ALAN HART, VINCENT REYNOUARD, HOLOCAUSTS AND ZIOPEDIA
Why the Holocaust Denial?
The "official" establishment version of the Holocaust suggests that
during World War II six million Jews were taken captive and exterminated
in Nazi concentration camps. This may very well be the case, but as we
know the winners write history, and in order to maintain control the Zionist globalist establishment
must firmly defend their version of events even in the face of
overwhelming evidence to the contrary. If six million really did die,
then questioning this figure, researching the facts and scrutinizing the
evidence surrounding the Holocaust should and would prove their story.
But thanks to organizations like the Anti-Defamation League, the
Southern Poverty Law Center, AIPAC, and other Zionist apologist groups,
simply questioning the official version of the Holocaust has become
dangerous.
All over Europe "Holocaust Denial"
(their Orwellian pigeon-hole term for questioning "official" history)
is ILLEGAL and has resulted in many lengthy imprisonments! Authors,
professors, and researchers like Sylvia Stolz, David Irving, Germar Rudolf, Dr. Frederick Toben
and many others have all spent years behind bars for simply speaking
out about this taboo subject. One man, Ernst Zundel, has spent over 7
years behind bars simply for re-publishing a small, fascinating book
called "Did Six Million Really Die?"
So
what are some of the arguments made by these "criminal" Holocaust
"deniers?" To begin with multiple Jew and Gentile sources alike confirm
that there were no more than 3 million Jews in Germany during the
Holocaust anyway. At the time, the entire Jewish population of Europe
was only 6.5 million, and over half of them can be accounted for as
living outside of Nazi Germany. The "official" story says that millions
of Jews were put to death in gas chambers, but the chambers at
Aushwitz, Dachau, and Mauthausen supposedly responsible for millions of
deaths do not have the necessary sealed doors, frames, or tall chimneys
required and forensic examinations of the sites have revealed no residue
of anything toxic ever being used there. Establishment historians
claim that Treblinka and Belzec are the sites of mass graves where
hundreds of thousands of Jews were buried, yet scientists have shown
using ground penetrating radar and core samples with 100% certainty that
there are no mass graves and the ground has never even been disturbed.
Of
course, atrocity propaganda is nothing new. It has accompanied every
conflict of the 20th century and doubtless will continue to do so.
During the First World War, the Germans were actually accused of eating
Belgian babies, as well as delighting to throw them in the air and
transfix them on bayonets. The British also alleged that the German
forces were operating a “Corpse Factory”, in which they boiled down the
bodies of their own dead in order to obtain glycerin and other
commodities, a calculated insult to the honour of an Imperial army.
After the war, however, came the retractions; indeed, a public statement
was made by the Foreign Secretary in the House of Commons apologizing
for the insults to German honour, which were admitted to be war-time
propaganda.
No such statements have been made
after the Second World War. In fact, rather than diminish with the
passage of years, the atrocity propaganda concerning the German
occupation, and in particular their treatment of the Jews, has done
nothing but increase its virulence, and elaborate its catalogue of
horrors. Gruesome paperback books with lurid covers continue to roll
from the presses, adding continuously to a growing mythology of the
concentration camps and especially to the story that no less than Six
Million Jews were exterminated in them. The ensuing pages will reveal
this claim to be the most colossal piece of fiction and the most
successful of deceptions; but here an attempt may be made to answer an
important question: What has rendered the atrocity stories of the Second
World War so uniquely different from those of the First? Why were the
latter retracted while the former are reiterated louder than ever? Is it
possible that the story of the Six Million Jews is serving a political
purpose, even that it is a form of political blackmail?
So far as the Jewish people themselves
are concerned, the deception has been an incalculable benefit. Every
conceivable race and nationality had its share of suffering in the
Second World War, but none has so successfully elaborated it and turned
it to such great advantage. The alleged extent of their persecution
quickly aroused sympathy for the Jewish national homeland they had
sought for so long; after the War the British Government did little to
prevent Jewish emigration to Palestine which they had declared illegal,
and it was not long afterwards that the Zionists wrested from the
Government the land of Palestine and created their haven from
persecution, the State of Israel. Indeed, it is a remarkable fact that
the Jewish people emerged from the Second World War as nothing less than
a triumphant minority. Dr. Max Nussbaum, the former chief rabbi of the
Jewish community in Berlin, stated on April 11, 1953: “The position the
Jewish people occupy today in the world—despite the enormous losses—is
ten times stronger than what it was twenty years ago.” It should be
added, if one is to be honest, that this strength has been much
consolidated financially by the supposed massacre of the Six Million,
undoubtedly the most profitable atrocity allegation of all time. To
date, the staggering figure of six thousand million pounds has been paid
out in compensation by the Federal Government of West Germany, mostly
to the State of Israel (which did not even exist during the Second World
War), as well as to individual Jewish claimants.
