Sunday, 2 August 2009



Hitler the Rothschild puppet?


By Mike King

Every few weeks or so, a reader will ask for comment on the persistent false allegation of Adolf Hitler having been a secret agent of the Rothschild bankers. Dismissing the claims as retarded rubbish with a few sentences of clarification is generally all it takes to reassure Hitler fans that there is no cause for alarm. All one has to do is look at the level of never-ending red-hot hatred that is still being levelled at Hitler. Seventy years after Germany's defeat in World War II, he continues to be vilified by the PRC (Predatory Ruling Class) for one simple reason -- to scare people into a "never do that again" frame of mind. The Great One was true blue -- the real deal -- the genuine article.
Contrary to the idiotic claims of patriotards and assorted trolls who are known to pose as “anti-Globalists,” Hitler shut down the German, French and Austrian branches of the House of Rothschild -- a very peculiar action for a “Rothschild agent”, eh?  

Nazis free Rotschild seize bank - The Daily News, Perth, Friday 8 April 1938, page 2 Nazis Seize Rothschild Fortune - Sydney Morning Herald, NSW, Saturday 23 September 1939, page 15

1 - The Daily News, Perth, Friday, 8 April, 1938, page-2
VIENNA, -- Whether ex-King Ed ward of England, the Duke of Windsor, had anything to do with it is not announced, but his Jewish friend, Austrian banker, Baron Louis Rothschild, was released today by the Nazis. But the Rothschild Bank is confiscated.
The Duke made a personal plea to Hitler for the release of Rothschild and others three weeks ago. But he was given a rebuff. Hitler replied, ‘regretting his inability to comply with the request.’
2 - The Sydney Morning Herald, Saturday 23 September 1939
LONDON, Sept. 22. (A.A.P.)
The fortune of Mr. Julius Rothschild, a member of the well-known ‘ Jewish banking house, has been confiscated by the German Government, states a message from Berlin.

This un-sourced nonsense about Hitler the British-Rothschild agent doesn't even merit the time that it takes to rebut it. But because more than a few truthers have bought into this lunacy and continue to repeat this lie (promoted by advertising salesmen such as Alex Jones, among others) -- what follows is a 'put-up-or-shut-up' refutation of the major points of the "Hitler-worked-for-the-Rothschilds" fairy tale and its lesser variant "The-Rothschilds-funded-and-manipulated-Hitler."
Some of these crackpots even go as far as to say that Hitler was not just a Rothschild puppet, but an actual family member!

Claim: Hitler tried to make deals with the British. He should have known that England would ally itself with Russia rather than against it. This proves that Hitler was a Rothschild agent and false opposition.
Rebuttal: The English ruling class was NOT monolithic. Hitler's outreach was to the reasonable elements -- not to scum such as Winston Churchill and Anthony Eden.
There were powerful men in Britain that were resisting the drive to World War II with Germany. Men such as former Prime Minister David Lloyd George, King Edward VIII (later demoted to Duke because he was an open admirer of Hitler), the 5th Duke of Wellington, Lord Halifax, and even Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain -- the "appeaser" who was maneuvered into war by the traitors in his own Party. It was those type of Englishmen that Hitler was trying to forge an alliance with -- not the Rothschild Jews and their Freemason stooges!
King Edward (then demoted to Duke), Prime Minister Lloyd George and Prime Minister Chamberlain were all cast aside and marginalized by the same Rothschild cabal that wanted to destroy Germany. Hitler pinned his hopes on the presence of a peace movement in Britain. That is why he attempted peace instead of invasion.

Claim: Hitler attacked a subsidiary of the New World Order (the USSR) instead of its heart, the City of London.  This proves that Hitler was a Rothschild agent and false opposition.
Rebuttal: Again, the reason that Hitler did not invade England was because he held out hopes for making peace. When Stalin provoked Hitler's preemptive invasion of Russia in 1941, the invasion of England was then out of the question, logistically speaking. Hitler's hesitation to invade Britain had nothing to do with protecting the Rothschilds.,204,203,200_.jpg
Russian defector confirmed that Stalin's massive military build-up in the east (1940-1941) was OFFENSIVE -- and eventually forced Hitler to invade Russia. Invading Britain was then out of the question.

Claim:  Hitler was part-Jewish.
Rebuttal: Hitler's "part jewishness" is a recurring claim for which there is zero evidence.

REWARD #1 will pay a $500 reward to the first person who can cite definitive documentation proving that Hitler was part Jewish. We will also publish and publicize a retraction. Send evidence to:
Claim: Hitler failed to see that America had already succumbed to total Rothschild control. He should therefore have known that America would enter the war and knocked Britain out before the Americans could arrive.
Rebuttal: Like Britain, America's political  class was not monolithic. The anti-war, anti-FDR forces in America were still very strong. Included among them were men like Charles Lindbergh and Joseph P. Kennedy.
With memories of World War I still fresh, the American peace movement was too strong for FDR to overcome. How was Hitler to know that FDR would one day stoop so low as to set up the Pearl Harbor attack? By that time, due to Stalin's war in the east, it was already too late to knock Britain (the destination point for U.S. troop arrivals) out of the war.
Claim: Hitler was financed by the same London and NYC-based Masonic Jewish bankers he was railing against. 
Rebuttal: Can anyone show us a receipt? Seriously, there is not one shred of evidence that the Rothschilds or their front men "financed" the rise of Hitler's NSDAP. Hitler's money came from German businessmen fearful of Communist takeover, Russian emigres / Royalists who fled the Bolsheviks, and regular Party members, disgruntled veterans and NSDAP supporters.
REWARD #2 will pay a $500 reward to the first person who can cite definitive documentation of Rothschild or Rockefeller money transfers to the German NSDAP during the 1920's and early 1930's. We will also publish and publicize a retraction. Send evidence to:

