9/11, 7/7, THE "JEWISH HOLOCAUST", THE "ARMENIAN GENOCIDE", OPERATION GLADIO, SANDY HOOK, THE "KOOKS"* AND THE TSUNAMI!
Published on 23 Jun 2013
Muad'Dib's latest film about the July 7 2005 London bombings.
After being unlawfully jailed for 157 days based on trumped-up charges, and the BBC making a dedicated hit-piece on the original 7/7 Ripple
Effect, the film-maker Muad'Dib expands upon the original film and has added over 60 minutes of new material connecting the dots of what most
likely really did happen in London on July 7th 2005, when 3 tube-trains and a double-decker bus were exploded.
Watching this film should leave the viewer no doubt that the crimes and murder committed in London were done by other organizations than by
claimed by the official and corporate media.
"I must say, in my opinion this is a masterpiece. In less than an hour, the film explains how this whole event was planned, how it was
staged, what went wrong, how the authorities sought to cover it up and the failure of the press to cover it adequately. I think it is as
marvellous a microcosm for understanding the nature of inside-jobs as anyone has ever produced, so I must congratulate you and tell you how
much I admire your work."
- James H. Fetzer, professor emeritus at the University of Minnesota about the original 7/7 Ripple EFfect.
"It is an example of critical journalism thatdraws wholly on public news sources to formulate a controversial, but plausible, theory. After
deploying three different theories of truth to develop insights into new and existing evidence, it is the BBC / Government theory that has a
lower level of correspondence with known .facts., is incoherent to the point of being implausible, and is more likely to distort its reports
because of institutional controls and political pressures."
- Rory Ridley-Duff Ph.D., senior lecturer in human resource management
and organisation behaviour, Sheffield Hallam University.
After being unlawfully jailed for 157 days based on trumped-up charges, and the BBC making a dedicated hit-piece on the original 7/7 Ripple
Effect, the film-maker Muad'Dib expands upon the original film and has added over 60 minutes of new material connecting the dots of what most
likely really did happen in London on July 7th 2005, when 3 tube-trains and a double-decker bus were exploded.
Watching this film should leave the viewer no doubt that the crimes and murder committed in London were done by other organizations than by
claimed by the official and corporate media.
Like "Dismantle The Matrix" on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/DismantleThe...
Follow "Dismantle The Matrix" on Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/DismantleMatrix
Thanks for watching and remember to give a Thumbs Up and Subscribe!
After being unlawfully jailed for 157 days based on trumped-up charges, and the BBC making a dedicated hit-piece on the original 7/7 Ripple
Effect, the film-maker Muad'Dib expands upon the original film and has added over 60 minutes of new material connecting the dots of what most
likely really did happen in London on July 7th 2005, when 3 tube-trains and a double-decker bus were exploded.
Watching this film should leave the viewer no doubt that the crimes and murder committed in London were done by other organizations than by
claimed by the official and corporate media.
"I must say, in my opinion this is a masterpiece. In less than an hour, the film explains how this whole event was planned, how it was
staged, what went wrong, how the authorities sought to cover it up and the failure of the press to cover it adequately. I think it is as
marvellous a microcosm for understanding the nature of inside-jobs as anyone has ever produced, so I must congratulate you and tell you how
much I admire your work."
- James H. Fetzer, professor emeritus at the University of Minnesota about the original 7/7 Ripple EFfect.
"It is an example of critical journalism thatdraws wholly on public news sources to formulate a controversial, but plausible, theory. After
deploying three different theories of truth to develop insights into new and existing evidence, it is the BBC / Government theory that has a
lower level of correspondence with known .facts., is incoherent to the point of being implausible, and is more likely to distort its reports
because of institutional controls and political pressures."
- Rory Ridley-Duff Ph.D., senior lecturer in human resource management
and organisation behaviour, Sheffield Hallam University.
After being unlawfully jailed for 157 days based on trumped-up charges, and the BBC making a dedicated hit-piece on the original 7/7 Ripple
Effect, the film-maker Muad'Dib expands upon the original film and has added over 60 minutes of new material connecting the dots of what most
likely really did happen in London on July 7th 2005, when 3 tube-trains and a double-decker bus were exploded.
Watching this film should leave the viewer no doubt that the crimes and murder committed in London were done by other organizations than by
claimed by the official and corporate media.
Like "Dismantle The Matrix" on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/DismantleThe...
Follow "Dismantle The Matrix" on Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/DismantleMatrix
Thanks for watching and remember to give a Thumbs Up and Subscribe!
-
Category
Published on 19 Oct 2013
Le 8 septembre 2013, l'émission
populaire "Truthseeker" (Chercheur de vérité) de Russia Today a publié,
avec plus d'un million d'abonnés sur YouTube, ce reportage de 13 minutes
intitulé
« Le chercheur de vérité : le 11/9 et l'opération Gladio
(E23).»
Plus grave que le Watergate : des réunions régulières entre des officiels US et le leader d'al-Qaïda ; preuves à l'appui, le terrorisme sous faux drapeau de la Maison Blanche pour mener le peuple « comme des moutons » ; le père d'une des victimes du 11/9 raconte pourquoi il soutient la campagne de pub ReThink911 sur Times Square et dans le monde entier.
