Tuesday, 2 March 2010



Tuesday, 2 March 2010
Extremist Views of the British Media

The recent series of programme televised mainly by the BBC and Channel 4, covering the Muslims in Britain, points to a single agenda of marketing the notion of ‘extremist’ views of some Muslims. What is an extremist view? There is no open discussion on that point; any Muslim is labelled as an extremist for showing sympathy towards the oppressed masses who are fighting for ‘freedom’ in the occupied lands of Palestine, Afghanistan and Iraq.

Such views are not specific to Muslims, many non-Muslims and in particular the leftwing organisations, express similar views and sentiment on Iraq, Palestine and Afghanistan. However, they are never labelled as extremists. It means - if the white face of George Galloway is replaced with an ethnic face, then you have an extremist who has been radicalised! It is funny how George Galloway is never classed as a militant, someone who is radicalised, or an extremist, even though he expresses such opinions so candidly.

To label someone as an extremist for defending their homeland, is no different to labelling Winston Churchill as a militant, and Britain as an extremist nation for reacting against the bombing raids of the expansionist Nazi Germany. Now the situation is reverse. Britain is riding on the expansionist US and Israel. Israel extends its settlements by uprooting the Palestenians; the US extends its military bases around the world to ensure its ‘freedom’ to exploit others is maintained.

The notion of extremist views is further characterised by the media claim that such opinions are held by a minority of Muslims, and stems from extreme interpretation of the religious texts, rather than a response to the events of war, mass killing, occupation and a theft of land and resources.

Consider the typical organisation of Islam4UK with its extremist views. Majority of the Muslims and non-Muslims in this world would concur with the political views of Islam4UK, even if they did not express their allegiance to such an organisation. The proof is simple. Just examine the issue of Palestine, Afghanistan and the fabricated Iraq war; majority of the nations and people of this world consider these wars as heinous crimes committed on innocent people. If the extremist views are meant to be a minority view, then what about minority view over the Iraq war? Even the legal experts endorsing the war inside the British government, was clearly a very small minority view.

According to that criterion of minority, Britain and the US are extremists for going against world opinion by launching a war without UN authorisation. They did not have the testicles to live up to their own ideals of majority rule (democracy), by subjecting their case to the UN General Assembly vote. What about the lone veto constantly used by the US to support Israeli war crimes, a terrorist nation with extremist views that is engaged in ethnic cleansing of the Palestinians. Is that not an extremist action by the US, as it stems from a minority position?

If the extremist views were a consequence of interpretation, then it implies the views have no connection with the war, mass killings, theft of resources, and the occupation of the Muslim countries. That is absurd. How do you explain the non-Muslims who share the same ‘extremist’ views on those issues? Have they been brainwashed by the Muslim extremists?

Then comes the usual repetition of the events of 7/7 and 9/11, as if they were without any cause, marks the beginning of the history of conflict. What does 9/11 have to do with the UK? If the connection is one of, Americans are the English speaking secular and Christian brothers, then that is also applicable to Muslims in the UK who identify with the oppressed Muslims in occupied lands. As for 7/7, this is a minor event compared to the mass casualties inflicted on the innocent people of Iraq and Palestine.

The British media should know that if you throw a brick through someone’s window, retaliation would naturally follow. It may be considered an extreme view, but it is a logical view, rooted in Judeo-Christian tradition, upheld by all nations. One cannot alter this reality, no matter how many spineless moderates are lined up by the media-gun to force a constant apology. No matter how much you howl terrorism, people can see the real mass terrorism inflicted on people who have done no harm to this country. Madrid and 7/7 had a cause; they were a reaction to the direct and indirect atrocities committed by the British and the Spanish government in Iraq. Until those countries decided to join the Zionist-neo-con driven war, the Muslims have been living peacefully in both countries for decades.

Rather, the British media is engaged in the broadcast of extremist views that causes offence to the millions of Muslims and non-Muslims worldwide. Its militant journalists spread lies and hate, constantly incite violence through justifying war and carnage as self-defence; these heartless journalists write with the ink drawn from the blood of the innocent people in Iraq, Palestine and Afghanistan. They justify the fascist outlook of Blair and his ilk, who thinks killing hundreds of thousand of innocent people, is somehow a noble cause for humanity. However, even Nazis like Adolf Hitler had grounds to fight, after the disproportionate suffering inflicted on Germany through the Treaty of Versailles. What is Blair’s excuse? Is it Iraq’s WMD?

Blair and his henchmen are the real extremists, with extremist views that should be sitting with Radovan Karadzic who is a small criminal in comparison, and they should all be answering for their war crimes.

Yamin Zakaria (yamin@radicalviews.org)
London, UK

Published on 02/03/2010

Posted by Yamin Zakaria at 03:11

Friday, 19 February 2010
Homosexuality and Zionism

If there is a man who lies with a male as those who lie with a woman, both of them have committed a detestable act; they shall surely be put to death. Their blood guiltiness is upon them.

- The Bible (Leviticus 20:13)

For those who will rant and rave, waving the usual politically correct card of homophobia, to stifle any discussion on this issue, need not bother reading past this sentence. They are part of the neo-liberal cabal, who are not interested in genuine free speech, and gag the opposing view by categorising it as incitement to hate. The tactics employed are identical to the Zionist dominated media that prevents any criticism of Israel, by labelling it as anti-Semitic.

Zionist-Israel is an exception. It is the only ‘democracy’ (for Jews only) in the Middle East, and the only country that has managed to portray itself as a victim of terrorism, after slaughtering 1500 civilians in Gaza in response to a few home made devices landing in their back garden. The only country that does not have to abide by UN resolutions unlike its neighbours, it has nuclear weapons and other weapons of mass destruction, and many other privileges. Like Zionist-Israel, homosexuality is also the exception from the norm! So, are there any other common traits between Zionism and the phenomenon of homosexuality?

Regardless of one’s conviction, nobody can dispute that homosexuality is self-destructive for the human race; it works against the natural process of procreation, because the semen can only function inside the vagina of a woman, and not in the rear end of another man! For sure, no society would survive, if homosexuality or celibacy became the norm. The biggest irony is homosexuals come into existence through heterosexual activity. Therefore, the constant noise about the rights of homosexuals is meaningless, without protecting the rights of heterosexuals, to whom they owe their existence. Ask the most liberal heterosexual, he or she would never want a child that has homosexual traits, as everyone has the yearning to see their grandchildren.

Similarly, Zionism is also destructive for the human race. The fundamental doctrine of Zionism is based on the servitude and if necessary, the annihilation of the non-Jews (Goyem or Gentiles). The ends justify the means, when it comes to ‘saving’ the chosen race of God. Even though Israel with its secular pretence may claim to distance itself from the nasty Talmudic Laws, but their policies at many levels are shaped by the basic Talmudic ethos of ethnic cleansing, and terrorising the non-Jews in the region. Nobody notices the edicts of the fanatical Rabbi calling for the murder of non-Jewish infants.

Let us put the debate of – is homosexuality nature or nurture – aside for the moment. There is a need to protect all minorities; however, there is clear distinction between legal protection, and aggressively encourage something. It is difficult to fathom, why homosexuality is increasingly pushed in our heterosexual faces, to the detriment of the majority and more importantly, the danger it poses to the survival of human race. Similarly, why the constant noise about the suffering of Jews in 1945, as if they have a monopoly over this issue? It was the Japanese, the Germans and the Russians who suffered most during the Second World War. If the Israeli-Zionists were really victims of a holocaust, how can they murder innocent Palestinian civilians en masse? How can victims exhibit such heartless and cruel behaviour towards innocent civilians, who had no connection with Nazi Germany?

Like it or not, the semen belongs inside the woman’s vagina, for that is the reason why the homosexuals exist. The irony is, if they want more homosexuals they need to participate in the process of procreation. Therefore, why should the rest of humanity spend time, effort and money to give them recognition and worse propagate it, when the homosexuals have ‘deliberately’ ceased to contribute in the vital role of ensuring the continuity of the human race? At best, they may claim to have some kind of handicap for which they should be given some aid, and most certainly, they are not on par with the heterosexual community, or have the chutzpah to complain about heterosexuals who are the cause of their existence.

Then they bring forward the claim of the mysterious homosexual gene. How did the liberals with their evolutionist mantra miss this? Surely, homosexuality works against the principle of natural selection as it encourages the termination of human race. If there is such a thing as the homosexual gene, then it is a ‘liability’ for the human species, it should have been eliminated by the process of natural selection long time ago.

Another way to assess any phenomena is to examine the results, so the old Biblical statement reads, “by their fruits ye shall know them”. Can anyone point out a society that has flourished through homosexual activities? Does a homosexual couple provide a stable family unit? How can it? There is no outcome, like children, a real family and a future. In most cases homosexual relationships breaks, as they primarily attach themselves for sexual reasons; there is nothing else to keep them together permanently.

In fear of the label of homophobic, like the fear anti-Semitism, many remain silent, even though they despise the acts, find it repulsive. Let us be candid, for the normal heterosexuals, acts of homosexuality causes disgust; as does the killing of innocent and defenceless people by the descendent of the victims of Holocaust. From Adam to the last Prophet of God, Mohammed (saw), they were all healthy heterosexual men; all the texts of the Abrahamic faiths condemn acts of homosexuality unequivocally, and human reason tells us, homosexuality and Zionism is suicidal for the human race!

Yamin Zakaria (yamin@radicalviews.org)
London, UK

Published in 19th Feb 2010

Posted by Yamin Zakaria at 03:43 13 comments Links to this post
Monday, 8 February 2010
Why Does Adultery Matter in a Secular Society?
"Secularism prohibits the imposition of any religion, except the religion of secularism"

According to the UK laws, adultery is illegal, but not a criminal offence; almost all the western secular societies uphold this view. Adultery only has relevance within the institution of marriage, which is rooted in religious texts. A fundamental tenet of a secular society is that religion is reduced to a personal choice; it is the prerogative of the individual to uphold or to abandon it. Therefore, they can formally marry in a Church, or cohabit, or participate in an open relationship where adultery has no meaning.

If secular societies placed any values on the institution of marriage, it would have classed adultery as a criminal offence, like the Sharia laws. Yet, the response to the revelation of the adulterous affair of the former England Captain, John Terry, gives the impression that a crime has been committed. Furthermore, there appears to be some kind of moral indignation towards John Terry from the masses, indicated by their silence after he is removed from his position as Captain and the numerous posts on the various websites. Any impartial person would be compelled to point the blatant hypocrisy by citing the old Biblical statement, “let those without sin cast the first stone”. This sort of response reveals the twisted and contradictory nature of secularism. Consider the following points, which illustrate this innate contradiction.

• There is a relentless push towards individual freedom, which subjects them to a sexually permissive culture from the cradle to the grave. Then the liberal laws that manifest in the ethos of sexual freedom permit all kinds of sexual activity, from participating in group-sex, homosexuality to the various forms of deviant sexual practices. The Jerry Springer show may serve as a useful guide here. Throughout life, they have been trained to seek sexual fulfilment without moral restraint, but once they get married, suddenly the moral barometer is raised, and they are expected to uphold the biblical commandment of “thou shall not commit adultery”. It is safe to assume that most football players are not committed Christians, and marriage will not transform them into virtuous monogamous men, after receiving years of ‘education’ and ‘training’ on how they should mate with the opposite sex. They cannot suddenly discard their established traits and close down the hormone channels.

• How would the media have reacted, if John Terry were involved with a man rather than a woman? There would have been a lot more sympathy and understanding in fear of being labelled as a homophobic, there is a drive to make homosexuality a norm. Thus, according to the secular guide, homosexuality is considered morally acceptable, but not an adulterous heterosexual relationship. Many would argue, a sexual act between a male and female is the norm, and a necessity, to which all homosexuals owe their existence is an undisputed fact! Whereas many (if not most) people, find a sexual relationship between two males abhorrent even if they do not speak out in fear of the liberal bullies.

In 2007, three of the Manchester United players allegedly ‘roasted’ a 19-year-old girl; the entire team with the exception of Cristiano Ronaldo was at the sleazy Christmas party, there was also a serious allegation of rape. The incident was not taken seriously by the authorities, nobody was punished in anyway, the tabloids covered the incident as a bit of gossip, and the graphic description was designed to titillate the readers rather than express moral indignation; most definitely, sex sells. There are many other similar incidents, and many more that nobody notices, especially if the players are from the lower divisions.

A young footballer, with money and fame, physically in peak condition with a six-pack abdominal, makes him a valuable catch for many women. Even the talentless duo of Jedwards led to young females bearing themselves in front of their house. For many of these women, catching these players or pop stars is an instant ticket to fame and fortune, not to mention a good time as well. This sort of behaviour did not led to a media outcry, the secular message is, the Muslims should bring up their daughters with such ‘honourable’ virtues rather imprison them in their veil (Hijab)!

The competition is fierce amongst females. It reminds you of a human cattle market, the players are exerting the demand with their money and fame; the women are supplying their flesh. Nobody is forcing these individuals to behave this way; they are exhibiting what free society is about. They are having fun. Is this what Bush and Blair is exporting to the Islamic world with their bombs and bullets, hoping that Muslim women would be emancipated with such traits?

So, why should adultery matter in a society where marriage is declining? The answer is obvious - it is an act of betrayal. For those who are cohabiting through a civil partnership it depends on the initial agreement formed by the couple. Regardless, secular society teaches and encourages one to explore and expand the sexual boundaries without moral restraints, which contradicts the values of commitment to ones spouse or partner. This is like teaching a man to be greedy and ruthless, and then expect him to show generosity after he has made losses.

Yamin Zakaria (yamin@radicalview.org)
London, UK

Published on 08/02/2010

Posted by Yamin Zakaria at 17:12 0 comments Links to this post
Wednesday, 3 February 2010
The Litmus Test for the Legality of Iraq War
“No one had attacked anyone. There wasn’t any new W.M.D. We could have taken the time and got it right”
- Claire Short

Here is the litmus test. Imagine this scenario. Tony Blair’s son is in a critical condition, and fighting for his life. He is in a luxurious private hospital, funded by his wealthy war-profiteering father, the pictures are broadcasted, and many of the Iraqi parents who lost their children or struggling to keep them alive, can see their ‘benevolent’ liberator in action. Anyway, ten leading physicians from various countries advise Blair of a certain medical operation to save his son’s life. Shortly after, Dr. Goldsmith dissents, he is a prominent doctor from an American-Israeli Hospital, and after some deliberation suggests an alternative course of action.

Which way Tony Blair is likely to go? The answer is obvious; any human being would opt for the former and go with the overwhelming majority opinion - because he would act ‘sincerely’ for the interest of his son. Any genuine father would take the decision based on his conviction of the facts, whereas a crooked father would pick an opinion to support his ulterior agenda. Like a father who may look to profit from the death of his wealthy son.