In terms of political blackmail,
however, the allegation that Six Million Jews died during the Second
World War has much more far-reaching implications for the people of
Britain and Europe than simply the advantages it has gained for the
Jewish nation. And here one comes to the crux of the question: Why the
Big Lie? What is its purpose? In the first place, it has been used quite
unscrupulously to discourage any form of nationalism. Should the people
of Britain or any other European country attempt to assert their
patriotism and preserve their national integrity in an age when the very
existence of nation-states is threatened, they are immediately branded
as “neo-Nazis”. Because, of course, Nazism was nationalism, and we all
know what happened then—Six Million Jews were exterminated! So long as
the myth is perpetuated, peoples everywhere will remain in bondage to
it; the need for international tolerance and understanding will be
hammered home by the United Nations until nationhood itself, the very
guarantee of freedom, is abolished. -Excerpt from Did Six Million Really Die?
L'équipe de Sans Concession a le plaisir de vous annoncer la diffusion de trois nouvelles vidéos.
Une première vidéo en deux parties intitulée : Le mythe des "camions à gaz" (première partie, deuxième partie). D'après
la thèse officielle, les Allemands auraient asphyxié 700 000 personnes
dans des "camions à gaz". Dans cette nouvelle vidéo, Vincent Reynouard
se fonde sur des documents historiques et sur des considérations
techniques (celles notamment développées par Pierre Marais) pour
démontrer que les "camions à
gaz" allemands n'ont jamais existé. Ils sont le fruit de rumeurs qui
n'ont guère eu de succès en Pologne mais qui, à partir de 1943, se sont répandues grâce à l'action de la propagande soviétique (procès de Krasnodar).
NB - "L'utilisateur a supprimé cette vidéo. Opération impossible".
Dans la deuxième vidéo, très courte, intitulée La vérité sur la conférence de Wannsee, Vincent
Reynouard explique que les nationaux-socialistes ne voulaient pas
exterminer les juifs. Leur objectif était de les refouler hors de la
sphère d'influence allemande en les
faisant travailler près du front de l'Est.
Ils
prévoyaient certes que bien des juifs mourraient lors de ce
refoulement, mais ils y voyaient une occasion de renaissance de ce
peuple (avec ses éléments les meilleurs).
Pour consulter les vidéos sur notre site internet, PHDNM, cliquez
ici
Vite, avant la censure !
NB Chères amies, Chers amis,
La vidéo intitulée La vérité sur la conférence de Wannsee, le 20 janvier 1942a été légèrement modifiée et elle est consultable sous un nouveau lien : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0UpDXfS2QkE
“Holocaust denial (and most aspects of holocaust revisionism) is
something I cannot get my Gentile mind around. It strikes me as evil on a
par with the commissioning of the slaughter and the slaughtering
itself.”
Wow, I thought to myself when reading it, this sounds pretty Jewish to
me, in spite of the reference to his “Gentile mind”, which seems to
indicate that Alan is at least part Gentile, if you know what I mean. Of
course, this could all have to do with his many Jewish friends, Alan
likes to mention in his articles, such as “Auschwitz survivor” Dr. Hajo
Meyer.
“He told me, and I believed him without reservation, that some of
his Jewish “comrades” in Auschwitz were assigned the task of removing
the corpses from the gas chambers and transferring them to incinerators
for burning. He added that the smoke and fumes from the chimneys of the
incinerators could be seen and smelled all over the camp.”
Alan is obviously one of those people who believe their friends
whatever they tell them, regardless of common sense, pesky scientific
and legal technicalities or forensic evidence. Here just a few examples:
The Leuchter Report and later again Germar Rudolf’s scholarly
examinations have proven beyond reasonable doubt that no Zyklon B has
been used as alleged in the shower rooms of the Auschwitz, Majdanek or
any other Nazi concentration camp for that matter.[1]
The outstanding documentary “One third of the holocaust” did an
equally excellent job at debunking allegations that the concentration
camps in Treblinka, Sobibor, and Belzec had been death camps, in which
supposedly one third of the Holocaust victims had been murdered.[2]
The allegations that the Germans were using in Treblinka the exhaust
fumes from a captured Russian tank to gas over a million prisoners are
obviously nonsense since diesel exhaust fumes do not contain poisonous
levels of carbon monoxide, which is why diesel vehicles are widely used
in underground mining.
The confessions made by Nazi leaders in the Nuremberg and other war
crime tribunals have been proven to be the result of rampant torture and
coercion, such as crushed testicles and threats to hand over wife and
daughters to the Russians for gang rape purposes.