Claim: Companies like Ford, Woolworth, Kodak, Alcoa and IBM; and Wall Street investors like Prescott Bush did business with 'Nazi' Germany.
Rebuttal: So what?! Many American firms and individuals did business with Germany after it became a united Constutional Monarchy (1871-1918) -- and continued to do business with Germany when it became a left-leaning socialist democracy (1919-1933) -- and continued to do business with pre-war Germany after Hitler and his NSDAP  were elected into power (1933-1941). Why wouldn't they?
If a local cigar shop imports and re-sells Cuban cigars, does that make the owner a Castro "collaborator" or a Communist? How bloody flippin' stupid!
Claim: Jewish banking legends Paul and Max Warburg supported Hitler's NSDAP through a large chemical company called I.G. Farben and its American subsidiary. I. G. Farben helped finance the NSDAP while Max served on its board and Paul served on the board of its American subsidiary.
Rebuttal: Means nothing! The Warburgs were neither CEO's nor Presidents at I.G. Farben; but only single board members out of many others. The origination of their terms on various corporate boards preceded Hitler's rise. Paul actually died one year before Hitler was even elected. We should also point out that many German firms that did not have a Warburg sitting on their board also supported Hitler! In short, I.G. Farben backed Hitler in spite of the Warburgs, not because of them.
Claim: In such and such a book, Professor so and so from such and such University reveals that Hitler blah -- blah -- blah -- blah -- blah -- blah.
Rebuttal: To the easily-impressed, junk historians citing the un-sourced garbage of other junk historians may sound like a statement of credibility; but it is not! Fools quoting fools in an endless circle-jerk proves nothing. At some point, one needs to produce original source documentation or multiple credible witness in order to support an accusation. We do not see any of that in any of the articles claiming that Hitler was an agent of the bankers.
Claim: Hitler's role was to smoke out all opposition to the New World Order and lead it to destruction.
Rebuttal: Apart from there being no evidence to support this horrible hypothesis, this opinion itself is nonsensical. If the deliverance of Germany into the hands of Satanic World Government was truly Hitler's goal, then all he had to do was allow the failed Wiemar Republic to continue imploding. Had Germany fallen to Bolshevism in the early 1930's (which it certainly would have were it not for Hitler's dynamic leadership) it would have been "game over" for all of Europe.
Claim: Inconsistency in regard to Hitler's behavior was due to his "multiple personality disorder."
Rebuttal: "Multiple personality?" Based on what data??? Based on what medical records?
"I'm a German Nationalist. I'm a British agent. I'm Jewish."
Claim:  Young Hitler visited London in 1912, where he was brainwashed and programmed at the Tavistock Institute.
Rebuttal: (palm to face -- deep sigh) Hard evidence, please --- not 'he said that she said that he said'.
REWARD #3 will pay a $500 reward to the first person who can cite definitive documentation proving that Hitler visited England in 1912, and that he was a mind-controlled British agent. We will also publish and publicize a retraction. Send evidence to:
Claim:  In May-June 1940, when England lay prostrate after their exodus from Dunkirk. Hitler had an opportunity to tear out the heart of the Globalist Jewish money monopoly. Instead he allowed 330,000 British and Allied soldiers to escape at Dunkirk -- proof that he was their agent, not their nemesis.
Rebuttal: Viewed through the lenses of 20/20 hindsight , Hitler's mercy at Dunkirk was a blunder. But to go from there all the way to "Hitler was a Rothschild agent" is the equivalent of talking 2 and 2 and hastily coming up with 5. What devotees of the Rothschild-Hitler School of illogic may not know is that after Dunkirk (May 1940), there was a bitter divide among members of Churchill's War Cabinet. A faction led by Lord Halifax was willing to sit-down with Mussolini of Italy (who was still neutral) and hear the details of a peace offer from Germany. The conflict is known as "The War Cabinet Crisis" -- and it almost ended Churchill's war before it could really heat up. (Details Here)
It was the presence of reasonable Englishmen such as Halifax, coupled with Hitler's sincere desire to avoid further bloodshed, that stayed Hitler's hand. That's called honor, not treason.
Lord Halifax (tall man) wanted the British War Cabinet to end the war -- if Hitler's terms were acceptable. Mad Dog Churchill blocked his efforts to even have the proposals heard.

Given that the moronic myth of Hitler-Rothschild is so devoid of logic, so utterly unsubstantiated, and so easily debunked -- one has to wonder why such claims continue to be peddled by some in the "truth movement". There are three categories of people promoting this rubbish:
1. False opposition/ Zionist trolls
2. Hitler-phobics
3. Sincere dupes of categories 1 & 2
The false opposition explanation for the Hitler-Rothschild lie is self-explanatory. There are those - the usual suspects (cough cough) - who, in an attempt to steer truth-seeking "conspiracy theorists" away from the greatness and goodness of Hitler, would have us believe that Hitler was a traitor working for the N.W.O. / Illuminati. They are deliberately poisoning the well of truth. It's that simple.
The Hitler-phobia phenomenon, on the other hand, is not the work of false opposition agents. Rather, it is motivated by the fear of "going all the way" by embracing the undeservedly toxic name of the "evil" Adolf Hitler. These weak-willed (and ad-revenue dependent) truthers will passionately (and sincerely) rail against the Globalists and their evil agent FDR, and the evil Communist Stalin. But they need to come up with a plausible-sounding explanation for Hitler's fight against the very same Globalists that they hate so much. 
You see, they can't say that the Globalists were suddenly "the good guys" during World War II -- but nor can they bring themselves to admit that Hitler was "the good guy" fighting Globalism either. Perish the thought! It quite a pickle for these timid types (John Birch Society, Alex Jones, etc). What to do -- what to do?
The 'Hitler-was-in-bed-with-the-Globalists' Fairy Tale solves this little problem. As the manufactured argument goes, the Globalists and Hitler were both "bad guys" who double-crossed each other! It's a very safe middle-ground for the 1/2 truth movement -- but it's a lie/error that 100% truthers should be aware of, and stay far away from.