NICK KOLLERSTROM WITH JIM FETZER
Sandy Hook: Analogies with the London 7/7 Bombings
Sandy Hook: Analogies with the London 7/7 Bombings
By Nick Kollerstrom (with Jim Fetzer)
“No-one has been able to get into the Sandy Hook elementary school to verify if there are any bullet-marks, bloodstains etc, then on January 2nd, the children were transferred to another school some miles away: we assume the old Sandy Hook Elementary School will remain sealed off, and will be demolished. Perhaps a shootout DID NOT ACTUALLY HAPPEN THERE, it was just an illusion.”–Nicholas Kollerstrom
Nicholas Kollerstrom is an historian of science who has taken great risks and suffered real harms by his willingness to conduct scientific research on the Holocaust. He has also done brilliant work on 9/11. The points that he makes here are rather chilling, including that the Batman film ‘Dark Knight Rises’ alluded to Sandy Hook region of Gotham City, as a portion of the city of Gotham during a setup of one of the bad guy’s dirty deeds in that movie. Earlier promotions of the film the year before did not (Alex Jones discovered) have that Sandy Hook reference. The 2000 film ‘The Sandy Hook Lingerie Party Massacre’ has the killer strike in the aftermath of a hurricane.’ And the ritual sacrifice of 22 children is portrayed in ‘The Hunger Games’ by Suzanne Collins: she lives in Sandy Hook. As he observes, “Perhaps a shootout DID NOT ACTUALLY HAPPEN THERE, it was just an illusion.”
Sandy Hook: Analogies with the London 7/7 Bombings
by Nicholas Kollerstrom
The Predator has struck, one more time. We
seek for its identity, what is it? I here compare two different events,
perpetrated by the Enemies of Mankind, seven years apart. Maybe first
read my earlier post.
1. Scene of crime remains concealed: no media access
No-one has been able to get into the Sandy Hook elementary school to verify if there are any bullet-marks, bloodstains, etc., then on January 2nd the children were transferred to another school some miles away: we assume the old Sandy Hook Elementary School will remain sealed off, and will be demolished. Perhaps a shootout DID NOT ACTUALLY HAPPEN THERE, it was just an illusion. Kids heard bangs, that’s all we can say. The new school will be patrolled by security guards permanently: presumably to maintain the kids in a state of sufficient trauma to prevent them talking, or remembering the wrong sort of thing.
No bodies, only some duffle bags (Daily Mail)
The Mail Online 6 January shows this image, subtitled: ‘Chaotic scenes at the school as police work to secure the area and bodies are carried out of the school.’ But look carefully, no bodies are here, only some duffle bags – and some are doubting whether this is the school car-park.
In the London Bombings, the three train carriages were kept absolutely out or bounds then destroyed one year later: the blown-up bus was taken up to Sevenoaks Military establishment, i.e only the military can see it.
2. CCTV switched off
The Sandy Hook Elementary School was in an up-market area of Connecticut, shown by the large majority of its children being from Jewish families. It would have had high-security equipment including CCTV cameras. We have as yet not been shown images from the time of the crime (curiously vague, but said to have been three minutes around 9.45 on 14th December). There are no images of a ‘crime scene’ eg bullet-marks in walls or through windows. No wounded persons being interviewed.
During the London Bombings, as also for 9/11, the CCTV was switched off: no pictures, from the most heavily CCTV’d city in the world (until 3 years later when some rather dodgy ones were released).
3. The patsy perpetrator(s), clueless and unmotivated, are themselves killed so they cannot defend themselves. Dead, then can be given all the blame.
There is no reason to suppose that the 20-year old autistic Adam Lanza had any expertise or practice in
using
guns, still less that his Mother went herself to a firing range or
belonged to a rifle club and brought her son along. The car allegedly
driven by him to the school turned out to belong to a shady felon, with
FBI ties. Would or could any young man shoot his mother, take her car,
drive it to a school to which he does not belong, be dressed in black,
shoot his way into the school with several guns and kill virtually every
target he aims at? How could anyone believe such a story? Then he kills
himself – and then, goes over to his car and puts the rifle he has used
back in the book. There is no conceivable motive for this physically
quite impossible sequence of events.The four alleged London bombers knew nothing about chemistry, never had any interest in it, and had no bomb-making skills that anyone ever heard about. Once dead they had no-one to defend their name against the official fictions. Not one of them had an animus against British society, to motivate any antisocial act.
4. An ever-changing story
If a story is being made up, then different agencies will be spinning it, so it will never be very coherent. The Sandy Hook story became incoherent at the moment when CNN News announced that four pistols had been found in the school: presumably because the official coroner had averred that each of the 28 bodies had an average of seven bullet-holes in them, so they needed four pistols to credibly sound as if two hundred bullets had been fired. One young lad is not going tobreak into the school with four guns – after shooting his own Mother.
The story of the rifle used – the Coroner averred that all injuries had been made with the rifle, then it was found to have been placed in the back of a car outside the school – can never make any sense.
First we were told she was a teacher at the school, and Adam went to that school, then later it emerged: A former school board official in Newtown called into question earlier reports that Nancy Lanza had been connected to Sandy Hook Elementary School, possibly as part of the teaching staff. “No one has heard of her,” said Lillian Bittman, who served on the local school board until 2011. “Teachers don’t know her.”
The 7/7 London bombings was truly an ever-changing story, with a narrative that relied heavily upon journalistic amnesia and credulity over the latest bit of unattributed gossip. Notably over what explosive had been used, which kept changing. The State lies to its own people. The State participates in killing its own people.
5. Terror-Drills being run
On 17th September 2010, HSEEP Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program had a drill with FEMA at the Sandy Hook Fire Department, which is near to the Elementary School. On the day of the event, starting at 9.00 am, a FEMA exercise ‘Planning for the Needs of Children in Disasters’ took place in Connecticut not far from Sandy Hook. Some conjecture that this got moved and happened at the school, which would account for the presence of Federal troops there seemingly much too early. There is probably a lot more of this to come out. There is a picture on the Web of children of Sandy Hook forming a chain and being told to close their eyes – that is what a kiddie terror-drill looks like – from a couple of months earlier.
