Sunday, 18 January 2015

DR KEVIN BARRETT - JO NO SÓC “CHARLIE HEBDO” BRÈTOL! Visca la llibertat - ¡Viva la libertad

Tuesday, March 10, 2015

We Are Not Charlie Hebdo: Free Thinkers Question the French 9/11

"A breakthrough in the study of State Crimes Against Democracy (SCADS). Never before have truth-seekers countered with such a comprehensive response to a likely false-flag operation so soon after it happened." -David Ray Griffin 

 "A necessary set of challenging responses to the Islamophobic manipulation of the Charlie Hebdo incident, suggesting the urgent relevance of dissent and suspicion in response to official versions of controversial events."- Richard Falk

Available soon from Sifting and Winnowing Books! Pre-order at the list price of $19.95 and avoid paying postage: Send $19.95 to S&W, POB 221, Lone Rock, WI 53556. The book will ship in early April.

Only one version of the Charlie Hebdo affair made the mainstream media: "Muslim extremists kill cartoonists and Jews." An officially-orchestrated response - "je suis Charlie" - followed.
But is there another side to the story?
Disturbing facts quickly emerged. Politicians, big media, the security industry, and arms manufacturers all rushed to cash in. And freedom of speech in France – the supposed target of the terrorists – was rolled back by the French government. Even as millions marched for Charlie, millions more sensed that something was very, very wrong.
In We Are Not Charlie Hebdo, twenty leading public intellectuals refuse the invitation to identify with "Je Suis Charlie." Jews, Muslims, Christians, Protestants, Catholics, atheists, people of the left and right, progressives and traditionalists, people from many different countries and ethnicities – all have united to say "we are NOT Charlie Hebdo." Most suspect the whole affair was a false flag operation or psy-op. (Evidence for that interpretation is presented in the book.) Others merely dissent from the official, mythic false consensus. 
If you question what governments tell you…if you doubt the mainstream media version of events…if you are NOT Charlie Hebdo…then this book is for you.
Zafar Bangash, editor, Crescent Magazine
Kevin Barrett, Press TV commentator and Veterans Today editor
Barry Chamish, author and investigative journalist
John Cobb, theology professor
Oe Dammegard, author
Laurent Guyénot, author
Anthony Hall, professor of Globalization Studies
Barbara Honegger, author and journalism professor
Shaykh Imran Hosein, Islamic scholar and geopolitical analyst
Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei, Supreme Leader of the Islamic Republic of Iran
Thaddeus Kozinski, humanities professor
Rabbi Michael Lerner, editor, Tikkun
Cynthia McKinney, six-term congresswoman and Green Party presidential candidate
John Andrew Morrow, professor of Islamic Studies
Ashahed Muhammad, editor, The Final Call
Paul Craig Roberts, former editor of the Wall Street Journal and presidential advisor
Alain Soral, philosopher-activist
Yvonne Ridley, journalist
Ibrahim Soudy, structural engineer
Webster Tarpley, historian
Andre Vltchek, journalist and filmmaker

About Me

My Photo
I'm the author of Questioning the War on Terror: A Primer for Obama Voters; Truth Jihad; A Guide to Mysterious San Francisco; and editor of 9/11 and American Empire v.2, and have taught Arabic, Islamic Studies, French, American Civilization and others subjects. Widely regarded as the world's leading Muslim 9/11 truth activist (for what that's worth) I spent 2006-2008 as the only talk show host featured on all three leading patriot radio networks (GCN, RBN, and WTPRN). I ran for Congress in Wisconsin's 3rd District in 2008: Currently I'm working on a couple of book projects...


1 comment:

Great Jihaad as usual.
I hope you and your loved ones are keeping well.

 US America, Canada, Australia, Britain, France, Israel and the West proved that their leaders and complicit masses were and still are the greatest cannibals, terrorists, cut throats, plunderers, thieves, racists, perverts, liars and monsters of all times

Visca la llibertat - ¡Viva la libertad

Thurs 01/15/2015 False Flag Weekly News

<a href="/channel/UCV432Plh-m3vo_rXe26Grwg" class=" yt-uix-sessionlink     spf-link  g-hovercard" data-ytid="UCV432Plh-m3vo_rXe26Grwg" data-sessionlink="ei=klm8VP-PJ9KB0AXY4ICwCg" data-name="">noliesradio</a>


 That US America, Canada, Australia, Britain, France, Israel and the West proved that their leaders and complicit masses were and still are the greatest cannibals, terrorists, cut throats, plunderers, thieves, racists, perverts, liars and monsters of all times has been proven hundreds of times over and by Westerners themselves, and after ransacking and plundering other countries and crucifying thousands of freedom fighters and civilians alike (boiling, roasting and eating some of them!) they went to war with each other killing many more millions of innocent people as well as the slaves who died under their ruthless claws, and those in their colonies they had forcibly drafted in their armies of assassins.  Yes, those stupid and decadent Muslims (what is left of them and their religion) and Survivors and Children of Survivors of Multiple Holocausts are so dumb and useless that they still do not get it or are too scared to do anything about it to stop it and not make it worse for everybody.  

But, why are Muslims, a universal nation (the Ummah of Muhammad) destined (conditionally, like the Israelites before them) to be the best of nations so ignorant, so lazy, and so cowardly?  Today the majority of them live as if God Almighty was not Almighty at all and instead a buffoon, the King of Buffoons, and just a figment of their diseased imagination, and expect Him not to fulfil His Promises, in particular to destroy the disobeying ones, the hypocrites, the cowards, the traitors and the followers of the Ways of Satan (found in themselves).  We read before that after so many warnings, the Existing or Non-Existing God finally punished and destroyed the Bani Isra’il (The Children of Israel) in ancient times (although the accounts that reached us are hardly credible) and when their corruption had reached incredible limits and had not achieved any greatness in their civilisation as expected or promised.  Other civilisations were greater and they were not the “Chosen Ones” although so-called Christians claim they are the “New Chosen Ones” of a New Alliance with the Israelite God or Jehovah!

