Thursday, 27 October 2011

MUAD'DIB NOT GUILTY - Kevin Annett: Pope Francis, Dictator Queen Elizabeth arrest warrants


John  Hill aka Muad Dib was found unanimously not guilty by the jury at at Southwark Crown Court in his four day trial  for attempting to pervert the course of justice. 

Full story  below,  in our articles section.

More on this at: :  

 Kevin Annett: Pope Francis, Queen Elizabeth arrest warrants; USA Bishop breaks with Vatican

Le 11-Septembre & l'opération Gladio

Published on 19 Oct 2013
Le 8 septembre 2013, l'émission populaire "Truthseeker" (Chercheur de vérité) de Russia Today a publié, avec plus d'un million d'abonnés sur YouTube, ce reportage de 13 minutes intitulé 

« Le chercheur de vérité : le 11/9 et l'opération Gladio (E23).»

Plus grave que le Watergate : des réunions régulières entre des officiels US et le leader d'al-Qaïda ; preuves à l'appui, le terrorisme sous faux drapeau de la Maison Blanche pour mener le peuple « comme des moutons » ; le père d'une des victimes du 11/9 raconte pourquoi il soutient la campagne de pub ReThink911 sur Times Square et dans le monde entier.

The (7/7) Ripple Effect Story

May 14, 2011 -- London, England

Now that Muad’Dib/John Hill has been found not guilty, the full story to this point of His malicious and politically motivated prosecution can be told…

Three years ago, Muad’Dib mailed some DVDs containing his ‘7/7 Ripple Effect’ film to a courthouse near London, where three scapegoats were being prosecuted in hopes of lending credibility to the government’s “official” 7/7 story.  These DVDs were sent by Muad’Dib because he wanted to keep innocent men from receiving very lengthy prison sentences.  ALL the rest of us who knew about that situation should be ashamed for not having done exactly what Muad’Dib did.

As a result of his good-will, Muad’Dib’s home was raided by police and he was arrested on a charge of "attempting to pervert the course of justice".  In the Orwellian 21st century, he was really just being attacked by a malicious and out of control police-state for getting in the way of their mass-murderous crimes (7/7 was an event of mass-murder).  The charge against Muad’Dib originated out of the filthy-corrupt Westminster (political) court in London, right next to where the globalist banking syndicate is headquartered.

Muad’Dib then spent over a year and a half fighting extradition to England where he knew it was going to be one corrupt event after another.  The very short story is that Muad'Dib's court-appointed lawyer in Ireland flatly refused to do as instructed and sabotaged any successful defense.  Since the other Irish judges were all quite corrupt too, never applying Law, or even the relevant legislation, Muad’Dib’s fight against extradition was eventually denied by the Irish Supreme Court in front of 40 supporters and he was re-imprisoned, then taken to the UK by "counter terrorist" police in November of 2010.

Once there, the more obvious corruption started, as Muad'Dib was at that point held firmly in the clutches of a filthy corrupt British Establishment (including police, courts, and media).

Firstly, Muad’Dib was deleted from the prison’s computer system, with them originally saying that Muad’Dib wasn’t even at their prison and they didn’t know where he was (lies).  About that same time, a police officer(?) working to prosecute Muad’Dib stated openly that many other people sent DVDs to the same courthouse as Muad’Dib, but no one else was even investigated, never-mind charged.  This was an open admission of a malicious and politically motivated prosecution/persecution.

Eventually the prison system was forced to admit they had Muad’Dib in custody, and a bail application was made, in front of yet another corrupt judge, who had the courtroom closed to the public before denying bail with the official reason that the judge(?) “didn’t want more DVDs to be sent out”.  Sending out DVDs is, obviously, not actually a crime.  Muad’Dib then spent approximately four months straight, incarcerated, teaching and waking up a sizeable portion of the prison staff and inmates who ALL knew that he did not in any way belong in prison.

In early March of 2011, bail was finally granted by the only judge throughout this entire process that actually seemed like a reasonably honest man.  However, this process was still made very difficult by the fact that the prison service kept making “mistakes” or “forgetting” to bring Muad’Dib to his own court hearings.  In all, Muad’Dib was only produced for two of seven different court hearings whilst in (police-)state custody.
After being granted bail, one of Muad’Dib’s supporters went to go pay the ransom money, only to find out that, once again, any reference to Muad'Dib had been deleted from the court's computer systems.  This of course complicated things, but eventually the sabotaged system was worked around, the ransom money was paid, and after a bit of haggling with the prison, Muad’Dib was released with barely enough time to travel to his bail address before his court-imposed 10pm nightly curfew.  At that point Muad’Dib began refining his defense and legal challenges.

His first action was to challenge the jurisdiction of the court, by proving, with a wealth of evidence, that “queen” Elizabeth is not the rightful monarch, and never was.

This was a two-point argument.  First, that Elizabeth knew—both then and now—that she was crowned on a fake coronation stone instead of the real Stone of Destiny/Coronation Stone, which meant not only was she never properly crowned, but she was also knowingly and fraudulently conning the public, and that is why she didn't want her coronation televised.
The second and absolutely irrefutable part of the arguement, is that Elizabeth had broken her legally binding coronation oath, which is a valid contract she made with the British people allowing her to be their queen.  Although more proof exists and was to be used in court, the skeleton legal argument summarizing this jurisdictional challenge can be found online at: REGINA v JAH.

At the end of March 2011, Muad’Dib submitted the basics of this challenge to the court, alongside applications to subpoena “queen” Elizabeth to testify, and also for production of the Sovereign’s Coronation Bible, which Elizabeth had used when swearing her legally binding oath.  Elizabeth also signed a written version of the contract, and a high-quality picture of the original can be seen here: Signed Coronation Contract.

Unsurprisingly, nothing at all was heard back from the court, unlike what would normally happen.  So, on the final working day before his May 9th trial, Muad’Dib visited the court clerk’s office, and asked them what the situation was.  At that point, he was finally notified that his subpoena applications had been denied (by an extremely dirty judge), but that the court had, once again, “mistakenly” mailed that information to the wrong address.

After having been harassed, monitored, restricted, and imprisoned for long periods of time by a completely rotten “judicial system”, May 9th 2011 finally came, and with it, as one would guess, more corruption.
The judge, hand-picked by the Establishment to handle Muad’Dib’s case, was clearly unhappy to have been forced into what he surely saw as a difficult predicament for him.  He had a totally innocent man (Muad’Dib) in front of him, and a courtroom full of witnesses which were going to make it very hard for this judge to carry out the orders he’d been given by his evil puppet-masters, which was to make absolutely sure a guilty verdict was returned against Muad’Dib.