“Sandy Hook has a recent history of federally staged Terror Drills. A mock school shooting drill was being conducted in Putman County only miles away on the very same day as the Sandy Hook events on December 14.”
The London Bombings had four main terror-drills leading up to it, the last of these by Peter Power on the very morning at the same three tube stations.
6. Guilty culprits announced too soon.
At 9:53AM, no more than ten minutes after the reported shooting ceased, the Associated Press published a story, “Official with Knowledge of Connecticut School Shooting Says 27 Dead, Including 18 Children.” Neighbours of Nancy Lanza said that around 9:15am they saw police surrounding the house, taping off the neighborhood and telling everyone to evacuate. Yet, they supposedly did not learn the identity of the shooter until c. 11:30am. They identified the bodies of the “shooter” and his mother before the body identifying process even started, with names, occupations, “health issues”, marital status and residency.
On 9/11, news items started alluding to Osama bin Laden about an hour after the event. On 7/7 Tony Blair announced that it was an Islamic crime at 5 pm on that day. The total of 52 dead was announced much too early, in fact while two of them ‘not yet dead’ were still in hospital.
7. Film pre-announcement of the event.
The Batman film ‘Dark Knight rises’ alluded to Sandy Hook region of Gotham City, as a portion of the city of Gotham during a setup of one of the bad guy’s dirty deeds in that movie. Earlier promotions of the film the year before did not (Alex Jones discovered) have that Sandy Hook reference. The 2000 film ‘The Sandy Hook Lingerie Party Massacre’ has the killer strike in the aftermath of a hurricane.’
Or, the ritual sacrifice of 22 children is portrayed in ‘The Hunger Games’ by Suzanne Collins: she lives in Sandy Hook.
The London bombings were prefigured in the film ‘V for Vendetta’ about an Underground train primed to blow up. It was filmed in the months leading up to 7/7, so Warner Brothers had free run of the London Undergound tunnels. Its launch had to be postponed because it was too similar to what had just happened. Likewise ‘the Descent’ a horror movie scheduled to open the day after on 8th July, about people trapped underground and dying: its launch had to be postponed. Compare the classic film ‘The Matrix,’ where after 17 mins one sees 11 Sept 2001 on Anderson’s passport ID.
8. Families not allowed to see bodies of loved ones.
At least one family had the experience of not even being allowed to see the body of their loved one. “They told me, ‘You can’t see (the body),’” Gilles Rousseau told Radio-Canada, the French-language CBC. “ They would just be shown photographs. ‘Where are the Sandy Hook Bodies? Many are wondering, are there any bodies?
There was a bizarre aspect to the 7/7 tragedy, in the way families had to wait often over a week just to be told whether their loved one was dead, and then would be not allowed to see the body – with phoney tales that it might upset them too much – or else shown them embalmed with a policeman standing by.
9. Families not allowed to speak
On December 19 the Connecticut State Police assigned individual personnel to each of the 26 families who lost a loved one at Sandy Hook Elementary. “The families have requested no press interviews,” State Police assert on their behalf, “and we are asking that this request be honoured” – a de facto gag order. What is it so terrible they might say?
In the 7/7 London bombings, ‘grieving parents’ would always be wheeled out to support the government narrative, but one could never get to speak to any of them.
10. Identity Theft
Adam Lanza was a vegan because he ‘didn’t want to hurt animals’. Nancy Lanza ‘was a wonderful, beautiful, elegant woman who loved life, and most importantly she loved her son, Adam’ a friend has testified. They lived on a street named after the great Indian Yogi ParamanshaYoganada: what did this mean to them?
The Mother has been hyped as an Apocalypse-expecting gun-toting food-storing freak (as a prelude to demonising gun-owners in America, the whole point of this exercise)
Sid Khan especially of the 7/7 Four was a rising star of Beeston, and after his death he became the most thoroughly demonised of the Four. Seemingly endless terror-tales were woven around him. Sid Khab was especially proud of his reputation for non-violent conflict-resolution (see my online talk, about MSK as a ‘local action hero’) Wherever false-flag terror is perpetrated, it is important to try and rescue the identity of the person who gets blamed and demonised (eg for the Bali Bomb of 2002, someone called Amrotzi, who was a quite sensitive and intelligent young man).
11. Actors used
At least one ‘grieving parent’ at Sandy Hook looks as if he was acting a part. People are suspecting work by ‘Crisis Actors.org’: ”Trained players and actors making it real,’ available for ‘active shooter drills.’ They bring ‘intense realism to simulated mass casualty incidents.’
The London bombings had some actors spotted on the street that morning, presumably part of the ‘terror drill’ scheduled for that morning http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cW089fj94vY ‘Wounded’ actors were especially noticed around Tavistock Square.
12. Deaths not real
‘Even more unusual are the observations of Facebook pages of the deceased being created days or even months prior to the shooting, further suggesting the synthetic and premeditated nature of the event. For example, on March 23, 2011 a Facebook site was established, titled “RIP Emilie Parker,” for the daughter of Robbie Parker, now well-known after the soliloquy delivered on CNN and preceded by a gleeful chuckle and query as to whether he should read the lines provided him.’ One may doubt whether any of the 28 ‘deaths’ at Sandy Hook Elementary School were real.
The London bombings had one definite not-real-death, viz Myriam Hyman (but there may have been others). She’s on the plaque at Tavistock Square but no way did she die there.
THE BIG DIFFERENCE
Normally when fabricated terror happens, the story is fake but the deaths are real. It is the dead bodies which give the air of gravity and solemnity, so that Those Who Create Delusion will be believed. The London bombings had dreadful scenes of carnage, seen by real witnesses.