Greg Hallett & the Spymaster


Hitler was a British Agent exposes for the first time Operation WINNIE THE POOH - Ian Fleming's removal of Adolf Hitler out of Berlin 2 May 1945.
The search for Hitler became an excuse for worldwide surveillance and the precursor to the Cold War.
Hitler's missing year in Britain is uncovered, as is his psychological deconstruction to perform as an agent for the British war machine.
It confirms his sex with men and his bizarre sexual habits with women, including hands-on murders made to look like suicides.
This book covers Hess and his body doubles' simultaneous flight to Britain, the Duke of Kent's faked death, Anthony Blunt's conception by a royal, Wallis Simpson's sexual practices with King Edward VIII, and how Wallis leaked the King's British military secrets to Hitler.
Hitler was a British Agent exposes the training of top level double agents, the repeated faking of their deaths and their very real escapes ... making this something of an illusion-buster.
Everything that happens now, happens because of 1945.
Former MI-6 Chief: "This book was written by a genius".
James Bond III: "A brilliant analysis of the deception of war".
Two Intelligence agencies have regularly stolen this book and “It has been read at the highest levels” during the final phases of writing.
As quickly as it was written, it was stolen, and in August 2005 word got back that they would let it out.
This came with further inside information, Hitler’s British passport marked ‘Jew’, and at least one historical act.


19. Churchill, Hitler and Stalin Work Together

Acquittement pour Hitler

Published on 6 Sep 2013

Dans cette vidéo Vincent Reynouard, revêt la robe d'avocat et plaide en faveur d'Adolph Hitler. Il démontre dans sa plaidoirie que les accusations portées au troisième Reich lors du tribunal de Nuremberg ne se fondent sur aucunes preuves recevables ou avérées.

Loin de la dramaturgie idéologiques officielles, vous découvrirez la volonté évidente de l'Angleterre de faire éclater une guerre entre l'Allemagne et la Pologne, bien que le troisième Reich, mais aussi l'Italie, ai tout tenté pour résoudre le conflit de manière pacifique.

Retrouvez d'autres vidéos de Vincent Reynouard sur sa chaîne Youtube , et des articles plus détaillés sur son site :


10 mai 1940

Hitler envahit la Belgique

Le 10 mai 1940, sept mois après la déclaration de guerre de la France et de l'Angleterre à l'Allemagne, celle-ci rompt le front occidental. Le Führer met fin à la «drôle de guerre» et lance ses armées sur les Pays-Bas, la Belgique et la France.
Le soir du même jour, à Londres, le roi demande à Winston Churchill, farouche partisan de la guerre à outrance contre Hitler, d'assumer la fonction de Premier ministre.
Le 14 mai, la reine des Pays-Bas, Wilhelmine, et une partie de son gouvernement se réfugient à Londres. Le lendemain, Rotterdam est bombardée et les Pays-Bas capitulent.
Les commandements anglais et français envoient leurs troupes en Belgique. Mais à leur surprise, Hitler ne s'en tient pas là. Conformément au plan du général Erich von Manstein, le Führer porte son principal effort dans les Ardennes, une région montagneuse qui n'est pas protégée par les efficaces fortifications de la ligne Maginot. C'est ainsi que trois divisions blindées du général Heinz Guderian percent le front français du côté de Sedan.
Les Belges, qui s'abritaient derrière leur neutralité, sont également débordés par les divisions blindées de la Wehrmacht cependant que les parachutistes allemands sautent sur Liège.
La percée des chars (panzers) allemands en mai 1940 (DR)
Les divisions françaises qui devaient protéger cette frontière se débandent sans attendre. Négligeant Paris, les panzers allemands bifurquent vers l'ouest...
À Paris, le 19 mai,désemparé par l'ampleur de la débâcle, le Président du conseil Paul Reynaud rappelle d'urgence le vieux général Maxime Weygand (73 ans), en poste en Syrie, et lui confie le commandement en chef des armées à la place du généralissime Gamelin.
Le 20 mai, en soirée, les panzers qui ont fait la percée de Sedan prennent en tenaille les armées franco-anglaises qui s'étaient imprudemment engouffrées dans la nasse belge. Le 24 mai, les Allemands prennent Boulogne, encerclent Calais et ne sont plus qu'à 35 kilomètres de Dunkerque.
Hitler, cependant, ne veut pas écraser la France et l'Angleterre mais seulement les réduire à l'impuissance pour avoir les mains libres à l'est de l'Europe, selon le projet énoncé dans sa profession de foi, Mein Kampf. Le 24 mai, il donne l'ordre à ses troupes d'arrêter leur progression, avec l'espoir que les Anglais, aux abois, vont saisir la perche qui leur est tendue pour entamer des négociations. Décevant ses attentes, les Anglais en profitent seulement pour consolider leurs défenses autour de la poche de Dunkerque.
Après une semaine de tergiversations, le Premier ministre britannique décide de faire rembarquer ses troupes à Dunkerque. C'est l'opération «Dynamo» : 300.000 soldats anglais et français sont évacués par le port de Dunkerque vers l'Angleterre, où ils se prépareront pour la contre-offensive... quatre ans plus tard.
En Belgique, toute résistance est devenue inutile de l'avis même des chefs alliés. Le roi Léopold III, qui n'a pas voulu suivre son gouvernement à Londres, signe donc la capitulation de son armée, effective le 28 mai. Le roi s'en tient à la reddition militaire et refuse l'armistice, c'est-à-dire une convention de gouvernement à gouvernement.
Le 5 juin, Hitler donne l'ordre à ses troupes de reprendre leur progression mais cet ordre arrive trop tard pour empêcher à Dunkerque l'évacuation des troupes britanniques vers l'Angleterre. Par sa faute, le Führer se prive ainsi d'une victoire rapide sur l'Angleterre.
Là-dessus arrive Mussolini, le dictateur italien. Il se joint à la curée et le 10 juin, déclare la guerre à la France déjà à genoux.
Le 14 juin, les Allemands entrent dans Paris qui s'est déclaré «ville ouverte» après la fuite du gouvernement à Tours puis à Bordeaux.
Le maréchal Pétain, devenu président du Conseil à la place de Paul Reynaud, négocie l'armistice avec l'envahisseur. La sonnerie du cessez-le-feu résonne le 25 juin à 0h35, soit six semaines après le début de l'invasion. Victimes d'un commandement défaillant, les soldats français et anglais se sont néanmoins battus avec un remarquable courage, à quelques exceptions près.
Pendant les six semaines qui séparent l'invasion du cessez-le-feu, la campagne de France a fait, selon les chiffres les plus récents (2010), environ 60.000 morts chez les soldats français, preuve d'une combativité remarquable. La Wehrmacht déplore quant à elle 30.000 tués.
Dès le début de l'invasion allemande, en Belgique comme en France, pressés par les autorités locales, les habitants des villes et des villages fuient vers un improbable abri dans le Sud.
En quelques jours, huit à dix millions de Belges et de Français se retrouvent sur les routes, sous le feu des Stukas, les avions allemands qui piquent sur les colonnes de réfugiés et les mitraillent en faisant retentir leurs sirènes, surnommées «les trompettes de Jéricho».
Publié ou mis à jour le : 2015-03-16 19:0