First, the judge flatly refused to hear Muad’Dib’s application to subpoena Elizabeth and the Coronation Bible.  With that brushed aside, he then read Muad’Dib’s jurisdictional challenge, or at least said he did, which, as above, had/has two points: a) the fake stone used, and b) the broken coronation contract.
After giving Muad’Dib a few minutes to make his case, the judge adjourned the court for the rest of the day.  The following morning he came back and said he was denying Muad’Dib’s challenge, ONLY on the grounds that it “didn’t matter” if a fake coronation stone was used.  The judge very slyly attempted to ignore a huge amount of Muad’Dib’s challenge, saying absolutely nothing whatsoever about Elizabeth having broken her legally binding contract with the British people.  The judge had to ignore and bypass that part of the challenge, because, even by their own silly “rules” and legislation, that part of the challenge is still absolutely water-tight and irrefutable, being very simple contract Law.

The fact that the judge refused to even mention that crucial part of Muad’Dib’s challenge offers a great deal of proof that it cannot be argued against in court, therefore, everyone should be studying the information and using it themselves in any British (or Commonwealth) courtroom possible.  If you’ve not broken a Biblical Law, then you cannot be prosecuted for anything by Elizabeth or her agents acting on her behalf.
With Muad’Dib’s challenge officially denied (ran roughshod over as he predicted), the jury was then sworn in, and the prosecution began spewing out a bunch of pointless hot air.  Basically, the prosecutor (who was an arrogant, rotten little girl with no moral decency whatsoever--which is why she was picked for the job) had absolutely no legitimate case to argue on behalf of those evil Establishment figures controlling her, and they ALL knew it.  So, she just talked around in circles for the better part of a, day, while some members of the public and jury struggled to stay awake.

Once that had finished, Muad’Dib’s only defense was getting up on the witness-stand and explaining to the jury that he sent the DVDs to the courthouse because innocent men were being maliciously prosecuted, just like he now was, and that he could not sit back and watch people go to prison for something they didn’t do.  It really was that simple, so, Muad’Dib then used the opportunity to also enlighten everyone in the courtroom about other subjects like the false-flag 911.  Upon cross-examination, the aforementioned rotten little girl prosecuting wasted everyone’s time by connivingly trying to get Muad’Dib to say he’d done something wrong.  That obviously didn’t work and she ended up hurting her own case even more, deciding she’d better sit down and be quiet when Muad’Dib scolded her for wasting everyone’s time speaking nonsense and trying to argue that black is white, and white is black.  Red in the face and embarassed, she sat down.

After this, both sides summed up their cases.  The prosecution slandered Muad’Dib and the defense team basically said this whole thing was horribly ridiculous.

Then it was the corrupt (and probably free-masonic) judge’s turn to have the last word.  This horror in a black dress went on to do everything he could possibly come up with to try and manipulate the jury into giving a guilty verdict.  This judge re-defined the words in the charge, stated Muad’Dib said things that he never said, then outright lied to the jury by stating it was not up to him which evidence they heard, when he had already forbid various (important) pieces of evidence from being shown to the jury (thereby making direct decisions about the evidence being heard).  He did basically everything he could to have Muad’Dib found guilty, just short of openly telling the jury that they must convict.  Had the public gallery not been full and over-flowing, he probably would have done just that.

The jury then went back to deliberate and about 2 and a half hours later came back saying they couldn’t reach a unanimous decision (possibly a plant in the jury).  The judge probably thought the odds were in favor of a conviction, so he then allowed a majority verdict (no less than 10 to 2 either way), and the jury went out again, before coming back an hour later saying they’d made a decision.

The jury forewoman that gave their verdict came in the room beaming with a wonderful smile, and a few other jury members were definitely grinning.  A NOT GUILTY verdict was then given and the jury left the room a final time to the applause and gratitude of the public gallery.

The judge then quickly left the courtroom quite visibly upset (knowing he was probably in trouble for failing to get this conviction on behalf of his masters) and the prosecutor waddled away back to whatever crypt she’d crawled out of.  The police officer visibly heading-up Muad’Dib’s prosecution actually had the decency to say he was sorry—which was nice, all things considered.  However only days later proved he really is a dirty cop and a two-faced establishment shill.

Muad’Dib is once again at complete liberty after having proven that doing the right thing always pays off in the end—IF you don’t lose strength.

As for the rest of us?  We can all look forward to a second-edition of the ‘7/7 Ripple Effect’ coming out soon. :-)

Yes, case closed… But a new beginning of sorts is upon us.  Keep checking back for updates.  This is just a battle won, but this war for Truth, Justice, and Liberty is not over yet.

-The Friends of Muad'Dib


Muad'Dib's latest film about the July 7 2005 London bombings.

After being unlawfully jailed for 157 days based on trumped-up charges, and the BBC making a dedicated hit-piece on the original 7/7 Ripple
Effect, the film-maker Muad'Dib expands upon the original film and has added over 60 minutes of new material connecting the dots of what most
likely really did happen in London on July 7th 2005, when 3 tube-trains and a double-decker bus were exploded.

Watching this film should leave the viewer no doubt that the crimes and murder committed in London were done by other organizations than by
claimed by the official and corporate media.

"I must say, in my opinion this is a masterpiece. In less than an hour, the film explains how this whole event was planned, how it was
staged, what went wrong, how the authorities sought to cover it up and the failure of the press to cover it adequately. I think it is as
marvellous a microcosm for understanding the nature of inside-jobs as anyone has ever produced, so I must congratulate you and tell you how
much I admire your work."

- James H. Fetzer, professor emeritus at the University of Minnesota about the original 7/7 Ripple EFfect.

"It is an example of critical journalism thatdraws wholly on public news sources to formulate a controversial, but plausible, theory. After
deploying three different theories of truth to develop insights into new and existing evidence, it is the BBC / Government theory that has a
lower level of correspondence with known .facts., is incoherent to the point of being implausible, and is more likely to distort its reports
because of institutional controls and political pressures."

- Rory Ridley-Duff Ph.D., senior lecturer in human resource management
and organisation behaviour, Sheffield Hallam University.

After being unlawfully jailed for 157 days based on trumped-up charges, and the BBC making a dedicated hit-piece on the original 7/7 Ripple
Effect, the film-maker Muad'Dib expands upon the original film and has added over 60 minutes of new material connecting the dots of what most
likely really did happen in London on July 7th 2005, when 3 tube-trains and a double-decker bus were exploded.

Watching this film should leave the viewer no doubt that the crimes and murder committed in London were done by other organizations than by
claimed by the official and corporate media.  
Land Of The Free reports on anything newsworthy and informative to freedom seekers. We are dedicated to covering cutting edge news and finding solutions.

We take interest in anything relating to the corporate takeover of the country and of course the planet!

We try to do this with humour and clarity.  Please let us know if you have any interesting news.

We would also appreciate your subscription to our You Tube channel,  landofthefreeuk. Check out our news report Windows on the world on our You Tube channel. Here is the link for our latest news.

Scroll down the page for our features section.
Ths site is being overhauled over the next few weeks with lots more information, please stay tuned.