Using that litmus test on the legality of war - was Tony Blair really convinced of the wavering opinion delivered by Goldsmith at the last minute, which was at odds with the vast majority of the legal experts. It is beyond doubt that he was not looking to be persuaded, because he was already committed to the American plan. All he needed was a fig leaf to cover his private parts, so that he can do the usual war dance around the ‘Bush’, praying for a slice of the profit from the gods; Goldsmith provided that fig-leaf, which is transparent to most people, causing revulsion.

Claire Short claims she was conned. No, she conned herself in the first place. The world could see that Iraq was a broken country that did not even have a conventional force, let alone WMDs. Yet, Claire Short, sitting in the heart of the Cabinet, could not see through all the signs that she is now citing in the Chilcot Inquiry that clearly points to one thing: Blair has already made his mind up about the invasion.

Furthermore, she tried to sugarcoat her decision to remain in the Cabinet by suggesting that the neo-con Blair would get a state for the oil-less Palestinians and the UN would takeover the Iraq operation. Even in the early days, one can see Blair is more suited to be a member of the Israeli Knesset rather than a Middle East Envoy. To be candid, Claire Short succumbed to her weakness, and it is not really worth dwelling on that. To err is human; to forgive is divine and one can apply that to Claire Short.

Blair as an individual has profited from the Iraq war, and he is making good money through the recession. For sure, you will not find any unusual items on his expense claim form. Maybe, he will donate some of that money to the Iraqi children born with deformities or to the many made orphans as their parents became collateral damage. Then the media would market those images, and it might finally ‘convince’ all the sceptics that the Iraq war waged by the profit making Capitalist nations was in fact driven by altruistic reasons.

Apart from the financial costs, the lives lost on all sides, facing an economic recession, what has the invasion achieved for the UK? Had it made the country safer, meaning was it in some danger before? 7/7 dose not count as it is a consequence of the war and not a cause. If you are in doubt, just check the date of the events.

Alternatively, has Tony Blair placed UK on the radar of the Jihadist and the future Jihadist from Iraq? The children will grow up knowing the cruelty shown by the Americans and that can be understood to an extent as a reaction to 9/11. An angry America had to spill some blood in the old tradition of the Wild West, it needed to quench its thirst for vengeance. Not that American is an innocent victim, far from it; she is an arrogant one, the judge, jury and the selective executioner of UN resolutions!

But, how would the future generation of Iraqis see the British role? The UK was not attacked by 9/11 or by Iraq; if anything the British have invaded and killed thousands of Iraqis during the period of the First World War. In fact, Winston Churchill used chemical weapons on the Kurds, long before Saddam Hussein. Yet, once again, they participated in this crime of aggression with a great deal of zeal. The Blair episode reminds you of that money making kid in the class, who would team up with the biggest bully and quietly incite the bully to extort money from other children. Later in life, the money making kid would become a banker in the City or a lawyer, who always show sympathy for the Israelis! Yes, he does have a heart and some ethics!

We are no longer living in the old days of the British Empire, where massacres could be suppressed, and if it leaked, one could use ‘diplomacy’ and bribery to quieten it; then with the passage of time it would vanish from people’s memory. Today, the age of information ensures that such things will remain fresh in the minds of the future generation. We cannot alter the past, but by addressing the present, and in particular, by addressing the crime of Blair, it may help to secure the interest of our nation. The future generation of Iraqis may see that the British population have a heart, not just the millions who marched against the war, but the vast majority disagree with this arrogant and heartless war criminal, and they have tried to do some justice.

Yamin Zakaria (yamin@radicalviews.org)
UK, London

Published in 03/02/2010

Posted by Yamin Zakaria at 02:51 1 comments Links to this post
Sunday, 31 January 2010
Does Blair’s Testimony Clarify the Motive behind the Iraq War?

"No matter how skilfully he ducked and dived today, Tony Blair's legacy will forever be that of the illegal, immoral Iraq war.
- Angus Robertson of the SNP

The ineffectual Chilcot Inquiry was never designed to account Tony Blair; rather it appears to have served as a lesson for future Prime Ministers not to make ‘administrative’ errors like submitting dodgy dossiers. Moreover, it gave Tony Blair an opportunity to present his side of the story in a casual manner.

If innocent people were killed because of an illegal war, then a crime has taken place. Therefore, Blair should have faced a panel of experts from neutral countries, selected by the UN. The process would have focused on the legality of the war, and the consequence for the innocent Iraqis; depending on the outcome, it might have formed the basis for a criminal prosecution.

Regardless of the purpose of the Chilcot Inquiry, there was expectation from all sides that it would clarify the motive behind the decision to join the US-led war, and Blair’s testimony should have played a key role. That is on the assumption that the information revealed by Blair and others is accurate and comprehensive. Nevertheless, his testimony has raised further questions on the following three issues:

a) The 9/11 Link

Blair claimed, 9/11 was the turning point; that is when Saddam Hussein became a threat. Is he suggesting Iraq was behind 9/11? Saddam Hussein was a staunch Arab Ba’athist and an Arab Nationalist, whereas 9/11 was allegedly the work of Al-Qaeda planned from the mountains in Afghanistan; the two groups are ideologically poles apart and there were no historical connection between them. Even his close assistant, Jack Straw, did not perceive 9/11 had increased the ‘threat’ posed by Iraq; only the Americans decided to view it in that light and Blair followed this like a disciple.

So, what is the connection between 9/11 and Iraq? The only connection I see is one of vengeance for the US. Blair decided to join in like a vulture behind as the injured and angry US lion. Iraq is predominantly a Muslim country; the Muslims had to pay regardless of their guilt or innocence. They would be civilised through the bombs and bullets of ‘freedom’ and ‘democracy’! Such crude ideas are difficult for Blair to spell out, and the people are expected to read between the lines.

b) Saddam’s Threat

Saddam was weaker economically and militarily in 2000 than in 1991, and he was even weaker in 2003, yet paradoxically, the threat level from Saddam Hussein went up after 9/11 according to Blair! Arrogant Blair was Bliar’ing here.

To date, it is still unclear how Saddam Hussein posed a threat when the Chemical and Biological Weapons were all destroyed, along with the capability to renew such activities, after the First Gulf War of 1991. Even the conventional force was stripped of its capability through a decade of rigorous sanctions; the UN inspection team lead by Scott Ritter systematically ensured the Iraqi force was paralysed. For that reason, the “smoking gun” would never be found. This is self-evident from the invasion in 2003.

One can also argue the world was safer place in 2000 than in 1991, as Saddam did not launch any further strikes against his neighbours, let alone challenge the might of the US hegemony in the region. Therefore, the containment policy was working.

c) Saddam’s Potential Threat

One can rationally understand the notion of an actual threat or an imminent one, but how does one conjure up a potential threat from a country that is progressively getting weaker. Even more absurd, how can anyone justify and invoke a war based on potential threat? It is perplexing, how Blair as a lawyer can construe the argument that one can be punished for his intention. This confirms his arrogance and dishonest nature.

Iraq was not Germany pre-1939 rebuilding its military capability; it was confined to its borders and getting progressively weaker through the rigorous sanctions. Even if Saddam managed to acquire some primitive WMDs, he would be in no position to threaten anyone, let alone the mighty US forces in possession of ‘real’ WMDs.

Blair then elaborated the world is a safer place after the removal of Saddam, but this cannot be the basis to attack another country. In any case, this sort of claim is just sheer non-sense, no nation would want their country destroyed and occupied by a foreign force to remove a dictator. The smug Blair is implying the war was good for the Iraqis who were the biggest victim. Since the invasion, the civilian casualties have continued to mount in Iraq and they face numerous problems; all were absent prior to the invasion. As Blair spoke of a better Iraq, new generation of Iraqi children are born with deformities due to the use of Depleted Uranium. In Fallujah for example, the doctors are dealing with up to 15 times as many chronic deformities in infants and a spike in early life cancers.

Regardless of the facts, Blair proceeds to blame others for the situation, as if the invasion was a reaction to that and not the cause of the violence and sufferings.

So has the region become any safer subsequent to a regime change? Has the oil-less Palestinians been given a fraction of the attention that was given to the oil-rich Kuwaitis? On the contrary, peace in the region continues to mean pieces (not just land, organs of dead Palestinians too) for Israel, who has launched two savage wars on the civilian population of Gaza and Lebanon, and constantly threatening to bomb Iran. In defiance of the UN, Israel continues to build more settlements in occupied territories. However, since it is Israel killing Palestinians and looting their lands and body parts, it does not count for much in the books of neo-con Blair who was also sabre-rattling against Iran. Of course, he will always do that behind the US might. Remember, a vulture always feeds on the leftover, after the lion has finished the kill.

On that Middle East issue, the so-called Middle East envoy blamed the Palestinians entirely, unlike the moderate and pretentious two-faced Jack Straw. According to Blair’s line of argument, the Israeli forces acted in self-defence by slaughtering the 1500 defenceless civilians in Gaza, like the Anglo-US forces from distant land came to Iraq and fought a war in ‘self-defence’! The Middle Easy envoy deserves a shoe full of excrements!

However, the testimony of Blair did clarify the following.

• It confirmed the Iraq war was instigated by the Americans for a regime change, and Blair subscribed to this in 2002. This is corroborated by the testimony of Sir Christopher Meyer, Britain’s ambassador to the US. According to Jack Straw, regime change was illegal, a clear violation of the UN Charter, and carried little support amongst the closest allies of Blair in the Cabinet.

• Therefore, Blair made the case for war based on the mythical WMDs of Saddam Hussein. Accordingly, Blair alludes to disarming Iraq’s mythical WMDs as synonymous with regime change. Its magic, they mean the same thing. So in the ‘logic’ (or arrogance) of Blair, 1441 not only authorised war, but also authorised a regime change!

That still does not answer why Blair joined the US-led crusade. At the time, Blair camp said, British interest would best be served by siding with the Americans, not just by giving political support but military too, even though the US did not need military support from UK, which Blair confirmed in the testimony. It was not an individual decision; the ruling elite within the UK permitted this important action. Did they hope for a small slice of a large US cake by offering their services to the American Empire? Is that why the Americans often portray the butler in Hollywood movies as a Brit?

The decision to join the US war was not based on any perceived threat to the UK, which has only come into effect because of that action. It was most likely based on some strategic and/or economic interests. But, there were no real short-term benefits gained, the bulk of the lucrative contracts went to the US companies; the vulture was not even allowed to feed on the Iraqi carcass it seems. Maybe, the US government will reciprocate in the future in some other way. This would be tested when Britain faces another crisis like the Falkland. My guess is, Blair and his cabal made a substantive error in joining the US-led war, without securing Britain’s share of the war booty, unless this is kept hidden like the Sykes-Picot treaty.

Yamin Zakaria (yamin@radicalviews.org)
UK, London

Published 31st January 2010

Posted by Yamin Zakaria at 17:08 0 comments Links to this post
Thursday, 28 January 2010
An Illegal War is State-Terrorism
“we were convinced that all the fissile material that could be used for any weapons purposes had been taken out of Iraq, and we knew that we had eliminated and destroyed the whole infrastructure that Iraq had built up for the enrichment of uranium.”
- Hans Blix, in a BBC Interview, Jan 2003

As the toothless Chilcot Inquiry collates the evidences from the various individuals, not many are asking some basic questions regarding the Iraq War. As a layperson, the following questions come to my mind:

• What aggression did Iraq commit against the US and the UK that could have justified the war? How did the people of Iraq ever cause any harm to the people in the UK or the US?

• Where are the weapons of mass destruction (WMD), which was the primary pretext for waging aggression on Iraq?

• Why was the UN Inspectors not given further time to finish their job, given that they had unimpeded access to inspect any place in Iraq and that they failed to find any evidence contrary to Iraq’s earlier declaration to the UN?

• In the absence of such weapons, why is the UN not taking the criminals to task at the international war crimes tribunal and order the belligerent nations to pay war reparations to Iraq?

I see the above questions are at the heart of the issue regarding Iraq war. The only answer I can conclude is – the new world order is governed by the brute force of the Wild West; far from some noble principle that is applicable equally to all nations. I do not want to “move on” like Blair, I want to see justice. I want to see criminals like Tony Blair, Jack Straw and Jeremy Greenstock face the gallows for the slaughter of innocent Iraqis, yet these armed robbers are parading themselves as ambassadors of peace. It is disgusting!

The evidence given by the former Attorney General, Lord Goldsmith, at the Chilcot Inquiry revealed that he had conveniently changed his mind after meeting the American Lawyers, and added pressure from Jack Straw and possibly few others, just weeks before the actual invasion is launched. Note, whilst he is mulling over this, the British troops are already there, poised to attack a nation that has been systematically disarmed for a decade. Therefore, the British government still would have gone into war with the Americans, even if Goldsmith managed to standby by his conviction. Nevertheless, if he did remain firm, it would have helped, even if it could not halt the war.

It should have taken a “smoking gun” to change someone’s mind on a serious issue of this nature, which Hans Blix and his team of inspectors with unrestricted access could not find in Iraq. Given the circumstances under which the sudden change of mind occurred, it shows that Lord Goldsmith is a feeble man; all he needed was a little ‘push’ to rubberstamp the war that was already on the verge of being launched. Unlike some of the other principled individuals, he could not standby his conviction, and if needed resign from the post. Perhaps, the folks from Spooks whispered in his ear about the fate of Dr. Kelly! So, his ears only consulted those who were bent on going to war. Indeed, it was a one-sided conversation.

Why did he not consult other lawyers with an opposing view concurrently? Why did he not consider that other major powers in the UN Security council were of the view that UN resolution of 1441 did not authorise war? Why did Britain go back to the UN Security Council to seek a second resolution if the first was adequate? Being a democracy, it is imperative to discuss such matters with the Cabinet, but Jack Straw denied Lord Goldsmith that opportunity, obviously, Jack did not want to be late for the war party.

People say lawyers are shark, but Goldsmith proved to be a spineless cod! His ‘fatwa’ is like the ‘fatwa’ given to the Saudis during the First Gulf War at the last minute by some cleric, to permit the US Forces to setup base inside Saudi Arabia. By the time the Fatwa was given, the US armed forces had already arrived at the shores of Saudi Arabia, as if the fatwa was necessary. Again, the basic question, what did the Iraqis do to the Saudis?

There is no doubt the majority opinion amongst the prominent legal experts is that the UN resolution of 1441 did not authorise war, and more pertinently, this was view held by the majority of the nations inside the UN Security Council, including France and Russia with Veto powers. Therefore, the war had no mandate from the UN Security Council; it was a unilateral and barbaric act of aggression by the Anglo-US regime. Without a legal backing – the invasion was state terrorism dispensed to the innocent civilians of Iraq.