Sandy Hook has only two dead bodies known: Adam and Nancy Lanza. On that morning, the local hospital went into lockdown and cleared four trauma rooms, but received only three patients, two of them dead children(according to the official story) and one mildly wounded adult. We saw locked-down kiddie-coffins in funeral services, but is that enough? The situation may remind us of 9/11, when airports that morning were waiting for the grieving relatives – but none came. The security forces averred that they had removed the bodies from the school in the middle of the night: had they?
Have children been stolen? Child slaves sell, we are told, for well over $200,000.
Nicholas Kollerstrom, Ph.D., historian of science, including articles on Sir Isaac Newton, Fellow of the Royal Astronomical Society, is a founding member of the UK’s 9/11 Truth movement, member of the New York Academy of Sciences, and author of 7/7: TERROR ON THE TUBE (3rd edition, 2012)
"KOOKS"* It is the first time ever in my life that I am using that term! Sounds nice!
Comment feed for this post
YouTube Video Posted Before Shooting & Connection To Sandy Hook
usahitman.com/uvpbsc/
4 Sep 2012 – Savings Bank, has created the Sandy Hook School Support Fund to provide support Gun sales spiked in Connecticut this week — just days ...http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VK0Nqp6hhVc
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=CSUAXBChnbE
Sandy Hook "Donation Sites UP Before Shooting!" BUSTED
01/10/13
08:45:00 am, by admin, 0 words 
Categories: Domestic Enemies, Caught In The Net, Worth Reading/Hearing/Viewing, SANDY HOOK False Flag
Sandy Hook "Donation Sites UP Before Shooting!" BUSTED
No feedback yet
Re: Newtown, Connecticut School Shooting 14 dec. 2012
by simonshack on January 8th, 2013, 8:43 pm
*
So what exactly is the deal with those GREEN RIBBONS?
http://www.webmomentofsilence.org/
Duh - just a random, happenstance/coincidence, I suppose...
http://septemberclues.info/
So what exactly is the deal with those GREEN RIBBONS?
http://www.webmomentofsilence.org/
Duh - just a random, happenstance/coincidence, I suppose...
http://septemberclues.info/
- simonshack
- Administrator
- Posts: 4010
- Joined: October 18th, 2009, 9:09 pm
- Location: italy
Re: Newtown, Connecticut School Shooting 14 dec. 2012
by Knapsack on January 8th, 2013, 8:58 pm
Just who is Desaree Juarez?
Yesterday, on shilly site Godlikeproductions, a video turned up regarding some alleged Sandy Hook victim fundraising sites that were set up prior to December 14, the day of the event. One of them was a donation page called "Sandy Hook Elementary Victims fund," hosted by gofundme (http://www.gofundme.com) and set up by "Desaree Juarez". The problem? It was created on December 13.
This page has since been taken down, but for now, a Google cache version is available here: http://tinyurl.com/bbettd8
It didn't take long for comments to begin appearing on this page asking the creator why it was created the day before the "shootings". Anticipating that the same excuse would be given that we received for the "R.I.P. Victoria Soto" Facebook page, that it was originally created for something else and then changed, URL and all, after the shootings, I pre-emptively checked gofundme's FAQ pages to see if it was possible to change the URL. This is what I found:
They make it very clear that a user may create a custom URL only ONCE. I hoped to prompt "Desaree" to paint herself into a corner, but she needed no help from me. By the time I returned to the donation page, she had already made a number of posts attempting to combat the allegations against her, including this one:
Obviously, her story of changing the URL twice does not add up. Knowing this, I sent her an email via the donation page calling her out. Minutes later, despite stating on the page that she would not remove it, the page had been taken down.
She was also quick to jump on someone's sudden comment on a news article which had mentioned her donation page. Was she watching this page like a hawk?
Here are the comments:
And here is a snippet of the article which mentions her donation page:
The article can be found here: http://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/local/Bay-Area-Responds-to-26Acts-of-Kindness-183989591.html
I was curious who this "Desaree Juarez" from San Jose, CA was, so I began searching for her online footprint. I found her Facebook page (http://www.facebook.com/#!/Sephora.Fox) and Twitter page (http://twitter.com/desareedelilah), which was allegedly set up on December 10. Military connections are obvious--"proud Army wife". It seems her Facebook account is used to do little more than spam other Facebook pages for donations.
Now check out this photo of "Desaree" from her Facebook page:
Weird, sick jokes from TPTB? Or course my doubts about this "Desaree Juarez" being a real person are flying very high.
Yesterday, on shilly site Godlikeproductions, a video turned up regarding some alleged Sandy Hook victim fundraising sites that were set up prior to December 14, the day of the event. One of them was a donation page called "Sandy Hook Elementary Victims fund," hosted by gofundme (http://www.gofundme.com) and set up by "Desaree Juarez". The problem? It was created on December 13.
This page has since been taken down, but for now, a Google cache version is available here: http://tinyurl.com/bbettd8
It didn't take long for comments to begin appearing on this page asking the creator why it was created the day before the "shootings". Anticipating that the same excuse would be given that we received for the "R.I.P. Victoria Soto" Facebook page, that it was originally created for something else and then changed, URL and all, after the shootings, I pre-emptively checked gofundme's FAQ pages to see if it was possible to change the URL. This is what I found:
They make it very clear that a user may create a custom URL only ONCE. I hoped to prompt "Desaree" to paint herself into a corner, but she needed no help from me. By the time I returned to the donation page, she had already made a number of posts attempting to combat the allegations against her, including this one:
Obviously, her story of changing the URL twice does not add up. Knowing this, I sent her an email via the donation page calling her out. Minutes later, despite stating on the page that she would not remove it, the page had been taken down.
She was also quick to jump on someone's sudden comment on a news article which had mentioned her donation page. Was she watching this page like a hawk?