Alex Salmond rebukes Israelis over Holocaust speech

The former First Minister tells the Council of Europe it was “inappropriate” for a senior Israeli representative at a Holocaust commemoration service to criticise the Iranians, who have questioned whether the atrocity took place.






Alex Salmond has criticised the Israelis over a Holocaust commemoration speech
Alex Salmond has criticised the Israelis over a Holocaust commemoration speech Photo: Getty Images
Alex Salmond has come under attack for using his new role representing the UK in Europe to issue a rebuke to the Israeli parliament on Holocaust Memorial Day.
The former First Minister told the Council of Europe that it was “inappropriate” for a senior Israeli representative at a Holocaust commemoration service to criticise the presence of Iranian President Hassan Rouhani in France.
But his dressing down came the same day as Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, the Supreme Leader of Iran, published a video questioning whether the Holocaust “is a reality or not”.
The Ayatollah’s website promoted the video with a banner across its home page, featuring a montage of images, including one of Adolf Hitler.
Mr Salmond, who recently returned from a trip to Iran, told the Strasbourg meeting that there was a “time and place for international politics” and the Israeli government should not have issued the criticism “during a solemn commemoration service.”
He last night defended his actions, telling the Telegraph that everyone he had spoken to who also attended the council’s commemoration service on Wednesday morning agreed that the “political” attack in the Israeli speech was wrong.
However, experienced figures from other parties questioned his judgment on the international stage and claimed his comments created the impression of him being an unofficial spokesman for the Iranian regime.
Mr Salmond was criticised for grandstanding during his Iran visit last month during which it was reported he told a Tehran-based news agency that Scotland’s “ruling party has always been against the decisions Westerners make against Iran.”
A still from Khamenei's video, Are The Dark Ages Over?  Photo:
Lord Campbell of Pittenweem, the former Liberal Democrat leader, who has specialised in foreign affairs, said: “Judgements in these matters are extremely important and often the less said the better.
“It was after all Mr Salmond who accused Tony Blair of committing an ‘unpardonable folly’ when the Prime Minister successfully set out to protect the people of Kosovo for the genocide being inflicted upon them.”
Lord Foulkes of Cumnock, a Labour peer who has also attended the Council of Europe, added: “He does appear to be a spokesman for Iran.”
The Prime Minister appointed the former SNP leader and fellow Nationalist MP Tasmina Ahmed-Sheikh to the British group to represent UK voters in the council’s parliamentary assembly.
It spends four weeks of the year in Strasbourg and recommends policies that are submitted to national governments for action. Michael Oren, a historian and former ambassador to the US, led this week’s Israeli parliament delegation.
Before Wednesday morning’s Holocaust ceremony, he criticised President Rouhani’s four-day visit to Italy and France, asking: “How can Europe honour the memory of the Holocaust, and on the exact same day host the leader of the Iranian regime, which denies that the Holocaust actually happened?”
Mr Salmond told this newspaper that the Israelis were free to repeat their criticism at other times, only not during the commemoration service.
“No one else is impressed by that sort of behaviour. It was a formal event to commemorate the greatest disaster in European history,” the former SNP leader said.
“Someone had to say what a lot of people who attended that service were thinking.” He said the appropriate method to make his feelings known was raising a point of order in the council’s parliamentary assembly as it had hosted the commemoration service.
Mr Salmond intervened in a debate on Wednesday morning, declaring an interest as a member of the Holocaust Commission of the United Kingdom and praising those who organised Wednesday morning’s ceremony.
“I found it inappropriate that the Israeli ambassador launched attacks on the Republic of Iran and its President, who is a guest of this republic,” he said.
“We cannot vet what people say, but we have the right to state that there is a time and a place for international politics. Such attacks should not take place during a solemn commemoration service.”
President Rouhani, who studied law at Glasgow Caledonian University, embarked on his tour of Europe to drum up trade and diplomatic links after Iran signed a historic deal to limit its nuclear ambitions.
In contrast to his predecessor Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, he has publicly acknowledged and condemned the Holocaust as “reprehensible.” The Israeli government was last night unavailable for comment.