Some argue the war was necessary, as Saddam posed a threat to the region, but the region was not calling for war, with the exception of Israel. Maybe that was enough, serving Israel is enough to prove that the West are no longer anti-Semitic and they can redeem their past sins by the punishing some innocent third party, once again. Israel is a nation that routinely engages in killing innocent civilians, and is busy in the process of ethnic cleansing to make the land pure for the chosen race of God, add to that 'accolade', they are harvesting the organs of dead Palestinians in the true spirit of the shylocks!

Yamin Zakaria (yamin@radicalviews.org)
London, UK

Published in 28/01/2010

Posted by Yamin Zakaria at 05:29 0 comments Links to this post
Tuesday, 26 January 2010
Women's Rights
"I do find it astonishingly hypocritical for the West to incessantly argue against polygamy when one would hard pressed to find a virtuous monogamous man amongst them!"

"Had Islam and Muslim men been the real oppressors of women, the feminist movement would have arisen from within the Islamic societies"
Posted by Yamin Zakaria at 10:04 0 comments Links to this post

Robert Spitzer, Psychiatrist Who Eliminated Homosexuality as Mental Disorder, Dies

Robert Spitzer

Dr. Robert Spitzer, a psychiatrist who was one of the leaders in establishing universal standards to describe mental disorders and helped remove homosexuality from the list of pathologies, died on Friday in Seattle at the age of 83, reports the Associated Press.
According to his wife, Columbia University Professor Emerita Janet Williams, Dr. Spitzer died of heart problems.

Throughout his career, Dr. Spitzer worked on several editions of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (D.S.M.), including the DSM-III, which he worked on with Williams. His work helped all in the profession agree on what they were seeing by defining all of the major disorders, which was a major breakthrough in the profession.

“Rather than just appealing to authority, the authority of Freud, the appeal was: Are there studies? What evidence is there?” Dr. Spitzer told the New Yorker magazine in 2005. “The people I appointed had all made a commitment to be guided by data.”

His “commitment to be guided by data” led Dr. Spitzer to believe that homosexuality should be removed from the list of mental disorders in the D.S.M. in 1973. It’s a conclusion he came to after meeting with gay activists and determined their sexuality couldn’t be a disorder because they were comfortable with it.
Though there was a fierce debate between members of the psychiatric profession over the designation of homosexuality at the time, Dr. Spitzer continued to press forward and reiterate his findings (?). “A medical disorder either had to be associated with subjective distress — pain — or general impairment in social function,” he told the Washington Post.

Spitzer’s work is believed by many to have aided in the advancement of gay rights, including Dr. Jack Drescher, a gay psychoanalyst in New York who tells the Times, “The fact that gay marriage is allowed today is in part owed to Bob Spitzer.”

Tags: People, Health

Psychiatrist who championed 'gay cure' admits he was wrong

Dr Robert Spitzer apologises for 'fatally flawed' study, published in 2001, which claimed gay people could be 'cured' if properly motivated

Gay activists
US gay and lesbian groups are likely to be delighted by Robert Spitzer's apology. Photograph: Sara D. Davis/Getty Images

One of the most influential figures in modern psychiatry has apologised to America's gays for a scientific study which supported attempts to "cure" people of their homosexuality.
The survey, published in 2001, looked at "reparative therapy" and was hailed by religious and social conservatives in America as proof that gay people could successfully become straight if they were motivated to do so.
But Dr Robert Spitzer has now apologised in the same academic journal that published his original study, calling it "fatally flawed". "I believe I owe the gay community an apology," his letter said. "I also apologise to any gay person who wasted time and energy undergoing some form of reparative therapy because they believed that I had proven that reparative therapy works."
Spitzer's letter, which was leaked online before its publication in the Archives of Sexual Behaviour, is sure to cause delight among gay civil rights groups and stir up anger among social conservatives, who have used the study to combat the acceptance of homosexuality as a normal part of human society.
Reparative therapy is popular among Christian conservative groups, which run clinics and therapy sessions at which people try to become heterosexual through counselling. Gay rights activists condemn such practices as motivated by religious faith, not science, and call them "pray away the gay" groups.
Spitzer's study looked at the experiences of 200 people undertaking the therapy, including subjects that had been provided by religious groups. He then asked each person the same set of questions, analysing their responses to the therapy and their feelings and sexual urges afterwards. He concluded that many of them reported feelings of changes in their sexual desires from homosexual to heterosexual.
Spitzer's stance was notorious, because in 1973 he had been instrumental in getting the American Psychiatric Association to stop classifying homosexuality as a mental disorder in its diagnostic manual: a move seen at the time as a major victory for gay rights.
His 2001 study caused a huge stir because many people felt that it was not rigorous enough for publication. The central criticism was that Spitzer had not paid enough attention to the fact that subjects might lie about their feelings or be engaged in self-deception.
For more than a decade Spitzer shrugged off the attacks and stood by his work, but he has now admitted that his critics were right. "I offered several (unconvincing) reasons why it was reasonable to assume that the subject's reports of change were credible and not self-deception or outright lying. But the simple fact is that there was no way to determine if the subject's accounts of change were valid," Spitzer wrote.
In an interview with the New York Times last week, Spitzer, who is 79 and suffers from Parkinson's disease, described how he had written his letter of recantation in the middle of the night after agonising over the study's impact.
He had also recently been visited by a gay magazine journalist, Gabriel Arana, who had described to him his own experience going through reparation therapy and how damaging it had been and how it had led to thoughts of suicide. "It's the only regret I have; the only professional one," Spitzer told the New York Times, which described him as being almost in tears as he talked about his decision to admit he was wrong.
"In the history of psychiatry I don't know that I've ever seen a scientist write a letter saying that the data were all there but were totally misinterpreted. Who admitted that and who apologised to his readers. That's something, don't you think?" Spitzer told the newspaper.
Gay rights group Truth Wins Out published the full text of the letter on its website and hailed the moment as a major step forward. "Spitzer's apology to the victims of 'pray away the gay' therapy … marks a watershed moment in the fight against the 'ex-gay' myth," the group said.

 But, the same Dr Robert Spitzer admitted before he died that HE WAS WRONG AND THAT HOMOSEXUALS CAN BE CURED IN MANY CASES!

Islamic Party of Britain founder sounds off on LBGT

And exposes the Orlando false flag operation
David Musa PidcockDavid Musa Pidcock is a founder of the Islamic Party of Britain. As reported on False Flag Weekly News a few weeks ago, he strongly supported Brexit. Now he’s back with an even more controversial broadside, which he will discuss on my live radio show tomorrow night (Friday, June 30th) 8 to 9 pm Eastern on Revolution Radio (Studio A).
An edited version of this essay will appear in the forthcoming Orlando False Flag: The Clash of Histories –Kevin Barrett, Veterans Today Editor
Gentlemen, you have all seen fit, to dispense with both the Biblical and Quranic prohibitions against homosexuality, and chosen to ignore the consequences which must inevitably follow. For as with all vain and inordinate opinions of one’s self, Gay Pride, along with the other deadly sins comes before a fall. But don’t take my word for it, but that of the Messiah, to the Lost Sheep of the House of Israel Isa McMariam /Jesus the son of Mary Peace and Blessing be upon him and his illustrious mother. If, in AD 325, Constantine AKA Constantcrime had not eliminated all the authentic gospels in order to maintain the idolatrous status quo of Pagan Rome, and with it the continuing worship of Mythras, the so called Son of God, born of a virgin along with 16 earlier claimants, including Apollo, Hercules, Buddha, Quetzalcohuatl, and of course Horus the son of Isis whose figures and symbols dominate the skyline of Washington, St. Peter’s Square and the Thames Embankment in Pagan Rome’s most northerly outpost London.
The Stars & 13 Stripes on the U.S. flag all relate to Horus and Isis along with the pyramid of Giza and the Ein Shams the eye of the sun god you all seem to love and worship.
“…Jesus said: “Truly all that which a man loves, for which he leaves everything else that is his god. And so the fornicator has for his image the harlot, the glutton and drunkard has for image his own flesh, and the covetous has for his image silver and gold, and so likewise every other sinner.” Then said he who had invited him: “Master, which is the greatest sin?”
Jesus answered: “Which is the greatest ruin of a house?” Everyone was silent, when Jesus with his finger pointed to the foundation, and said: “If the foundation give way, immediately the house falls in ruin, in such wise that it is necessary to build it up anew: but if every other part give way it can be repaired. Even so then say I to you, that idolatry is the greatest sin, because it deprives a man entirely of faith, and consequently of God; so that he can have no spiritual affection. But every other sin leaves to man the hope of obtaining mercy: and therefore I say that idolatry is the greatest sin.” All stood amazed at the speaking of Jesus, for they perceived that it could not in any wise be assailed”. THE GOSPEL OF BARNABAS Chapter 33  
Therefore you should see what happened when the first Gay dominated communities of Sodom & Gomorrah defiantly ignored the divine rules and shamelessly flaunted themselves as we have recently witnessed around the world.
On the western side of the Dead Sea lie the remains of two ashen cities, one at the base of Mt. Masada, and the other at the base of Mt. Sodom. In 1989, amateur archaeologist, Ron Wyatt was driving along the road past these sites. Although he had driven along this road perhaps thirty to forty times before, this time they suddenly looked like city walls and buildings. Pulling over to investigate further, Ron found that within these cities are building-like structures, all completely composed of ash. There are rooms that one can still enter today. He found interlinking streets, ziggurats and sphinx, all enclosed in traditional city walls, complete with buttresses.
PastedGraphic-6Several oxidised bronze spearheads were found and even a skeleton that had completely turned to ash was found in Sodom. The marrow was visible at the ends of each of the bones. With a molecular frequency radar generator, Ron found gold salts, the by-product of vaporized gold. Samples of the material were taken and tested which proved to be pure ash. (See II Peter 2:6). From a height, one can see that the cities are laid out in an obvious man made ‘square’ formation. The surrounding material is all normal brown rock. The obvious question would be if the cities were destroyed 3900 years ago, how is it that the ash has not been completely eroded away? Research showed that objects burned with sulphur leave a remaining ash heavier than the original material
Embedded in these pure ashen remains are pure sulphur, or brimstone balls. Sulphur is usually found in crystalline form, but this sulphur is unique to the world as it is round, white and has the consistency of compact powder. It is usually 30-40% sulphur, whereas these sulphur balls are 95-98% pure sulphur. The impurities in the sulphur are metals that would add to the heat given off. It burns at 5000-6000 degrees Fahrenheit. It was tested at Galbraith Laboratories, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA. They said that a BTU test could not be done as it would damage their stainless steel test chamber. Sulphur is usually only found by volcanoes, sulphide ore mineral veins, or by sedimentary rocks associated with anhydrite, gypsum, limestone and salt domes. We know that these sulphur balls must have been burning at some time in the past, because of the presence of burn rings around them.
These cities are indeed unique. Other cities that have been destroyed by fire or by volcanoes, such as Pompeii, have a layer of ash on top, but under that is the original material. Here however, we see entire cities completely turned to ash, exactly as the Bible describes. II Peter 2:6 “And turning the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah into ashes condemned them with an overthrow, making them an ensample unto those that after should live ungodly lives”.


David (Daud Musa) Pidcock
www.islamicparty.com / info@islamicparty.com 
Tel: 00-44-1908-671756 Mobile: 0750-3210363
From: “The White House” <info@mail.whitehouse.gov>
Date: 25 June 2016 00:53:41 BST
To: <pidcockdavid8@gmail.com>
Subject: Meet our newest national monument:
Reply-To: “The White House” <reply-ff2f10707d60-15_HTML-2616599-6229366-4635@mail.whitehouse.gov>
Dear President Obama,
I am in receipt of your recent White House Press Release, dated the 21st of June 2016, informing me that:- “Today, President Obama designated Stonewall National Monument to honor the broad LGBT equality movement.”
However, in light of the foregoing, forensic evidence, and the further proof appended below that the Global FLOOD of Noah, did indeed take place, as mentioned in the Bible, the Qur’an and the little known book of Enoch, I find this particularly offensive and threatening to the future of mankind and the safety of those of us who fortunately are not LGBT and recognise that history is about to repeat itself. For your information, Allah/Allah’a/Hashem does not destroy a people unless and until they have been adequately warned.
Therefore it behoves you and the members of your Bicameral House and Senate to check out the information provided and regard this as being such a warning and to therefore repeal all your Executive Orders regarding these issues.
Please do not let the above Hebrew caution: “Mene Mene Tekel Upharsin” from (Dan. v. 1-28), apply to you. Daniel read it and explained it to mean that God had “numbered” the kingdom of Belshazzar and brought it to an end; that the king had been weighed in the balance and found wanting; and that his kingdom was to be divided and given to the Medes and Persians, but following this scenario there will be nothing left and no one left to divide with.
Yours sincerely
President Obama Designates Stonewall National Monument
Today, President Obama designated Stonewall National Monument to honor the broad LGBT equality movement.
Today, President Obama designated a new national monument at the historic site of the Stonewall Uprising in New York City to honor the broad LGBT equality movement.
The new ‘Stonewall National Monument’ will protect the area where, on June 28, 1969, a community’s uprising in response to a police raid sparked the modern LGBT civil rights movement in the United States.
Check out the video to learn more about the Stonewall Uprising and how it sparked a movement for LGBT equality:

“I’m designating the Stonewall National Monument as the newest addition to America’s National Park System. Stonewall will be our first national monument to tell the story of the struggle for LGBT rights. I believe our national parks should reflect the full story of our country, the richness and diversity and uniquely American spirit that has always defined us. That we are stronger together. That out of many, we are one.”
 President Obama
In addition to protecting more land and water than any President in history — more than 265 million acres — President Obama has sought to protect places that are diverse, culturally and historically significant, and that reflect the story of all Americans.
Earlier this year, President Obama designated the Belmont-Paul Women’s Equality National Monument, a site that has been central to the fight for women’s equality for over a century.
By honoring the history and accomplishments of the movement for LGBT equality, today’s designation will be a historic moment in this effort towards a more inclusive National Park System.
The President’s designation of Stonewall National Monument is just one example of his ongoing commitment to equality, for all Americans no matter who they love. Find out about just a few of the President’s actions to advance justice and equality for all, including LGBT Americans:
Preventing Hate Crimes: Overcoming years of partisan gridlock, the President worked with Congress to pass and sign into law the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd, Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act into law in October 2009, which extends the coverage of federal hate crimes law to include attacks based on the victim’s actual or perceived sexual orientation or gender identity.
Ending Discrimination in Healthcare: In March 2010, the Affordable Care Act was signed into law by President Obama and it ensured that companies cannot discriminate against anyone just because he or she is lesbian, gay, bisexual, or transgender.
HIV/AIDS Strategy: President Obama developed and released the first comprehensive National HIV/AIDS Strategy for the United States in 2010, updated it through 2020, and is implementing it to address the disparities faced especially by gay and bisexual men of all races and ethnicities and transgender women of color.
Repealing Don’t Ask Don’t Tell: The President signed bipartisan legislation to repeal Don’t Ask Don’t Tell on December 22, 2010, allowing gay, lesbian, and bisexual Americans to serve openly in the Armed Forces without fear of being dismissed from service.
No longer enforcing the Defense of Marriage Act: In February 2011, the President and Attorney General announced that the Department of Justice would no longer defend the Defense of Marriage Act’s provision defining marriage under federal law as only between a man and woman, a provision subsequently struck down as unconstitutional by a landmark Supreme Court’s  decision.
Prohibiting LGBT Discrimination for Federal Contractors: In July 2014, the President signed an Executive Order prohibiting federal contractors from discriminating against any employee or applicant for employment “because of race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, or national origin,” continuing to set an example as a model employer that does right by its employees.

