And Jews, Christians, and Muslims (all three sharing the same religion and God!) and all FREEDOM FIGHTERS refuse to unite against the common enemy - ZIONIST ILLUMINATI HEGEMONY!
JEWISH-ISRAEL ABSOLUTE TAKE-OVER OF THE US TERRORIST REGIME!
USA-FRANCE - ZIONIST ILLUMINATI VICIOUS ATTACKS ON CHRISTIANS AND MUSLIMS!
Affaire Décathlon/Hijab ou le déchaînement islamophobe par Salim Laïbi
Streamed live on 26 Feb 2019
Se procurer le livre :
https://www.editionsfiatlux.com/?prod...
https://www.amazon.fr/dp/B07DB99N52?r...
Au pays (FRANCE) du racisme anti-arabe, anti-musulman, et anti-Islam, anti liberté d’expression, anti-égalité, anti-fraternité, anti-religion et anti-moralité, esclavagiste, pillard et massacreur des peuples sans défense, il est tout à fait normal que l’Islam et les Musulmans n’aient pas bonne presse !
Les médias racistes et fascistes dominants, surtout depuis les attaques de MOSSAD-CIA du 11 septembre 2001 aux États Unis, en collusion avec l’occident tout entier, n’ont cessé de diaboliser sans arrêt les Musulmans et l’Islam, et, avec l’État sioniste qui s’est aussi joint à la Nouvelle Croisade des fabricants de guerres, en orchestrant des opérations sous faux drapeaux sur le sol français, utilisant des Musulmans comme bouc-émissaires. [BAFS]
« Pour contrecarrer un tant soit peu cette doxa médiatique, et rétablir certaines vérités sur la religion enseignée par le Prophète Muhammad et ses pratiquants, les éditions Fiat Lux ont eu la bonne idée de publier :
« Ils aiment l’Islam, anthologie des écrits des grands auteurs occidentaux ».
Un livre qui fera date car il exhume moult témoignages enfouis d’intellectuels européens, américains ou arabes, parmi les plus brillants de leur génération, qui reconnaissent l’énorme héritage légué par la civilisation islamique à un monde occidental qui continue de nier cet apport fondamental à leur culture.
Les citations ont été compilées par Salim Laïbi, par ailleurs directeur de la maison éditrice, tandis que la préface est signée du Professeur Pierre Dortiguier qui rappelle à juste titre que « l’Islam est une composante, majoritaire il est vrai, de ces peuples (Syrie, Palestine, Liban, Égypte…) dont il épouse l’unité sans l’absorber ». Parmi les laudateurs de la religion musulmane, on trouve des sommités telles
Napoléon, Fernand Braudel, Diderot, Goethe, Hugo, Lamartine, Gustave Le Bon, Nietszche, Tolstoï…
Sur les 186 pages qui constituent l’opus, on s’arrêtera sur ce résumé de Voltaire dans son Essai sur l’Histoire universelle :
« Dans nos siècles de barbarie et d’ignorance, qui suivirent la décadence et le déchirement de l’empire romain, nous reçûmes presque tout des Arabes : astronomie, chimie ou médecine, et surtout remèdes plus doux et plus salutaires que ceux qui avaient été connus des Grecs et des Romains… ».
Ils ont aimé l’Islam. On a aimé ce vibrant hommage ! »
______________________________________
Nasser Mabrouk – El Djazaïr Mag
https://archive.org/details/TexeMarrs-HolocaustDogmaUnmasked_979/TexeMarrs-HolocaustDogmaUnmasked-Part1.flv.mp3
TUESDAY / FEBRUARY 26, 2019
Texe Marrs - Holocaust Dogma Unmasked
TUESDAY / FEBRUARY 26, 2019
Slimes Caption: Fred Edwords, one of the plaintiffs in the case, said the memorial in Bladensburg, Md., “sends a message of Christian favoritism and exclusion of all others.”
NY Times: 40-Foot Cross Divides a Community and Prompts a Supreme Court Battle
REBUTTAL BY
Nearly 100 years ago, 1925 to be precise, the citizens of
Bladensburg, Md. erected a 40-foot tall
stone cross to honor the memory of 49 local young men whose lives were tragically pissed away in Woodrow Wilson's
infamous war for Globalism and Zionism. Now, a
group of local atheists want the structure relocated off of public
property,
or destroyed and replaced with something less
offensive to their delicate sensibilities -- such as a "slab or "obelisk"
as they propose in their Supreme Court brief. The local leader of this
anti-Christian
crusade, while acknowledging that all of dead
soldiers were probably Christians, gives us his twisted reasoning for
wanting
the monument replaced:
From the article:
"Mr. Edwords,
who is challenging the cross, said that 'it’s probably true that they were all Christians.'
But he added that the looming cross, especially when
illuminated at night, sends a message about religious favoritism rather than remembrance.
'When
you’re driving at night, you don’t
see devotion and valor and all that stuff; you
just see a giant cross floating in the darkness,” he said. “And
that leaves the impression that the city of
Bladensburg is a Christian enclave. Now I grant that people who grow
up in a
Christian environment often don’t think things
like that,” he said.
“Their Christian privilege
makes it to where they can’t easily see how it
looks. But for people like me — and Jews and Hindus and Muslims
and Buddhists — this tells them they’re
outsiders.'"