 Latest News

David Icke on Occupy Movement. Icke urges protestors to  go after the real enemy

Cameron sacks rebel MPS then visits Lockheed Martin

Police infitrator keeps false identity in court on Occupy Wall street and End The Fed. London protests ongoing for the foreseeable future

Greece and all its assets (including the population)  now owned by IMF. Max Keiser sees financial terrorism in action
Opening of mass graves of Native Indian children starts in Canada. Check out Kevin Annett and , , . 
BRANTFORD, ONTARIO – Elders of the Mohawk Nation in collaboration with the International Tribunal into Crimes of Church and State (ITCCS) and its Secretary, Kevin Annett, announced today the commencement of forensic excavations on the grounds of the oldest Indian residential school in Canada - the Mohawk Institute run by the Church of England.

 Frustrated by the ongoing whitewash by the Canadian government of the murder of residential school children by Catholic and Protestant churches, the Sovereign Mohawk nation of Grand River has begun digging for children’s remains to “finally give them a proper burial and bring to trial those who killed them”, to quote Mohawk elder Bill Squire.

Check out forthcoming events and join our friends at The Kent Freedom Movement

Oafs of office
As we reported last year private security and council appointed control freaks are the new civillian army. However they have  to call the non existent police(is your local police station still open...) with non constables. They will however demand your name and address, as you have no rights., unless of course you inform the goons of their non powers.

Council  with a Common Purpose refuse to face refuse..Walthamstow Company cleared by judge of giving away a cardboard box.

More on Common Purpose trained Councillor Clyde Loakes,  the (un)sustainable voice of communitarianism. Leading "beyond authority" the common purpose mantra.

And theres more  from one of Londons most Rotten Boroughs!
Following our article Job Centre Plus and DWP = Work For Nothing or get nothing, heres an interesting post. Give it your support and renounce slave labour. As more and more self employed people and businesses go under this will be the solution. Work Houses  for the nation run by Corporations, most of whom pay no tax in the UK.

Some interesting info about the IMF:

Daily Mail reports  three year olds put on database for "racist" jibes

 Gore the bore runs out of hot air on global warming / carbon tax scam

Theresa May bans all protests in London Boroughs for one month.

Interview with eye witness at Tottenham after riots.
A call to lawful Rebellion:

On a lighter note, a bit of musical fun around the enigma of 2012

Climate Scam
An event called The Secret Garden Party, July 21st-24th quoted on its website:
"You will be in a place where freedom of spirit and expression is the norm – so you need to formulate an idea of how best to use it."
Nice double speak going on here at an event which promotes carbon tax and even charges you £2.50 for every empty car seat in your vehicle. Its all there, NLP, the aforementioned double speak and a bit of common purpose too maybe?
The site features a symbolically occult animated intro which appears to promote the theory of evolution, essential to the New World Order (as humans have to be seen to be animals who are blighting the earth or "Gaia".) 
The video also  has a hand which appears from a green shoot which reveals an all seeing eye on its palm. There is also a UFO going through the stars which contains an outline of Stonehenge. Any speaker on the Occult  New World Order could do a lengthy talk on the intro video alone. There is much more embedded in the content of the site which stands out as pure New Age, New World Order propoganda.
We wonder if Al Gore and Bill Gates will turn up to promote their discredited carbon tax and population reduction too.
There seem to be quite a lot of these controlled, funded "gatherings" and "community projects" focussing on getting you ready to be carbon taxed, listen to global warming brainwashing and talking about "sustainability."
What was that old David Bowie song Memories of a free festival...mmm would be nice to have one, but the local councils and Green Taxation mafia  seem to control the agenda at these "events". Try organising your own and see what happens.
   "freedom of expression"  nice concept, shame about the agenda (21)

Tony Farrell intelligence analyst for South Yorkshire Police states 7/7 and 9/11 government accounts untrue. See for full interview. The Sun and Sheffield Star have also reported the story.
Congress to vote on War without end. World War 3?
 Strauss Khan, Putin and "No gold" in Fort Knox?

Latest Articles

Blairs Millions and a wider view

This article is by Staff Report...As Gadaffi was also about to trade with the gold backed gold coin The North African Dinar this adds yet more intrigue...   Tony Blair's six secret vi...
Monday, 10 October 2011

Kevin Annett opening of mass graves update 9th October 2011

News image
Brantford, Ontario Both pro- and anti-government groups in the Mohawk Nation united this past week to endorse the independent investigation into mass graves of children at the former ...
Monday, 10 October 2011

Notice to unlawful Debt Collectors masquerading as bailiffs

One of our contributors put this Notice together in response to an unlawful "Notice of Removal" from a debt collection company whose third party agent (debt collector) was masquerading as a ...
Tuesday, 30 August 2011

Wardrobe of Wonder

  In these interesting times heres a bit of light relief. Mark Windows with his rocktastic song Wardrobe of Wonder......       {phocadownload ...
Saturday, 30 July 2011

How to handle The Census Non Compliance "Officer"

  Following the data hacking this Non Compliance threat seems to have dwindled and the "Non compliance officers" will soon be unemployed or working as security guards again, but if they ...
Tuesday, 28 June 2011

Muad`Dib aka Anthony John Hill... Not Guilty.

This article has been reprinted in Namaste Magazine  with insertions from Muad Dib.   The imprisonment and trial of Anthony John Hill aka Muad'Dib (meaning "Teacher of Righteousness" and a character from th...
Tuesday, 31 May 2011

Job Centre Plus and DWP = Work for nothing, or get nothing.

  News just in...The Head Office of JC Plus and DWP cannot  define the job role of an "adviser".  This has been received by one of our contributors in writing. More ...
Saturday, 14 May 2011

More on Dodgy Debt Collectors

More on dodgy Debt Collectors Debt Collectors are quoting The Domestic Violence and Crimes and Victims Act when sending out their computer generated “warrants of distress” for civil debt. Th...
Monday, 2 May 2011

Rulings to use in court for council tax and CSA summonses

  Councils and The CSA are among the corporations who issue their own summonses, as we reported in our artlcle "How to not get summonsed for non payment of council tax".  ...
Monday, 2 May 2011

Osama Bin Laden dead...again?

  FOX NEWS REPORTS BIN LADEN DEAD...IN 2001! Report: Bin Laden Already Dead Wednesday, December 26, 2001 N.B "FOX NEWS"? Usama bin Laden has died a peaceful death due to an untreated lung complication, th...
Monday, 2 May 2011

Council use debt collectors "6 million times in 36 months"

  Councils called in debt collectors  over 6 million times between Aug 2007 and Sept 2010.  That breaks down to 4.1 million for council tax and 1.4 million for parking, fines ...
Saturday, 9 April 2011

Bank Charges on benefit ? Try This

  Heres a template you can use if you are on Job Seekers Allowance and you get bank charges applied to your account.     Dear Sir   I request a refund for ...
Friday, 8 April 2011

Who are the "anarchists" Agent Provocateurs at protests?

  The  mainstream media focussed on the actions of "anarchiists" on the 26th March protests in London, these "anarchists"  threw a few bins about, sprayed graffitti, some broke a few windows ...
Tuesday, 5 April 2011

Council Tax Bankruptcy and the Birkenhead Lawful Rebellion

    Here is the article with video links from The UK Column about the bankruptcy case heard at Birkenhead County Court on March 7th    The Council Tax Bankruptcy hearing on Monday ...
Tuesday, 5 April 2011

Become a "bailiff" and earn £5.93 per hour!