We read that one of the Bani Isra’il, a Nazarean of very doubtful origins and about whom we know practically nothing except later fabrications, concoctions, myths, legends, and Roman canonised texts, inspired some Middle Eastern people (Arabs, Palestinians, Canaanites, Samaritans, Syrians, Lebanese, Judeans, Phoenicians, Egyptians, Abyssinians), Romans, Greeks and other Europeans to start an improved form of Judaism.  Today we call it Christianity.  But, they were persecuted and mass murdered by the millions by the Romans.  Some three hundred years later, Rome accepted a corrupt form of that Nazarean Messiah as their State religion and made the Messiah into God Himself, three Gods in One, the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit or Ghost, and his mother into a Goddess eventually departing thus drastically from the religion preached by the Messiah himself who believed in and worshipped only One God he called his Father and the Father of all humanity.  But, Rome regarded itself as of a pure White race and the Romans hated all Blacks as well as the descendants of the Arabs, Israelites, Palestinians and other Semitic people (all mixed races), and even their languages as well as all Muslims and their adopted religion Islam, and so they made the Messiah White, blond with blue eyes and a racist who did not allow inter-racial marriages just like today the European Royals to this very day.  
But, having not much to follow in their fabricated canonised texts, they had added to them all the former Israelite texts translated into Greek from a mixture of ancient Arabic, Phoenician, Syriac, Babylonian, Egyptian and other dialects that was later called Hebrew.  Rome was already a great Empire that had achieved great things by imperial conquests and extreme violence, and after forcing every conquered nation to accept their State religion they started wars among themselves until another bloodline of the Messiah (a mixture of all races) from Arabia arrived on the scene and attempted to return the Middle Eastern people to the original natural religion of surrender to One God alone and to one humankind where all racism and oppression were banned.    

Yet, we also read that Muslims fought among themselves and killed each other right at the beginning, but at the same time we also read how Muslims enriched world civilisation and in particular Persian, Hindustani and Christian civilisation.  At one point in history civilisation was heavily Islamic.  But, then Muslims lapsed in Kali Yug, the Dark Age just like all the others.  Who took over?  Not Zoroastrians, Buddhists, Vedantists, or Christians, but criminal and monstrous Atheists, evolved apes as many call themselves, perverts, Old Testament Jews, Talmudists, Freemasons, Rosicrucians, Rotarians, genocidal racists, ethnic cleansers, liars, deceivers, cheaters, thieves, slavers,  usurers, homosexuals, prostitutes, paedophiles, gamblers, drug addicts,  pornographers, abortionists, euthanasians, Freudians, incestuous degenerates, savage capitalists, with collaborating Christian, Hindu, Buddhist and Muslim traitors as their house “Negroes”, and with the Totalitarian Zionist United Nations Mafia Organisation, UNO, of course!
We saw the French State and its Death Squads (CIA-MOSSAD-DGSE-MI6) kill a few mainly pornographers and blasphemers (if they are really dead!) and all of a sudden 40 head of States (mostly mass murderers) united and travelled to France (as planned!) to show to the Muslim TERRORISTS that here they were assembled all in one place and at the same time defying them to launch their usual SUICIDE ATTACKS and BOMBINGS!  Guess what happened?  The Muslim TERRORISTS got so scared and so terrorised by those pornographic and war loving entities that they did not budge a single finger, and the 40 thieves thus assembled were able to rejoice in all security (‘grieve’) and announcing to the world that they had won against the ISLAMIST BASTARDS and Charlie Hebdo could now go ahead in peace and total security and print not their usual 60,000 porn magazines, but THREE MILLION this time with more attacks, slanders, blasphemies, and lies on Islam, Muslims, Prophet Muhammad, while the whole Western World are being incited globally by both media and government to more hatred and violence towards Muslims with almost absolute Church, academic and celebrity complicity.  

The MONUMENTAL FARCE is not that there is anything wrong with Arabs, Muslims or Islam, but there is everything wrong with the masses who believe such crap when the main target is not Islam but their own civil liberties, money, morality, and family life.  The   Celebrities as well as the Civil Servants (State Slaves) worldwide have usually made a pact with Satan and are not allowed to ever talk against the Devils that own them directly or indirectly, that is, they are muzzled forever and will never utter the slightest reproach against Jewish criminality or imorality.  The few academics, journalists and celebrities who dare resist them are almost always fired, ostracised or found dead or suicided!   We know a few hundreds of them, including a Jewish Messiah, several US Presidents, and heads of states trying to free themselves from their clutches!  The later Arab Prophet and Messenger is recorded to have been poisoned by one of those “Jews”!   

And, as planned, more wars will be launched, more false flags, and always led by that terrorist and ethnic cleansing bastard entity known as Eretz Israel or “The Jewish State of Israel” that officially trains all the gangs of assassins of their decadent Christian Godfathers and Godmothers !  Don’t worry France, you have a problem with those Muslim bastards, we’ll send you our MOSSAD SWAT GANGS and will get rid of them all as WE ARE THE SOLE DEFENDERS OF WESTERN CIVILISATION!  But, the truth is that their MOSSADNIKS are already everywhere and at all levels of western establishment, but the zombified masses refuse to see or cannot see that!      

On the recent renewal of my French passport, the French fonctionnaire (Zionist Slave of the Republic), my old passport was confiscated and when I objected because I did not want MOSSAD to one day use my passport on their many times promised French 9/11 and requested for a photographic copy of its pages, I was denied this right, and I was literally and rudely ordered out of the French Embassy by that bully of a ‘woman’!   I have made a written complaint and I have never received any reply to this day.  This is how the fascist State operates!  

Those warmongers and perverts have never stopped calling people like me polygamists (I married five times and am therefore only a polygynist not at all comparable to their brothel non civilisation!), hand choppers, head beheading savages, wife beaters and women oppressors, terrorists, backward, and why should we therefore stop calling them The Excrements of the Earth, the world’s greatest Holocaust manufacturers, exterminationists, cannibals, terrorists, cut throats, plunderers, thieves, racists, perverts, liars, anus worshippers, vagina addicts, paedophiles, incestuous degenerates, and monsters of all times past, present, and future if we let them as we are doing right now.  Any dialogue must be on our terms and not theirs, or else there should be no dialogue whatsoever – only TOTAL BOYCOTT and REVOLUTION!   Let us stop buying and joining in their shit and let them eat and drink their shit themselves!  But, this is too hard for those degenerate Muslims and non Muslims alike.  As far as Hindus, Jews, Christians and Muslims are concerned, the religion(s) they are practicing and the God(s) they are worshipping (just like the Atheists, Macro Evolutionists and Agnostics) are bogus and literally shit and I mean it, and this can be the reason why they feel so comfortable living in deep shit on a daily and nightly basis!   And do not dare say that I am angry because I am not rabid mad, not yet!  

