Sunday 6 August 2017

FOR BLASPHEMY JESUS THE SON OF MARY SHOULD HAVE BEEN STONED TO DEATH BY ISRAEL


JESUS THE SON OF THE FATHER (BAR ABBAS) WAS SENTENCED TO DEATH BY THE ROMANS FOR REBELLION!
FOR BLASPHEMY JESUS THE SON OF MARY SHOULD HAVE BEEN STONED TO DEATH BY ISRAEL, BUT NOT CRUCIFIED BY THE ROMANS! 
SOUNDS A LOT BETTER! 

El Problema Judío explicado para Dummies - Evalion [Sub ESP]

Alerta Judiada Int. 2

Published on 22 Jun 2016
Evalion explica el problema judío para novatos y escépticos. No es una cuestión moral, se trata de mantener la seguridad de los Estados. El pueblo judío históricamente siempre ha actuado como una quinta columna, organizándose para promover e imponer intereses judíos en países ajenos y explotando en último lugar a la población huésped mediante la usura, que hoy tiene su máxima expresión en el sistema económico global basado en la deuda, ideado por el judío Harry Dexter White en la conferencia de Bretton Woods de 1944, cuando la derrota de Adolf Hitler era segura. Lemas como "todos somos iguales" fueron introducidos por la Judería organizada para obtener los mismos derechos que los autóctonos y así poder infiltrarse en las altas esferas de poder.

El pueblo judío no se ha integrado en más de 2000 años de historia ni lo hará. El problema judío no es religioso, ni cultural, es genético.

El vídeo podéis descargarlo a través de mega https://mega.nz/#!HJFzmK6J!OeC4iVl7Lz...

Descarga y comparte

express_logo


EVERYTHING you know about Jesus' death is wrong – He wasn't even crucified

JESUS wasn't crucified and Pontius Pilate wasn't even in Judea – Ten incredible reasons why the Bible has it wrong about the central moment of the Christian faith.

Easter crucifixion in the Philippines GETTY
Ten incredible reasons why the Bible has it wrong about the crucifixion of Jesus
New book Crucifixion’s a Doddle by Julian Doyle, uses ancient texts, religious artworks and the Bible itself to refute some of the most common-held beliefs about the death of Jesus.
Doyle's research questions the popular image of the immense wooden cross when there were so few trees in Judea. He points out that the Romans executed criminals by impaling them, while Jewish law preferred stoning them. And why were there no images of the cross for almost four centuries after Jesus' death?
After the attempt to crucify the Monty Python team for their film Life of Brian it became clear to Doyle, the film’s editor, that something was seriously wrong with everything we think we know and he began to investigate.
He tells Express Online his ten reasons why the Bible is wrong.
Crucifixion of Christ, Church of Santa SabinaGETTY
The very first image of the Crucifixion of Christ on a wooden side-door of a church in Rome
 
1. The image of Jesus on the cross has been invented by commissioned artists.
After realising something was wrong I checked back to see the earliest images of Jesus being crucified but there are none. Okay, we have seen millions of such paintings but there are none for hundreds of years after his death. It is not until the fourth century that scenes of the Crucifixion of Jesus began to appear. And this is the first one.
Yes, this is it, the very first image of the Crucifixion of Christ, which appears on a small panel on a wooden side-door of the Church of Santa Sabina in Rome, which was consecrated in AD 440, almost exactly 400 years after the event.
In this first attempt the crucified figures do not appear to be attached to crosses, although there are nails in the hands. But no church before this date even had a crucifixion image. So around AD 430 the image we know was invented. Invented because not only is there no image of Jesus on the cross but there is no image of anyone on a cross. 

2. You cannot carry the size of tree Jesus is shown crucified on. 
You can see we made small crosses for the actors to carry as only an Olympic athlete could carry the trees usually depicted. But the actors still struggled with these.
Executioner NC
The executioner is removing nails from a previous victim to make the cross available for the next
 
3.  The Post is set in the ground as a permanent fixture.
See in the picture the executioner is up a ladder, which is leaning on the cross. The cross has to be set deep in the ground to stay up.  What happens to the cross after Jesus is taken down? Is it thrown away so the next victim can use his own cross? Or dug up and taken back for the next victim to carry back up? No: as in the picture, it is a permanent.

4. The primary purpose of crucifixion is not to kill a criminal.
See in the picture where the executioner is removing nails from a previous victim to make the cross available for the next. When I asked Terry Gilliam why he did something so subversive, he just said it was probably his morbid senses. But clearly it was also just so logical. 
Why does this totally undermine the story in the Bible? Because, surely the purpose of Crucifixion is to put the body on show, as a deterrent, as long as possible. Upright like a banner, struggling with pain, degraded and dehumanized, till it rotted. 



Now just consider Joseph of Arimathea’s visit to Pilate when he is told he can retrieve the body as long as he is already dead.
Are they joking? They make a cross for a man, he carries it to Golgotha, they nail him up, and after a few hours he drops dead and Pilate says: "Okay, you can take him down now."
What an absurd amount of effort and time, not to mention a ridiculous use of a valuable tree, to kill a man.

5.  Jesus could not have died in just 4 hours.
In the film, Eric Idle’s statement as Mr. Cheeky, the guy crucified next to Brian is revealing. Eric is suggesting that death does not come that quickly? In the Bible Jesus is raised on the cross at either 9 or 12 o’clock and is dead by 3pm. 
Monty Phyton crucifixion sceneMONTY PHYTON
 
The most subversive scene in Life of Brian undermines the Bible story
ERIC: "Not so bad once you’re up. You being rescued then?"
BRIAN: "It’s a bit late for that now, isn’t it?"
ERIC: "Oh, no. We’ve got a couple of days up here. Plenty of time. Lots of people get rescued. Yeah. My brother usually rescues me, if he can keep off the tail for more than twenty minutes. Randy little bugger. Up and down like the Assyrian Empire."