N.B. Of course, I do not share the racist bias of The White Resister, especially their visceral hatred for Muslims and Islam!

The White Resister

"My Father Heinrich Himmler was Not a Monster”

On the anniversary of the death of Heinrich Himmler, both the Daily Mail and the Mirror have articles about the bravery and devotion of his daughter. 

Of course they refer to this bravery as evil and hatred and so on. But the girl truly does have an amazing heart, which should serve as an inspiration to all of us. Gudrun Burwitz, who was once called Gudrun Himmler, remains defiant and unbroken.
The children of Rudolf Hess, Martin Bormann and others turned their backs on their fathers and denied their legacies. Gudrun did not.
Seventy years after her father, Heinrich Himmler, allegedly killed himself with a cyanide tablet after being captured by British troops, she continues to defend him.
From the time of his death when she was 14, she kept a scrapbook of every newspaper picture she could find of him.
She still have a manuscript, which she says demolishes the lies told about her noble father, which remains unpublished, presumably because it would be illegal to publish it.
To this day, she works to help the German and other Axis victims of Allied aggression evade torture and imprisonment.
She runs an organization called Stille Hilfe – “Silent Help” – which has help SS soldiers escape to South America.
In 2010, the organization paid for the legal defense of Samuel Kunz, an SS man accused of murdering 437,000 Jews at Belzec.
She also recently helped Dutch SS man Klaas Carel Faber live out his life and die peacefully in bed.  He died in 2012 in Germany, never extradited.
To this day she denies the official story of her father’s death, saying that the picture of him dead had been altered.
(Daily Stormer)

New legacy: Genghis Khan's bloody conquests scrubbed 700million tons of carbon from the atmosphere as depopulated land returned to forest

By Mike King

Not that any credence should be placed in the Holocaust , but imagine a museum exhibit in a major American city honoring The Great One (that's Hitler for all you newbies and normies). How soon would 1 million Jews and other assorted libtards and "anti-racists" converge upon the event and tear the building apart brick by brick?
Not that any credence should be placed in the official version of the Spanish Inquisition either, but imagine a museum exhibit in a major American city honoring King Ferdinand and Queen Isabella - the Monarchs who, in 1492, expelled the Jews from Spain. Same reaction as above.
Again, not that any credence should be placed in the official version of 9/11, but imagine a museum exhibit in a major American city honoring Osama Bin Laden and his merry band of box-cutter-wielding madmen.
Or how about an exhibit dedicated to the Crusades, the Confederacy, the Ku Klux Klan, Joe Stalin, or Pol Pot? Unthinkable! Related image
These famous "anti-Semites"  would never get a sympathetic museum exhibit in their honor.

Even comparatively far less "controversial" figures such as Jesus, Charlemagne, Christopher Columbus, Andrew Jackson, Robert E. Lee and Napoleon would somehow offend the delicate sensibilities of the oh-so-tolerant kosher-keepers of western culture. But when it comes to the single greatest killer of White people the world has ever seen (pre-Bolshevik era) Philadelphia's Franklin Institute has no self-righteous moral compunction about sponsoring a traveling exhibit honoring - yes, honoring - Mr. Genghis Khan of Mongoldom. Directly or indirectly, the Mongols were responsible for an estimated 40,000,000 deaths. (many White folks - Aryans of Northern India, Persia, Middle East, Eastern Europe - but also many Chinese)
From the Institute's own website:
Genghis Khan: Bringing the Legend to Life
"Uncover the amazing story of one of the world’s greatest leaders and most misunderstood conquerors, Genghis Khan. Learn how his empire forever changed the face of the world, and discover his legacy as both a ruthless warrior and a revered statesman."

Now, let's try that same promo for Hitler:
Adolf Hitler: Bringing the Legend to Life
"Uncover the amazing story of one of the world’s greatest leaders and most misunderstood conquerors, Adolf Hitler. Learn how his empire forever changed the face of the world, and discover his legacy as both a ruthless warrior and a revered statesman."

Can you see the double standard here? What ever happened to all that tommy-rot about "never again" and "we must never forget"? Before we continue, a crash course on Genghis Khan and his immediate successors is in order here. As you read this excerpt, keep in mind that the people who suffered at the hands of Khan were real people - our Indo-European ancestors - whose DNA we still carry. Visualize, if you can, the unimaginable terror that these gentle people must have felt as the mounted Mongol beasts rode into their villages and cities - torching their homes, exterminating the men, children and elderly; while riding off with the prettiest fair maidens.