Yesterday, Romans and Greeks have been depicted as the greatest civilisations of History that count for White European imperialists, plunderers, slave traders and racists and they did together with the highly advanced Muslims produce the greatest civilisation of recent History.  But, today the same slave masters and genocidal racists are depicted as the most highly civilised people on earth together with genocidal racist Jews and Talmudists who are now telling us (like mass murderer George W. Bush did before) that usurious Jews, Talmudists, Zionists, Racists, Freemasons, drug barons, and mass murderers like Bibi Netanyahu and pornographers like “Charlie Hebdo” will force us at gun point to accept their Western values and immorality and they have the Courts on their side to severely punish any recalcitrant!  What a Satanic world!  But, fortunately more and more Europeans and Westerners who love freedom, justice and morality above everything else are rising up at great personal costs and sacrifice.  The day Christians and Muslims will unite will be a Day of Victory for the entire world but not before as on their own they do not seem to want unity at all.

Sovereign Freeman-on-the-land - not yet suicided!
Addressed to the French Republic of Shit (Greater Israel) 
Sunday  18 January 2015

Dieudonné et le terrorisme : réponse à Valls


Published on 19 Jan 2015

Après la censure de sa vidéo "Je ne suis pas Charlie", Vincent Reynouard va encore plus plus loin en démasquant l'hypocrisie de Monsieur Valls lorsqu'il évoque les poursuites intentées contre Dieudonné pour "apologie du terrorisme". Répondant à tous ses adversaires qui lui reprochent ses parallèles avec la deuxième guerre mondiale, Vincent Reynouard démontrent qu'effectivement, les Alliés ont laminé le IIIe Reich et la Japon en violant la légalité et en pratiquant le terrorisme aussi bien à petite qu'à grande échelle... Finalement, notre monde issu de cette "victoire" de 1945 ne fait que récolter ce qu'il a semé voilà 70 ans.
Vidéo explosive : à regarder d'urgence avant la censure.

Je ne suis pas Charlie

Published on 9 Jan 2015

Dans ce court éditorial, Vincent Reynouard explique l'hypocrisie du discours républicain sur la "tolérance" et la "liberté"...

·         Notice

Je ne suis pas Charlie

The following content has been identified by the YouTube community as being potentially offensive or graphic. Viewer discretion is advised.

or Cancel

 Muhammad Ali Ben Marcus Le Président John Fitzgerald Kennedy: "Ich bin ein Berliner" - Je suis un Berlinois! 26 juin 1963
JFK pronconça ces paroles dans le but de souligner le soutien des USA aux Allemands de l'Ouest contre les Allemands de l'Est.
"Lass' sie nach Berlin ko
mmen" - Laissez-les venir à Berlin, parlant des Allemands de l'Est qui désiraient venir à Berlin Ouest afin de démontrer que les Capitalistes et les Communistes pouvaient travailler ensemble.
Sur les marches de Rathaus Schöneberg, il rappela à une audience de 450,000 personnes présentes, la célèbre formule: civis romanus sum - je suis un citoyen romain! Faisait-il ainsi
À l'époque de JFK, le monde occidental sous contrôle judéo-maçonnique était fier de dire tout haut: Today "Ich bin ein Berliner!" Tous les hommes (pas les femmes!) libres, peu importe où ils habitaient, furent des citoyens de Berlin, et, comme un homme libre (croyait-il), JFK prononça avec une grande fierté ces mots: "Ich bin ein Berliner!" alors que les habitants de Berlin ne se disaient jamais Berlinois. Berliner dans le jargon local voulait tout simplement dire beignet!
Theodore Chaikin "Ted" Sorensen (May 8, 1928 – October 31, 2010), de mère juive de Russie (Annis (Chaikin) Sorensen, écrivit la plupart des discours de JFK, y compris le plagiat du poète mystique chrétien Khalil Gibran qui avait écrit: "Ne demandez pas ce que peut faire le pays pour vous; demandez ce que vous pouvez faire pour votre pays!"
Il est d'usage de dire "Nous sommes tous Palestiniens", et cela ne veut pas dire pour autant que ceux et celles qui disent ces mots font "l'apologie du terrorisme palestinien" ou qu'ils soient des voyous, des brigands, des gangsters, des enfoirés (Jacques Weber) comme veulent nous le faire croire les criminels et 'philosophes' juifs, et les sionistes de France et d'ailleurs!
Samedi 4 janvier 2015


 Jean-Marie LE PEN, TENTATIVE D'ASSASSINAT ? Complot Charlie Hebdo # Dieudonné # Soral # fn

Scady Adit

Pour vivre ensemble il faut savoir aimer 1971


Je suis Shoarlie

BFM TV 17/01/15 : « Tariq Ramadan, vous êtes Charlie ? »

TARIQ RAMADAN : « ... Nous refusons d’avoir peur.  Nous refusons le meurtre !  Nous sommes pour la liberté d’expression.  Et, de ce point de vue là, je n’ai aucun problème… » ... de dire que JE SUIS CHARLIE ! (sous-entendu)

Ce sale hypocrite, escroc, et traître de Tariq Ramadan ! 
Je lui ai pardonné maintes fois ses prises de position, son habitude de toujours permettre aux racistes et aux ennemis détracteurs de l’Islam (des Arabes et des Musulmans, y compris leurs dignitaires religieux et combattants de la liberté) d’en rajouter une couche de leur MISISLAMISME

(RACISME ET HAINE DE L’ISLAM) lors de leurs ‘interviews’ d'endoctrinement, mais cette fois-cil, qu’il aille bien au diable, ce satané traître ! 