Conversion Therapy: The President has supported legislative efforts to ban the use of so-called “conversion therapy” against minors and released a Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) study condemning the practice.

Promoting the rights of LGBT people the world over: President Obama issued a presidential memorandum that directs all federal agencies engaged abroad to ensure that U.S. diplomacy and foreign assistance promote and protect the human rights of LGBT persons.”
PastedGraphic-14In 1959, stereo photos were taken by a Turkish airline pilot of a boat shaped object on the mountains of Ararat for The Geodetic Institute of Turkey. Dr. Brandenburger of Ohio State University, USA, after studying the photographs concluded, “I have no doubt at all, that this object is a ship. In my entire career, I have never seen an object like this on a stereo photograph.” Dr. Brandenburger was a photogrammetry expert who had discovered the missile bases in Cuba, during the Kennedy era.
PastedGraphic-15An American team ran a day and a half expedition to the site, hardly enough time to carry out any scientific testing. They blew a hole in the side of the structure with dynamite, although some timber shaped stones were revealed, their conclusion was, “Nothing of any archaeological interest”. If this object was Noah’s Ark, it would be approximately 4400 years old so the wood would have petrified. So finding timber shaped stone was encouraging evidence. However, because the material had no growth rings, the team decided it could not be wood. But does this really prove true? The conditions of the world before the Biblical flood were very different from now. The Bible says, “…for the LORD God had not caused it to rain upon the earth…But there went up a mist from the earth and watered the whole face of the ground.” (Gen 2: 5, 6). Growth rings in wood are caused by seasonal variations, so in a pre-flood environment, with no seasonal variations, the trees would have no growth rings. And this is exactly what the American team found! In fact, if the material did have growth rings, it could not have been Noah’s Ark. After seeing an article published in LIFE magazine covering the expedition, Ron Wyatt an amateur archaeologist, visited the site in 1977. His interest was aroused and he decided the structure deserved further investigation as to whether this could be Noah’s Ark.
It lay 6,300 feet above sea level, much too high to be the remains of a boat from a local flood. It is over 200 miles from the nearest sea. The dimensions were consistent with the Biblical description of Noah’s Ark in Gen. 6:15, measuring 300 cubits long. The width was greater than that mentioned in the Bible as the sides of the boat had splayed, which would be expected in a boat of that age. Ground penetrating radar proved the boat to have three decks; the top two decks had collapsed leaving the bottom deck intact which contained 144 rooms. Walls, cavities, a door near the front, ramps, and two large round ‘tank shapes’ near to the bow were also located. The radar scan revealed four protrusions extending from the stern that were probably stabilizers.
PastedGraphic-17Ron tested the material at Galbraith Laboratories in Knoxville, Tennessee and it proved to be laminated, petrified wood. Tests for carbon showed that samples from the site contained much higher carbon content than the surrounding area. The specimen from the site proved to be 4.95% carbon, while the specimen from the surrounding area, tested at 1.88%. Thus the specimen from the site had once been living matter. Such sophisticated alloys as iron, titanium and aluminium also proved to be present. With only a superficial inspection the rib timbers and deck joists are clearly visible along the entire length of the ship.
With the use of four types of different metal detectors, thousands of metal rivets were found on the site. Iron was found at regular intervals which made up a pattern of horizontal and vertical lines ‘criss-crossing’ the boat, demonstrating iron at the levels of each bulkhead. Conventional science teaches that the Iron Age far precedes the time of the flood, but the Bible in Genesis 4:22 says, “Tubalcain [was] an instructor of every artificer in brass and iron”. Iron nodules were also found in about 5400 places, which show linear patterns consistent with the shape of the hull.
In 1991, Greg Brewer, found a petrified antler in the side of the ark. As a result of a core drilling Ron found extinct rodent hair, petrified animal droppings and red human hair. All the expeditions have so far been to Mt. Ararat, but what does the Bible actually say about the resting place of Noah’s Ark? Gen 8:4, “And the ark rested on the seventh month, on the seventeenth day of the month, upon the mountains of Ararat. The Bible does not say the ark came to rest on Mt. Ararat, but on the mountain range of Ararat. That is exactly where we find this boat shaped object, it is located about fifteen miles south of Mt. Ararat. The names of the surrounding places are interestingly associated with the Biblical account of the flood. The valley is called ‘The Valley of Eight’, in reference to the eight survivors of the flood, Noah and his wife, their three sons and their wives.
PastedGraphic-18A village in the valley translates to ‘The Village of Eight’, where several giant anchor stones can be found thousands of feet above sea level and hundreds of kilometers from the nearest sea. On the anchor stones there are carved Christian crosses from the crusader period, evidence that the crusaders also recognized the Christian significance of the anchor stones. There are thirteen of these anchor stones that all lie in direct line with the boat. So evidently, Noah cut them loose as the waters subsided and just before the ark came to rest.
Near to this village is another smaller village with a name that translates to ‘The Crow will not Stand’. Undoubtedly, referring to when Noah released a raven from the ark. Another village is called ‘Where the Oars were Reversed’, again suggesting that a boat once passed over this area, where it began to slow down to its final resting place. The Turkish government has also sent their own archaeological team, who recovered four intact metal rods, each about four foot long. These are now in the possession of the Ministry of Mines and Minerals, in Turkey. They have officially dedicated the site as a national park declaring it to be the remains of Noah’s Ark!
Orlando and Culture Wars against Islam
As the saying goes, things are often not what appear to be, echoing what the Prophet Muhammad, Peace and Blessings Be Upon Him, mentioned in his prophecies regarding the conditions which would prevail in the period just prior to the Day of Judgement (Yom alqayamat) during which it will be “difficult to distinguish truth from falsehood. When men will commit adultery with men and women with women, as in Orlando and which now occurs globally on an ever increasing scale. At that time the following conditions will also obtain:
1400 years ago, gave the following long range forecast to believers and the wider world:-
  • A time will come when: “Prayers will be neglected, carnal desires will be pursued, transgressors will become leaders, and it will not be possible to distinguish the truth from falsehood: Telling lies will become desirable, the payment of zakat/charity will be considered a burden, the believer will be deemed to be a most disgraceful individual, who will be pained at being surrounded by evil but unable to speak out. Rain will do no good and will fall out of season. Men will commit adultery with men and women with women. Women will dominate. The offspring will disobey their parents; friends will treat each other badly. Sins will be taken lightly. Mosques will have external decorations and beauty and there will be worshippers too, but there will be enmity and mutual hostility in their hearts. Then will appear a people from the West (Magrib) who will dominate the weak amongst my people. People will produce copies of the Holy Qur’an in letters of gold but will not act upon it. The Qur’an will be recited in a melodious way. Usury (i.e. Interest, Riba, Sood, Feis, Bungha) will become rampant, Human blood will have no value, religion will have no helpers. Singing women will be on the increase. The rich will perform Hajj as a pastime, the people of the middle class to conduct business, and the poor to beg.”
  • Reported by Ibn Abbas, in the Mudkhal of Ibn al-Hajj
Abu Hurairah further reports the following:-
“When learning is acquired for other than religious purposes (i.e. to confirm the existence of God) voices are raised in the mosques. The most wicked members of a tribe becomes its ruler, the most worthless member of a people becomes its leader, and a man is honoured through fear of the evil he might do. Singing girls and stringed instruments make their appearance (The Andrews sisters, Beverly Sisters, The Poynter Sisters, The Supremes, the 3 Degrees, The Spice Girls, Dixie Chicks, etc. etc. etc. all classed as “Funky Divas”.*
“Wines are once again drunk, and the last members of this people curse the first. At that time look out for violent winds, earthquakes, metamorphosis, pelting rain, and signs following one another like pieces of a necklace falling one after another when its string is cut.”
* http://www.billboard.com/articles/pop-shop/girl-group-week/5901266/top-10-girl-groups-of-all-time
From the foregoing it is patently obvious that the events predicted by RasuluLah – Peace & Blessings be upon him – perfectly correspond with this unimpeachable data. Therefore, it would represent folly of the highest magnitude, to keep ignoring the warnings mentioned in the Qur’an, which have already visited countless communities and which will inevitably visit societies who engage in the predicted crimes mentioned in the above hadith. Prior to the Great Flood of Noah Alaihissalaam – Peace and Blessings be upon him – with the exception of sodomy and homosexuality – people indulged in all of the above mentioned activities. We know this from Surah
“According to the Quran, Lot was a prophet and a nephew of Abraham. A group of angels visited Abraham as guests[8] and gave him glad tidings of a son “endowed with wisdom”;[9] they told him that they had been sent by God to the “guilty people”[10] of Lot[11] to destroy them[12] with “a shower of stones of clay”[13] and deliver Lot and those who believed in him, except his wife saying “she is of those who lag behind”.[14][15] The Quran also draws upon Lot’s wife as an “example for the unbelievers” as she was married to a righteous man but cheated him by not believing in his message and was thus condemned to Hell.[3][16]
The people of Sodom and Gomorrah, the twin cities which Lot was sent to with God’s message, transgressed consciously against the bounds of God. Their avarice led to inhospitality and robbery, which in turn led to the humiliation of strangers by mistreatment and rape. It was their abominable sin of sexual misconduct which was seen as symptomatic of their attitudes,[17][18] and upon Lot’s exhorting them to abandon their transgression against God, they ridiculed him,[19] threatening with dire consequences;[20] Lot only prayed to God to be saved from doing as they did.[3][21]
Then two angels in the disguise of handsome young boys came to Lot, who became distressed knowing the character of the people, and feeling himself powerless to protect the visitors; he said, “This is a distressful day.”[22] When the people – overjoyed at the news of new young boys in the village – came to snatch them away from Lot,[23] he tried to convince them to refrain from practising their lusts on the visitors, and offered his own daughters to them (to marry, according to the translation of Abdullah Yusuf Ali) in return for the boys’ free release,[24][25] but they were unrelenting and replied “we have no need of your daughters: indeed you know quite well what we want!”[26] The Quran remarks “they moved blindly in the frenzy of approaching death”.[3][27]
Lot was powerless to protect the boys, but they revealed to him that they were indeed angels sent by God to punish the people for their transgressions. They advised Lot to leave the place during the night and not look back, informing him that his wife would be left behind on account of her sinful nature and that they “were about to bring down upon the folk of this township a fury from the sky because they are evil-doers”.[3] Keeping his faith in God, Lot left his home and the cities during the night with his family and others who believed in him, and only his wife stayed behind. When morning came, God turned the cities upside down, and rained down on them stones hard as baked clay,[28] putting an end to the lives of the people of Sodom and Gomorrah once and for all.[3]
Translated References from the Quran
Note: There are many references to Lot in the Quran. The following are some of them.
Lot’s prophecy: Quran 26:161, 026.159 
YUSUFALI: And verily thy Lord is He, the Exalted in Might, Most Merciful.
PICKTHAL: And lo! thy Lord! He is indeed the Mighty, the Merciful.
SHAKIR: And most surely your Lord is the Mighty, the Merciful.
YUSUFALI: The people of Lut rejected the messengers.
PICKTHAL: The folk of Lot denied the messengers (of Allah),
SHAKIR: The people of Lut gave the lie to the messengers.
YUSUFALI: Behold, their brother Lut said to them: “Will ye not fear (Allah)?
PICKTHAL: When their brother Lot said unto them: Will ye not ward off (evil)?
SHAKIR: When their brother Lut said to them: Will you not guard (against evil)?
YUSUFALI: “I am to you a messenger worthy of all trust.
PICKTHAL: Lo! I am a faithful messenger unto you,
SHAKIR: Surely I am a faithful messenger to you;
YUSUFALI: “So fear Allah and obey me.
PICKTHAL: So keep your duty to Allah and obey me.
SHAKIR: Therefore guard against (the punishment of) Allah and obey me:
YUSUFALI: “No reward do I ask of you for it: my reward is only from the lord of the Worlds.
PICKTHAL: And I ask of you no wage therefor; my wage is the concern only of the Lord of the Worlds.
SHAKIR: And I do not ask you any reward for it; my reward is only with the Lord of the worlds;
YUSUFALI: “Of all the creatures in the world, will ye approach males,
PICKTHAL: What! Of all creatures do ye come unto the males,
SHAKIR: What! Do you come to the males from among the creatures
YUSUFALI: “And leave those whom Allah has created for you to be your mates? Nay, ye are a people transgressing (all limits)!”
PICKTHAL: And leave the wives your Lord created for you? Nay, but ye are froward folk.
SHAKIR: And leave what your Lord has created for you of your wives? Nay, you are a people exceeding limits.
YUSUFALI: They said: “If thou desist not, O Lut! Thou wilt assuredly be cast out!”
PICKTHAL: They said: If thou cease not, O Lot, thou wilt soon be of the outcast.
SHAKIR: They said: If you desist not, O Lut! You shall surely be of those who are expelled.
YUSUFALI: He said: “I do detest your doings.”
PICKTHAL: He said: I am in truth of those who hate your conduct.
SHAKIR: He said: Surely I am of those who utterly abhor your behaviour
YUSUFALI: “O my Lord! Deliver me and my family from such things as they do!”
PICKTHAL: My Lord! Save me and my household from what they do.
SHAKIR: My Lord! Deliver me and my followers from what they do.
YUSUFALI: So We delivered him and his family, – all
PICKTHAL: So We saved him and his household, every one,
SHAKIR: So We delivered him and his followers all,
YUSUFALI: Except an old woman who lingered behind.
PICKTHAL: Save an old woman among those who stayed behind.
SHAKIR: Except an old woman, among those who remained behind.
YUSUFALI: But the rest We destroyed utterly.
PICKTHAL: Then afterward We destroyed the others.
SHAKIR: Then We utterly destroyed the others.
YUSUFALI: We rained down on them a shower (of brimstone): and evil was the shower on those who were admonished (but heeded not)!
PICKTHAL: And We rained on them a rain. And dreadful is the rain of those who have been warned.
SHAKIR: And We rained down upon them a rain, and evil was the rain on those warned.
YUSUFALI: Verily in this is a Sign: but most of them do not believe.
PICKTHAL: Lo! Herein is indeed a portent, yet most of them are not believers.
SHAKIR: Most surely there is a sign in this, but most of them do not believe.
YUSUFALI: We also (sent) Lut: He said to his people: “Do ye commit lewdness such as no people in creation (ever) committed before you?
PICKTHAL: And Lot! (Remember) when he said unto his folk: Will ye commit abomination such as no creature ever did before you?
SHAKIR: And (We sent) Lut when he said to his people: What! Do you commit an indecency which any one in the world has not done before you?
YUSUFALI: “For ye practise your lusts on men in preference to women: ye are indeed a people transgressing beyond bounds.”
PICKTHAL: Lo! Ye come with lust unto men instead of women. Nay, but ye are wanton folk.
SHAKIR: Most surely you come to males in lust besides females; nay you are an extravagant people.
YUSUFALI: And his people gave no answer but this: they said, “Drive them out of your city: these are indeed men who want to be clean and pure!”
PICKTHAL: And the answer of his people was only that they said (one to another): Turn them out of your township. They are folk, forsooth, who keep pure.
SHAKIR: And the answer of his people was no other than that they said: Turn them out of your town; surely they are a people who seek to purify (themselves).
YUSUFALI: But we saved him and his family, except his wife: she was of those who legged behind.
PICKTHAL: And We rescued him and his household, save his wife, who was of those who stayed behind.
SHAKIR: So We delivered him and his followers, except his wife; she was of those who remained behind.
YUSUFALI: And we rained down on them a shower (of brimstone): Then see what was the end of those who indulged in sin and crime!
PICKTHAL: And We rained a rain upon them. See now the nature of the consequence of evil-doers!
SHAKIR: And We rained upon them a fateful rain; consider then what was the end of the guilty.
pastedgraphic-7“Then answered Jesus: “Verily I say unto you, Satan ever seeketh to  annul the laws of God; and therefore, he with his followers, hypocrites  and evil doers, the former with false doctrine, the latter with lewd  living, today have contaminated almost all things, so that scarcely  is the truth found. Woe to the hypocrites; for the praises of this world shall turn into the insults of hell.” [The Gospel of Barnabas] SOURCE SATANIC VOICES ANCIENT & MODERN
Jeremiah 11:9-10.
“And the LORD said unto me, A CONSPIRACY is found among the men of Judah, and among the inhabitants of Jerusalem. They are turned back to the iniquities of their forefathers, which refused to hear my words; and they went after other gods to serve them: the house of Israel and the house of Judah…have broken my covenant which I made with their fathers”.