What crap! Hindus, Muslims (who revere Jesus as a holy prophet) and Buddhists
couldn't care a rat's ass about crosses on public property. Only militant atheists, Satanists, Jews and vampires
(but I repeat myself), get all worked up over the sight of a crucifix.
1
&
2. Maryland's historic post-war "Peace Cross" --
erected in 1925 -- has suddenly been deemed "offensive"
by "the usual suspects" and their "humanist"
frontmen. //
3. Expect "Weekend at Ruthie's" Ginsberg
(cough cough) and the other three Supreme Court
Jews (Sonia Sotomayor is a crypto "Marrano") to side with the God-hating
plaintiffs.
Let's hope all five of the
"conservative" judges will rule with some sanity in the upcoming case.
The manipulative kosherized bullshit about "separation of church and state" ™ -- which subversive groups such as the
ACLU (American Civil Liberties Union)
have used to cleanse the land of all vestiges
of Christianity and its positive moral effects --
is based on a single out-of-context quote by the brilliant author of the
Declaration of Independence and 3rd President of
the United States at the time, Thomas Jefferson.
As usual, the Marxist-Libtard Axis of Criminal
Insanity gets it all ass-backwards. Jefferson, a
Deist, was not out to protect the government from Christianity. To the exact
contrary, he strove to protect religious practice from government control / interference.
Let's have a look at the full Jefferson letter (an 1802
response written to a group of Christians) in which he reassures them of his protection of their liberties.
"Gentlemen
The
affectionate sentiments of esteem and approbation
which you are so good as to express towards me, on behalf of the
Danbury
Baptist association, give me the highest
satisfaction. My duties dictate a faithful and zealous pursuit of the
interests
of my constituents, & in proportion as they
are persuaded of my fidelity to those duties, the discharge of them
becomes
more and more pleasing.
Believing
with you that religion is a matter which lies solely
between Man & his God, that he owes account to
none other for his faith or his worship, that the legitimate powers of
government reach actions only, and not opinions, I
contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American
people which declared that their legislature
should "make no law respecting an establishment of religion,
or prohibiting the free exercise thereof," thus building a wall of separation between Church &
State. Adhering to this expression of the
supreme will of the nation in behalf of the rights of conscience, I
shall see with sincere satisfaction the progress
of those sentiments which tend to restore to man all his natural
rights,
convinced he has no natural right in opposition to
his social duties.
I
reciprocate your kind prayers for the protection & blessing of the common father and creator of man,
and tender
you for yourselves & your religious
association, assurances of my high respect & esteem. (emphasis
added)
Thomas Jefferson
Jan. 1. 1802"
Jan. 1. 1802"
In
other words, the government will not
establish / impose a state religion -- like the
Church of England or the Russian Orthodox Church, for example -- on
other
sects. That's all that phrase means -- nothing
more!
Not
only is
the term "separation of church and state" nowhere
to be found in either the Declaration of Independence or the U.S.
Constitution; but the very letter in which the term
appears shows that Jefferson's words have been taken out-of-context by
ACLU Communists in order to promote the religion of
Atheism.
Of course,
it is interesting to note how the religious symbols of a certain group (cough cough)
can still find their way
onto public property without so much as a peep of
complaint from the Communist / Atheist / ACLU Jew lawyer crowd. The National Menorah is a 40-foot tall & 30 foot wide monstrosity erected
on the South Lawn of the White House in Washington, D.C. It was first lit in 1979 by President Jimmy Carter,
and has been erected and lit every year since -- growing taller in the process! The
annual event includes a music presentation of
Hanukkah songs by the U.S. taxpayer-funded United States Army Band.
Every year,
a Jewish government official or member of the
president's cabinet participates in the lighting of Mega Menorah -- a
symbol
of defiance against western (Greek) assimilation. U.S. governors now issue proclamations in honor of the National
Menorah; and now we also have annual Hanukkah and Passover Seder events inside the White House!
The
Jews -- ever the grand masters of rhetorical gymnastics
-- argue that these stunts are no different than
the annual outdoor lighting of the White House Christmas tree, or the
annual
Easter Egg hunt. Now if we accept, for the sake of
argument, the "separation of church and state" ™
nonsense, the flaw in such illogic is that decorated trees and painted
eggs do not
carry any Christian / religious meaning or value;
whereas the lighting of the menorah and the Passover Seder speech are,
even
for atheistic Jews, important religious practices.
The
"miraculous" menorah is their "crucifix" -- and the Passover blessing
and "miracle" speech is their "Our Father." So, a
more accurate comparison would be to the erection of
a 40-foot cross on the White House grounds and a
presidential recitation of the Lord's Prayer at the annual easter Egg
Hunt. Man oh man and "oy vey!" Can "youse guys" even begin to imagine the
deafening magnitude of the "public" shit-storm such acts would kick up?
No sir. What's good for the goose is most certainly not permitted
for the Goyim gander. Why not? Because (((they))) OWN this frickin' country. That's why!
Separation
of synagogue and State? Not a chance!
Boobus
Americanus
1: I read in today's New
York Times about an upcoming Supreme Court case to decide if a giant
post
World War I cross erected in 1925 violates the
separation of church and state clause of the Constitution.
Boobus
Americanus
2: Well, that seems a bit petty. However, if
it's on public property, it is technically illegal.