Tariq Ramadan sur BFM TV 17/01/15

<a href="/channel/UCNuLzvXH4rcIXHAosp2WegA" class=" yt-uix-sessionlink     spf-link  g-hovercard" data-name="" data-ytid="UCNuLzvXH4rcIXHAosp2WegA" data-sessionlink="ei=iz2-VMW0F4T7cJPWgOAH">Risalat Al Islam Tariq Ramadan IQRAA</a>

BBC News calls Charlie Hebdo a false flag…

…A hoax – but whose? and why?

Screenshot of last Sunday's hoax "BBC" report
Screenshot of last Sunday’s hoax “BBC” report

By Kevin Barrett, Veterans Today Editor

Last Sunday, eyebrows were raised – not just raised, but lifted right off people’s faces to hover three feet overhead – when BBC News apparently published a story reporting evidence that the Charlie Hebdo shootings were a false flag attack. The story looked and felt real, with none of the clumsy giveaways of your average hoax (think Sorcha Faal) or the outrageous giveaways of your average parody (think Kevin Barrett).
The embedded “BBC” TV news report looked professionally produced and featured yours truly reporting for False Flag Weekly News, also referencing my 9/11 truth movement colleague Dr. Paul Craig Roberts. It discussed evidence that the Charlie Hebdo shootings were fake, including the ballistics evidence presented here at VT by Gordon Duff.

Watch the latest False Flag Weekly News – the show that scared someone into creating a fake BBC website and story…and get the links to all the stories we covered here.

The fake BBC report presumably cited Roberts and me because our work on the Charlie Hebdo false flag had gone viral and reached more people than anyone else’s. My stories and reports tallied reads and views  well into the six figures, meaning the actual audience (including reposts) was over a million – despite cyber-criminal efforts to stop it, including a multiple hacks here at VT that removed my story from circulation during the most critical period shortly after the event. Roberts’ stuff also went viral; together, we reached millions of people with the message that Charlie Hebdo was a false flag. Was the bogus BBC report a reaction to our success?
The fake BBC story went up late Sunday and stayed up just long enough to start going viral Monday morning. (That’s Sunday the 11th a.k.a. 1/11 for all you illuminati fans out there.)
Someone with access to expertise and resources spent a considerable amount of time and trouble to produce this high-grade hoax. Who would do such a thing? And why?
Let’s take the Cartesian approach and break the problem down into manageable sub-units by listing possible suspects and motives, and then rating their plausibility.

*Suspect #1: A rogue truther. Frustrated by the mainstream media’s failure to report evidence of false flag operations, our rogue truther, who happens to possess the resources and expertise to create a plausible fake BBC website and news video, acts on the slogan: “If you don’t like the news, make some yourself.”

Plausibility rating: negligible. The operation was too professional. Also, spreading hoaxes doesn’t help the truth movement’s credibility. Like 9/11 from the point of view of radical anti-imperialist Muslims, anyone smart enough to pull it off wouldn’t want to. And if the purpose of the hoax was to publicize the suppressed truth about Charlie Hebdo, the hoaxer would have immediately gone public, claimed credit, and explained his or her motive.

Suspect # 2: A malicious hacker spreading viruses just for fun. This is the hypothesis entertained and investigated by a purported cyber-security outfit called But according to their investigation, it appears that no viruses or malware were spread. So OpenDNS falls back on the theory that the hoaxer was simply doing a trial run to find out how many people would click on this kind of story…market research, as it were. Gosh, who would do something like that? Which leads to the third and most plausible theory:

*Suspect #3: An anti-truth disinfo agent working for the organization(s) that orchestrated the Charlie Hebdo attack, namely the Gladio 2 network involving pro-Zionist elements of Western intelligence services and their organized crime partners. These are the folks who would be interested in doing “market research” on how fast “conspiracy theories” spread in the wake of false flag attacks. They might also be interested in what would happen if a major news outlet such as BBC somehow evaded the control of the censors and reported honestly on a false-flag event like the Charlie Hebdo shootings. This kind of scenario, in which a fit of honesty somehow seizes people at a big mainstream outlet, is their worst nightmare. In order to plan for such a worst-case contingency, they would want to know how fast the story would spread, who would be spreading it and how, and so on.  With this knowledge, they would be in a better position to keep such an event from blowing up into a social-stability-threatening scandal.

Such a cointelpro-generated “false-flag false-flag story” would be a clear example of Cass Sunstein’s “cognitive infiltration.” Sunstein, an ardent Zionist and former Obama Administration Information Czar, has argued that “conspiracy theories” represent a threat to society, and that some day the US government may have to ban them. But since that is not yet possible (the frog being as-of-yet insufficiently boiled) the government should “disable the purveyors of conspiracy theories” and engage in “cognitive infiltration” of the truth movement.

The fake BBC story certainly did “cognitively infiltrate” the truth movement. It may have allowed the Gladio B operators, using raw NSA data provided to Israel, to see exactly who was spreading the “conspiracy theory” and in what manner.

The phony BBC story also promoted what Sunstein calls “beneficial cognitive diversity,” meaning that it muddied the waters. By revealing that the “BBC story” was a hoax, Sunstein’s minions promote suspicion of news reports presenting evidence for false-flag events.

The clear implication: By figuring out who created the BBC hoax, we can nail suspects in the Charlie Hebdo massacre.
In the same way that suspicion has fallen on the cameraman who “just happened” to be in position to film the fake shooting of the policeman, questions arise about the cyber-security firm, which published a misleading, propagandistic story about the fake BBC report. OpenDNS, which has very little public track record and looks like an intel-agency cutout, displays “guilty demeanor” by vilifying Paul Craig Roberts in an apparent Cass Sunstein style attempt to “disable” one of the “purveyors of conspiracy theories” by attacking his reputation.
So…Which intelligence agency or “national interest” would likely be lurking behind the OpenDNS cut-out?
Here’s a clue: They’re trying to muddy the waters even further by (ludicrously) blaming Iran:
“One might conclude that, given the recent events surrounding Charlie Hebdo in Paris, the posting of disinformation on the bbc-news[.]co[.]uk site, and links to an Iranian state-sponsored news agency corroborating the same disinformation, that this was a State-executed, State-ordered, State-integrated, or State-rogue-conducted activity backed by Iran.”
Now which country has a government that is always trying to smear Iran, and is even on record pushing for all-out war?
I think we have identified, in rough outline, the probable perpetrators of the BBC Charlie Hebdo false-flag hoax…and the Charlie Hebdo massacre itself.