{GRP} Muslim position on LBGT & killing in Orlando, Florida
Inbox x
Jun 18 (1 day ago)
makdmc <makdmc@gmail.com>

to Iftekhar, Iftekhar, global-right-p., Noor, TARIQ

Dear All
We were already having
Sunni Islam
Shia Islam
Wahabi Islam
Deobandi Islam
Barelvi Islam
Now we have new brand of Islam
‘American Islam’
As suggested by Parvez Ahmed
Can’t we follow and propagate only ‘ISLAM’ without any prefix?
Is Islam itself is not sufficient to guide us and explained in interfaith dial auger?
On Jun 18, 2016 4:26 AM, “Iftekhar Hai” <iftekhar.hai@gmail.com> wrote:
American Islam must be rooted in American pluralism
By Parvez Ahmed Thu, Jun 16, 2016 @ 4:32 pm | updated Thu, Jun 16, 2016 @ 4:38 pm
“The fact that it took place at a club frequented by the LGBT community I think is also relevant,” said President Barack Obama after the unspeakable tragedy in Orlando when a gunman killed 49 people and injured 53, the worst mass shooting in U.S. history.
The identity of the victims has been either dimly acknowledged or not acknowledged by two groups — Republican leaders and Muslim imams.
The pattern of many GOP politicians muting the identity of the victims is in sharp contrast to their dogged attacks on anyone, particularly Obama, for not mentioning the “Islamic” identity of the perpetrator.
By one report, not a single congressional Republican who tweeted about the Orlando shooting mentioned the obvious identity of the victims.
Neither has Florida Gov. Rick Scott. Many GOP leaders have spent their political careers fighting to deny LGBT people their due civil rights. Sympathizing with the people they have been bashing is a bridge too far for many.
Muslim imams, in general, have condemned the mass shootings in Orlando. But I am struggling to find even one who acknowledged and empathized with the identities of the victims.
Noted scholar Yasir Qadhi on Facebook talked at length about the unfair expectations levied on the Muslim community, which he defines as “the problem of being a minority under pressure.” But conspicuously missing from his post was any mention of the actual victims of this tragedy. This is especially troubling because Qadhi ignores the bitter truth of why this tragedy happened in the first place. The list of religious leaders with similar ignorance is too long to cite.
Not naming the primary identity of the victims adds to the oppression. Erasing their identities from the narrative reinforces a bigoted society’s desire to erase their existence.
It is as callous as saying that 9-11 is an act against all humanity while discounting the fact that Americans were targeted simply because of whom they are. Or saying that the murder of three Muslim students in North Carolina was just another mass murder when it was obvious that the identity of the victims played an important role in their deaths.
Tragedies are often crossroads of choice. We can allow ourselves to retreat into the comforts of our preconceptions. Or we can question the norm and seek to carve a better path. In Orlando, the Muslim community chose the latter. They rallied not only to distance themselves from the ideology of the perpetrator but more importantly to express solidarity with the LGBT community.
Muslim groups banded together in a coalition to raise funds for the victims and have pledged to hand over those funds to Equality Florida, a pro-LGBT group. Their efforts have raised over $60,000 from over 1000 supporters.
On CNN, a local Muslim leader, Rasha Mubarak, underscored the camaraderie between Muslim and LGBT communities while sending her heartfelt condolences to the families and loved ones of those killed or injured. And yet the group she represents, Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), has been notably silent on the many initiatives for LGBT rights, from marriage equality nationally to civil rights protections in local human rights ordinances.
Groups who demand equal accommodation of Muslims at workplaces do not yet have policies protecting against the discrimination of LGBT people in their own organizations, oblivious of the rights of LGBT Muslims.
In the struggle for equality, the Muslim community finds the LGBT community as valuable allies. Many LGBT leaders have courageously reminded people that in their moment of anger and anguish, they should not turn against Muslims.
Yet many Muslim leaders have shown shocking indifference to LGBT rights. LGBT Muslims are often shunned at local mosques.
American Islam has to be rooted in American pluralism.
I hope that the tragedy at Pulse compels the Muslim community to recognize that we must serve as partners and allies with all Americans in our common struggle for equality. We must embrace our common humanity.
Parvez Ahmed is a professor at the University of North Florida.

For more information: http://www.global-right-path.com
A Single Machine May Replace Thousands of Humans, BUT Not a Single Human Can Ever Replace a Single Machine
Global Anthem – Change Our World, My Love for Humanity, A True Love
Only Solution to Extreme Global Poverty, Global Famine & global Refugee Crisis due to Global Economic Crisis etc. with 100% Guarantee upon FULL Permission
Hiring Robots & Firing People BUT Robots do not eat apples so apple farms (Businesses) might get Bankrupt
Global Right Path is not responsible for the content of emails/postings
Courtesy & mutual respect is a prerequisite – submit articles that will benefit mankind and make sure that no copyright material is used without permission and others
are not unduly offended or caused any undue discomfort or pain
All Faiths are welcome
For general group discussions, email to irshad-forum@googlegroups.com

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups “Global-Right-Path” group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to global-right-path+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to global-right-path@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/global-right-path.

Judge: FBI Transcript Shows Nobody Died in Orlando Shooting Until SWAT Teams entered the Building
TIM BROWN — JUNE 27, 2016
What should have been front page news everywhere somehow got buried amid the official narrative we were given about the Orlando shooting. Judge Andrew Napolitano told FOX News that an FBI transcript indicated that no one died until 05:13am Sunday morning when the police SWAT teams entered the building.
“Here’s what is news in the summary – nobody died until 05:13 in the morning, when the SWAT team entered. Prior to that no one had been killed. The 53 that were injured, and the 49 that were murdered all met their fates at the time of, and during, the police entry into the building,” Judge Napolitano said.
Consider that the narrative we have been given was that Omar Mateen entered the club around 02:00am on Sunday morning to begin his killing spree, so why was no one actually killed until 05:13am, over three hours later?
Here’s the official transcript.
So, this makes one question why the 911 call transcripts are being redacted and why the people are not being told the truth across the media about what really took place.
We have been told that 5 to 6 police officers were already in the club for 15 to 20 minutes or more prior to the SWAT teams’ entering.
So, what is the truth here?  Some claim that 05:13am is the time of death, but how is that when that suspect was not even down until 05:15am?  Could it be that some of the people in the club were shot by the SWAT team or by Mateen?  With nearly50 people dead and more wounded, how was Mateen able to get off that many shots?  I’m really curious.
Take a listen to the entrance of the SWAT team into the club.
If that was not enough, police officers have even admitted that they may have killed some of the people. WFAA reports:
Monday, Orlando Police Chief John Mina and other law enforcement officers offered new details about the shooting, including the possibility that some victims may have been killed by officers trying to save them.
“I will say this, that’s all part of the investigation,” Mina said. “But I will say when our SWAT officers, about eight or nine officers, opened fire, the backdrop was a concrete wall, and they were being fired upon.”
A law enforcement source close to the investigation who asked not to be named said a crowd of up to 300 people and the complex layout of the dance club may have resulted in some patrons being struck by gunfire from officers.”
FBI to Americans regarding Redacted 911 Transcript Orlando Shooter: “You Can’t Handle the Truth”
TIM BROWN — JUNE 21, 2016

It appears that the Federal Bureau of Investigation thinks that Americans are too childish and unable to handle the truth concerning the reality of Omar Mateen’s 911call. They have redacted section of the call and refused to release the full audio and transcript of the phone conversation.
More than 29 minutes of conversations have been very briefly summarized. However, in a free country, why redact this information? Why keep it from the public?
One thing we do know, not one word of the FBI’s summary indicates comments that Mateen may have made of his hatred of the sodomite community, even though his wife claims he was a sodomite. Personally, I think if that is the case, then wouldn’t it be more in line with previous sodomites and Muslims who have engaged in self-inflicted crimes and cry victim?
There is no doubt that there was not only something to do with sodomy, but something to do with Mateen’s allegiance to the Islamic State.
On Monday morning, assistant special agent in charge of the FBI’s Tampa field office, Ron Hopper, said that the while “the audio is compelling,” the agency would not release the full audio or transcript because they believed it would only glorify Mateen and encourage other jihadists to engage in the same activity.
The Intercept reports:
Pressed by reporters as to why the transcript released on Monday was partial, and edited, Hopper seemed to refer to Mateen’s words about the other attackers.
“Part of the redacting is meant to not give credence to individuals who have done terrorist attacks in the past,” he said, “we’re not going to propagate their rhetoric, their violent rhetoric, and we see no value in putting those individuals’ names back out there.”
“We’re trying to prevent future acts from happening, again,” he continued, “and for cowards like this one, people like that influence them, so we are not going to continue to put their names out front.”
So, were there other attackers? Are there more waiting in the wings? My guess is that is probably the case. As Michael DePinto points out, there are a number of reasons to question the official story we are getting from those investigating it, and a number of important things that the public at large were unaware of that took place while attention was diverted to the Orlando shooting.
Of course, all this omitting of information to the public was mocked by plenty of conservatives on Twitter.”
BBC PANORAMA 2004: LONDON UNDER ATTACK (THE SHOW THAT PLANNED 7/7) THE FOLLOWING YEAR IN 2005 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x7uIjg9dtoI
So where does this antipathy towards Islam, Muslims particularly Arabs originate?  In order to understand the genesis of this hatred we must turn appropriately to Genesis one of the 5 Old Testament books aka the Pentateuch revealed to Moses – Peace Be Upon Him- on Mount Sinai, in Midian in what is now part of Saudi Arabia. Specifically to Genesis 16:12, in which we find the following passages describing Ishmael – Peace Be Upon Him and the family of Abraham.
Genesis – 21: 14. “And Abraham rose up early in the morning and took bread and a bottle of water, and gave it unto Hagar, putting it on her shoulder, and the child and sent her away: and she wandered in the wilderness of Bersheeba. (15) And the water was spent in the bottle, and she cast the child under one of the shrubs. (16) And she went and sat herself down over against him as it were a bowshot’s length (300 yards/Meters) for she said: Let me not see the death of the child. And she sat over against him, and lifted up her voice, and wept. (17) And God heard the voice of the lad; and the Angel of God called unto Hagar and said unto her – ‘what aileth thee, Hagar? Fear Not, for God has heard the voice of the lad where he is. (18) Arise, lift up the lad and hold him in your hand – for I will make him a great nation. (19) And God opened her eyes, and she saw the well of water; and she went, and filled the bottle with water and gave it to the lad to drink.(20) And God was with the lad; and he grew and dwelt in the wilderness, and became an archer. (21) And dwelt in the wilderness of Paran. And his mother took him a wife out of the land of Egypt…”
As to his character and nature we are told what he would be like in Genesis 16:12 “Yado ba-kol ve-yad kol bo” that “His hand is in everyone’s hand and everyone’s hand is in his.”  And not as Paul and the other poisonous scribes and heresiarchs would have us believe that: “His hand is against every man and everyman’s hand is against Him.” However we are grateful to Paul/Saul for slipping up in the following passage of his letter to the Galatians about the actual location of Mount Sinai being in Arabia.
Paul  Galatians 4 (King James Version)
22: For it is written, that Abraham had two sons, the one by a bondmaid, the other by a freewoman.  23: But he who was of the bondwoman was born after the flesh; but he of the freewoman was by promise. 24: Which things are an allegory: for these are the two covenants; the one from the mount Sinai, which gendereth to bondage, which is Agar (Hagar).  25: For this Agar (Hagar) is mount Sinai in Arabia, and answereth to Jerusalem which now is, and is in bondage with her children”.
So began the grand game of dispossession and the necessity of inventing a “New Covenant” to cover up the fatal deception by Rome’s Pagan Authorities through its state controlled Church, by usurping the authority which should have remained with the Law of Moses until the coming of Muhammad, with God’s final Message to the whole of Mankind.
Islamic history states that Zamzam Well was revealed to Hajar, the wife of Abraham (Ibrahim) and mother of Ismael,[2] around the year 2000 BC. According to Islamic tradition, she was desperately seeking water for her infant son, but could find none, as Mecca is located in a hot dry valley with few other sources of water. Muslim traditions say that Hajar ran seven times back and forth in the scorching heat between the two hills of Safa and Marwah, looking for water. Getting thirstier by the second, her son, Ishmael, anxiously scraped the land with his feet, where suddenly water sprang out.
There are other versions of the story involving Allah sending his angel, Gabriel, who touched the ground where water rose. [3]
The name of the well comes from the phrase Zomë Zomë, meaning ‘stop flowing’, or stop draining away a command repeated by Hajar during her attempt to contain the spring water. [1]
According to Islamic tradition, Abraham rebuilt the Bait-ul-Allah (House of Allah) [Baitulos – in Greek] at the site of the well, a building which had been originally constructed by Adam, and today is called the Kaaba, a building towards which all Muslims around the world face in prayer, five times each day. The Zamzam well is located approximately 20 meters east of the Kaaba. [1]