Volume 7, A Glorious Disaster:
The Christians: Their First 2000 Years:
(Abridged, edited and illustrated by
In England, the herring business had all but collapsed when buyers from the Baltic just never showed up. Why? It seemed that there suddenly were fewer people left in the Slavic lands to buy the catch -- wiped out, some reported, by hideous horsemen appearing like a whirlwind from the east.
People with dogs’ heads? Well, maybe not that, but they certainly behaved like wild dogs. They usually left nothing alive, and in any case the stench of corpses made whole cities uninhabitable. Resistance seemed useless. The princes of the Slavic people, then known as the Rus (Russians), reportedly had assembled the greatest army in their history, but in a single battle these hard-riding devils wiped it out.
Kill - Rape - Plunder - Enslave
Beyond them and beyond the lands east of Persia, they left the storied cities of Samarkand and Bukhara in charred ruin. According to the works of the Iranian historian Rashid al-Din  the Mongols killed more than 700,000 people in Merv and 1,000,000 in Nishapur. No one knew where they might strike next, and they claimed that their destiny was to rule the whole world.
In conquering Asia, the Mongols murdered untold millions–a catastrophe of a magnitude never before experienced. These disasters are attributable to the evil genius of a single man, the tyrant Genghis Khan, who rejoiced in slaughter and commanded the killing of innocent men, women, and children as his mounted minions raped, pillaged, and plundered wherever they went. For centuries Genghis Khan would stand infamous as history’s most ruthless practitioner of genocide. 
These Mongols were Asiatic, not Caucasian. They were also, as those in their path were about to discover to their grief, the world’s finest cavalry soldiers and by far the most brutal. By age twenty-eight, through an alliance with neighboring Turks, Khan had subjugated all the Mongol tribes. Then he turned on his Turkish allies, killed their leader, and subjugated them, too. He built loyalty through rewards of slaves and booty, plus endless promise of new horizons. In 1206 he declared himself supreme Khan (King).
Genghis ruled by imposing heavy tax revenues, troops on demand, and utter obedience to his laws. He once declared that “the greatest pleasure is to vanquish your enemies and chase them before you, to rob them of their wealth and to see those dear to them bathed in tears, to ride their horses, and clasp to your bosom their wives and daughters.” 
Kill the men - Steal the White women. What a guy!  

In one battle against Muslims, Khan's hordes descended on a city and hacked to pieces every man, woman, and child there. All except the governor, that is. He died in slow agony as molten silver was dripped into his eyes and ears.  Mongol armies then converged on the great trading city of Samarkand. After Genghis’s horsemen annihilated 50,000 foot soldiers. The defending cavalrymen tried to switch sides, which left the city undefended. The citizens surrendered, and the Mongols took 100,000 of them as slaves. They then executed 30,000 prisoners.
Meanwhile, there was more horrifying news. Bukhara, 100 miles northwest, had fallen to a Mongol army commanded by Genghis himself. He had surprised the city, hacked its fleeing garrison to pieces, and burned the place to the ground.
Genghis  then headed west, burning crops, razing  cities, and slaughtering every human he encountered. He then dispatched 20,000 men on a mission to scout the rich lands to the west beyond the Caspian Sea. When confronted by a large force of Georgians, the Mongols fled with the Georgians pursuing them until their horses were exhausted – at which point the Mongols returned, mounted on the fresh steeds they had waiting for them, and massacred the entire Georgian army.
Riding out of the Caucasus, the Mongols tore a path westward. By 1222, their scouting army reached Hungary. They then lured an 80,000 strong Slavic force into a 250-mile chase. Then, at the river Kalka, the invaders suddenly turned, confronted the Slavs, and annihilated them. Slavic contingents coming up from behind were wiped out by Mongol archers hidden in clouds of dark smoke, making the battleground a black nightmare of slaughter.
By the time the prince of Kiev arrived with his army, half the original force of 80,000 lay dead. The horrified Kievans turned to flee but were butchered in their entirety. The prince was suffocated to death beneath the table on which the triumphant Mongols ate their victory banquet.
Mongols had no honor when it came to prisoners-of-war.

To Europeans, it did indeed seem that these heathen warriors would enslave every nation. Who could stop them? At the heart of their capability were the  tribesmen themselves, toughened and disciplined from birth. They could ride for days without food or water. If necessary, they drank blood drawn from their horses’ leg veins.
The Mongols could outrace any foe. Their favorite tactic was to feign withdrawal, drawing the enemy past hidden flanks, then crush him from front and back. They created smoke and floods and by 1300 were using gunpowder cannons, incendiary grenades, and flaming bamboo rockets. All this was now directed toward the slaughter, enslavement, and subjugation of Europe.
In 1236 Genghis’s grandson Batu, with an army 120,000 strong, set about finishing off the northernmost Islamic state, the Bulgar kingdom. In the summer of 1237 he overwhelmed the Bulgarian capital, Bulgar, exterminating its entire population of 50,000 and razing the place so completely that it was never rebuilt.
The once-powerful state of Kiev, where more than 200 years ago Prince Vladimir had introduced Christianity, had disintegrated into quarreling provinces. The northern trading center of Novgorod  had declared independence and was growing rich. Princes fought perpetually with each other over succession and against the free citizens in the emerging cities.
Ryazan became the Mongols’ first target. Driving an outpost garrison back into the city, the invaders spent a week erecting a wooden palisade all around it to protect their archers and catapults. A three-day barrage of arrows and rocks followed, after which the attackers burst in with battering rams and began their slaughter.
Civilians were hacked to pieces with swords, pierced with arrows, flayed alive, impaled, drowned, or burned alive. The Mongols raped girls before murdering them and defiled nuns in churches while priests were forced to watch, and then were thrown into the fires. They torched the city but did allow a few people to run away and tell the rest of the Slavs what awaited them.
Image result for medieval people
Kill - Rape - Plunder - Enslave 
Gentle Medieval White folks who looked like the ones depicted above were exterminated, raped or enslaved by the MILLIONS!