    Job Centre Plus have been advertising for debt collectors. There has to be some gallows humour in times like these.   Here is the info: FIRST CALL BAILIFF NORTH EAST LONDON 40 HOURS PER ...
Saturday, 26 March 2011

Newlyn and their abusive bailiff

  A bailiff from Newlyn debt collectors visited the business premises of a woman in Essex for outstanding business rates. The bill had in fact just been overlooked. The woman had ...
Sunday, 13 March 2011

The Census: A reply to The Queen.

As stated in the News section, The Census is described as "A count of the population" . Here is a form which fulfills your duty and can be sent to ...
Monday, 7 March 2011

Bank card backlash

  This article was sent to us by someone who had their bank card stopped because their bank suspected fraudulent action. This can be something really suspicious like using your card ...
Monday, 7 March 2011
 Veterans Today

TRUTH JIHAD: 10th anniversary of 7/7: Israeli security firms implicated in London false flag

Did VERINT and ICTS bomb London?

Audio Player

For only $3.95 a month you can listen to shows on-demand before they are broadcast – and also get free downloads and other perks from Kevin! If you are a subscriber, just log in to the members area of to get early access to the shows. Help Kevin keep these shows on the air – become a subscriber today!
Editor’s note: The embedded Truth Jihad Radio interview with Nick Kollerstrom, author of Terror on the Tubeanalyzes the recent beach resort shooting in Tunisia – whose victims were mostly Brits – as a likely PR launch for the 10th anniversary of the 7/7/2005 London bombings. For more information see my recent post Terror in Tunisia: Another false flag? And for background, check out my essay “Pre- and Post-9/11 False Flags: How Weapons of Mass Deception Are Interdependent” in the new book We Are NOT Charlie Hebdo! Free Thinkers Question the French 9/11.
Below is a brief breakdown of evidence implicating insiders and Israelis, not necessarily in that order, in the 7/7 bombings.

10th Anniversary Of The London 7-7-2005 Subway Bombings

by VidRebel
This essay is based upon the latest edition of the video 7-7 Ripple Effect which was recently released. This article also contains some of my own research. Here is the video:

7/7 Ripple Effect 2

Staffan Enbom
The May 16, 2004 BBC Panorama program (London Under Attack) had a What If scenario looking at organizing TV coverage of bombings  at 3 Tube stations  and on one road vehicle. They concluded that the BBC would have to allow Security officials to dictate their coverage.
This is the same BBC that had announced the collapse of World Trade Center Tower 7 some 24 minutes in advance.

 ENHANCED VERSION: News Reports WTC7 Fell Before It Happens!
Ron Paul Video
They had been told by the then Rothschild owned Reuters News agency that Tower 7 had collapsed. I think they had a time zone problem. London had just left what they call Summer time. But America was still on Daylight Savings time.
From the Ripple Effect video we learn that Peter Power on 7-7-2005 was running a mock terror drill on the London Underground. They chose the 3 tube locations and the day and the hour that the 3 bombs exploded.

 Peter Power 7/7 Terror Rehearsal
Anything that defies my sense of reason.....
What are the odds of that? The London tube is closed one day a year so the odds of picking the right day are 1 in 364. The London tube is open 19 hours a day which gives you a 1 in 19 chance of picking the right hour. There were to the best of my knowledge 274 stations in 2005. So the odds of  picking the right 3 stations is calculated by multiplying 1/274 X 1/273 X 1/272. You could calculate the odds of Peter Power’s client picking the hour, the day and the station by multiplying  1/19 X 1/364 X 1/274 X 1/273 X 1/272.
Or you could improve the odds by realizing Tony Blair was Prime Minister and that Robert Kiley, a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and a former Director of Logistics for the CIA, was appointed Commissioner of Transport for London. Kiley quit in January 2006 six months after the London bombings and after five years in the job. He was paid almost £2 million in a settlement for standing down, and remained as a £3,200-a-day consultant.
There are some other long odds to calculate. The Israeli company VERINT was in charge of the CCTV cameras. The bus bomb exploded near the London headquarters of ICTS, an Israeli company. That Israeli  company ICTS  was in charge of security at the airports where  4  planes were hijacked on 911. ICTS was also in charge when the Christmas Day bomber was let on board an international flight without a passport despite having paid cash for a one way ticket and being put on a terrorist watch list by his father for being mentally unstable. ICTS was also in charge when the shoe bomber Richard Reid boarded Flight 63 from Paris to Miami on 12-22-2001.
The Israelis were also in charge of security at Fukushima on 3-11-2011 which was exactly 7 years to the day after the Madrid train bombings of 3-11-2004. The Madrid bombings were exactly 911 days after the Israelis attacked America on 9-11-2001. The Stuxnet virus was designed by the Israelis and the CIA to shut down Iran’s peaceful nuclear power project. It was found on the Siemens controllers at other plants in Japan but there is no definitive word whether or not Stuxnet played a role at Fukushima. I cannot calculate the odds of Israelis being in charge of security at terrorist events. Besides, someone might hurt my feelings by calling me a dirty, filthy anti-Semite.
The Israeli company VERINT claims their CCTV cameras on 7-7-2005 all failed. That should be added to the list of improbable events. The alternative is to believe there was no video of the 4 Muslim men because they were not on the trains.
The Ripple Effect video has CCTV from a gas station in Leeds which indicates that Mohammad Sidique Kahn, never went to London. He was  the oldest of the 4 young men and had helped the Leeds police with Asian gang problems. His wife had just been taken to the hospital where she subsequently lost her baby. He was likely arrested in Leeds and then permanently disappeared.
Charles Shoebridge, a British terror expert, believed that 2 of the 4 suspects including Kahn were MI5 agents. The two alleged leaders were likely working for MI5 and had made suicide videos as part of a training exercise. The videos released by the police mentioned no details from 7-7 and were made when both men appeared to look much younger.
John Loftus, a former US Army intelligence officer, an author and a terrorism expert, said that Americans previously refused to indict Haroon Rashid Aswat, the alleged mastermind of 7-7, on charges from previous events in the USA. Aswat was an MI-6 agent who might have been borrowed by the Americans. After the 7-7-2005 bombings, he fled to Pakistan. He was arrested on his arrival but was released after 24 hours. He was eventually extradited  to the US in 2014 after having been treated for psychiatric problems in the UK.
A few key points from the video. The police can only release still photos of the 4 suspects arriving at the Luton station because they have no CCTV video of them arriving on time. And the video proves the still photos are dodgy.
The 7:40 and 7:46 trains from Luton to Kings Cross station were both cancelled so three of the men arrived at London’s King Cross station too late for the drill. They likely figured out they had been set up after they heard the news of the bombings so they headed to Canary Wharf which had prestigious media outlets where they presumably would be safe. There was a report on both BBC TV and radio that 3 Muslim terrorists had been shot and killed at Canary Wharf. Those one time broadcasts were never repeated.
It is alleged that the fourth ‘terrorist’ who was the youngest went from Kings Cross station on the #91 bus to Euston station where he caught the #30 bus which would have taken him back to Kings Cross except that it was diverted to Tavistock square where it was blown up.
The CCTV on that particular bus had been worked on for 20 hours by a secretive crew on a previous Saturday. This job normally takes 2 hours at most. The top of the bus was taken clean off. It obviously involved cutter charges and could not have been the result of a backpack bomb. The primary witness Richard Jones claimed to have seen an Asian man on the bus. Jones also said he got off at his stop just before the explosion. That was an obvious lie as the bus had been diverted so nobody on the bus was looking for a stop near Tavistock. Jones later admitted in an interview that he had worked with explosives.
A white van was parked near the explosion. It belonged to King Star, a controlled demolition company. The bus bomb exploded near the London headquarters of ICTS, an Israeli company that, as mentioned, had run security at the 911 hijack airports. Witnesses said they heard two explosions on the bus bombing.
Witnesses on the Tube bombings said there were no backpacks and no Asians. They said the bombs exploded from underneath the floor of the trains. The video shows the directionality of the blast. Forensic exams showed the bombs were military grade plastic explosives and had timers. No suicide bombers were needed. The homemade bombs in the backpacks theory was proven false.
On 7-7-2005 Mossad and traitors within the British government killed 52 people in the London subway bombings.
So one more myth in the War on Terror dies. How long before we can be allowed to tell the truth in public without losing our jobs and being harassed?

