslims have committed far less domestic terror attacks than white supremacists,
it is the American-Muslim community that is under unprecedented levels
of surveillance and government intrusion. Muslims in America are
unquestionably experiencing a fascist system of surveillance, operating
at the same level that East Germans faced under the Stasi spy agency.
Researcher, Arun Kundnani, has shown how the FBI has one
counterterrorism spy for every 94 Muslims in the U.S., which approaches
Stasi’s ratio of one spy for every 66 citizens.
Clearly
racism, as much as oil, fuels the War on Terror. White Christians
rarely have to worry that an undercover agent or informant has
infiltrated their churches, student organizations or neighborhoods. The
simple fact that U.S. law enforcement has not infiltrated and spied on
conservative Christian communities to disrupt violent rightwing
extremism, which is the biggest terrorism threat in America, confirms what Muslims in American know in their bones: to worship Allah is to be suspect.
Federal
judges recently ruled that suspicion-less surveillance of Muslims is
permissible under the U.S. Constitution. The NYPD has admitted that
Mosques, student groups, restaurants, even grade schools, have all been
under surveillance. By rapidly increasing both government policies of
secrecy and surveillance, Mr. Obama’s government is increasing its power
to watch its citizens, while diminishing its citizens’ power to watch
their government.
The
threat of homegrown Islamic terrorism has been largely manufactured, so
that the so-called War on Terror can promote multi-billion dollar,
corporate-sponsored militarism abroad and the erosion of two
hundred-year-old civil liberties at home.
Muslim-Americans
are not only facing increasing oppression from the state, but they are
also facing growing prejudice from their fellow countrymen, as hate
crimes and civil liberty violations against Muslims continue to
precipitously rise.
A
recent Pew Forum Poll established that Muslims are by far the most
disliked minority in America. According to FBI statistics, anti-Muslim
hate crimes soared by an astounding 50 percent last year. Muslims
constitute 1 percent of the U.S. population, but they are 13 percent of
the victims of religious-based hate crimes. Islamophobia and xenophobia
now seem as American as apple pie. Intolerance of Muslims is often
inverted, depicting Muslim customs as an insult to Western customs.
One
major aspect of American totalitarianism, shared by fascist regimes, is
the nation’s enormous military budget. In 1933, Nazi Germany’s military
spending was 2 percent of their national income; by 1940, it was 44
percent.
Today,
America spends more on her military than the rest of the world
combined. America has expanded its military into having 662 foreign
military bases, according to the Department of Defense’s 2010 Base
Structure Report. The War on Terror has cost $6 trillion, the equivalent
of $75,000 for every American household, calculates Harvard
University’s Kennedy School of Government.
Another
hallmark of totalitarianism is the creation of a prison system outside
the rule of law that is largely designed to imprison and torture one
minority group. The Guantanamo Bay gulag is unquestionably a crime
against humanity. There is unlimited cruelty in a system that seems to
be unable to free the innocent and unable to punish the guilty.
In
April 24, 1934, a People’s Court, just like Guantanamo was established,
which also bypassed the judicial system: prisoners were held
indefinitely in isolation and were tortured and subjected to show
trials. The People’s Court was signed into law by Adolf Hitler.
In
2007, a politician who was vehemently against the human rights abuses
at Guantanamo Bay, explained what he would do about the torture camp if
he ever became President:
“When I am President, I will close Guantanamo. It is a moral outrage, a blight upon America’s conscience. It is the location of so many of the worst constitutional abuses in recent years. From inception, Guantanamo was a laboratory for unlawful military interrogation, detention, and trials.”
The
politician who uttered these words was Senator Barack Obama.
Ironically, under President Obama’s tenure, conditions for Guantanamo
detainees, from both a physical and legal standpoint, have become
markedly worse.
Public
executions are perhaps one of the most overt and odious symbols of
totalitarianism. In totalitarian Spain, under General Franco, mass
public executions were the norm, and were often carried out in bullrings
or with band music and onlookers dancing in the victims’ blood. With
Hitler and Mussolini supplying arms to Franco, some 200,000 men and
women were publically executed during the war and bombed from overhead.
Nowadays,
drones are the ultimate totalitarian technology. Washington both uses
drones for what amount to public extra-judicial executions of Muslims
abroad, and for spying on American Muslims at home.
Most
Americans believe that drones are targeted and therefore humane.
Nothing could be further from the truth. By all accounts, drones have
killed more children than terrorists. According to a new report from The Intercept, nearly 90 percent of people killed in drone strikes in Afghanistan are civilians.
By
2018, some privacy experts believe law enforcement will likely control
over 35,000 drones that the government will use to monitor Americans
from the skies.
Integral
to the rise of the America Muslim Totalitarian State is propaganda.