Here are the comments:
And here is a snippet of the article which mentions her donation page:
The article can be found here: http://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/local/Bay-Area-Responds-to-26Acts-of-Kindness-183989591.html
I was curious who this "Desaree Juarez" from San Jose, CA was, so I began searching for her online footprint. I found her Facebook page (http://www.facebook.com/#!/Sephora.Fox) and Twitter page (http://twitter.com/desareedelilah), which was allegedly set up on December 10. Military connections are obvious--"proud Army wife". It seems her Facebook account is used to do little more than spam other Facebook pages for donations.
Now check out this photo of "Desaree" from her Facebook page:
Weird, sick jokes from TPTB? Or course my doubts about this "Desaree Juarez" being a real person are flying very high.
- Knapsack
- Member
- Posts: 18
- Joined: October 2nd, 2011, 1:47 am
Re: Newtown, Connecticut School Shooting 14 dec. 2012
by HonestlyNow on January 8th, 2013, 10:15 pm
Unleashed wrote:I wish someone could just make stills of the two b/w boa scenes from the er...wedding they attended.
- HonestlyNow
- Member
- Posts: 167
- Joined: September 13th, 2011, 12:15 am
Re: Newtown, Connecticut School Shooting 14 dec. 2012
by anonjedi2 on January 8th, 2013, 10:34 pm
Nice work, Knapsack. Her facebook page is
interesting. It seems she's been on facebook for quite some time but
has had very little activity in terms of posts, updates, etc.
Thankfully for us, her page is not private (click View Highlights).
Going back a few months, almost all of her posts seem to be pimping her fundraising pages for Breast Cancer. She seems very interested in raising money for a good cause, whatever that cause might be.
In December, she has several posts about her Sandy Hook fundraising page and is excited to announce that she's been featured in an MSNBC article. That article seems to have been removed from MSNBC.com. Here's the link http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/50239375/ns ... s-kindness
Here's the Google Cache version. http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/s ... clnk&gl=in
I wonder why they took the article down?
Another local article (NBC) that mentions her is still up - http://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/local/Ba ... 89591.html
If you scroll down her facebook page, you'll find that she is affiliated with The Pink Ribbon Club. Check out their facebook page here: https://www.facebook.com/thepinkribbonclub2
Note the following on the right side under "recent posts by others"
This post is dated 12/14/2012 at 7pm. She is linking to her breast cancer awareness page, but didn't she change it to Sandy Hook Victims page by that time in the night? She says she changed it in the afternoon, so why is she still linking to her supposed Breast Cancer Page, if it has indeed been changed to a page for Sandy Hook Victims as she claims?
Next, I googled "Desaree Juarez" + san jose. Her name came up on a facebook page called "Wheel of Fortune Game"
Here, she is pushing her Breast Cancer Gofundme page on the Wheel of Fortune Game facebook page:
https://www.facebook.com/wheeloffortune ... 4043587743
Note that this post by her is dated October 18th. Which means she already had a gofundme account and page setup for Breast Cancer Awareness at that point. If you hover over the link you can see the URL for that page (which no longer exists) \A-cure-for-breast-cancer
So we have at least 2 posts of her promoting her Breast Cancer gofundme page prior to 12/14/2012 circa 7pm. One was on Oct. 18th, the other the night of the "massacre" ... so she has had 2 pages on gofundme (both have been deleted).
If she's a real person, she's definitely lying.
Going back a few months, almost all of her posts seem to be pimping her fundraising pages for Breast Cancer. She seems very interested in raising money for a good cause, whatever that cause might be.
In December, she has several posts about her Sandy Hook fundraising page and is excited to announce that she's been featured in an MSNBC article. That article seems to have been removed from MSNBC.com. Here's the link http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/50239375/ns ... s-kindness
Here's the Google Cache version. http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/s ... clnk&gl=in
I wonder why they took the article down?
Another local article (NBC) that mentions her is still up - http://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/local/Ba ... 89591.html
If you scroll down her facebook page, you'll find that she is affiliated with The Pink Ribbon Club. Check out their facebook page here: https://www.facebook.com/thepinkribbonclub2
Note the following on the right side under "recent posts by others"
This post is dated 12/14/2012 at 7pm. She is linking to her breast cancer awareness page, but didn't she change it to Sandy Hook Victims page by that time in the night? She says she changed it in the afternoon, so why is she still linking to her supposed Breast Cancer Page, if it has indeed been changed to a page for Sandy Hook Victims as she claims?
Next, I googled "Desaree Juarez" + san jose. Her name came up on a facebook page called "Wheel of Fortune Game"
Here, she is pushing her Breast Cancer Gofundme page on the Wheel of Fortune Game facebook page:
https://www.facebook.com/wheeloffortune ... 4043587743
Note that this post by her is dated October 18th. Which means she already had a gofundme account and page setup for Breast Cancer Awareness at that point. If you hover over the link you can see the URL for that page (which no longer exists) \A-cure-for-breast-cancer
So we have at least 2 posts of her promoting her Breast Cancer gofundme page prior to 12/14/2012 circa 7pm. One was on Oct. 18th, the other the night of the "massacre" ... so she has had 2 pages on gofundme (both have been deleted).
If she's a real person, she's definitely lying.
- anonjedi2
- Member
- Posts: 23
- Joined: December 31st, 2012, 6:50 am
Re: Newtown, Connecticut School Shooting 14 dec. 2012
by Unleashed on January 8th, 2013, 10:45 pm
HonestlyNow wrote:
Unleashed wrote:I wish someone could just make stills of the two b/w boa scenes from the er...wedding they attended.
Thank YOU!!
Now, we can get close ups and I am not seeing how anyone would believe either of these people were the Lauren and Wanna be Sadsack boyfriend.
It is amazing what passes for established "history" on the MSM, isn't it?