Every Easter in the Philippines, they perform a Passion play culminating with the actual nailing up of at least three penitents on to crosses. Ruben Enage, age fifty-three, has been crucified twenty-seven times. He began his yearly rite after surviving a fall from a three-story building. The wounds can take two weeks to heal. 
So the likelihood of someone dying in such a short period of time seems impossible. To cover this criticism one Gospel, John, tries to suggest Jesus was speared in the side to prove he was dead. Problem is it says: ‘and immediately blood and water came out.’
Which means the heart is pumping so he is evidently not dead.
7. Jesus was not crucified.
The most subversive scene in Life of Brian is the first one we actually shot, which in context totally undermines the Bible story. 
HIGH PRIEST JOHN: You have been found guilty by the elders of uttering the name of our Lord and so as a blasphemer you are to be stoned to death. 
MATTHIAS: Look, I’d had a lovely supper and all I said to my wife was, ‘That piece of halibut was good enough for Jehovah’. 
HIGH PRIEST JOHN: Blasphemy! He’s said it again.
The scene is based on Jewish Law as expressed in the Bible: "Then the Lord spoke to Moses, “The one who blasphemes the name of the Lord shall be taken outside the camp, and let all who heard him lay their hands on his head; then let all the congregation stone him." (Leviticus 24:14) 
To help you understand the significance let me quote you another event in the Bible. 
Acts of the Apostles has this story:  "Stephen, was performing great wonders and signs... The elders dragged him away and brought him before the Council." When Stephen makes a long speech: "They cried out with a loud voice, and covered their ears and rushed at him. When they had driven him out of the city, they began stoning him." (Acts 7) 




Now look at Jesus' trial before the same Sanhedrin: "Jesus said, “You shall see the Son of Man sitting at the right hand of Power.” Tearing his clothes, the high priest said, “What further witnesses do we need? You have heard the blasphemy?” And they all condemned him to be deserving of death." (Mark 14:61) 

Jesus' crime is also clearly blasphemy, so why do the Sanhedrin take Jesus to Pilate? Blasphemy has nothing to do with the Romans. The crime is punishable, as shown in Life of Brian by stoning, which is clearly decided by the Jews themselves. Crucifixion/staking is the Roman punishment for rebellion. 
And let me quote from Jewish law about stoning: "If a man guilty of a capital offence is put to death and his body hung on a tree, you must not leave his body on the tree overnight. Be sure to bury him that same day, because anyone who is hung on a tree is under God’s curse"’ (Deuteronomy 21:22)
So after stoning the body is hung on a tree and then taken down and buried before sunset.

8. Pilate could not have crucified Jesus because the Roman governor left Judea years before Jesus' death.
Jesus’ two year mission begins after the death of John the Baptist. But look how Josephus describes John’s life and death. Firstly he describes the death of King Philip in AD 34. Then he tells us that to marry Philip’s wife, Herod divorced his first wife, who was the daughter of King Aretas of Petra.
Easter crucifixion in the PhilippinesGETTY
Every Easter in the Philippines, they perform a Passion play culminating with the crucifixion
 
But King Aretas’ daughter went home crying to her father, who raised an army and attacked Israel. Herod sent his army into battle but they were completely wiped out.
‘Now some of the Jews thought that the destruction of Herod's army came from God as a just punishment of what Herod had done against John, who was called the Baptist. For Herod had killed this good man…’(Joseph ‘Antiq’)

If John had been killed eight years before the destruction of Herod’s army, surely nobody would link the two events? The destruction of the army in AD 36 must have been no more than six months to a year after the Baptist’s death, for them to be linked, which places his death in AD 35. If Jesus’ two year mission began then he would still be alive in AD 38. Pilate left Judea in AD 36.

9. Gol Goatha is not ‘the place of the skull’ as translated in all the Gospels.
The Aramaic name Gol Goatha, means ‘mount of execution’, The 'place of the skull’ is Gulgalta. Why insist on a mistranslation? The site is probably Goatha mentioned in the Book of Jeremiah (31:39) where he describes it towards the east, outside the city wall.
The Church of the Holy Sepulcher is claimed by Constantine’s mother to be on the crucifixion site, but this is clearly a mistake and the mistranslation is to conceal this.
Crucifixion’s a Doddle by Julian DoyleJULIAN DOYLE
Crucifixion’s a Doddle by Julian Doyle
 
10. Where did the trees come from in the first place?
While making the film, we imported trees because they are scarce in Tunisia, as they are in Jerusalem. And look what the Bible says when King Solomon wrote to King Hiram: 
"I intend to build a temple for the Name of the Lord. So give orders that cedars of Lebanon be cut for me and I will pay you for your men whatever wages you set. You know that we have no one so skilled in felling timber as the Sidonians." (1 Kings 5–6) 
Solomon obviously doesn’t trust Israeli carpenters. 
Hiram sent word back: 
“My men will haul cedar and juniper logs down from Lebanon to the Mediterranean, and float them as rafts..., and Solomon gave Hiram twenty thousand cors of wheat, and twenty thousand baths of pressed olive oil. Solomon continued to do this for Hiram year after year.’   (1 Kings 5). 
Trees are, clearly, a scarce and valuable commodity, so why use them just to kill criminals?

The full evidence for all these 10 statements and many more can be found in the book Crucifixion’s a Doddle by Julian Doyle (Clink Street Publishing: £11.99) out now.

No comments:

Post a Comment