Sheldon Wolin has poignantly pointed out that, whereas the production of
propaganda was crudely centralized in Nazi Germany, in the United
States, it is left to highly concentrated media corporations, thus
maintaining the illusion of a “free press”.
The
American propaganda machine is highly sophisticated. It does not rely
upon the radio addresses, speeches, and leaflets disseminated by the
Nazi Ministry of Propaganda and Public Enlightenment, nor does it rely
on the crude censorship or harassment of free press ordered by a
Politburo. The propaganda of America’s “one percent” is subtle yet
pervasive; it relies not only on government diktats but also on the mass
media, art, pop culture and Hollywood.
American
cinema and music have always been a remarkably effective means of
whipping up xenophobic wartime sentiment. For example, the highest
grossing war film in history, American Sniper, and President Obama’s favorite television show, Homeland,
both engage in an overly broad generalization of Islam, and depict
Muslims and terrorists in a way that is indicative of widespread
Islamophobia in American culture.
The
American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee reported a spike in
Islamophobia and hate crimes after the release of American Sniper, which
culminated in the recent slaying of three young Muslims in North
Carolina, who were shot in the head sniper execution style. American
Islamophobia operates in the service of American militarism and American
militarism abroad, and in turn, ratchets up Islamophobia against
minorities at home.
The
media determines our language, our language shapes our thoughts, and
our thoughts determine our actions. Language is the fulcrum of a
society’s perception. Whosoever controls the public’s language, controls
the public’s perception.
The
corporate elites who sit on media editorial boards control said
language. In 1983, fifty companies owned ninety percent of U.S. media.
Today, only six media giants control a staggering ninety percent of what
the American public listens to, reads, and watches. “Think of the press
as a great keyboard on which the government can play,” once remarked
Joseph Goebbels, Nazi Germany’s Minister of Propaganda.
For
Muslim-Americans the media’s Orwellian totalitarian language is clear:
Drones are Unmanned Aerial Vehicles. Torture is Enhanced Interrogation.
Occupation is Liberation.
Donald
Trump’s recent call to ban Muslims from entry into the U.S. is not
without precedent. The Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882 effectively banned
all Chinese immigration to the US. This racist law remained in place for
five decades and required all Chinese to carry identification
certificates or face deportation. When Trump endorsed identification
cards to be worn at all times by American Muslims, his popularity jumped
almost 3 percentage points. If Donald Trump’s policies are viewed by
Americans as odious and un-American, then why has he consistently gained
popularity after every anti-Muslim outburst?
America’s
history is stock full of totalitarianism and popularized, irrational
fear of “the other”. It began when the settler pioneers feared Native
Americans and united against them by slaughtering millions in order to
quell that fear. As settlers began to unite around a common identity
they feared the British Monarchy and rebelled against it. Americans then
fought against Mexico, France and various other countries for vast land
control. Five hundred documented revolts on slave ships and the fact
that plantation owners were greatly outnumbered by slaves, cemented the
role of fear that perpetuated slavery for centuries. With greater fear
comes greater violence, and with greater violence comes a greater need
to justify that violence by ratcheting up the fear.
After
the attacks on Pearl Harbor, Japanese Americans were forced into
interment camps on American soil. Vietnamese Americans were then targets
of xenophobia in America during the Vietnam War, and then there was the
“Red Scare”, which targeted Russian-Americans throughout the Cold War.
From
the ashes of the Soviet Union arose the terrorists from the oil-rich
Middle East, who became America’s new number one enemy and so the legacy
of American xenophobia continues. Today, as the deliberately unending
war on terror rumbles on abroad, Muslim, Arab, and Sikh Americans fear
that they are living in a totalitarian state.
Please share widely!
زوروا صفحات حزب التجديد الإسلامي في فيسبوك:
Visit the Facebook page of The Islamic Renewal Party
ALSO: On Google+
& LinkedIn:
https://www.linkedin.com/ (Muhammad Al-Massari)
تابعونا على قناة حزب التجديد الإسلامي بتطبيق تيليجرام:
Follow US ON TELEGRAM:
@Tajdeed_Channel
)هذه المشاركة آمنة، في غاية الأمان(
Telegram is very secure and superior to e-mail
https://twitter.com/almass3ari/status/667716922671263745
Un discours "dangereux"
FRENCH COURT JOKE - PARODIE DE JUSTICE!
"LE POINT"
Zemmour condamné pour provocation à la haine envers les musulmans
Dans une interview, le polémiste avait déclaré que les musulmans avaient le Coran pour code civil et formaient un "peuple dans le peuple". (Ce n'est pas provoquer la haine, ces propos???)