This is what they represent the entirety of evidence of their past relationship on?
- Unleashed
- Member
- Posts: 288
- Joined: March 25th, 2011, 4:27 am
Re: Newtown, Connecticut School Shooting 14 dec. 2012
by Knapsack on January 8th, 2013, 10:48 pm
anonjedi2 wrote:Note that this post by her is dated October 18th. Which means she already had a gofundme account and page setup for Breast Cancer Awareness at that point. If you hover over the link you can see the URL for that page (which no longer exists) \A-cure-for-breast-cancer
So we have at least 2 posts of her promoting her Breast Cancer gofundme page prior to 12/14/2012 circa 7pm. One was on Oct. 18th, the other the night of the "massacre" ... so she has had 2 pages on gofundme (both have been deleted).
She did indeed have a breast cancer awareness gofundme page (as if we really need more breast cancer awareness
), which you correctly point out as having the URL gofundme.com/A-cure-for-breast-cancer.When she was first questioned regarding her Sandy Hook donation page, she claimed that it had originally been a breast cancer page and was then changed on the 14th. Commenters asked what the URL had been--she claimed that she couldn't remember--but then said that it was "something like" gofundme.com/help-find-a-cure, which we know is not possible. Also, why would she create a second breast cancer donation page?
I suppose she thought she could get away with that lie by deleting the old breast cancer donation page. No matter the details, she's caught red handed lying about this very suspicious donation page.
- Knapsack
- Member
- Posts: 18
- Joined: October 2nd, 2011, 1:47 am
Re: Newtown, Connecticut School Shooting 14 dec. 2012
by anonjedi2 on January 8th, 2013, 11:01 pm
Caught red-handed indeed, which is why she's deleted BOTH pages.
The Sandy Hook page was created on December 13th (Day before the "shooting").
So she had to create a story about it first being a Breast Cancer Awareness page (to cover up that mistake).
But we have proof that she already had a breast cancer awareness page as early as Oct 18th (and probably earlier). So why would she create a second page? BUSTED.
The Sandy Hook page was created on December 13th (Day before the "shooting").
So she had to create a story about it first being a Breast Cancer Awareness page (to cover up that mistake).
But we have proof that she already had a breast cancer awareness page as early as Oct 18th (and probably earlier). So why would she create a second page? BUSTED.
- anonjedi2
- Member
- Posts: 23
- Joined: December 31st, 2012, 6:50 am
Re: Newtown, Connecticut School Shooting 14 dec. 2012
by Knapsack on January 8th, 2013, 11:07 pm
Blatant Newtown Reference in the Aurora Trial Coverage
I just found this article from USA Today about the James Holmes preliminary trial:
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nati ... g/1816875/
There is a completely ridiculous Newtown/Sandy Hook reference buried here:
Absurd!
I just found this article from USA Today about the James Holmes preliminary trial:
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nati ... g/1816875/
There is a completely ridiculous Newtown/Sandy Hook reference buried here:
Absurd!
- Knapsack
- Member
- Posts: 18
- Joined: October 2nd, 2011, 1:47 am
Re: Newtown, Connecticut School Shooting 14 dec. 2012
by Unleashed on January 8th, 2013, 11:37 pm
Interesting comment from Adam Curry formerly of MTV.
full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VW8tVWtrQeM
full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VW8tVWtrQeM
- Unleashed
- Member
- Posts: 288
- Joined: March 25th, 2011, 4:27 am
Re: Newtown, Connecticut School Shooting 14 dec. 2012
by anonjedi2 on January 8th, 2013, 11:43 pm
One thing I'm wondering about is why all the
cars, firetrucks, ambulances and everyone else were located at the
Firehouse and not the school itself. Here is one example. Why is this
sign at the firehouse?
Another thing worth noting, is the woman in the photo.
Former professional tennis player and nun Andrea Jaeger ... more in the article.
http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/lupic ... -1.1221363
Another thing worth noting, is the woman in the photo.
Former professional tennis player and nun Andrea Jaeger ... more in the article.
http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/lupic ... -1.1221363
- anonjedi2
- Member
- Posts: 23
- Joined: December 31st, 2012, 6:50 am
Re: Newtown, Connecticut School Shooting 14 dec. 2012
by Knapsack on January 8th, 2013, 11:51 pm
Remember Chris Ramos?
He was quite possibly the worst "survivor" actor during the Aurora hoax. See his fine work below:
full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fVYs9Cb4DQQ
Looks like he made it into the Newtown coverage! This article from December 14 interviews a man named "Chris Ramos," father of three, to get his take on things.
Original article can be found here: http://www.cbs47.tv/news/local/story/Ma ... 9Og2A.cspx
He was quite possibly the worst "survivor" actor during the Aurora hoax. See his fine work below:
full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fVYs9Cb4DQQ
Looks like he made it into the Newtown coverage! This article from December 14 interviews a man named "Chris Ramos," father of three, to get his take on things.
Original article can be found here: http://www.cbs47.tv/news/local/story/Ma ... 9Og2A.cspx
- Knapsack
- Member
- Posts: 18
- Joined: October 2nd, 2011, 1:47 am
Re: Newtown, Connecticut School Shooting 14 dec. 2012
by Sisterlover on January 9th, 2013, 12:20 am
Some strange forensics re: pozner/haller
timeline... By now, everyone's familiar with Alexis Haller, the uncle
of slain sim Noah Pozner (shot 11 times, or 9 more times (9/11) than the
rest of the children). Watching Anderson gush over the family's
wherewithal (here:http://noahpozner.org/videos/), I noticed that the
photos were attributed to Victoria Haller, not mother Veronique
Haller-Pozner. Of course, the two are 'friends' on Fakebook, so a
cursory glance at Victoria's timeline suggests she married Alexis Haller
on... you guessed it... Dec.15,2012. One day after the fateful events
in Newtown.
