Sunday, 21 November 2010



Exposé of Gandhi—Obama’s Role Model
Obama’s Idol, Gandhi, Was An Anti-African Racist, Endorsed Jewish Genocide
·        Gandhi praised Hitler and asked all European Jews to commit mass suicide
·        109th Congress of the United States condemned Gandhi’s anti-Jewish remarks
·        India failed to get him nominated for Nobel; Nobel Peace Prize Committee produced a telegram sent by Gandhi as proof his being a perpetrator of violence
·        Gandhi’s sex exploits, his pedophilia and moral turpitude
·        Like African Americans, Gandhi refused to give Dalits, the ‘untouchable’ and segregated Hindus, separate electorate, he kept them in slavery
Western media has romanticized Gandhi, and other cultures followed blindly. To this day, South Africans won’t allow Indians to erect a statue of Gandhi in Durban. Research by Time magazine, Nobel Peace Committee and US Congress confirms India’s founding hero, and US President Barrack Obama’s idol, supported anti-African apartheid and extermination of Jews. His wife died of a preventable disease because his religious extremism stopped him from using ‘western’ penicillin.
SULTAN M HALI | Wednesday | 10 November 2010 | The Daily Mail
ISLAMABAD, Pakistan—The Daily Mail, in its editorial of 5 Nov. 2010, titled, Battered Obama Heads On Asian Tour, had predicted that the Indians would roll out the red carpet to Obama and ask for the moon from him because after receiving a drubbing at the US midterm elections 2010, the US President would be more malleable.
A weakened Obama, concentrating more on foreign policy accomplishments to stave off defeat at the Presidential elections in 2012 and in an effort to make massive defense sales to India, secure more jobs for the unemployed US citizens and capture the Indian economy, has signed on the dotted line on every Indian proposal, including endorsement for a permanent UN Security Council seat for India.
President Obama visited the mausoleum of India’s founding father Karamchand Mohandas Gandhi and, praying rich tributes to Gandhi during his Lok Sabha speech, he mentioned that Gandhi was his role model and his philosophy of “non-violence” was appreciated and followed by Dr. Martin Luther King too, who had visited India and been inspired by Gandhian principles.
It is a matter of concern that like many others before him, Obama has also been duped into believing the “greatness” of Gandhi. The Daily Mail presents an exposé of Gandhi gleaned and compiled from the works of Dr. G. B. Singh, Dr. Watson, and Mr. Mohandas Gandhi, his two grandsons –Arun Gandhi and Rajmohan Gandhi, quotes from Sarojini Naidu, records from South Africa, Mr. Subhash Chandra Bose and Time Magazine, a seminal critique of Mr. Gandhi authored by Erik Erikson titled “Gandhi’s Truth”, and finally reports of the Nobel Peace Committee and the records of the US Congress.

The sad fact is that generation after generation of Indians has been fed on the myth that Gandhi was a saint and the founder of Bharat and a propagator of nonviolence. One only has to refer to the sources above to discover that Gandhi was actually a fraud and the international opinion too somehow fed on lies has come to accept Gandhi as great reformer. The truth is that during his stay in South Africa, Gandhi actually endorsed a British war to suppress the movement by Black Africans to gain their freedom and actually served as a Sergeant Major in the British Army, suppressing the freedom fighters. Resultantly, South Africans won’t even tolerate his statue in Durban.
There were huge riots in South Africa against him and his fake nonviolence. His salt march and decision to leave South Africa are non events. Gandhi’s racism is obvious from his friendly overtures to Hitler, showering praise on him and asking all Jews to commit mass suicide. [By contrast, Mohammad Ali Jinnah, the Founder of Pakistan, respected Jews and Christians as fellow People of the Book].
The Jewish Defense League, Anti Defamation League, Israel and the Jewish world abhors Gandhi. The 109th Congress of the United States of American condemned him for his racism. India tried to promote Gandhi for the Nobel Peace Prize but the Nobel Peace Prize Committee Committee criticized him for his war mongering, and requesting the Government of India to wage war on Pakistan at the accession of Kashmir.
The Nobel Peace Prize Committee produced the telegram sent by Gandhi as proof his being a perpetrator of violence and dumped his name from the list of nominations. Gandhi’s sex exploits, his pedophilia and moral turpitude have been commented on as well as endorsed by various authorities, including his grandsons.
Gandhi reportedly had an affair with Subhash Chandra Bose’s wife and in collaboration with Nehru, he had one of the most important leaders of Independence assassinated. Not only that 29000 members of the Indian National Army were murdered in cold blood—these were the sons who were fighting for independence and were a significant factor in the British decision to leave. Gandhi and Nehru too fell out and hated each other, a fact transcribed by Jaswant Singh in his book. Gandhi’s indulgence in incest, drinking his own urine and frequent daily enemas, has all been recorded by authentic sources including his own family.
His cruelty towards his own wife Kasturba Gandhi and her ultimate death owing to lack of medication depict the cruelty in his nature. His fits of rage and jealousy of the Quaid-e-Azam Mohammad Ali Jinnah and asking Hindus to attack his person too are recorded history. By not giving the Dalits, the ‘untouchable’ and segregated Hindus, separate electorate, he kept them in slavery. He said that one would have to go over his dead body to abolish the caste system. That is why the 450 million Dalits and Lower Caste hate him so much. Renowned Hindu minority leader Dr. B. R. Ambedaker detested Gandhi for his duplicity and for calling the Dalits with the condescending and derogatory term of “Harijans”.
Sarojini Naidu was very critical of Gandhi and stated that, “We have to spend millions to keep Mr. Gandhi in poverty”, because a whole impoverished village and Ashram had to be created to depict Gandhi’s false poverty.
Yet if US President Obama is so impressed by a fake and fraud, whom Churchill referred to as ‘Half naked Fakir’, then this says a lot about Mr. Obama’s moral compass and his historical judgment.
Edited for space and clarity. Mr. Hali is a renowned defense analyst and TV host. The Daily Mail is published from Islamabad.