Queen and Prince Charles using power of veto

 over new laws, Whitehall documents reveal

The Queen and Prince Charles are using their little-known power of veto over new laws more than was previously thought, according to Whitehall documents.

The Queen and the Duke of Edinburgh attend the state opening of Parliament
The Queen and the Duke of Edinburgh attend the state opening of Parliament Photo: Ian Jones
At least 39 bills have been subject to Royal approval, with the senior royals using their power to consent or block new laws in areas such as higher education, paternity pay and child maintenance. 
Internal Whitehall papers prepared by Cabinet Office lawyers show that on one occasion the Queen vetoed the Military Actions Against Iraq Bill in 1999, which aimed to transfer the power to authorise military strikes against Iraq from the monarch to parliament.
She was also asked to consent to the Civil Partnership Act in 2004.
In the Whitehall document, which was released following a court order, the Parliamentary Counsel warns that if consent is not given by the royals "a major plank of the bill must be removed".
Legal scholar John Kirkhope, who fought to access the papers following a freedom of information case, said the document revealed senior royals have "real influence and real power".
"There has been an implication that these prerogative powers are quaint and sweet but actually there is real influence and real power, albeit unaccountable," he said.
The document also contains a warning to civil servants that obtaining consent can cause delays to legislation. Royal approval may even be needed for amendments to laws, it says.
Andrew George, Liberal Democrat MP for St Ives, which includes land owned by the Duchy of Cornwall, said the findings showed the Royals "are playing an active role in the democratic process".
He called for greater transparency in order to evaluate whether the powers were "appropriate."
"This is opening the eyes of those who believe the Queen only has a ceremonial role," he said.
"It shows the royals are playing an active role in the democratic process and we need greater transparency in parliament so we can be fully appraised of whether these powers of influence and veto are really appropriate. At any stage this issue could come up and surprise us and we could find parliament is less powerful than we thought it was."
The power of veto has been used by Prince Charles on more than 12 government bills since 2005 on issues covering gambling to the Olympics.

Thursday, 30 September 2010


 Why has Judaic hired former Scotland Yard Peter Power (Elsevier) never been investigated as the primary suspect of the 7/7 Flase Flag? 
BECAUSE he carried it out himself with his MI6-MOSSAD team and the complicity of the UK Government (National & Local), Royals, media and Churches!

7/7 Ripple Effect 2


Published on 6 Jul 2012

Muad'Dib's expanded new version of the acclaimed original 7/7 Ripple Effect.

After being unlawfully jailed for 157 days based on trumped-up charges, and the BBC making a dedicated hit-piece on the original 7/7 Ripple Effect, the film-maker Muad'Dib expands upon the original film and has added over 60 minutes of new material connecting the dots of what most likely really did happen in London on July 7th 2005, when 3 tube-trains and a double-decker bus were exploded.

Watching this film should leave the viewer no doubt that the crimes and murder committed in London were done by other organizations than by claimed by the official and corporate media.

"I must say, in my opinion this is a masterpiece. In less than an hour, the film explains how this whole event was planned, how it was
staged, what went wrong, how the authorities sought to cover it up and the failure of the press to cover it adequately. I think it is as
marvellous a microcosm for understanding the nature of inside-jobs as anyone has ever produced, so I must congratulate you and tell you how much I admire your work."

- James H. Fetzer, professor emeritus at the University of Minnesota about the original 7/7 Ripple EFfect.

"It is an example of critical journalism thatdraws wholly on public news sources to formulate a controversial, but plausible, theory. After
deploying three different theories of truth to develop insights into new and existing evidence, it is the BBC / Government theory that has alower level of correspondence with known .facts., is incoherent to the point of being implausible, and is more likely to distort its reports
because of institutional controls and political pressures."

- Rory Ridley-Duff Ph.D., senior lecturer in human resource management and organisation behaviour, Sheffield Hallam University.

After being unlawfully jailed for 157 days based on trumped-up charges, and the BBC making a dedicated hit-piece on the original 7/7 Ripple Effect, the film-maker Muad'Dib expands upon the original film and has added over 60 minutes of new material connecting the dots of what most likely really did happen in London on July 7th 2005, when 3 tube-trains and a double-decker bus were exploded.

Watching this film should leave the viewer no doubt that the crimes and murder committed in London were done by other organizations than by claimed by the official and corporate media.

5 June 2011
VERDICT NOT GUILTY (Not found anymore)

J for justice - The Incredible Story Of Muad Dib And His 7/7 Ripple Effect

Beo Nguyen

Uploaded by on 5 Jun 2011
John Anthony Hill - 7/7 Ripple Effect, The Arrest, Trial & Verdict
June 5, 2011

John Anthony Hill, also known as Muad'Dib is the producer of the film "7/7 Ripple Effect". The film disputes the official account of the July 7, 2005 London bombings (also known as 7/7), a terrorist attack on public transport in Central London, by four suicide bombers later named as Hasib Hussain, Germaine Lindsay,
Shehzad Tanweer, and Mohammad Sidique Khan. The film was first released on the Internet on November 5, 2007, two years after the attacks. Physical copies were also sent to many of the people connected with the attacks. The film implicates the Metropolitan Police and Tony Blair, and claims that the true perpetrators of the attacks were MI5 and/or Mossad, who tricked the four men into travelling to London with rucksacks, in order to provide CCTV footage later to be used as evidence in the investigation of the attacks. It alleges that the four bombers were actually murdered in Canary Wharf, and did not die as suicide bombers in the explosions on the three tube trains and one bus where the attacks took place. John Anthony Hill was arrested in Ireland for the "crime" of sending DVD's of the film to the judge and jury of the first trial of three men: Waheed Ali, 25, Sadeer Saleem, 28, and Mohammed Shakil, 32, who were being tried at Kingston Crown Court, England. Muad'Dib was accused of "attempting to pervert the course of justice", when he sent copies of it to those in charge of delivering a verdict. In this interview, John Anthony Hill will discuss his film, the theories behind the attacks, his arrest and court case. He'll also convey his next plan to challenge the court system. Topics discussed: 7/7 London bombings, presumption of innocence, amicus curiae, Stone of scone, stone of destiny, BBC propaganda machine, legalese, pervert, influence, the judge, the jury, challenge to jurisdiction of sovereignty, lawful, legal, Gods law, the court and more.