Let us remind ourselves what the bible would still contain if it had not been sabotaged by Paul, Constantine and other enemies of Gospel truth:-
“Barnabas, apostle of Jesus the Nazarene, called Christ, to all them that dwell upon the earth desireth peace and consolation. Dearly beloved, the Great and Wonderful God hath during these past days visited us by His Prophet Jesus Christ in great mercy of teaching and miracles, by reason whereof many, being deceived of Satan, under pretence of piety, are preaching most impious doctrine, calling Jesus son of God, Repudiating the circumcision ordained of God Forever, and permitting (the consumption of) every unclean meat: among whom also Paul has been deceived, whereof I speak not without grief: for which cause I am writing that truth which I have seen and heard, in the intercourse I have had with Jesus, in order that you may be saved, and not deceived of Satan and perish in the judgment of God. Therefore beware of every one that preacheth unto you new doctrine contrary to that which I write, that you may be saved eternally. The Great God be with you and guard you from Satan and from every evil. Amen.
Barnabas tells us that following his healing of the leper, Jesus entered into Jerusalem, requesting the leper to keep silent about the miracle, but he could not control his exuberance crying out “Come hither Israel, Come receive the Prophet Whom God sendeth unto thee…Behold the Prophet!  Behold the Holy one of God! At which many who were leaving the city ran back and entered in with him, recounting all that which God, through Jesus had done unto the leper. The whole city of Jerusalem was moved by these words wherefore they all ran together to the Temple to see Jesus, who had entered therein to pray, so that they could scarce be contained therein. Therefore the priests besought Jesus saying: ‘This people desireth to see and hear thee; therefore ascend to the pinnacle, and if God gives thee a word – speak it in the Name of the Lord’.
“Then ascended Jesus to the place where the scribes were wont to speak. And having beckoned with his hand for silence, he opened his mouth, saying: ‘Blessed be the Holy Name of God, Who in His Goodness and Mercy Willed to create His creatures that they might glorify Him. Blessed be the Holy Name of God, who created the Splendour of All the Saints and Prophets before All things in order to send him for the salvation of all the world, as He spoke by His servant David: “Before Lucifer in the brightness of All the Saints I Created Thee”. Blessed be the Holy Name of God, Who created the Angels that they might serve Him. And Blessed be God, Who punished and reprobated Satan and his followers, who would not reverence him (Adam) Whom God Willeth to be reverenced. Blessed be God, Who created man out of the clay of the earth, and set him over His works. Blessed be the Holy Name of God, Who drove man out of Paradise for having transgressed His Holy Precept. Blessed be the Holy Name of God, Who with mercy looked upon the tears of Adam and Eve, first parents of the human race. Blessed be the Holy Name of God, Who justly punished Cain the fratricide, sent the deluge upon the earth, burned up three wicked cities, scourged Egypt, overwhelmed Pharaoh in the Red Sea, scattered the enemies of His people, chastised the unbelievers, and punished the impenitent. Blessed be the Holy Name of God, Who with mercy looked upon His creatures, and therefore, sent them His Holy Prophets that they might walk in truth and righteousness before Him: Who delivered His servants from every evil, and gave them this land, as He promised to our father Abraham and his son(s) forever. Then by His servant Moses He gave us His Holy Law, that Satan should not deceive us; and exalted us above All other peoples. ‘But brethren, what do we (do) to-day, that we be not punished for our sins?’
“Then Jesus with the greatest vehemence rebuked the people for that they had forgotten the Word of God, giving themselves only to vanity: he rebuked the priests for their negligence in God’s service and for their worldly greed; he then rebuked the scribes because they preached vain doctrine, and forsook the Law of God; he rebuked the doctors because they had made the Law of God of none effect through their traditions. And in such wise did Jesus speak to the people, that all wept from the least to the greatest, crying mercy, and beseeching Jesus that he would pray for them; save only their priests and leaders, who on that day conceived hatred against Jesus for having thus spoken against the priests, scribes and doctors. And then meditated upon his death, but for fear of the people, who had received him as a prophet of God, they spake not a word…The prayer being ended Jesus descended from the temple; and that day he departed from Jerusalem, with many that followed him. And the priests spoke evil of Jesus among themselves…
One  skilled  in  the  law  invited  Jesus  to  supper,  in  order to  tempt  him.  Jesus  came  thither  with  his  disciples;  and many  scribes  to  tempt  him  waited  for  him  in  the  house. Whereupon,  the  disciples  sat  down  to  table  without  washing their  hands.  The  scribes  called  Jesus,  saying:  ‘wherefore  do not  thy  disciples  observe  the  traditions  of  our  elders,  in not  washing  their  hands  before  they  eat  bread?’  Jesus answered:  ‘And  I  ask  you,  for  what  cause  have  you  annulled the  precepts  of  God  to  observe  your  traditions?  You  say  to the  sons  of  poor  fathers:  “Offer  and  make  vows  unto the temple.” And they make vows of that little wherewith they should support their fathers. And when their fathers wish to take money, the sons cry out: “This money is consecrated to God”. O false Scribes and Hypocrites, does God use this money? Assuredly not, for God eateth not, as He sayeth by His servant David the prophet: “Shall I then eat the flesh of bulls and drink the blood of sheep? Render unto me (only) the Sacrifice of Praise, and offer unto Me your vows; for if I should be hungry I will not ask aught of thee, seeing that all things are in My Hands, and the abundance of paradise is with Me”. Hypocrites you  do  this  to  fill  your  purse,  and  therefore  ye  tithe,  rue,  and  mint.  Oh  miserable  ones!  for  unto  others you  show  the  most  clear  way  by  which  you  will  not  go! You  scribes  and  doctors  lay  upon  the  shoulders  of  others burdens  of  unbearable  weight,  which  you  yourselves  the while are  not willing  to  attempt  to move them with  even  one  of  your  fingers.
Verily  I  say  unto  you,  that  every  evil  hath  entered  into the  world  under  the  pretexts  of  the  elders.  Tell  me,  who made  idolatry  enter  into  the  world,  if  not  by  the  usage  of the  elders? Tell me who made idolatry to enter into the world, if not the usage of the Elders? For there was a king who exceedingly loved his father, whose name was Baal.  Whereupon,  when  the  father  was  dead, his  son  for  his  own  consolation,  caused  to be made an  image  like  unto the  father,  and  set  it  up  in  the  market  place  of  the  city. And  he  made  a  decree  that  everyone  who  approached  that  statue  within  a  space  of  fifteen  cubits  should  be  safe, and no  one  on  any  account  should  do  him  harm. Hence  the  malefactors,  by  reason  of  the  benefit  they received  (from  its  sanctuary),  began  to  offer  to  the  statue roses  and  flowers,  and  in  a  short  time  the  offerings  were changed  into  money  and  food,  insomuch  as  they  called  it  god, to  honour  it. Which, from custom, was  changed  into  law.  Insomuch  that  the (cult  of)  Baal spread  throughout  all  the world;  and  how  much doth  God  Lament  this  by  the  Prophet  Isaiah,  saying:  ‘Truly this  people  (Israel)  worship  Me  in  vain,  for  they  have annulled  My  Law  given  them  by  My  servant  Moses,  and  follow (only)  the  traditions  of  their  elders.’
Verily  I  say  unto  you,  that  to  eat  bread  with  unclean  hands does  not  defile  the  man,  but  that  which  cometh  out  of  the man  defiles  him.’  Thereupon  said  one  of  the  scribes:  ‘If  I should  eat  pork,  or  other  unclean  meats,  will  I  not  defile my  conscience?’
Jesus  answered:  ‘Disobedience  will  not  enter  into  the  man (through  his  mouth),  but  comes  out  of  the  man,  from  his heart;  and  therefore  will  he  be  defiled  when  (as  the  result) he  shall  eat  forbidden  food.’
Then  said  one  of  the  doctors:- ‘Master,  thou  hast  spoken  much  against  idolatry  as  though the  people  of  Israel  had  idols,  and  so  thou  hast  done  us wrong.’
Jesus  answered: – ‘I  know  well  that  in  Israel  today  there  are not  statues  of  wood;  but  there  are  statues  of  flesh.’  Then answered all the scribes in wrath:  ‘And so we  are idolaters?’
Jesus  replied: –  ‘Verily  I  say  unto  you,  that  the  precept saith  not  that  thou  ‘Shalt  worship’  but  that  ‘Thou  shalt Love  the  Lord  thy  God  with  all  thy  heart  and  with  all  thy mind.’  Is this not true?’  ‘It is true’, answered  every  one.
Then  said  Jesus: –  ‘Verily  all  that  which  man  loveth  and  for which  he  leaveth  everything  else,  that  thing  is  (or has become) his  god.  And so the  fornicator  hath  for  his  idol  the  harlot,  the  glutton and drunkard his  own  flesh,  and  the  covetous  hath  for  his image  silver  and  gold,  and  so  likewise  every  other  sinner (has  his  own  particular  god).’
Then  the  one  who  had  invited  him  said: –  ‘Master,  which  is the  gravest  sin?’
Jesus answered: – ‘Which is the greatest ruin of any house?’ But everyone remained silent.  Then  Jesus  pointed  to  the foundation,  and  said:  ‘If  the  foundation  gives  way immediately  the  house  falls  into  ruin,  in  which  wise  that  it is  necessary  to  build  it  up  anew;  but  if  any  other  part gives  way  it  can  be  repaired.  Even  so  I  say  to  you,  that idolatry  is  the  greatest  sin  (of  all),  because  it  depriveth a  man  entirely  of  faith,  and  consequently  of  God;  so  that  he can  have  no  spiritual  affection.  But  every  other  sin  leaveth to  man  the  hope  of  obtaining  mercy;  and  therefore  I  say  that idolatry  is  the  greatest  sin.’ All  stood  amazed  at  Jesus,  for they  perceived  that  it  (his answer) could  not  in  any  wise assailed.
There  stood  before  the  door  one  who  had  his  right  hand shrunken  in  such  fashion  that  he  could  not  use  it. Whereupon,  Jesus  having  lifted  up  his  heart  to  God,  prayed, and  said:  ‘In  order  that  you  may  know  that  my  words  are true,  I  say,  ‘In  the  name  of  God (Allaha),  man,  stretch  out  thine infirm  hand.’  He  stretched  it  out  whole,  as  if  it had  never had  aught  ill  with  it. Then with  fear  of  God  they  began  to eat…The  priests  took  counsel  among  themselves  to  catch  him in  his  talk.  Wherefore  they  sent  the  Levites  and  some  of  the scribes  to  question  him,  saying:  ‘Who  art  thou?’
Jesus  confessed,  and  said  the  truth:  ‘I  am  not  the  Messiah –  (Who you refer to as the Messenger)’
They  said:  ‘Art  thou  Elijah  or  Jeremiah,  or  any  of  the ancient prophets?’ Jesus answered:  ‘No’.
They said:  ‘who art thou?  Say  in  order  that  we  may  give testimony  to  those  who  sent  us.’
Then  said  Jesus:  ‘I  am  the  voice  that  crieth  through  all Judea,  and  crieth  ‘Prepare  ye  the  way  for  the  Messenger  of the  Lord.’  Even as it is written in Esias [Isaiah].’
They  said:  ‘If  you  are  not  the  Messiah  (Messenger)  nor Elijah,  or  any  prophet  (from  the  past)  wherefore  do  you preach  new  doctrine,  and  make  thyself  of  more  account  than the  Messiah  (Messenger)?’
Jesus  answered:  ‘The  miracles  that  god  worketh  by  my  hands show  that  I  speak  that  which  God  willeth:  nor  indeed  do  I  make  myself  to  be  counted  as  him  of  whom  you  speak.  For  I  am not  worthy  to  unloose  the  ties  of  the  hosen  or  the  latchets of  the  shoes  of  the  Messenger  of  God,  whom  ye  call ‘Messiah’,  who  was  made  before  me,  and  will  come  after  me, and  shall  bring  the  words  of  truth,  so  that  his  faith  will have  no  end’.
The  Levites  and  scribes  departed  in  confusion, and  recounted  all  to  the  Chiefs  of  the  priests,  who  said:- ‘He  hath  the  devil  at  his  back  who  recounteth  all  to  him.’
“Verily  I  say  unto  you,  that  every  prophet  when  he  is come,  hath  borne  to  one  nation  only  the  mark  of  the  mercy  of God.  And  so  their  words  were  not  extended  except  to  the people  to  which  they  were  sent.  But  the  Messenger  of  Allaha, when  he  shall  come,  God  shall  give  him  as  it  were  the  seal of  His  Hand,  in  so  much  as  he  will  carry  salvation  and  mercy to  all  the  nations  of  the  world  that  shall  receive  his doctrine.  He will  come  with  power  upon  the  ungodly,  and shall  destroy  idolatry,  insomuch  that  he  will  make  Satan confounded:  for  so  promised  God  to  Abraham,  saying:  ‘Behold, in  thy  seed  I  bless  all  the  tribes  of  the  earth;  and  as  thou hast  broken  in  pieces  the  idols,  O  Abraham,  even  so  shall thy  seed  do.’ James  answered:  ‘O  master,  tell  us  in  whom  this  promise  was made;  for  the  Jews  say  in  ‘Isaac’  and  the  Ishmaelites  say  in ‘Ishmael.’ Jesus answered:  ‘David, whose son was he, and of what lineage?’
James  answered:  ‘Of  Isaac;  for  Isaac  was  father  of  Jacob, and  Jacob  was  father  of  Judah,  of  whose  lineage  is  David.’
Then  said  Jesus:  ‘And  the  Messenger  of  God  when  he  shall come,  of  what  lineage  will  he  be?’
The disciples answered:  ‘Of David’.
Whereupon  Jesus  said:  ‘You  deceive  yourselves;  for  David  in spirit  called  him  Lord,  saying  thus:  ‘God  said  to  my  Lord, sit  thou  on  My  right  hand  until  I  make  thine  enemies  thy foot  stool.  God  shall  send  forth  thy  Rod,  which  shall  have lordship  in  the  midst  of  thine  enemies.’  (Psalm 110)  If  the Messenger  of  God  whom  you  call  Messiah  were  the  son  of David,  how  should  David  call  him  Lord? Believe  me,  for  verily  I  say  unto  you,  that  the  promise  was made  in  Ishmael,  not  in  Isaac.’
Thereupon  said  the  disciples:  ‘O  Master,  it  is  thus  written in  the  book  of  Moses,  that  in  Isaac  was  the  promise  made.’
Jesus  answered  with  a  groan:  ‘It  is  so  written  but  Moses wrote  it  not,  nor  Joshua,  but  rather  our  rabbins,  who  fear not  God.  Verily  I  say  unto  you,  that  if  you  consider  the words  of  the  Angel  Gabriel,  you  shall  discover  the  malice  of our  scribes  and  doctors.  For  the  Angel  said:  ‘Abraham,  all the  world  shall  know  how  God  loveth  thee:  but  how  shall  the world  know  the  love  thou  bearest  for  God.  Assuredly  it  is necessary  that  thou  do  something  for  love  of  God.’  Abraham answered:  ‘Behold  the  servant  of  God,  ready  to  do  all  that which  God  shall  will.’  Then  spoke  God,  saying  to  Abraham: ‘Take  thy  son,  thy  first  born  Ishmael,  and  come  up  the mountain  [Arafat  near  Mecca]  to  sacrifice  him.’  How  is  Isaac first  born,  if  when  Isaac  was  born  Ishmael  was  seven  years old?’
Then  said  the  disciples:  ‘Clear  is  the  deception  of  our doctors;  therefore  tell  us  thou  the  truth,  because  we  know thou  art  sent  from  God.’
Then  answered  Jesus:  ‘Verily  I  say  unto  you,  that  Satan ever seeketh  to  annul  the  laws  of  God;  and  therefore  he  with his  followers,  hypocrites  and  evil  doers,  the  former  with false  doctrine,  the  latter  with  lewd  living,  today  have contaminated  almost  all  things,  so  that  scarcely  is  the truth  found.  Woe  to  the  hypocrites;  for  the  praises  of  this world  shall  turn  into  the  insults  of  hell.  I  therefore  say  unto  you  that  the  Messenger  of  God (Allah/Allaha)  is  a splendour  that  shall  give  gladness  to  nearly  all  that  God hath  made,  for  he  is  adorned  with  the  spirit  of understanding  and  of  counsel,  the  spirit  of  wisdom  and might,  the  spirit  of  fear  and  love,  the  spirit  of  prudence and  temperance,  he  is  adorned  with  the  spirit  of  charity  and mercy,  the  spirit  of  justice  and  piety,  the  spirit  of gentleness  and  patience,  which  he  hath  received  from  God three  times  more  than  He  hath  given  all  His  creatures.  O blessed time, when he shall come to the world!
Believe  me,  that  I  have  seen  him  and  have  done  him reverence,  even  as  every  prophet  hath  seen  him:  seeing  that (it  was)  of  his  spirit  that  God  giveth  to  them  their prophecy.  And  when  I  saw  him  my  soul  was  filled  with consolation,  saying;  ‘O  Muhammad,  God  be  with  thee,  and  make me  worthy  to  untie  thy  shoe  latchet,  for  obtaining  this  I shall  be  a  great  prophet  and  holy  one  of  God’.”
And Jeremiah warned of this gross falsification in the following passage: – “How can you say, we are wise, and the Law of the Lord is with us’?  But, behold, the false pen of the scribes has made it into a lie,” JEREMIAH: 8:8
As Roger Bolton, stated in his report for BBC Radio 4, on October 28th 2009: “that when viewed in the cold light of day the Codex Sinaiticus, and all subsequent versions, including the King James Version of the Bible contain at least 23,000 errors, with many additions having been inserted into these oldest of all known manuscripts – for example the last ten verses of Mark having been added along with references to the Son of God which are not in the original text, these having been inserted at a much later date”.
Furthermore – According to a 1957 edition of AWAKE! Published by the Jehovah’s Witnesses, it states that as early as 1720.AD, an English Authority had already estimated that there were at least 20,000 errors in the two New Testament versions used by Protestants and Catholics – with 50,000 being a more likely figure.
But such discrepancies should come as no surprise when viewed in the light of Deuteronomy 31:25-29 which contains the much early warnings by Moses, about such scriptural corruption occurring along with the corruption and fate of those who carry out such monstrous crimes against their own immortal souls and those of humanity as a whole.
PastedGraphic-17AFTER MOSES FINISHED WRITING IN A BOOK THE WORDS OF THIS LAW FROM BEGINNING TO END, he gave this command to the Levites who carried the ark of the covenant of the LORD: “Take this Book of the Law and place it beside the ark of the covenant of the LORD your God. THERE IT WILL REMAIN AS A WITNESS AGAINST YOUASSEMBLE BEFORE ME ALL THE ELDERS of your tribes and all your officials, so that I can speak these words IN THEIR HEARING and call heaven and earth to TESTIFY AGAINST THEM. For I know that after my death YOU ARE SURE TO BECOME UTTERLY CORRUPT and to turn from the way I have commanded you. (Deut. 31:24-26, 28-29)
619 BCE “Because there was no canon law and the people relied on only oral tradition, it was easier for heathen beliefs to creep into the Jewish faith” Likewise, these same heathen beliefs from the synagogue continued into the Church and were passed off by Paul and his demonic cronies as the teachings of Jesus – which were vehemently opposed by St. Barnabas and St. James and their followers – who openly declared Paul to be a Daggala a “wolf in sheep’s clothing” an Anti-Christ.  
Deuteronomy 31: 25-29. Warns how the Children of Israel – who eventually became Jews – would corrupt themselves and everything and every community they came in contact with, due to them abandoning or circumventing GOD’S METICULOUS IMMUTABLE LAW. Which at times led to them hiding it entirely from the eyes of others who might challenge any such deviation from it, and or having the audacity to change it, as it was in the case of Paul, who’s additional and equally unforgivable crime, is that of daring to call the LAW a “curse”, particularly when it is the same LAW that Jesus had been sent here to fulfil – the tent maker from Tarsus has much to answer for – but as we will see, as mentioned above and below, the rot had set in long before he came on the scene!
JOSHUA: 24:26-27: And Joshua recorded these things in the Book of the Law of God. Then he took a LARGE STONE and set it up there under the oak near the holy place of the LORD. “See!” he said to all the people. “THIS STONE WILL BE A WITNESS AGAINST US. It has heard all the words the LORD has said to us. IT WILL BE A WITNESS AGAINST YOU if you are untrue to your God.”
Red Sea Crossing Site Into Arabia Rediscovered
Exodus Chapters 14, 15
One of the greatest miracles wrought by God was His rescue of His “entrapped” people by leading them through the Red Sea. After throwing Egypt into chaos by virtue of the 10 plagues that had been poured out on them, the Egyptians begged the Israelites to go.
The Israelites were gathered at Succoth, a common staging point for Egyptian armies prior to heading north for battle. Moses knew well the spot and gathered his people there. It was just north of the western arm of the Red Sea known today as the Gulf of Suez. There was a canal there at that time between the Mediterranean Sea and the Gulf of Suez, as well as a bridge over it.
Moses had been told by God/Hashem-Allah to bring the people to Mt. Sinai in the land of Midian in Arabia, which was on the other side of what we now call the Gulf of Aqaba arm of the Red Sea (Exodus 3:12). Thus he did not take them on what was known then as the Way of the Land of the Philistines, a more direct route, but took them on a highway known as the Way of the Wilderness of the Red Sea. This highway circled down through what was called the Wilderness of the Red Sea (which we now incorrectly call the Sinai Peninsula) and then continues around the upper tip of the Gulf of Aqaba.
Flippantly Frank, then goes on to state, somewhat facetiously that: ‘it’s a good thing that faith can’t move mountains or earth would have become a desert as soon as faith was born’.”
Faith can indeed move mountains and or the location of mountains which indeed did happen – the example being when Constantine’s mother moved Mount Sinai out of Arabia into Egypt – which people would have discovered had they been genuinely searching for the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, and being blind to the fact that deserts are the breeding grounds for faith and places of deep contemplation – THE 10 COMMANDMENTS WERE REVEALED IN DESERT CONDITIONS
“In Addition To The Damage Wrought By Constantine [Constantcrime] And The Council Of Nicea In 325AD, The Legacy Of Constantine’s Mother’s Has Been Equally As Destructive Because She Managed To Deceive The World Into Believing That Mount Sinai Was/Is At The Southern Tip Of What Is Now Called The Sinai Peninsula Between The Red Sea Gulfs Of Suez And Aqaba. Deceiving Even The Likes Of Anne Widdecombe MP, Who Recently Made A Pilgrimage There In The Misguided Belief That She Was Treading On The Actual Ground On Which Moses Received The 10 Commandments And Where The Israelites Found Refuge From Egypt’s Pharaonic Persecution – A Mistaken Belief She Holds In Common With 1.5 Billion Other Christians, And A Large Percentage Of The Rest Of Humanity Including 1.8 Billion Muslims. However, As We Will See, She, Like Most People – With One Extremely Significant Exception Is Completely Wrong.
4. The Bible: A History 
The story of the most influential book ever written, interpreted by seven prominent figures from different walks of life.
The Commandments and Me: Ann Widdecombe.MP.
As I stood on top of Mount Sinai, I thought; “This is what Moses saw when he received the Ten Commandments.”
TV CHANNEL 4 Friday 05 February 2010
MP Ann Widdecombe explored the history of the Ten Commandments in Moses and the Law. She investigated the extraordinary influence they’ve had on our society while setting out her own religious conviction, arguing that modern society could do with observing the Commandments a little more closely.
In many ways time has stood still and the scene could be straight out of the Bible. Man hasn’t changed much either.
The Ten Commandments were given as a guide to how we should live centuries ago. They’re quite blatantly needed today.
The Ten Commandments are as relevant now as they ever were. They are a model for how society should function. There’s no escaping they are powerful guidelines to follow and would make our society better if they were.
Some commandments are just obvious. For example, Thou shalt not kill. Apart from times of war, there are some other circumstances. I do not believe in abortion, but the only circumstance I would allow it in law would be if the mother was going to die. You’ve got a choice between two lives and can’t escape it if one is going to go.
Another is Thou shalt not commit adultery. Look at the sexual licence of today. Are we a happier society?  We’re more broken. There are record numbers of children growing up in broken homes, because people don’t believe in the sanctity of marriage. This law speaks for itself really, as does Thou shalt not steal. Everyone knows to steal is wrong.