Holocaust revisionists such as Arthur Butz, Carlo Mattogno, Germar
Rudolf and Robert Faurisson have sufficiently proven, under biggest
personal sacrifices I might add, that the entire Holocaust narrative is a
vicious hoax. [3]
Since Alan is a longstanding contributing author to the Rebel site
and I value freedom of expression, I posted it in spite of my
reservations. However, I added some of my objections and also sent him
an email saying: “Alan, the most disturbing thing for me about the official
holocaust story is when seemingly intelligent people like yourself don’t
get that something that you cannot question without being
systematically and viciously destroyed, even imprisoned, must be a lie,
irrespective of the country, not just Communist China or North Korea.”
Alan’s reply to me was: “Perhaps I am more intelligent than you think I am and you are
less intelligent than you think you are. The fact that by its blackmail
Zionism has made questioning the holocaust a crime in some places
etcetera is not evidence of any kind that the holocaust is a lie. It’s
all part of Zionism’s process of using and abusing the holocaust as a
blackmail card.”
Since Alan has such a high opinion of his intelligence and is
convinced that he’s right, I decided to have a closer look at the
evidence he is providing for this claims that the Nazi holocaust
narrative actually happened, other than the hearsay statements made by
his Jewish friends.
Alan claims that the Nazis decided to mass-murder the Jews because
the Brits reneged on the Balfour declaration and the Transfer Agreement
they had with Hitler about forcedly resettling the European Jews in
Palestine. In other words, since the Palestinians didn’t want them and
the Brits were unwilling or unable to force the Palestinians to accept
them, Hitler decided to exterminate the Jews instead. Plausible, I
admit, but that doesn’t get rid of the problem that the alleged methods
of mass murder are nonsense, as demonstrated by the revisionists.
Alan then quotes from speeches held on the Wannsee conference and
from Goebbel’s diary. It would appear that Alan – in spite of writing
books on the topic – is completely oblivious not only to the work of the
above mentioned leading revisionists, but also to the most eminent
historian on the era of World War II, David Irving. [4] If he wasn’t, he
wouldn’t have come to his libelous interpretations, unless, of course,
he’s consciously peddling a false narrative to please his Jewish friends
and publishers. Crime pays, after all. There is an even more awkward
explanation possible though. Maybe, it’s the other way round, and it’s
Alan Hart who is not as intelligent as he thinks.
Footnotes:
[1] Fred Leuchter, Robert Faurisson, Germar Rudolf: The Leuchter Report, Critical Edition, http://therebel.org/books/475030-the-leuchter-reports-critical-edition
[2] One Third of the Holocaust (2006) and related documentaries can be found in the online video section of the Rebel site (http://therebel.org/videos).
[3] You can find PDF versions of many of the books of above mentioned authors in the online books section of the Rebel site (http://therebel.org/books)
[4] e.g. David Irving, Revelations from Goebbels’ Diary (http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v15/v15n1p-2_Irving.html
All over Europe "Holocaust Denial"
(their Orwellian pigeon-hole term for questioning "official" history)
is ILLEGAL and has resulted in many lengthy imprisonments! Authors,
professors, and researchers like Sylvia Stolz, David Irving, Germar Rudolf, Dr. Frederick Toben
and many others have all spent years behind bars for simply speaking
out about this taboo subject. One man, Ernst Zundel, has spent over 7
years behind bars simply for re-publishing a small, fascinating book
called "Did Six Million Really Die?"
So
what are some of the arguments made by these "criminal" Holocaust
"deniers?" To begin with multiple Jew and Gentile sources alike confirm
that there were no more than 3 million Jews in Germany during the
Holocaust anyway. At the time, the entire Jewish population of Europe
was only 6.5 million, and over half of them can be accounted for as
living outside of Nazi Germany. The "official" story says that millions
of Jews were put to death in gas chambers, but the chambers at
Aushwitz, Dachau, and Mauthausen supposedly responsible for millions of
deaths do not have the necessary sealed doors, frames, or tall chimneys
required and forensic examinations of the sites have revealed no residue
of anything toxic ever being used there. Establishment historians
claim that Treblinka and Belzec are the sites of mass graves where
hundreds of thousands of Jews were buried, yet scientists have shown
using ground penetrating radar and core samples with 100% certainty that
there are no mass graves and the ground has never even been disturbed.
Of
course, atrocity propaganda is nothing new. It has accompanied every
conflict of the 20th century and doubtless will continue to do so.
During the First World War, the Germans were actually accused of eating
Belgian babies, as well as delighting to throw them in the air and
transfix them on bayonets. The British also alleged that the German
forces were operating a “Corpse Factory”, in which they boiled down the
bodies of their own dead in order to obtain glycerin and other
commodities, a calculated insult to the honour of an Imperial army.
After the war, however, came the retractions; indeed, a public statement
was made by the Foreign Secretary in the House of Commons apologizing
for the insults to German honour, which were admitted to be war-time
propaganda.
No comments:
Post a Comment