Verbatim copying and distribution of this entire article is permitted in any medium
without royalty provided this notice is preserved.

Do NOT underestimate the power of your comment
Please click here to comment at or read what others have said about this story.
Subscribe to our PakNationalists Group to receive regular updates. Join this group  

PakNationalists is a meeting point of Pakistani nationalists. We come from all backgrounds. We are proud of the great history of all Pakistanis, a people extracted from the great cultures of the Turks, Persians, Arabs and Aryans. And we are proud of modern Pakistan, a nation that rose against all odds. We believe in the oneness of the Pakistani nation and that it is destined to play its role in these challenging and interesting times. This pride affects how we approach Pakistan’s national and international policy issues.

PakNationalists is associated with

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "PakNationalists" group.

To post to this group, send email to

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to

For more options, visit this group at

Ignorance on Parade

Islamophobia, Left and Right

‘Koran discovered with coffee cup stain on the front cover, US marines deployed to all Starbucks franchises.’

The quip, retweeted by celebrity atheist Richard Dawkins, exemplifies the belligerent incomprehension with which so many, including self-proclaimed liberals, have responded to protests against the film The Innocence of Muslims.

Rioting over a YouTube clip that offends the Muslim sky fairy? How tremendously foolish! How childish; how superstitious; how very, very silly!

Well, we’ve certainly seen ignorance paraded over the last few days but it’s as much by smug progressives as anyone else.

Consider a historical analogy.

In 1857, Bengali soldiers (known as ‘sepoys’) shot their British officers and marched upon Delhi. The Great Indian Rebellion became very violent, very quickly. The rebels massacred prisoners, including women and children; the British put down the revolt with a slaughter of unprecedented proportions.

Now, that rebellion began when the troops learned that their cartridges, designed to be torn open with their teeth, would be greased with beef and pork fat, an offence to the religious sensibilities of Hindus and Muslims alike. Had Twitter been an invention of the Victorian era, London sophisticates would, no doubt, have LOLed to each other (#sepoyrage!) about the credulity of dusky savages so worked up about a little beef tallow. Certainly, that was how the mouthpieces of the East India Company spun events: in impeccably Dawkinesque terms, they blamed ‘Hindoo prejudice’ for the descent of otherwise perfectly contented natives into rapine and slaughter.

But no serious historian today takes such apologetics seriously. Only the most determined ignoramus would discuss 1857 in isolation from the broader context of British occupation. In form, the struggle might have been religious; in content, it embodied a long-simmering opposition to colonial rule.

That’s why those who pretend the protests against The Innocence of Muslims came from nowhere merely reveal their own foolishness.

‘Today, many Americans are asking — indeed, I asked myself — how could this happen?’ said Hillary Clinton after the riots in Libya. ‘How could this happen in a country we helped liberate, in a city we helped save from destruction? This question reflects just how complicated and, at times, how confounding the world can be.’

The echoes of George Bush’s infamous query ‘Why do they hate us when we’re so good?’ suggests nothing whatsoever has been learnt from the last decade and the hundreds of thousands of deaths in Iraq and Afghanistan and elsewhere.

For this is, of course, the same Hillary Clinton who, as recently as 2009, proclaimed Mubarak, Egypt’s torturer-in-chief, and his wife, ‘friends of my family’, acknowledging a relationship that exemplified the pally connections between the US elite and every dictator and despot in the region. Mubarak might have been crossed off the Clinton Christmaas list but President Obama forges ever closer relations with the tyrants of Saudi Arabia, delivering the biggest ever arms deal in US history to fortify a reactionary and criminal government against its populace.