Check it out here: http://www.facebook.com/victoria.haller.58 She receives a couple accolades for her nuptials on that day, and does nothing to correct them, despite the fact that she discusses being married 8 years previous a little further down the rabbit hole of her facebook timeline...
How strange... there's also no photos of the loving inlaws, cousins playing together, etc. despite getting photo credits on Anderson's puff piece. Also odd, mother Veronique is a fan of Hunter S. Thompson. Is this the new Gonzo journalism?
Check it out here: http://www.facebook.com/victoria.haller.58 She receives a couple accolades for her nuptials on that day, and does nothing to correct them, despite the fact that she discusses being married 8 years previous a little further down the rabbit hole of her facebook timeline...
How strange... there's also no photos of the loving inlaws, cousins playing together, etc. despite getting photo credits on Anderson's puff piece. Also odd, mother Veronique is a fan of Hunter S. Thompson. Is this the new Gonzo journalism?
- Sisterlover
- Member
- Posts: 48
- Joined: July 22nd, 2011, 6:49 pm
Re: Newtown, Connecticut School Shooting 14 dec. 2012
by Knapsack on January 9th, 2013, 12:32 am
We've all heard about how a police officer has
been assigned to each Newtown family who lost a loved one. This is
pretty vague. I've been wondering what exactly that is supposed to
mean. This surreal article from the Washington Post, December 30, seems
to clear this up a bit:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/ ... ory_2.html
Sooo... the state troopers are living with the victims' families, even two weeks after the shootings? That's the story they're going with?! And the Barden family gets two troopers?
They will "forever be family"?
Why on Earth would these families need live-in state troopers?
Surely this odd narrative nugget is a test of the public's B.S. detectors!
http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/ ... ory_2.html
Sooo... the state troopers are living with the victims' families, even two weeks after the shootings? That's the story they're going with?! And the Barden family gets two troopers?
They will "forever be family"?
Why on Earth would these families need live-in state troopers?
Surely this odd narrative nugget is a test of the public's B.S. detectors!- Knapsack
- Member
- Posts: 18
- Joined: October 2nd, 2011, 1:47 am
Re: Newtown, Connecticut School Shooting 14 dec. 2012
by Mercurial on January 9th, 2013, 2:44 am
Tribute video uploaded to vimeo over a month before Newtown event, apparently. Plus more memorial funds set up in advance.
full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UDKpyD1jPOM
full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UDKpyD1jPOM
- Mercurial
- Member
- Posts: 109
- Joined: December 31st, 2010, 1:23 am
Re: Newtown, Connecticut School Shooting 14 dec. 2012
by Unleashed on January 9th, 2013, 2:59 am
Sisterlover wrote:Some strange forensics re: pozner/haller timeline... By now, everyone's familiar with Alexis Haller, the uncle of slain sim Noah Pozner (shot 11 times, or 9 more times (9/11) than the rest of the children). Watching Anderson gush over the family's wherewithal (here:http://noahpozner.org/videos/), I noticed that the photos were attributed to Victoria Haller, not mother Veronique Haller-Pozner. Of course, the two are 'friends' on Fakebook, so a cursory glance at Victoria's timeline suggests she married Alexis Haller on... you guessed it... Dec.15,2012. One day after the fateful events in Newtown.
Check it out here: http://www.facebook.com/victoria.haller.58 She receives a couple accolades for her nuptials on that day, and does nothing to correct them, despite the fact that she discusses being married 8 years previous a little further down the rabbit hole of her facebook timeline...
How strange... there's also no photos of the loving inlaws, cousins playing together, etc. despite getting photo credits on Anderson's puff piece. Also odd, mother Veronique is a fan of Hunter S. Thompson. Is this the new Gonzo journalism?
Aw. It's too bad that Veronique and her daughter, could not attend the nuptials as they were spending a few cherished hours down to the tattoo parlor, gritting their teeth while getting mother/daughter tats.
- Unleashed
- Member
- Posts: 288
- Joined: March 25th, 2011, 4:27 am
Return to London, Madrid, Oslo and other faked terror events
SANTA BARBARA SHOOTING HOAX !
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
This email was sent to ghyslaineroc@yahoo.co.uk by noreply-ichnews@live.com |
Update Profile/Email Address | Instant removal with SafeUnsubscribe™ | Privacy Policy.
|
Information Clearing House | Po Box 365 | Imperial Beach | CA | 91933
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
THE UGLY TRUTH - 17 January 2013
BREAKING NEWS–NO PHOTOS OF DEAD BODIES AT AURORA, COLORADO SHOOTING
An exhaustive study of the internet has uncovered the fact that there are NO PHOTOS of dead bodies, blood, bullet holes, etc, that would prove that the massacre at Aurora, Colorado (said to have been perpetrated by James Holmes, pictured above) in fact took place.
Given that this is one of the ‘proofs’ being used by ‘Sandy Hook Truthers’ to prove that the massacre in Connecticut in fact DID NOT take place (and which has now become the subject of ridicule by the JMSM) what we are forced to conclude is that the massacre in Aurora, Colorado also did not take place, and is all part of a huge conspiracy on the part of Israel to propagandize Americans into giving up their guns.
- Leave a Comment
Thank you for helping us keep the lights on
Archived Radio Programs
Why Sandy Hook Massacre Spawned "Conspiracy Theories"
One
month after the Sandy Hook school shootings, the list of victims
continues to grow. One man, Gene Rosen — who found six children and a
bus driver in his driveway, brought them into his home, fed them and
called parents to assure them that their children were safe — has been
harassed by telephone, email and online by those who think he is lying
about his actions, and is part of a conspiracy.