Honour thy father and thy mother.
People hand the care of their parents to the State at the first opportunity. They pop them in a home. There isn’t the same family connection there used to be.
We’ve lost the idea that care is the responsibility of the family. Granny gets to be a nuisance and gets parked on the State. Once you would have had a huge family under one roof. If we don’t look after our elderly, who will look after us?
Bear false witness against thy neighbour. The media need to take this one on, as well as producers of memoirs, who make quite a thing of slandering somebody. Now nobody believes that they have to account to anything except the publisher and their advance.
If people were more aware they had to account to God for the truths of what they say, they’d be more careful. Women crying false allegations of rape, people claiming child abuse where there was none. You get all manner of allegations, almost like a sport. In fact, they’re very, very serious lies.
Thou shalt not covet.
This is a big one still. All I can say is look at bankers’ bonuses. If you actually look at the hunger of society today, I would say, this commandment is more relevant than ever.
Remember the Sabbath and keep it holy.
I think we’ve lost a lot by having lost this commandment. Even if you are not religious, there was much to be said for a day apart. Having that day when everything closed down was a real break, which I think is a major loss.
IDOLS – Thou shalt not bow down thyself before them nor worship them.
We don’t have photos of Christ. So you have representations of them which are reminders. Don’t worship the image, worship Christ. Once you start ascribing to an image Divine powers, then I think it’s a problem. The Cross is a huge symbol of salvation, sacrifice and suffering. But it doesn’t mean that an individual piece of wood has any more power than a flag and a bit of cloth.
Thou shalt not take the name of the Lord thy God in vain. These days people are always saying “Oh, my God,” But it’ wrong. I don’t think that there’s any shame in saying, we shouldn’t treat the Name of God quite as casually as we do. There is a real significance. It’s not just a convenient swear word”.
Unfortunately, Ann Widdecombe was on the wrong mountain, indeed, even on the wrong continent – Africa!
How do we know?
From Studying Exodus, and the Quran, but also from studying the New Testament; for Ann, as a Christian, she should have known from the words of Paul, in his 4th letter to the Galatians, verse 25, that Mount Sinai: “is in Arabia”.   These are the only truthful words uttered by Paul in his testimony, and the only verifiable fact.
Paul Galatians 4 (King James Version)
22: For it is written, that Abraham had two sons, the one by a bondmaid, the other by a freewoman.  23: But he who was of the bondwoman was born after the flesh; but he of the freewoman was by promise.  24: Which things is an allegory: for these are the two covenants; the one from the Mount Sinai, which gendereth to bondage, which is Agar (Hagar).  25: For this Agar (Hagar) is Mount Sinai in Arabia, and answereth to Jerusalem which now is, and is in bondage with her children.