16/03/2011    Wednesday - 1st Hour: With Paul Craig Roberts. 2nd Hour: With Muad'Dib.

* The Hierarchy Enslaving You

Chronology of events relating to Muad’Dib’s arrest and trial.

created 04/03/2009 - 22:24, updated 15/09/2010 - 12:45
The film “7/7 Ripple Effect” is finished and publicly released electronically on the Internet on the 5th November 2007 (Guy Fawke’s Day – Divine Timing), and goes viral, sending ripples and waking up sleepers across Britain and around the world, as intended.
Muad’Dib also sends out physical DVD copies during May/June 2008, when the first trial of the three men is taking place at Kingston, because He believes those men to be innocent and cannot stand by and do nothing and allow innocent men to spend years in prison for something they did not do. Later, on 1st August 2008, it is reported that the jury in this trial cannot arrive at a verdict after three weeks of consideration, and the judge dismisses them. Perhaps “7/7 Ripple Effect” has something to do with THIS; as you might glean from reading on; ensuring the accused are not wrongfully found guilty and sentenced, yet.
On 19th August 2008, a BBC Conspiracy Files film crew which is preparing a hit-piece on 7/7 Truth, tracks down Muad’Dib’s residence and ambushes Him, cameras rolling, attempting to get Him to reply to evil loaded questions. Muad’Dib doesn’t speak a word to them and walks past them. This takes place AFTER email exchanges between BBC representatives and Muad’Dib, initiated by the BBC, where Muad’Dib states His conditions in order to agree to take part in their programme about His film, which they refused to agree to.
As a direct result of Muad’Dib’s non-compliance with the government propaganda organ called the BBC, in aiding them to produce a hit-piece to smear 7/7 Truth and undo the ripples caused by the film, the authorities are forced to resort to their plan B: His arrest, and (as of now) attempted extradition to face trial in England. Please bear in mind the DVD’s are sent in May/June, and they wait till AFTER the BBC’s failed attempts in August to trump up the charge of “attempting to pervert the course of justice”. Also bear in mind that the film "7/7 Ripple Effect" has already been publicly available for at least six months before Muad’Dib mails copies to the judge and jury.
A European arrest warrant requested by the British authorities is issued on the 17th January 2009, TWO DAYS before the re-trial of the three accused begins at Kingston, on 19th January 2009.
Then, on Tuesday 10th February 2009, Muad’Dib’s home is invaded by policy enforcers known as gardai, who broke the peace instead of keeping it. He is arrested and computers, printer, DVD-burner and also documents forming part of His Defence are stolen and remain so to this day. Not even a search warrant is produced. He is treated like a terrorist criminal. His home looked like it had been burgled when the gardai had finished turning it over, which is, in reality, what they did - burgle it.
On the same day, He is taken before a judge in a Dublin court, who orders His remand in custody for 8 days until the next hearing.
On Wednesday 18th February, the judge sets bail conditions and adjourns till Wednesday 4th March 2009. The conditions are:-
1. Surrender of passport.
2. Shall not communicate with any party in England or Wales save for wholly personal reasons or save for reasons wholly connected with the church and organisation known as The Way. (Effectively forbidding Him from discussing 7/7 with anyone in England and Wales, and a clear indication that they are attempting to keep His trial secret in those countries.)
3. Has to sign at Garda station every Monday, Wednesday and Friday between 8am and 8pm.

And the ransom money to be paid is the hefty sum of 3500 Euros.

On the evening of Thursday 19th February 2009, Muad’Dib is ransomed following a successful Bail Appeal for donations and freed, after spending nearly 10 whole days in prison.
That same day it is reported in the English press that some pupils in English schools are being encouraged to imagine they are the “suicide bombers” plotting the July 7 attacks. The real motive for this, being, to completely side-step the issue of whether the four men were actually guilty in the first place, so as; through role-playing in classrooms; to re-inforce in children’s minds the false belief that there is no doubt that they were (guilty), and that films like “7/7 Ripple Effect” are wrong.
According to reports, this “teaching pack” is then withdrawn after complaints, when it becomes public knowledge.
Muad’Dib attends another hearing on Wednesday 4th March 2009, where the judge quickly adjourns until the same time the following week. They need to prepare an affidavit and submit it before next week, to then see if everyone is ready for the real hearing.
On the hearing of Wednesday 11th March 2009, the proper hearing has now been set for Thursday 19th March 2009 at 2:00 PM, at the Four Courts building in Dublin, probably in Court 11 (will confirm in which just prior to the hearing).
At the Thursday 19th March 2009 hearing, the judge said he would take 2 weeks to consider the verdict which will be delivered on Thursday 2nd April 2009.
On the 2nd April 2009, at 11:00 AM in Court 11 of the Four Courts building in Dublin, the judge Mr Peart breaks his word by not watching 7/7 Ripple Effect before issuing a verdict, as he said he would do; but that doesn't stop him from issuing the verdict anyway and ordering Muad'Dib's surrender to the British "authorities" in 15 days time. And he does not have an excuse since envelopes containing DVD's of 7/7 Ripple Effect were mailed to him from all around the world (which he stated he did not open. Why not Mr Peart? Didn't you say you wanted to watch it?). Mr Peart also does not allow Muad'Dib to speak during the trial. It is reported by some who attend court, that Mr Peart acts like a different person from 2 weeks earlier, as if he has been "gotten to". In view of his actions, this would seem a strong possibility.
The crimes committed against Muad'Dib by the Irish and English "authorities of INjustice" now include:-
1. Handing mail to people it was not addressed to (to the policy enforcers).
2. Burgling Muad'Dib's home.
3. Stealing Muad'Dib's computers.
4. Stealing Muad'Dib's printer.
5. Stealing Muad'Dib's DVD-burner.
6. Stealing several documents belonging to Muad'Dib, including those forming part of His legal Defence.
7. Kidnapping Muad'Dib, and putting Him in prison for nearly 10 days.
8. Exacting a ransom of 3500 Euros in order to let Muad'Dib go.
9. The judge taking away Muad'Dib's right to freedom of speech by not allowing Him to discuss anything other than personal matters with people in England and Wales as part of the ransom conditions, preventing Him from discussing 7/7 with people in those countries.
10. The judge breaking his word and not watching the film at the centre of this dispute, before issuing the verdict.
11. The judge once again taking away Muad'Dib's right to freedom of speech, by not allowing Him to speak in the trial.
12. Re-incarcerating Muad'Dib on the 2nd April 2009, where He spent a further 23 days.
Talk about "perverting the course of justice"! What was Muad'Dib's "crime" again? - Sending a free DVD with the TRUTH to a courthouse of so-called "justice"! Only the BLIND cannot see reality - that Muad'Dib committed no REAL "crime" but has had PLENTY REAL crimes committed against Himself.
On 8th April 2009, an appeal was lodged with the Supreme Court in Dublin, and accepted.
The court now awaits proper filing of documents by the solicitor. After that, a certificate of readiness will be released by the court with information regarding a hearing date.
The current average wait time for a Supreme Court hearing date is 27 to 30 months. However, the solicitor may submit a request for priority consideration, after the certificate of readiness is released.
In a hearing on Wednesday 22nd April 2009, the judge has set another hearing for Friday 24th April 2009 at 2:00 PM in the Four Courts building, Dublin.
The prosecution do not want the judge to allow bail for Muad'Dib, even though He has behaved impeccably in His eleven years living in Ireland. He also did not break bail the first time around, recently, and went to sign every time He was expected to, at the Gardai station.
So what the prosecution is doing really is unjustifiable. Could there be a lot of pressure being brought to bear on them from "spiritual wickedness in high places"?
After judge Peart having decided on Friday the 24th April 2009 that Muad'Dib could be bailed/ransomed, He was ransomed the next day on Saturday the 25th, having spent 23 days in prison, at an estimated cost of €5300 for the taxpayer.
The bail conditions are the same before except that they wanted more money. They are now holding €6000.
He is well and in good spirit and has been out on bail for over a year, awaiting a date for the Irish Supreme Court to hear His appeal against the extradition for sending a DVD containing the truth. That date has now been set for the 11th November 2010.
To this day, no English newspaper has reported on Muad’Dib’s arrest and extradition trial. The authorities do not want the jury in the re-trial of the three innocent men at Kingston to know about Him and “7/7 Ripple Effect”, to try and make sure they find the accused guilty this time around, instead of unable to agree on a verdict, or, even better for TRUE JUSTICE: find the innocent men not guilty.