As the Mongols burned a bloody path northward, the Grand Duke of Suzdal traveled the country gathering armies to defend his capital of Vladimir. The Mongols destroyed his city before he got home, then confronted his army by the river Sit, surrounded it, and annihilated it.
Now short of supplies, the invaders summered on the grassy plains west of the Don, where they received fresh herds of horses from Mongolia. Through the following winter, they annihilated or enslaved nomadic peoples as far south as the Crimea.
In autumn 1239 they went north and destroyed Chernigov. Then, they spent the winter on the Kipchak steppes but used the time to reconnoiter Kiev, still the largest and most magnificent city in all the Slavic territories.
In December 1240 they struck. Their army battered down the walls, then sliced its way through defenders atop the rubble. The carnage was merciless, and in a horrific conclusion, the weight of people crowding inside the cathedral collapsed its walls. All that remained of the once-splendid metropolis was a hideous pile of writhing and crushed humanity; six years later travelers found Kiev’s streets still filled with skulls and other bones. The Rus were close to being vanquished in a stroke.
The siege and slaughter of Russian Kiev
Editor's Note *
About this time, the Mongols made common cause with the Jews of Khazaria. Centuries earlier - before the Christian Rus warriors finally put the converted Khazar Hun Empire "out of business" - the Khazar Jews had conquered Hungary and Poland. (here) Israeli scholar Sophia Menache's 2008 paper, entitled: Tartars, Jews, Saracens and the Jewish-Mongol ‘Plot’ of 1241. (here)  explores this relationship.
The Jewish Khazar Empire was a Turko-Hun entity; and Turkics are the "cousins" of Mongols. Old Khazaria was indeed referred to as a "Khanate" (political entity ruled by a "Khan"). This is why derivatives of the word "Khan" (King) is a common Jewish surname -  Kagan, Kaganovich etc. That dispersed Khazars and Mongols would vindictively cooperate in exterminating and enslaving the White Christians of Slavic-Rus Europe is not surprising. Related image
Supreme Court Justice Kagan - Stalin's 'right hand man" Kaganovich - Putin-hater Vicky "F - - k the EU" Nuland & neo-con husband Robert Kagan
The Mongol army, like a hurricane gathering momentum, had grown bigger because of thousands of conscripts - (*surely including many Khazar Jews). Batu assigned 30,000 troops to hold the Rus while he led another 100,000 across an astounding 600-mile front. His target was Hungary, ruled by King Bela IV from Buda. 
Neighboring rulers ignored Bela's plight. Only after Batu annihilated Carpathian defenders did Hungary assemble an army. Bearing down on them through the mountain snows at an amazing 60 miles per day, the Mongols arrived at Vac, slaughtered everyone there, and set up camp.
Nevertheless, Bela's remaining army of 100,000 was still the largest in Europe, and when Batu failed to attack immediately, Bela grew confident. Then, Mongol reinforcements arrived from the south and he watched in amazement as the invading army began a slow departure. They were giving up, thought the king; they must be afraid or in trouble. And so, disastrously, he chased them.
At Mohi, about eighty miles east of Pest, the Mongols sprang their trap. Surrounding the Hungarians, they unleashed a barrage of firebombs and arrows. When a gap finally appeared in the encircling horde and the Hungarians raced through it to escape, they found themselves trapped in a gorge where archers annihilated 60,000 of them.
By then all Europe had been further frightened by news of more mayhem to the north, where the northern wing of the Mongol army had destroyed the Polish cities of Lublin and Zawichost, sacked Sandomierz, and plundered a monastery.
In Krakow and Wroclaw terrified residents actually burned their own cities and fled. Finally, at Legnica the rampaging horsemen had met an army of 25,000 that included Templars, Teutonic Knights, the entire Polish aristocracy, and the full flower of northern chivalry. But even this assemblage was obliterated in short order.
Waves of panic now rippled all the way to the Atlantic. In cathedrals people prayed, “From the fury of the Tatars, O Lord, deliver us.”  The pope called for a crusade against the Mongols in Germany. Bela, in exile, sent money to build forts on the west side of the Danube.
Months went by with no move from Batu. Then, on Christmas Day 1241, the Mongols exploded with fury against Buda and against Gran , 30 miles northwest. There they roasted citizens alive to make them reveal the locations of hidden treasure, before riding toward Vienna, about seventy miles away. The invasion of Austria had begun. Mongol troops were spotted as far away as Zagreb, east of the Adriatic. Panic also spread in Italy when some were spotted near Venice.
All Europe lay helpless before them. (By the way, In the far east, in centuries to come, the Mongols will inflict similar horror, genocide and cultural destruction upon Aryan India.) It would require the combined might of every army in Christendom to stop these horsemen, but such a unified force simply did not exist. Then, amazingly, the Mongols vanished.
What the Europeans did not know was that Ogedei Khan (son of Genghis) had died of a sudden convulsion. His death had saved Europe, because Batu had to go to Karakorum, where the succession would be contested. However, the dread fear remained, of course; these ghastly marauders would surely return, spelling the doom of Christendom. Image result for mongols internal dissent
The death of Ogedei saved western Europe and caused internal dissension among the Mongols.

There were some who took a  different view of the Mongols, regarding them not as vanquishers of Christendom but as an instrument by which Christianity could actually overcome Islamic invasion. When Innocent IV became pope in 1243, his chief question about the Mongols was, could they be converted and used to fight the Muslims? Seeking answers, in 1245 he dispatched to them a diplomatic embassy led by a  Franciscan monk called John of Plano Carpini.  After a historic three-year adventure, his small party returned as heroes, the first Europeans to have visited the Far East. Unfortunately, the message he brought from Genghis Khan was a humiliating rebuff. Christendom had just two choices, the Mongols declared: submit or perish.
If the Mongols had had the chance, they would have destroyed Rome and Florence as they devastated Kiev and Baghdad, and there could never have been a Renaissance based on Christian culture.
The terror-filled population of Western Europe dreaded the final Mongol push - which, thankfully, never came. What would the world have been like if the Mongols had completed the dream of Genghis Khan?