Genesis – 21: 14. “And Abraham rose up early in the morning and took bread and a bottle of water, and gave it unto Hagar, putting it on her shoulder, and the child and sent her away: and she wandered in the wilderness of Beer-Sheba. (15) And the water was spent in the bottle, and she cast the child under one of the shrubs. (16) And she went and sat herself down over against him as it were a bowshot’s length (300 yards/Meters) for she said: Let me not see the death of the child. And she sat over against him, and lifted up her voice, and wept. (17) And God heard the voice of the lad; and the Angel of God called unto Hagar and said unto her – ‘what aileth thee, Hagar? Fear Not, for God has heard the voice of the lad where he is. (18) Arise, lift up the lad and hold him in your hand – for I will make him a great nation. (19) And God opened her eyes, and she saw the well of water; and she went, and filled the bottle with water and gave it to the lad to drink. (20) And God was with the lad; and he grew and dwelt in the wilderness, and became an archer. (21) And dwelt in the wilderness of Paran. And his mother took him a wife out of the land of Egypt…”
Biblical Beer-Sheba the true Location of the Well of Zam Zam
Islamic history states that Zamzam Well was revealed to Hagar, the wife of Abraham (Ibrahim) and mother of Ismael, [2] around the year 2000 BC. According to Islamic tradition, she was desperately seeking water for her infant son, but could find none, as Mecca is located in a hot dry valley with few other sources of water. Muslim traditions say that Hagar ran seven times back and forth in the scorching heat between the two hills of Safa and Marwah, looking for water. Getting thirstier by the second, her son, Ishmael, anxiously scraped the land with his feet, where suddenly water sprang out.
There are other versions of the story involving Allah sending his angel, Gabriel, who touched the ground where water rose. [3]
The name of the well comes from the phrase Zomë Zomë, meaning ‘stop flowing’, a command repeated by Hagar during her attempt to contain the spring water. [1]
According to Islamic tradition, Abraham rebuilt the Bait-ul-Allah (House of Allah) at the site of the well, a building which had been originally constructed by Adam, and today is called the Kaaba, a building towards which all Muslims around the world face in prayer, five times each day. The Zamzam well is located approximately 20 meters east of the Kaaba. [1]
The Masjid al Haram houses the holy Kaaba, the focal point of prayer for all Muslims.  Safa — from which the ritual walking (sa`i, Arabic: سعى) begins — is located approximately half a mile from the Kaaba. Marwah is located about 100 yards from the Kaaba. The distance between Safa and Marwah is approximately 450 meters, so that seven trips amount to roughly 3.15 kilometers. The two points and the path between them are now inside a long gallery that forms part of the Masjid.
B’hai-tuloh /Baitulos – Greek = Bait-ul-Lah (House of Allah) in Arabic
THE SIN BEARING STONE The names by which this swaddled and anointed stone is called strikingly confirms the conclusion that the Greek and Arabic names are one and the same. This we find from Priscian, who, speaking of “that stone which Saturn/Adam is said to have devoured for Jupiter,” adds, whom the Greeks called “Baitulos.” Now, “B’hai-tuloh” represents / signifies Christianity’s “Life-restoring child.” SOURCE “THE TWO BABYLONS” By the Rev. Alexander Hislop or PAPAL WORSHIP proved to be the Worship of Nimrod and his Wife – ISBN 0-7136-0470-0 Date: 1916
So – What is the Black Stone?
PastedGraphic-9The Black Stone (called الحجر الأسود al-Hajaru-l-Aswad in (Arabic) is an Islamic relic, which, according to Islamic tradition, dates back to the time of Adam and Eve. Remember Eve is buried in Jeddah. It was a white stone of consolation sent by Almighty God to Adam and Eve, following their fall from Paradise, through which they, and their offspring, would be able to find redemption – since which time it has progressively darkened due to billions of Adam’s offspring having visited it over the millennia – during which time it has absorbed their sins – and as a result – turned a very dark brownish black.
Many geologists and historians – not understanding its origins or significance – believe it to be a tektite or a meteorite. It is the eastern cornerstone of the Kaaba, the ancient stone building towards which Muslims pray, in the centre of the Grand Mosque in Mecca, Saudi Arabia. Bait-ul-Lah the House of Allah in Arabic – is conspicuous in its absence from books on the subject of B’hai-tuloh / Baitulos in Greek. These are just some of the Misconceptions about Islam, Mecca and its Black Sin bearing Stone (al Hajr ul Aswad – Arabic).
One particularly important and interesting observation I made during my visits to perform Hajj and Umrah, is the fact that there are no signs of wear and tear on the Black stone itself – which is clear from the above photograph – note that it still has all those very distinct facets and indentations – and this in spite of the billions of touches and kisses it has had to endure.
About 2/3rds of the way around this peninsula, God told Moses to lead the people off the highway and towards the Red Sea. (Exodus 14:1-3)
At this point, the Israelites left the Way of Wilderness of the Red Sea and entered into a canyon leading directly to the Gulf of Aqaba arm of the Red Sea.
As they were still in Egyptian controlled territory, their every move was watched by military lookout posts on the surrounding hills and probably flashed via mirror relay back to Pharaoh (see photo of the ruins of such a lookout on right side below). When Pharaoh realized the Israelites were hemmed in by the mountains and the sea, he decided to pursue them (Exodus 14:3)…
Upon arriving at the Red Sea, the Israelites found themselves on an enormous beach. This beach was 4.5 miles long by 2 miles wide (7 km x 3 km). However, (as recorded in the writings of Josephus) the mountains closed in around the beach and there was no apparent escape route. At the north end of the beach an Egyptian military garrison was stationed in a fort. You can see the fort building in the next two photos. Locals from a nearby Bedouin village still draw water from the well inside the buildings.
The Gulf of Aqaba is around 5,000 feet deep (1,500 m) for most of its length with a steep 45 degree slope to the bottom. However, on the side where the Israelites were trapped was the canyon they had just come through. Water rushing off the land soon after the flood had carried with it a tremendous amount of sand which had been deposited halfway out into the Gulf. Miraculously, a similar canyon had produced a tremendous deposit of sand originating from the other side. The location of both canyons was such that the sand reached each other and formed a land bridge of about 6/10ths of a mile wide (900 m) by 8 miles (13 km) long through the deep between the two sides. The slope both up and down on this land bridge was a gentle 6 degrees.
But even then, at the deepest point, the land bridge was around 1,000 feet (300 m) deep. So given that it would take around 400 psi of pressure to hold back water 1,000 feet high, how could the Israelites survive such as wind as they passed through?
To congeal means to turn from a liquid to a solid such as from water to ice. Moses raised his rod over the sea and God caused a strong east wind to blow, quickly freezing the water into a thick mass of ice on either side of what became a channel or trough over this land bridge.
Exodus 14:21, 22 says: “Then Moses stretched out his hand over the sea, and all that night the Lord drove the sea back with a strong east wind and turned it into dry land. The waters were divided, and the Israelites went through the sea on dry ground, with a wall of water on their right and on their left.”
Then God caused the wind to cease and the Israelites passed through on dry (and perhaps frozen?) ground.
After the Israelites reached the other side, God removed the cloud blocking the Egyptians and they pursued the Israelites, going into the trough. Moses stretched forth his rod over the sea again. The ice which was thinnest at the western side of the trough began to melt, sending water cascading into it. The water rushed into the channel and eastward carrying many of the Egyptian soldiers and their horses with it. The bodies of many of the drowned soldiers were washed up on the eastern shore at the feet of their intended victims. (Exodus 14:30)
The Bible also says that the Lord “made the wheels of their chariots come off so that they had difficulty driving” (Exodus 14:25) causing the Egyptian soldiers to become stuck. Expeditions diving along this underwater bridge discovered many coral encrusted chariots with their wheels detached. Some gold plated wheels were found indicating high level officials or priests were part of the group pursuing the Israelites. Also found were parts of skeletons of men and horses, all preserved by the coral covering them.
We hope to add some photographs here in the near future showing some of these underwater findings.
Further evidence of the underwater bridge and the crossing site comes from identical Phoenician columns found on either side of the crossing site. The inscriptions on the one found on the west side lying in the water had been eroded off. However, on the one found on the Arabian side, archaic Hebrew inscriptions were still legible on the leeward side of the column. They read “This monument is erected by King Solomon, king of Israel, in Honor of Yahweh in commemoration of the crossing of the Red Sea.” King Solomon, in his building of the temple, had formed very good relations with the Phoenician people. The column on the west side was moved across the road and stood upright in concrete (see below). The column on the Arabian east side was removed and possibly moved to a museum.
PastedGraphic-13The Israelites continued up the canyon and on to Mt. Sinai. And we should expect to find evidence corroborating the Bible along this route. Click here to go to the Mt. Sinai page.
The Bible proved right again! May God be glorified and our faith in Him and His word increased!
For many more photographs, video clips of what was found on the Red Sea floor, and lots more marvellous information, we recommend the video, Surprising Discoveries, Part II and the Ark of the Covenant and other Discoveries CD-ROM.

Photos copyrighted by MindVision Interactive Pty Ltd., Adelaide, South Australia and Jonathan Gray. Used by permission.
Back to the Discoveries pageBack to Compilation ListBiblePlus Home Page
After finding chariot parts in the Gulf of Aquaba, Ron Wyatt wondered if Mount Sinai could be in Saudi Arabia. In Galatians 4:25 the Bible states that Mount Sinai is in Arabia, “For this Agar is Mount Sinai in ARABIA. “After being denied a visa Ron entered the country without one on foot. He made his way to ‘Jebel el Lawz’ (Mountain of the Law), known by the locals as “Jebel Musa” (Moses’ mountain) which his research showed could have fitted the Biblical description of Mount Sinai. On arrival at the site Ron found that the peak of the mountain had been burnt with such a severe heat that the granite rock had been turned to obsidian (burnt rock turned to glass, e.g. volcanic glass).
The Saudi archaeologists had said they can locate where the source of heat was, by the ‘shadow effect’ on the rocks. They concluded that it was fifty meters above the peak. “And Mount Sinai was altogether on a smoke, because the LORD descended upon it in a fire…For the mountain did burn with fire” Ex. 19:18, Deut. 5:23. Could this burnt, blackened peak be the remains of God’s own presence?
PastedGraphic-16Within the area Ron found another remarkable find. A massive split boulder, sixty foot high, forty foot wide, and twenty foot deep, sitting on top of a rocky hill. Upon closer investigation he identified clear evidence of water erosion, quite a surprise considering this was located in a dry desert! Is there an account in the Bible that talks of such a rock? “Behold I will stand before thee there upon the rock in Horeb; and thou shalt smite the rock, and there shall come water out of it, that the people may drink.” Ex. 17:6. Moses had led the people across the desert to Mount Sinai. They were now complaining because they had no water. It was for this reason that God commanded Moses to strike this rock that God could manifest His power to perform miracles, and cause water to flow from this rock in 12 streams.PastedGraphic-17
PastedGraphic-18Also in the area Ron found the twelve wells at Elim mentioned in Exodus 15:27, the stone altar mentioned in Exodus 20:24, the altar that Moses built and dedicated to, “Jehovah-Nissi” in Exodus 17:15. He found a broken section of a grinding stone or millstone. The Bible says the Israelites gathered and ground manna in mills, Numbers 11:8.
The twelve pillars of stone and the altar mentioned in Exodus 24:4 were also located and several items of pottery, (Leviticus 6:28, 11:33, 15:12). Exodus 32:5 tells the account of Aaron building an altar to the golden calf, and Ron found an altar with twelve Egyptian style petroglyphs of calves. An archaeologist from Riyadh University became very excited when he saw these calves, he pointed out that they were of Egyptian style, and were not to be found anywhere else in Saudi Arabia.
The account tells of Moses’ anger on seeing the idolatry of the Israelites, and how he melted down the golden calf that they were worshipping. Ron found the gold dust inside the altar.


.                   Deuteronomy 18 
15 “The LORD your God will raise up for you a prophet like me from among your BRETHREN (NOT fellow Israelites,) and you must listen to that prophet.
16 For this is what you yourselves requested of the LORD your God when you were assembled at Mount Sinai  (IN ARABIA).* You begged that you might never again have to listen to the voice of the LORD your God or see this blazing fire for fear you would die.2
17 “Then the LORD said to me, `Fine, I will do as they have requested.
18 I will raise up a prophet like you from among your MIDIANITE BRETHREN (NOT fellow Israelites.) I will tell that prophet what to say, and he will tell the people everything I command him (I WILL PUT MY WORDS IN HIS MOUTH – THE RECITATION i.e. THE QUR’AN).
19 I will personally deal with anyone who will not listen to the messages the prophet proclaims on my behalf.
20 But any prophet who claims to give a message from another god or who falsely claims to speak for me must die.’
21 You may wonder, `How will we know whether the prophecy is from the LORD or not?’
22 If the prophet predicts something in the LORD’s name and it does not happen, the LORD did not give the message. That prophet has spoken on his own and need not be feared.
Hebrew Horeb, another name for Sinai
According to Kalda Bin Zaid bin Baraka Al Madani of Medina in the Hijri year 300 in his book:  “Asma Al Masalek li’ay am al Mehdi Al Malik li Kul Al Dunya Bi Amr Allah Al Malik” (The Best ways to know the time of Al Mehdi King of the World by Allah’s command or Al Mahdi at the threshold) states: “…and woe to he who betrays the trustworthy Mehdi. In the Hijri year 1400 and count 20 or 30 years (2016 = 1437 Hijri) the trustworthy Mehdi will appear, he will fight the whole world and both the Daleen (Christians) and the Maghdoob alayhim (Jews) will join against him with the hypocrites in the land of Isra and Miraj at Mount Megidon and there will come out against him the Queen of the world and deception, an adulteress called America, who will incite the world to deviation and infidelity; and the Jews of the world at that time will have the upper hand and will rule Quds and the holy city (Jerusalem). And all nations will come to fight by sea and air except those in the land of extreme cold and the land of extreme heat. And the Mehdi will see that all the world does plot against him, but he will see that Allah’s plan is stronger than all, and he will see that the World belongs to Allah and to Him it will return, and that the World is but a tree that Allah wills him to rule from its roots to its branches and Allah will throw down on them (the unbelievers) a disastrous punishment and Burn their land and seas and skies and the sky will rain down a harmful shower, the people of the Earth will curse the infidels, and Allah shall will the defeat of the unbelievers”.


In the Saheeh hadith of Ahmed and Abu Dawood and Ibn Maja and Ibn Haban, (Albani also classified it as saheeh) that on the authority of Dhi Mukhmar, The Messenger of Allah (Peace and Blessings be Upon him) The Romans will make a treaty with you, and then you shall all fight a common enemy, then you shall be victorious and share the spoils, then you will go to an area of mountainous green forest, there a man from the Romans will raise the cross and exclaim to all that “The Cross is indeed victorious”, so one of the Muslim men will rise up and kill him, upon that the Romans will begin to betray the treaty and battles will follow and the Romans will gather against you under 80 banners each banner will encompass 12 thousand troops” (Justin Webb on the BBC World Service in 2005 announced that the number of troops deployed by the coalition against Iraq and Afghanistan was 960,000 i.e. 12,000 x 80 = 960,000).


1 comment:

  1. Even the names THEY give themselves and adopted by most of us are misleading!
    I AM GAY, and have always been since I was around 12 years of age, but I was never and never will I be a HOMOANUSSEXUAL pervert!