Now all that remains is to bring them to justice.


 Veterans News Now

Paris Charlie – the Shock Doctrine par Excellence

False flag – converted immediately into public shock, the perfect condition for ramming any police, military and surveillance legislation down the people’s throat.

French President Francois Hollande reviews troops during his visit aboard the a French nuclear aircraft carrier on Jan. 14, 2015 off the coast of Toulon, southern France. Anne-Christine Poujoulat/Pool/Reuters
French President Francois Hollande reviews troops during his visit aboard the a French nuclear aircraft carrier on Jan. 14, 2015 off the coast of Toulon, southern France. Anne-Christine Poujoulat/Pool/Reuters

by Peter Koenig

On 12 January the French Parliament approved with almost unanimity – with one abstention only – the budget for France’s continuous and enlarged involvement in the new war on Iraq, a new war engagement led by Washington and supported by its vassals, UK, Canada, Australia and France. Aircraft carriers and troops were immediately mobilized, not even losing a day. Doesn’t that conspicuously smell of an earlier preparation, just waiting for that crucial and appropriate event, prompting parliamentary approval?

At the same time France lawmakers agreed to displayed 10,000 troops throughout the country to protect ‘vulnerable places’; spying on citizens, for their protection takes on new forms and formats. A direct reaction to the attack on Charlie Hebdo on January 7 and the assault on a kosher supermarket on January 9? – Killing 17 people in all? Is that it?

French Ministers of the Interior and of Defense have advanced their wish of substantially increased respective military and defense budgets, when the 2016-2017 allocations are being discussed later this year. No doubt they will get their way.

No doubt, this is the shock doctrine at its best. People are in awe and shock after the assault of the satirical and Moslem insulting Charlie Hebdo. A million and a half took to the streets in Paris this past weekend, the largest manifestation since the liberation of Paris after WWII in 1945. Some media report more than 6 million people marching throughout Europe. Almost all waving signs “I am Charlie” – Solidarity or stupidity? Hard to say. Most likely just sheer ignorance.

Its ignorance that kills our democracies, our human values; public ignorance allows leaders (sic) to wage wars, to aggress nations that refuse to submit, to fall to their knees. Its ignorance perpetuated daily by our mainstream media and swallowed without question, day-in-day-out like breakfast coffee.


Neocon leaders, all over Europe, the new patsies of Washington that we, the people, have voted into office, under shrewd but hardly noticeable Washington-funded propaganda, through NED (National Endowment for Democracy) and other well-endowed CIA sponsored so-called think-tanks, meddling in local politics, sowing threats or acts of destabilization. Europe’s new masters that a majority of the people doesn’t really like, but who are in office anyway – these spineless stooges constitute Europe in Brussels, the EU itself having become a miserable colony of Washington.

So, with a populace under shock, politicians have it even easier to get away literally with murder, with whatever they want under the pretext of fighting the eternal enemy – the Moslem terrorist armies, AlQada, ISIS and whatever other names they have morphed into or morphed out from in the course of the last couple of decades. Eternal war on eternal terrorists perpetuates evil and more terrorism and – war budgets yielding insane profits for the war industry throughout the western Washington-aligned world.

Under shock and awe, people will approve every aberrant and sick wish of aggression by politicians – if being told that it is for their good and protection. Yes, that’s what the propaganda machine has done to the ‘free-thinking’ minds of the citizens of our ever so heralded democracies. Democracies, freedom of expression, freedom of press – mon oeil !

Charlie Hebdo false flag

The Charlie atrocities reek all over of false flag. An attack so well and professionally carried out with cutting edge Kalashnikovs and get-away methodology, way beyond the capacities of the Kouachi brothers, who have no doubt criminal records, spent time with and were trained by the very AlQada and ISIS that were created and funded by Washington and by its European puppets – including the French, according to President (sic) Hollande’s own admission.

Yes, the French were and are funding counter-terrorism in Iraq and Syria, the very counter-terrorism that provides them in turn with pretexts to bomb the two war-torn countries to even more rubble – just for regime change, with the added benefit of oil and gas, and a constant profit generating war machine – leaving millions of deaths behind, mostly civilians, women and children and elderly – and other untold millions as refugees, in miserable unsanitary camps, or fleeing across dangerous borders to unknown destinies, to disease, hunger and death – people the world forgets, the media stays away from – forgotten lives.

The Kouachi brother, as well as Amedy Coulibaly, the suspect in the hostage drama of the Hyper Kosher food market in eastern Paris, whose identities and past activities were well recorded in French police files, were most likely pre-identified as perpetrators of the probable pre-meditated murderous attacks that left 17 people dead within three days of horror in Paris; attacks so well organized and carried out that they could easily bear the stamp of French special forces, CIA, Mossad or all three of them – because, cui bono – who benefits? – Perhaps the Masters of all three of them?
The Kouachi brothers were identified only by a conveniently lost ID in the get-away car, reminiscent of the intact passport of one of the 9/11 ‘terrorists’ found in the rubbles of the twin towers. Are people really ignorant enough to believe such a farce? – All three were caught and killed almost immediately by police. Dead men don’t talk.

And there is more – coincidentally, as reported by Michel Chossudovsky of Global Research , the Police Commissioner, Helric Fredou, Number Two Police Officer of the Regional Service of France’s Judicial Police in Limoges, “committed suicide on the night of Wednesday to Thursday at the police station.” Commissioner Helric Fredou was leading the police investigation into the Charlie Hebdo terror attack.

Dead police commissioner Helric Fredou.
Dead police commissioner Helric Fredou.

The reason given for the ‘suicide’ is ‘burn-out’ and depression – depression when in charge of one of France’s most prominent criminal investigations of the century? The incidence as of this day is hardly covered by the msm.