No, Hillary Clinton might not recall such matters. But the people of the Muslimworld are considerably better informed – and that’s the context for their anger.

But what about the movie itself? Why should such a shoddy piece of amateur filmmaking become such a flashpoint?

Again, shift to a more familiar referent and the outrage becomes at once markedly less strange. The Protocols of Zion were, of course, also a bodged-up job, a childish forgery thrown together by racist cranks from the Tsarist secret service. But no-one’s surprised when Jews (and their anti-racist allies) mobilise against some fresh incarnation of that notorious document, since we all, quite correctly, recognise any new publication of the Protocols as a conscious and deliberate attempt to promote hatred.

The Innocence of Muslims should be understood in the same fashion. This is a film produced at a time in which, across Europe and the United States, the far right has developed an Islamophobic doctrine that replicates, almost exactly, the key tropes of traditional anti-Semitism.

Jews will not integrate. Jews are more fertile than Christians and are outbreeding them. Europe is becoming a province, a colony, of a Judaic entity. Europe will either be Judaicised or there will be a civil war. Most likely, Jews will resort to terrorism as part of their takeover. They are already spoiling for violence.

All of that sounds like the rantings of an old-school fascist. But replace ‘Jew’ with ‘Muslim’, and you’re left with a workaday opinion piece from any mainstream conservative paper.

The structural homology here is not accidental. Mattias Gardell notes how:
The tradition of Islamophobia is, like anti-Semitism, rooted in the medieval Christian hostility to the ‘enemies of God’, with these perceptions disseminated, expanded upon, restructured, rearticulated and reactivated in various social and political contexts, from the Turk scare in early modernity, via the colonial expansion, to the War on Terror.
Many stories told about Jews in medieval and early modern Europe were also spun around what were then termed Moors, Saracens or Red Jews: Muslims were devil-worshipping, sexually deviant, man-eating monsters; Muslims ritually defamed the cross and consumed the blood of ceremonially slaughtered Christian children in blasphemous communions. Church art portrayed Mohammed as the Antichrist, and Muslims as horned devils, Christ-killers, dogs or a hybrid race of dog-men. Lars Vilks – the Swedish artist who depicted Mohammed as a dog – may claim originality, but the dog motif goes back hundreds of years and is as old as the Judensau (the medieval depiction of Jews in obscene contact with a sow).

Elsewhere, the journalist Colm Ó Broin has produced a neat demonstration of the relationship between the old hate and the new hate, with a close comparison of the writings of the notorious Islamophobe Robert Spencer on Muslims alongside the propaganda of Julius Streicher, the editor of, Der Stuermer. Streicher, you’ll recall, went to the gallows at Nuremberg – but Spencer holds forth regularly on FOX News.

The labour leader August Bebel famously dubbed anti-Semitism the ‘socialism of fools’, since some supposed radicals subscribed to crackpot theories about Jewish finance. In a similar fashion, Islamophobia today often gets served up as an addlepated secularism by vulgar atheists, indifferent to how often their conversationsabout Muslim theology slide neatly intoanguish about Muslim birthrates (an obvious giveaway of the racialised imagination and its biological concerns).

Should Muslims be worried about rising Islamophobia? Of course they should! As the recent report by the Institute of Race Relations, Pedlars of Hate, makes clear, anti-Islam bigotry is becoming a key element of the revival of the far Right – a Right that doesn’t merely slander Muslims but also takes action against them.
The Innocence of Muslims was, quite obviously, intended as a provocation, and many Muslims have argued that the minority of shrilljihadis who raised their sectarian and violent slogans at protests around the wold fell entirely into the intended trap.

Then, again, this too is familiar. Twentieth century race-baiters knew all about goadingtheir victims into a certain response, and then using that response to justify a fresh pogrom. Not unexpectedly, German far-right extremists (who have some historical experience with this strategy) are now planning fresh screenings of the film.

Those who call themselves progressive might note that a certain Karl Marx followed the Great Indian Rebellion closely. While he acknowledged and decried the excesses of the rebels, he declared these were ‘only the reflex, in a concentrated form, of England’s own conduct in India.’

In other words, Marx, one of history’s more famous atheists, stood firmly with the ‘ignorant’ sepoys against their ‘enlightened’ opponents.

‘John Bull,’ he wrote, ‘is to be steeped in cries for revenge up to his very ears, to make him forget that his Government is responsible for the mischief hatched and the colossal dimensions it has been allowed toassume.’

Add ‘Uncle Sam’ to that sentence, and you have a remarkably apt assessment of what’s taking place today.
Jeff Sparrow is the editor of Overland magazine and the author of “Money Shot: A Journey into Porn and Censorship.