The three on trial are from Leeds in Yorkshire and their alleged offence was in London, so why aren't they being tried in Leeds or London? Why a sleepy, quiet, predominantly white suburb like Kingston? Doing their dirty deeds away in the dark, away from view, to keep it as quiet as possible?
T.H.E.Y.* are determined to convict these three innocent men to, by extension, CON-vince the British people that the original four were guilty also. And undo the effect of Muad’Dib’s ripples.
* The Hierarchy Enslaving You.
They will probably try the same with Him and His trial in England, if He is extradited. And if we allow them to get away with it.
On Tuesday 28th April 2009, the Kingston re-trial jury unanimously REFUSED to convict Waheed Ali, Mohammed Shakil and Sadeer Saleem, of helping to plot the 7/7 attacks, finding them not guilty. They have spent over two years in prison. Muad’Dib sent the 7/7 Ripple Effect DVD’s to the judge, laywers and jury (whom the judge had misled) of the first trial at Kingston, because they should never have been accused in the first place and had no case to answer. They should never have spent all that time in prison.
However, the following day, on Wednesday 29th April 2009, Waheed Ali and Mohammed Shakil were unjustly sentenced to seven years, for “planning to attend a terror training camp in Pakistan”. One man’s terrorist is another man’s freedom fighter. Looking at the atrocious acts of mass terrorism committed by the United States and Britain over the years, together murdering over a million people, it is difficult to see how armed forces from other nations who have spent time training in the USA or Britain, should not logically be accused of the same thing.

They Need Your Fear: Jury Verdicts Overruled
In the spring of 2009, three Muslims were sentenced for life, for having allegedly intended to blow up a load of planes over America. My book Terror on the Tube, Behind the Veil of 7/7 has a chapter on their earlier trial, in 2008: ‘The Heathrow liquid bombs Hoax.’ The people arrested did not actually have plane tickets, nor had they made any bombs. They were put on trial in 2008, and the jury did not find them guilty of this allegedly-intended crime. Some were convicted of having planned an event that might have caused some ‘terror’ but they were not found guilty of the alleged airplane plot.
That should have been the end of it. There used to be a legal principle called ‘Double Jeopardy’ that prevented you from being tried twice for the same crime. If a jury found you innocent, or rather failed to find you guilty, that was it: but, no longer! Another big, Marathon three-month trial has now taken place, costing the British taxpayer over twenty million pounds, and this time three of them have been found guilty. The pretext for the re-trial was that some e-mails had not been cited in the previous trial! Nowadays, the Crown can override the Double Jeopardy principle if it reckons some ‘substantial’ new evidence has arisen: some e-mails, withheld from the first trial, were used as a basis for having a new one. These e-mails did not show a great deal.
The reports on this second trial did not go into the nature of the explosives intended-to-be-used, maybe because the ‘binary munitions’ story of the earlier trial had been ridiculed rather thoroughly. They were intending, it was said, to bring hydrogen peroxide, sulphuric acid and acetone into a plane toilet, and … There was a gee-whiz explosive called TATP which would allegedly have been formed, except that this would have been really quite impossible.
The story ends: Muslims go to jail, and we the people are supposed to be grateful for being ‘rescued’ from terror. That’s why we are not allowed to bring toothpaste onto the plane at Heathrow. Mothers were forbidden to bring milk on board, to feed their baby. Such an event as this is called in ToT ‘phantom terror’, in that no-one is injured and nothing actually happens, but fear is generated. Such phantom-terror events happen in the wake of real terror, in this case the July 7th London bombings, and they provide an aftermath of fear-and-terror.
Some readers may recall a repeated trial somewhat like this, in the case of the ‘July 7th’ trial. In the summer of 2008 a trial of three friends of the four alleged London bombers took place at Kingston County court, it was a huge affair for over three months. The charge was absurd, concerning the Victorian ‘Explosive Substances Act’ and the Jury did not in the end find them guilty. So, the Crown obtained a new jury and had a retrial! Another marathon three month trial, and this time the jury did agree – they were innocent!
Or at least, they were innocent of conspiring to cause explosions’ in London – the original charge. But, that did not mean they could go home, O no! Two of them were found guilty, on the grounds that they were going to attend a terror training camp in Pakistan. Where did that charge suddenly come from? Never mind that Waheed Ali, one of the accused, had explained to the court, that training to fight for the liberation of Kashmir (that’s what I heard they were training to do, while attending the Kingston Trial of 2008) was OK by Islamic principles, and was a world apart from ‘terrorism.’ But, the trial had not been about such a charge, had it? (1) What really matters in a trial like this, it seems to me, is that the meme of Islamic terror is reinforced, but also that no-one gets to talk to the key figures: there is no stage at which you or I can get to hear the viewpoint of these young men, over what is going on.
The only previous person charged over the 7/7 London bombings had been the chemist Al-Nashar, Leeds biochemistry graduate. His flat, which he rented out to Hasib Hussein, was dubbed the ‘bomb’ factory. He was arrested in Cairo, then released with no charges. His laptop was confiscated and found to be full of music: not bomb-making recipies, not Al-Quaeda contacts, but just – classical music. This situation was resembling the aftermath of 9/11 where, in the years that followed, the FBI seemed incapable of pressing charges against anyone.
Concerning the retrial of the three friends of the Four, its sole notable feature was the arrest of Muad’Dib in Ireland, immediately before it began in January 2008, on the grounds that he had sent some copies of his DVD ‘The Ripple Effect’ to the trial – a normal and traditional feature of British justice (see section on Muad’Dib), where citizens contribute material they believe may be relevant..
For these mega- three month fake-terror trials, no observers can sit though them. No independent observer prepares a resumé of their arguments. The press have to accept the summaries they are given, which contain the prepared ‘meaning’ of the trial, and they simply regurgitate that. I went to the Kingston Trial of 2008 quite a bit, because the BBC kept dragging me over there, for a Conspiracy Files program they were making (they didn’t show any of this – their goal turned out to be, to trash me for their program: guess I should have known that in advance). For this reason my chapter 11 on this trial is quite comprehensive: it describes a vital turning-point in the whole 7/7 story, and I may have been the only person to have an in-depth conversation with the brother-in-law of Mohammed ‘Sid’ Khan, one evening up in Leeds. (My visit to Leeds was more or less ruined by having the BBC film crew following me around, who insisted on coming, and made everyone thoroughly suspicious, quite understandably. But, at least I managed to shake them off for that evening) Those two things enabled me to exercise proper judgement and discernment, concerning the flood of official misinformation that was coming out in 2008, as the story twisted and turned.
1. Here is Daniel Obachike’s blog-comment on that trial, which sums it up quite well: ‘So MI5’s crude attempts to apportion blame for the 54 killed in the London bombings has failed to convince anyone, judges and jury included. The 3 men charged with assisting a team of alleged suicide bombers had the charges dismissed. The case was based on footage of them in London on a trip with Siddeque Khan.
Yet the British media were told the trio’s fingerprints linked them with alleged bus bomber Hasib Hussain and Jermain Lindsey.
Then, in a comedic twist to justify £100 million of taxpayers money spent on this diversion, 2 of the aquitted were given 7 years for attempting to fly to Pakistan.’