False flag written all over the walls of Charlie Hebdo’s publishing house. – The publisher being controversial, having received frequent threats for its Moslem-offensive cartoons, was normally under heavy police protection. Why was on 7 January only one police car with one police officer parked half a block away?

False flag – converted immediately into public shock, the perfect condition for ramming any police, military and surveillance legislation down the people’s throat. Better, it doesn’t even have to be ‘rammed down’, the population asks for it. They want to be protected and secure. They want their government going to war to wipe out Moslem terrorism, never mind how violent and how cruel they go about it, never mind the criminal acts these governments are committing in the name of protecting their citizenry.
Does anybody take to the streets in Europe, in the US with posters saying “I am…. blank” … the million victims of Iraq, of Syria – of Libya, of Afghanistan, of Yemen, of Pakistan, of Sudan, of Somalia – and the list is almost endless. These millions of lives wiped out by Obama’s drones and NATO count for nothing in the dulled minds of the western civilization (sic).
The war and killing machine that feeds the propaganda machine, driven by the six Zionist-Anglos-Saxon monster media that control 90% of the western information system, shy not from dishing out lie after lie after lie to indoctrinate the populace with believes that have zilch to do with reality – but they transform our western populace into hapless zombies.

What does it take to stop this vicious cycle and awaken consciousness?

Peter Koenig is an economist and geopolitical analyst. He is also a former World Bank staff and worked extensively around the world in the fields of environment and water resources. He is the author of Implosion – An Economic Thriller about War, Environmental Destruction and Corporate Greed – fiction based on facts and on 30 years of World Bank experience around the globe.

Also see:


A Media Info Site at Veterans Today Network
Since 2011, VNN has operated as part of the Veterans Today Network; a group that operates over 50 plus media, information and service online sites for U.S. Military Veterans.

Related Posts:

The views expressed herein are the views of the author exclusively and not necessarily the views of VNN or any other VNN authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors or partners and technicians. Notices

Posted by on 11:20 am, With 107 Reads, Filed under Africa, Americas, Asia, China, Europe, Oceana, Russia, Turkey, United Kingdom, World News. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback to this entry

You must be logged in to post a comment Login
Join Our Daily Newsletter


Terrorisme sous faux drapeau : le cas de la rue des Rosiers

Le point de vue du capitaine Paul Barril, du GIGN, sur l’attentat de la rue des Rosiers perpétré le 9 août 1982.

« Qui sont les auteurs de la boucherie sanglante de la rue des Rosiers ? Le terroriste Abou Nidal revendique souvent, et sans aucun complexe, les forfaits qu’il commet. En revanche, il ne s’exprimera jamais sur le “sujet tabou” de l’attentat de la rue des Rosiers. Plus de treize ans après les faits, c’est le silence dans la “communauté du renseignement”, où pourtant peu de secrets peuvent résister au temps, à la délation et aux vantardises, voire à la trahison ou aux primes en dollars. Les attentats arabes commis dans les années 80 ont été, un à un, élucidés, leurs auteurs connus, ainsi que leurs commanditaires. Tous, sauf pour la rue des Rosiers. Black-out total. Cet attentat reste “hors normes”. Un de ses premiers effets aura été de renverser, en faveur de l’État d’Israël et contre le “terrorisme palestinien”, le climat violemment anti-israélien créé par les atrocités commises au Liban par Tsahal, l’armée israélienne. Un basculement du discours télévisuel et médiatique suivit. L’“agresseur israélien” devint la “victime juive”. Un miracle en somme.
J’en serai moi-même surpris, à l’occasion d’une rencontre au sein de l’ambassade israélienne à Paris, avec un vieux monsieur chauve, digne et discret : le représentant du Mossad pour l’Europe. Les Israéliens, qui n’ont jamais manifesté, dans le cas de l’attentat de la rue des Rosiers, leur habituelle volonté d’appliquer la “loi du Talion”, semblaient peu intéressés par mes informations. J’en ai gardé un profond sentiment de malaise et de gêne.
Régis Debray, dans une note confidentielle qu’il adressa au président de la République, en date du 20 avril 1984, confirma mes interrogations sur cet étrange attentat de la rue des Rosiers, ainsi que la dangerosité des Irlandais de Vincennes. Il faisait apparaître le rôle particulièrement trouble de Bernard Jégat. En effet, écrivait-il à François Mitterrand :
“Il a la conviction intime [Bernard Jégat], ainsi qu’un faisceau de présomptions, que ses amis irlandais ont servi de base logistique (voitures, passeports, contacts, armes) dans l’attentat de la rue des Rosiers, mais il n’en a pas la preuve matérielle, là est la difficulté. Bernard Jégat se sent aujourd’hui menacé de mort par ses anciens amis. Il demande les moyens de déménager rapidement, un permis de port d’arme et une orientation sur la conduite à tenir (doit-il aller ou non chez le juge d’instruction ?). Il me remettra, dans une quinzaine de jours, un rapport écrit détaillé sur tout ce qu’il a vu, vécu et entendu entre 1979 et 1982 dans son réseau terroriste, qu’il croyait au départ, mais à tort, purement de soutien à la cause irlandaise.”
Sans commentaire.
Mon scepticisme sur l’attentat de la rue des Rosiers s’est aggravé quand j’ai appris qu’Abou Nidal, alors le terroriste le plus recherché de la planète, avait passé de longues années, en toute tranquillité, dans une villa cossue de Koweit City. Rallié, en 1991, à la coalition anti-irakienne durant la guerre du Golfe, il a néanmoins laissé certains de ses hommes de main participer aux pogroms antipalestiniens qui eurent lieu, justement au Koweit, après le triomphe des troupes américaines.
Quoi qu’il en soit, pour le GIGN, à l’époque, c’était “l’alerte rouge”. L’Anschluss du général israélien Sharon avait pour but déclaré de “rendre service au monde” en envoyant Israël “extirper du Liban le terrorisme international”. Nous étions le 6 juin 1982. L’opération “Paix en Galilée” commençait. Deux mois plus tard, les résultats n’étaient pas probants. En “découpant la ville au chalumeau”, selon l’expression d’un rescapé, les blindés du “boucher de Beyrouth” parvinrent, certes, à chasser l’OLP de Yasser Arafat de ses bases, mais pour combien de temps, et surtout, à quel prix ? Au demeurant, aujourd’hui, Yasser Arafat est prix Nobel de la paix, il a remis les pieds, avec ses hommes en armes, sur une parcelle du sol de la Palestine et il a même une représentation à Paris. »

Paul Barril, Guerres secrètes à l’Élysée, Éditions Albin Michel, 1996, pp. 38-40
Voir aussi, sur E&R :
E&R | 18 janvier | Laurent Guyénot |18

Affaire Merah : une coentreprise Mossad-DCRI ?