By 1256 Hulagu had assembled a force of 100,000. His first objective was to destroy the independent sect called the Assassins in their mountain fortresses near the Caspian Sea . More than 100 Assassin castles crumbled over the next year, pounded by a thousand crews of Chinese catapult bombers. Every inhabitant, including women and children, was slaughtered.
The Mongols rolled toward Baghdad, on the Tigris River, and drowned defending soldiers by the 1000's by breaking a dike. Bursting through Baghdad’s walls, they unleashed one of the bloodiest single-city massacres in human history. It began after remaining troops voluntarily disarmed, expecting to be conscripted, but instead were marched out of the city and butchered. Then, the Mongols killed 500,000 surrendering civilians.
The Mongols burned Baghdad, then had the Caliph sewn up in a carpet and trampled to death by horses. Muslim historians put the total killed as high as 2,000,000.
In Russia, Alexander Nevsky was the first prince to become the Mongols’ servant. He knew that his people were too weak to expel the Mongols. Thus, he gave them the chance to survive by gaining the confidence of their overlords. About the mid-14th century the Russians would finally shake off the “Tatar-Mongol yoke.”
1- Much like Vladimir Putin during the early 2000's, Prince Alexander Nevsky bought time for Russia - paying the Mongols their taxes as Russia patiently waited for the Mongols to weaken internally. 2The vast Mongol crime-Empire eventually shrank all the way back to what is modern day Mongolia.

And that's all you need to know about the wonderful Mr. Khan and his uncultured, brutish bloodline-successors who came very close to annihilating Western Civilization. Had it not been for the tenacity of the Germans, Poles, Russians, and some internal dissension among the Mongols themselves, all of Europe would have been enslaved and racially cleansed (sort of like what is happening now). This then is the monster that the Jewish Supremacists are throwing in the White Man's face as some hero of history.
A New Jersey newspaper quotes the developer of the Khan exhibit, Don Lessem, who is Jewish. (1) Lessem's deceitful apologia for Khan is hard to stomach:
"We grew up thinking of him (Genghis Khan) as a barbarian," said Lessem, a Philadelphia native and dinosaur guru. "But in reality, we were the barbarians." (By "we", Lessem means White people. You know the trick!)
In the new traveling exhibit, "Genghis Khan: Bring the Legend to Life" —  at the Franklin Institute in Philadelphia — the true story of this notorious conquerer is told. Fascinated by the genius of Khan, Lessem, the developer of the exhibit, wanted to "set the record straight.
"He brought the East and West together," Lessem said, adding that Khan was indeed a true visionary. 'Khan invented passports, paper money, he believed in freedom of religion and tax breaks for clerics. There are so many things that are a part of our everyday lives. We just don't realize it,' he said."
What a great guy that Genghis was, eh Lessem? That's easy for you to say because Khan and his successors, much like ISIS,  mass murdered the Aryans of Central Asia, India and Eastern Europe; and the White Christians, Persians and Muslims of the Middle East (and lots of Chinese too). You see, anyone who genocided, raped and enslaved as many Aryans as Genghis Khan did is A-1 kosher-certified in Lessem's Talmudic book! Lessem's role is central in putting together this ode to White Christian and Muslim genocide. But what about the Franklin Institute's top-brass? Well, as it turns out, Larry Dubinski, current president and CEO at Franklin is also Jewish. (2) Image result for don lessem and obama Image result for Larry Dubinski,
1- Genghis-lover Don Lessem, the jew creator of the freal show.  2- Lessem, poses with another hater of all things White - Barack Obongo  3- Franklin Institute top dog - Larry Dubinski (cough cough).

As an historic figure of great significance, there ought to indeed be a Genghis Khan exhibit. But such an exhibit should graphically depict Khan and his mass-murdering, raping, plundering, torturing, enslaving, culture-wrecking Mongol hordes as genocidal monsters who terrorized our gentle European ancestors -- not as "misunderstood conquerers" who gave us "passports" and "tax breaks for clerics." The Mongols brought death, plunder, cultural vandalism and plunderous taxes to the West -- nothing more. Good God! This is all so frickin' twisted and evil! Apart from the captive students who are frog-marched through this exhibit, any self-hating White libtard who voluntarily shells out money to view this obscenity should have molten silver poured down his throat and into his eyes - Mongol style. How's that for being "misunderstood?"

UPDATE: The above piece was originally published in 2015, when Don Lessum's exhibit was on its initial display in Philadelphia. Lessum's nightmare is currently being featured at the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library in California. Get a load of the fawningly deceitful  description posted up at the Reagan Foundation website:
"What do pants, the pony express, cannons, paper money, skis, violins, bakhlava and “hooray!” have in common? Answer: Genghis Khan introduced them all to the West.
Not Genghis the brutal barbarian of Western history books, but Genghis the great civilizer and lawmaker, whose empire brought each of these innovations to the west, including 13th Century Mongolian-style democracy.
Now the most comprehensive exhibition of Genghis Khan and his treasures invades the Reagan Library, its only Southern California stop on an international tour that has drawn more than a million visitors.
Image result for don lessem genghis khan Image result for cnn man of the millenium genghis khan Image result for genghis khan exhibit don lessem with kids
1. Don Lessum with members of Denver's "Mongolian community" -- who helped Lessum celebrated the Khan exhibit  2. The nationwide propaganda tour is currently running at the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library in California.  3. "The Greatest Civilizer, eh? Jewish "scholars" like Lessum have rehabilitated the monstrous swine who terrorized our European ancestors.

No comments:

Post a Comment