J for justice - The Incredible Story Of Muad'Dib And His 7/7 Ripple Effect

Published on 2 Oct 2012
Who is the human+being Muad'Dib?
Human (name): John Anthony Hill.
Human (birth): Sheffield, England, 1948.
Spirit-being (names): Muad'Dib / JAH / Elijah.
Reasons why the "Elite" fear Muad'Dib

1. On 13/June/1988, in fulfillment of prophecy, Muad'Dib served a High Court Writ upon the British Parliament, at court in the City of Sheffield, demanding that He be allowed to immediately repeal all man-made "laws" which are all illegal according to God's Law, and which enable the rich to "legally" steal from everyone else. He would also re-institute the "Year of Release", which is the forgiveness of debt every seven years, and the REAL "Jubilee" and begin to redistribute their share of the wealth that has been stolen from them back to the poor, and ban usury. The ban on private gun ownership would be repealed and all would have exactly the same powers to arrest persons committing real crimes.

2. T.H.E.Y.* KNOW Who He REALLY is.

3. Muad'Dib has proven that the Stone of Destiny (a.k.a. The Coronation Stone & Stone of Scone & Jacob's Pillar) was never returned by the Scots after four of them removed it from Westminster Abbey on "Christmas Day" 1950, also in fulfillment of prophecy. The stone handed to the authorities in 1951 was a fake and Elizabeth II was aware of this when she perpetrated a fraud upon the British people, by having herself crowned upon this fake stone. There were no specific camera shots of this stone, and she demanded no shots closer than 30 feet, so people couldn't see that it wasn't the real Stone. This means that she is not the rightful monarch of Britain, and moreover, has broken the Coronation Oath she took, in which she vowed to uphold God's Law, which prohibits the monarch (or anyone else) from making up new "laws", or taking away from God's Law. The real Stone will eventually re-surface so that the Rightful King can be crowned upon It. Bertie Gray, the stonemason who made two copies of the Stone, confessed on his death-bed that they had not returned the real Stone. Bertie's children confirmed this in 2008.

4. Muad'Dib has located the exact spot marking the entrance to the chamber which is the resting place of the Ark of the Covenant, at the Hill of Tara in Ireland. For over 10 years He has been campaigning to be allowed to dig down some metres in a space not more than 2m x 2m. Obviously, this, and He, have been a thorn in the side of the Irish authorities, who do not want to permit the Ark to be recovered because it doesn't form part of the N.W.O.'s plans. Quite the opposite, It is a tool which will help to defeat them. This could also explain the seeming eagerness of the Irish authorities to comply with the false British charge and extradition request against Muad'Dib, because He was not going away until He had recovered the Ark, also in fulfillment of prophecy.

The real power behind the N.W.O. is not any human, but Satan, and the N.W.O. is his evil mimic of God's Kingdom on Earth. All attempts to thwart or defeat Satan's N.W.O. are doomed to fail, UNLESS they are GOD'S WAY of doing it. The ONLY Person on Earth who knows Father's Will and is actively living It, is Muad'Dib. Your only chance of survival is through helping Him, to prove, without a shadow of a doubt, whose side you are on. As these End-times get progressively worse, in fulfillment of the Warnings delivered to mankind through God's Prophets, the Truth of this will become clearer and clearer, even to those who are still sleeping in the dust of the earth (inside Adams and Eves) and have not awakened spiritually.

Who is JAH?

Muad'Dib's DVD "7/7 Ripple Effect" provided substantial evidence as to why the 7/7 London Bombings were not the work of Muslim terrorists, and that they were certainly not carried out in the manner claimed by the British government and security services. He also gave a very creditable alternative scenario as to "what really happened" on 7/7. He spent 157 days in prison awaiting trial for posting copies of his DVD to the Judge and Foreman of the jury of a trial at Kingston Crown Court, which concerned individuals accused of assisting the 2005 London bombings. They were subsequently found not guilty. Muad'Dib was also subsequently found not guilty. The stunning silence of the BBC and mainstream media regarding these trials says it all. This is his story.
FOR MORE INFORMATION Muad'Dib's Trial: His Films:
 "7/7 Ripple Effect"
 "The Nazi Banksters' Crimes Ripple Effect"
"Elizabeth To Go"
Use The Court Defence Yourself: Download the challenge to the "Crown's Jurisdiction and Sovereignty" Britain's Biblical History: The Lia Fail is the Stone of Destiny and a good place to start...
Essential Reading: "The Way home or face The Fire"

No comments:

Post a Comment