Pour réfléchir sur l’affaire Charlie, il faut une perspective historique. La comparaison s’impose avec l’affaire Merah. Les similitudes sont trop troublantes pour être dues au hasard ; le profil des (...)

JO NO SÓC “CHARLIE HEBDO” BRÈTOL! Visca la llibertat - ¡Viva la libertad





From Muhammad AL-Massari

Today Monday 25 January 2015 at 11:56 AM

Another Great Performance by Elie Wiesel

by Daniel McGowan / December 15th, 2014
  On December 8, 2014 WXXI-TV’s Great Performances presented the legendary violinist Itzhak Perlman and the renowned cantor Yitzchak Meir Helfgot in a musical exploration of liturgical and traditional works for both chamber orchestra and klezmer settings. To fortify its Jewish character the program included a short discussion between Itzhak Perlman and Elie Wiesel, arguably the foremost proponent of the current Holocaust narrative.

Wiesel told the incredulous Perlman that as a boy he too had studied violin. Moreover he claimed that he took his violin to Auschwitz in June 1944; his father suggested that since Elie was already there he might as well try out for the Auschwitz Orchestra in hopes of earning an extra ration of bread. But alas Elie could only play classical music, like Beethoven, and not those evil Nazi marches, so during his interview with the head of the Auschwitz Orchestra a vicious kapo grabbed his violin and smashed it under foot.

As a Jew, I was proud of Perlman’s gracious restraint in not calling Wiesel’s remarks utter nonsense. He did not even stoop to ask Elie how such a tall story could have been omitted from Night, his best-selling novel, which is force fed to American students as a must-be-believed memoir.
But I am tormented. Is it not shameful of The Great Weasel to mention the existence of an Auschwitz Orchestra? An orchestra in an extermination camp? What next? A swimming pool? Oy, what a shanda fur di goyim.

And if we are to accept an inmate orchestra at Auschwitz might we not envision a Klezmer band at Ketziot, Israel’s largest concentration camp for Palestinians in the Negev Desert; it could be called the Ketziot Klezmer Klub and give new meaning to the otherwise odious acronym KKK.
But wait; you must not mention an Israeli concentration camp. Forget Ketziot. Do not compare the plight of Jews with the plight of Palestinians; such a comparison according to Elie Wiesel is “unworthy.” Just sit back and enjoy his “great performance.”
Daniel McGowan is a Professor Emeritus at Hobart and William Smith Colleges. 

Voltaire Network

What lies behind the anti "conspiracy theorist" discourse

The State Against The Republic

At the request of President François Hollande, the French Socialist Party has published a note on the international “conspiracy theorist" movement. His goal: to prepare new legislation prohibiting it to express itself. In the US, the September 11, 2001 coup established a "permanent state of emergency" (Patriot Act), launching a series of imperial wars. Gradually, the European elites have aligned with their counterparts across the Atlantic. Everywhere, people are worried about being abandoned by their States and they question their institutions. Seeking to retain power, the elites are now ready to use force to gag their opposition.

| Damascus (Syria)
JPEG - 22.5 kb
January 27, 2015, President François Hollande made "conspiracy theorists" responsible for the crimes committed by the Nazis against the Jews of Europe. He called for a ban on their freedom of expression.
The President of the French Republic, François Hollande, has assimilated what he calls "conspiracy theories" to Nazism and called to prevent their dissemination on the Internet and social networks.
Thus he declared, on January 27, 2015 at the Shoah Memorial:
"[Anti-Semitism] maintains conspiracy theories that spread without limits. Conspiracy theories that have, in the past, led to the worst "(...)" [The] answer is to realize that conspiracy theories are disseminated through the Internet and social networks. Moreover, we must remember that it is words that have in the past prepared extermination. We need to act at the European level, and even internationally, so that a legal framework can be defined, and so that Internet platforms that manage social networks are held to account and that sanctions be imposed for failure to enforce" [1].
Several ministers also decried what they called conspiracy theorists as so many "fermenters of hate and disintegrators of society."
Knowing that President Hollande calls "conspiracy theory" the idea that States, whatever their regimes - including democracies - have a spontaneous tendency to act in their own interests and not in that of their constituents, we can conclude that he presented this confused amalgam to justify a possible censure of his opponents.
This interpretation is confirmed by the publication of a note entitled "Conspiracy theories, current status" by the Jean-Jaurès Foundation, a Socialist Party think tank of which Mr. Holland was the first secretary. [2]
Let’s leave aside the political relations of François Hollande, the Socialist Party, the Fondation Jean-Jaurès, its political radicalism Observatory and the author of the note and let’s focus on its message and its ideological content.