I highlighted some parts in aqua because they are totally wrong assessments.  Do your own research.


© 2007-2010. All rights reserved.
Verbatim copying and distribution of this entire article is permitted in any medium
without royalty provided this notice is preserved.

From: [] On Behalf Of Bitter Truth
Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2014 19:03
To: Bitter Truth

Dr Awatar Singh Sekhon (Machaki)

The world democracies and its news media call it the progressive, developing and the largest democracy of the world, the Indian democracy which came into being on the 15th day of August, 1947. Although more than 3.5 million lives were lost, no one pays any attention to this "Genocide of Sikhs", when the Sikhs and Muslims of the British India Empire killed one another, and the worst migration of mankind took place, from West Punjab to East Punjaband vice versa. The wounds have not healed since then (the 15th August, 1947). Why did this happen? It happened because of a person who had been a failure in his profession of law, a person who had carried out the 'Genocide of Zulu tribe' is Africa, the same person who had a rank of "Sergeant-Major" in the British Red Cross, the same person who used to sleep naked with his grand nieces and young girls to test his manhood, to say the least. This was the person who said "If Pakistan came into being, it will be over my dead body." This person whom Sir Winston Churchill called a "naked fakir". Janab M A Jinnah, "the Father of Pakistan", use to say "when Gandhi has come to see me, he has come to cheat me."

This person was the father of the Indian democracy. He, a Gujrati Baniya, was assassinated by a Marathi Brahmin and he uttered the word "Hay Ram", as though this word he had remembered very well to say before his death on 30th January, 1948. This Father of India, MK Gandhi, had been disrespectful to Sahib Guru Gobind Singh ji, the 10th Master of Sikhs. He hated the Sikhs. And he was our world's peaceful person like any citizen of the world, with the exception of the Indian democracy. MK Gandhi never fulfilled his (hollow) promises to the Sikhs made in the pre-15th August, 1947 period.

Not only MK Gandhi was so violent towards the Sikhs,the 4th largest and youngest religion of the world. His followers had been JL Nehru, VB Patel, Chandu Lal Trivedi, AB Vajpayee, GV  Panth, Narender Modi, the then Chief Minister of the Province of Gujarat, presently the Prime Minister of India, responsible for the "Genocide of Muslims of Gujarat" in 2002-2003, in which more than 15,000 Muslims were killed by the Brahmins-Hindus goons and the followers of Narender Modi, Indira Gandhi, Rajiv Gandhi, Soniya Gandhi and her successor Manmohan Sinh (never elected to the Indian parliament from any constituency of Lok Sabha or the Lower House of Indian parliament).

Since 15th August, 1947, the major accomplishments of the largest democracy of the world have been:

Killing of Sikhs: more than 3.2 to 3.4 million

Killings of Sikhs in an "Undeclared" war on the Sikh Nation, "robbed" Punjab of 15th August, 1947, and the Holy and Historic Homeland of Sikhs, in "Operation Bluestar" of June 1984 & Genocide of Sikhs in November - December, 1984.

Killing of Muslims: more than 500,000

Killing of Muslims of the Muzafarnagar district of the U P: 106,000 (September to December, 2013)

Killing of Muslims of the IDA:JK (Internationally Disputed Areas of Jammu Kashmir: more than 500,000

Killing of Tamils: 15,000 +

Killing of Christians: over 312,500

Dalits: tens of thousand

Assam and its 7-sister: more than 15,000

Adivaasis, Bodos, Buddhists, non-Brahmins-Hindusminorities, etc.: over 20,000

When such killings of non-Brahmins-Hindus have taken place and going on, along with sexual violations, in millions and in an "Undeclared" war on the Sikhs and their Holy and Historical Homeland, the "robbed" Punjab of 15th August, 1947, it is still the progressive and largest democracy (?). The author calls it an alleged Indian "DEMO[N]CRACY of the world, run by the Brahmins-Hindus-Baniyas-Turbaned Brahmins, since 15th August, 1947.

Indian democracy's Prime Minister, Narendra Damodardass Modi is the killer, murderer and organizer of "Genocide of Muslims of Gujarat, 2002-2003", when more than 15,000 innocent became the victims of the vicious policies of the Brahmins-Hindus, while he was the Chief Minister of the State of Gujarat.

Narendra Damodardass MODI has been responsible for the Displacement of the Sikh farmers, who made the Gujarati'unproductive' land to the agriculturally productive land.

Indeed, for the Sikhs, the 15th day of August, 1947, is one of the Darkest days in the History of the Peace-loving people.

Above are some of the Highlights of the Brahmins-Baniyas-Hindus-Turbaned demo[n]cracy, in addition to its "clandestine" operations.

No comments:

Post a Comment