Source AFP
Publié le
- Modifié le | Le Point.fr
Le polémiste Éric Zemmour
a été condamné jeudi à 3 000 euros d'amende pour provocation à la haine
envers les musulmans, pour des propos au journal italien Corriere Della Sera
en octobre 2014. Il y déclarait notamment que les musulmans "ont leur
code civil, c'est le Coran", qu'ils "vivent entre eux, dans les
banlieues. Les Français ont été obligés de s'en aller." Le
parquet avait requis 10 000 euros d'amende. "Je pense que nous nous
dirigeons vers le chaos. Cette situation de peuple dans le peuple, des
musulmans dans le peuple français, nous conduira au chaos
et à la guerre civile", ajoutait-il : "Des millions de personnes vivent
ici, en France, mais ne veulent pas vivre à la française."
Éric Zemmour faisait alors la promotion de son livre Le Suicide français. Lors de l'audience devant le tribunal correctionnel de Paris,
le polémiste avait soutenu qu'il parlait de "musulmans en banlieue
qui s'organisent et qui", selon lui, "sont en voie de
sécession". Ces propos "stigmatisants", "sans nuance" visaient
"l'ensemble de la communauté musulmane", avait estimé la procureur
Annabelle Philippe dans son réquisitoire. Le tribunal a eu
la même appréciation, car à "aucun endroit de l'interview" il ne réduit
son propos à "une fraction seulement" des musulmans.
L'ensemble du propos de Zemmour "repose sur un postulat éminemment
clivant" : "que la communauté musulmane s'opposerait, par
essence et par culture, aux Français ou au peuple français", pour les
juges. "Sous couvert de relater une évolution inéluctable, Éric Zemmour
propose en réalité à ses lecteurs la seule option susceptible
à ses yeux d'éviter la guerre civile", "un départ organisé et forcé
de France de la communauté musulmane dans son entier". Le tribunal
étrille la "sémantique à la fois guerrière et catastrophiste", qui
dénote chez lui "le passage conceptuel d'une réalité
probable à une solution à la fois crédible et souhaitable".
Un discours "dangereux"
"Les propos tenus par Éric Zemmour avant les attentats sont
aujourd'hui partagés par une large partie de ceux qui s'expriment",
a réagi son avocat, Me Olivier Pardo, qui va faire appel. "Je
ne peux que constater l'acharnement dont fait l'objet Éric Zemmour",
a-t-il ajouté. Le polémiste a en outre été condamné à verser,
selon les cas, 1 ou 1 000 euros de dommages et intérêts à des
associations parties civiles, auxquels s'ajoutent les frais
de justice, soit au total 13 003 euros. Le jugement "reconnaît une
nouvelle fois qu'Éric Zemmour est un propagateur de haine", a estimé Me
Sabrina Goldman, avocate de la Licra (Ligue internationale
contre le racisme et l'antisémitisme). "Son discours est d'autant plus
dangereux qu'il se fait le chantre du parler vrai, il
prétend dire la vérité alors qu'il ne fait que dire la haine",
a-t-elle déclaré. Le président de SOS Racisme, Dominique Sopo, s'est
félicité que la justice ait rappelé que "la liberté d'expression" n'est
pas "la liberté de propager la haine". "On peut se demander
une fois de plus comment il peut avoir une telle position d'autorité
dans les médias", a-t-il dit.
Éric Zemmour a déjà été condamné en 2011 pour provocation à la haine,
après avoir déclaré à la télévision que "la plupart des
trafiquants sont noirs et arabes, c'est comme ça, c'est un fait". Plus
récemment, le 22 septembre, il a été relaxé après avoir évoqué dans une
chronique des "bandes" d'étrangers "qui dévalisent,
violentent ou dépouillent", mais le parquet a fait appel. Dans ce
dossier, le procès en appel est prévu le 6 avril.
"Ce facho de raciste d' Éric Zemmour, qui n'a
même pas
une tête de Gaulois, ne fait que
répéter ce que les médias, les politiciens
haineux et les bloggeurs écrivent
et hurlent
au quotidien! Cette
condamnation est une
parodie!"
BAFS
DAILY ANTI-MUSLIM AND ANTI-ISLAM
RACIST SHIT IN BRITISH
PRESSTITUTE RAG!
DAILY ANTI-MUSLIM AND ANTI-ISLAM
RACIST SHIT IN BRITISH
PRESSTITUTE RAG!
Muslim engineer kidnapped his female
colleague and raped her for five days 'to
convince her to convert to Islam'
- Engineer Syen Emad Hasan, 30, proposed to woman who cannot be named
- 27-year-old woman turned him down, moved to Dubai for work in August
- Returned to confront him when he threatened to upload 'obscene images'
- Hasan then locked her up in his bathroom and 'brutalised her', police said
No comments:
Post a Comment