Rosen
is not the first hero to be assaulted and insulted by conspiracy
theorists with doubts. In 2002, when conspiracy theorist Bart Sibrel
confronted astronaut Buzz Aldrin and called him a “coward and a liar”
for faking the moon landings, the 72-year-old promptly punched Sibrel in the face.
A group called the Sandy Hook
Truther movement has emerged from the dust and chaos over the past weeks
to claim that the school shooting was all a staged event. Though many
Americans are outraged and incredulous that anyone could doubt that the
tragedy even happened, the Sandy Hook school shootings follow classic conspiracy thinking. Here are a few reasons why.
Poignant political implications
Shootings — even child murders —
happen every day, several times a day, in America. According to UNICEF,
America has the worst record of child abuse and homicide in the
industrialized world, with an average of 27 children killed every week
by their parents and caregivers. But those child murders don’t have
implications for enacting a national policy on gun control.
Most events producing conspiracy
theories have important social and political implications, and the Sandy
Hook shootings are no exception. No one, regardless of what side of the
gun control issue they are on, can deny that guns played a key role in
the Sandy Hook killings. So the conspiracy theorists must instead
challenge the claim that the attack even occurred. They believe it’s all
a hoax to scare people into supporting more gun control and a step
toward an outright repeal of the Second Amendment. [5 Milestones in Gun Control History]
‘Holes’ in the ‘official story’
A common theme running through conspiracy thinking is
that if you’re smart enough, and just look closely enough at all the
news coverage and available information, you can see lies and
contradictions in accounts of the event. Truthers claim that they have
found “absolute proof” that the shootings were a hoax, pointing to a
6-year-old girl named Emilie Parker, who was shot to death in the school
massacre.
Or was she? They claim that the
smoking-gun photographic proof that Emilie is still alive is that she
was photographed after the shooting with President Obama during a visit
with the families. The girl is actually Emilie’s sister, wearing the
same dress that Emilie wore in another photograph.
In the topsy-turvy world of
conspiracy thinking, any little girl who resembles Emilie and is wearing
the same dress as one she owned must be her. It could not possibly be
her sister, who could not possibly be wearing either Emilie’s dress or
an identical one. Instead, it’s obviously proof that the whole shooting
was faked.
But this claim, even if it were
true, raises more questions than it answers. For example, if Sandy Hook
was indeed a “staged event” as claimed, with Emilie Parker alive and the
president part of the conspiracy, why would the government be so
careless as to release a photograph of Emilie, knowing that she had been
reported dead in a carefully orchestrated national hoax? Is a widely
published photo opportunity with the president of the United States
really the best place to hide someone who is supposedly dead?
Conspiracy theorist websites offer dozens of other examples and pieces of evidence, ranging from real or perceived contradictions in eyewitness accounts to conflicting news reports. And indeed there are some contradictions. [The 10 Most Bizarre Conspiracy Theories]
The minds of conspiracy theorists
But what the conspiratorial mind
sees as misinformation and lies, others see as merely perfectly ordinary
incomplete and inaccurate information following a multifaceted tragedy.
Especially in the hours and first days after such a chaotic and
horrifying event, witnesses can be confused and mistaken. Police
officers and reporters can misspeak, or be given incorrect information.
Not
every single statement about what occurred, from dozens of different
people in different places at different times, will agree in every
detail. Three different witnesses to a minor car accident will often
give three slightly different accounts of what they saw, so it’s
unrealistic to expect dozens of people who were involved in a chaotic
school massacre to report exactly the same things.
Part of the reason that conspiracy theories linger
is that any contradictory evidence — no matter how conclusive or
compelling — can just be dismissed by claiming that it’s part of the
cover-up. There is ultimately no evidence that would satisfy most
conspiracy theorists. Those who distrust the government will use any
excuse to support their beliefs, logical or not. Conspiracy theorists
prefer complex mysteries over simple truths, and find mystery where none
exists.
Research has shown not only that a person who believes in one conspiracy theory is likely to support others, but also contradictions don’t deter conspiracy theorists.
The
idea that the Sandy Hook massacre was faked is not only absurd, but
also an insult to the victims of the tragedy. The victims are really,
provably gone; they are not safely hidden away somewhere until the Sandy
Hook shooting has served its ultimate goal of taking away America’s
guns. The bullet holes are there. The children and adults are dead.
Toxic conspiracies, however, will live on.
Time to move on
The entire ‘debate’ on the matter of Sandy Hook has–unfortunately but, sadly, predictably–devolved into an irrational feeding frenzy. People who were once friends are now clawing and biting each other in a ridiculous waste of time that in the end only benefits the enemy.
Therefore we are going to close this discussion and move on to more productive matters that will actually bear fruit, so anyone out there still ‘feeling the need’ to engage in some kind of similar feeding frenzy is invited to visit one of the other websites that cater to this kind of nonsense. As far as those involved with TUT are concerned, there are bigger fish to fry.
Like this:
You and one other blogger like this.
-
#3 by bigcree1Shadowhawk on January 18, 2013 - 6:29 amYeah no kidding! while we (WE?) frenetically ripping each others heads literally, ‘they’ are busy draining the inlet. We had best get our focus back on ‘them’ where it belongs. The facts will soon emerge and then we can all enjoy it together instead of battling each other over trivial matters & less!
-
#8 by B.A.Frémaux-Soormally on January 18, 2013 - 5:05 pmI saw this coming with all those big mouths posing as experts on every aspect of this sordid “Affair” and on each and every bit of “news” posted here when Reverend Mark Dankof was discussing and revealing very serious and more important stuff (for adults!)! (TUT Broadcast of 9 January 2013)
BAFS
BAFS