Definition of "conspiracy theories"

The terms "conspiracy theories" and "conspiracy theorism" have developed in France in the wake of the publication of my book on US imperialism post-September 11, titled The Big Lie [3]. At the time, we had trouble understanding what the terms meant because they referred to American political history. In the United States, are commonly called "conspiracy theorists" those according to whom President Kennedy had not been assassinated by one man but by many, forming a conspiracy (in the judicial sense). Over time, these expressions entered in the French language and have overlapped with memories of the 30s and the Second World War, those of the denunciation of the "Jewish conspiracy". These are therefore now polysemous, sometimes evoking the law of the state-Stator silence and, at other times, European anti-Semitism.
In its note, the Jean-Jaurès Foundation gives its own definition of conspiracy theorism. It is
"an ’alternative’ narrative that claims to significantly upset the knowledge we have of an event and therefore competes with the "version" which is commonly accepted, stigmatized as "official"" (p. 2).
Observe that this definition does not apply solely to the delusions of the mentally ill. Thus, Socrates, through the myth of the cave, affirmed his challenge to the certainties of his time; Galileo with his heliocentric theory challenged the prevailing interpretation of the Bible of his time; etc.
For my part, and since they see me as the "pope of conspiracy theorists" or rather the "heretic" in the words of Italian philosopher Roberto Quaglia, I reaffirm my radical political commitment, in keeping with the French republican radicalism of Leon Bourgeois [4], of Georges Clemenceau, [5] of Alain [6] and of Jean Moulin. [7] For me, as for them, the state is a Leviathan which by nature abuses those it governs.
As a radical Republican, I am aware that the state is the enemy of the common good, of the Res Publica; which is why I wish not to abrogate it, but to tame it. The republican ideal is compatible with various political regimes-including monarchies, as was enacted by the authors of the Declaration of 1789.
This opposition, which the current Socialist Party disputes, has so shaped our history as Philippe Pétain repealed the Republic to proclaim the "French State". Immediately after his assuming presidential office, I denounced Hollande’s Petainism [8]. Today, Mr. Hollande claims to be of the Republic to better fight it and this inversion of values ​​plunges the country into confusion.

Who are the "conspiracy theorists"?

The "conspiracy theorists" are thus citizens who oppose the omnipotence of the State and who wish to place it under surveillance.
The Jean-Jaurès Foundation describes them as follows:
"[It’s] a heterogeneous movement, heavily entangled with the Holocaust denial movement, and which combines admirers of Hugo Chavez and fans of Vladimir Putin. An underworld that consist of former left-wing activists or extreme leftists, former "malcontents", sovereignists, revolutionary nationalists, ultra-nationalists, nostalgists of the Third Reich, anti-vaccination activists, supporters of drawing straws, September 11th revisionists, anti-Zionists, Afrocentricists, survivalists, followers of "alternative medicine", agents of influence of the Iranian regime, Bacharists, Catholic or Islamic fundamentalists "(p. 8).
One will note the amalgams and abuse of this description aiming to discredit those it designates.

Myths of the "conspiracy theorists"

The Jean-Jaurès Foundation continues its vilification by accusing "conspiracy theorists" of ignoring the realities of the world and naively believing hackneyed myths. Thus, they would believe in the "World Zionist plot", the "illuminati conspiracy" and the "Rothschild myth" (p. 4). And to credit these three statements, it cites an example solely on the "Rothschild myth": blogger Etienne Chouard - whose work is not simply about the Republic, but goes beyond to treat Democracy [9] - says the Pompidou-Rothschild 1973 law is the source of the debt of France. And the Foundation goes on to refute this assertion by quoting an article published by Libération.
One will note here that the example of Étienne Chouard leaves one unsatisfied about the two other cited myths. Especially, the Foundation addresses ignorant people who have neither read the response from Mr. Chouard to Libération [10] nor the contribution of the "conspiracy theorist", former Prime minister Michel Rocard. [11] Indeed, in this debate, it is clear that the 1973 law allowed the explosion of the French debt in favor of private banks, which would have been impossible before.

The "conspirasphere"

For the Fondation Jean-Jaurès, conspiracy intellectuals would be
"essentially North Americans. Particular mention is made of Webster Tarpley and William Engdhal (both former members of the US political-sectarian organization led by Lyndon LaRouche), Wayne Madsen (, Kevin Barrett ( or Michel Chossudovsky ( ). With their European counterparts, they form a kind of International to which Thierry Meyssan, president of Voltaire Network, tried to give concrete form in November 2005 in Brussels, bringing together an "anti-imperialist conference" - "Axis for Peace "- the list of participants of which reads like a who’s who of conspiracy authors most prominent at the time" (p. 8).
First, let’s observe that the Fondation Jean-Jaurès must only read in French and English, and have barely skimmed over the participants’ lists of Axis for Peace, to believe that the phenomenon it describes only concerns France, Canada and the United States. In fact it includes a very large literature in Arabic, Spanish, Persian and Russian; languages ​​which are also in the majority in Axis for Peace.
Let’s note also the malicious nature of the reference to "the politico-sectarian American organization led by Lyndon LaRouche." Indeed, William Webster Tarpley and Engdhal quit this organization more than 20 years ago. And at the time when they were members, this party was represented in France at an extreme-left organization’s congress.
A little further on, the Jean-Jaurès Foundation does not fail to mention the comedian Dieudonné M’Bala M’Bala, whose shows the State seeks to prohibit, the sociologist Alain Soral, whose website ( ) obtains audience records in France, and Alain Benajam (, chairman of Voltaire Network France and representative of the Novorossian Government of Donbass.
JPEG - 15.5 kb
In 1989, the former head of US intelligence in Europe, Irving Brown, revealed to reporters Roger Faligot and Rémi Kauffer that he had recruited Jean-Christophe Cambadélis when he militated in Lambertists Trotskyists. 25 years later, Mr. Cambadélis became First Secretary of the French Socialist Party.

The political ideas of "conspiracy theorists"

After these appetizers, the Fondation Jean-Jaurès comes to the heart of the debate, that of political ideas. It defines those of the "conspiracy theorists" thus:

- "the erasure of any distinction in kind between liberal democracies and authoritarian regimes (deemed more “totalitarian" than the worst of totalitarianism)”;
- "[Opposition to] any anti-racist legislation under the pretext of defending "freedom of expression";
- "[Rejection of] the relevance of the left-right divide, the real divide is the one between" the system "(or" Empire "or the" oligarchy ") and those who resist it"; (P. 8)
- "the idea that Zionism is a project of world domination" (p. 9).
The Jean-Jaurès Foundation specifically targets areas of conflict, but exaggerates to discredit its opponents. For example, no one is opposed to all anti-racism legislation, but only and exclusively to the Fabius-Gayssot law that punishes by imprisonment any debate about the extermination of the Jews of Europe [12].

What is Zionism?

The Foundation then engages in a very long analysis of my works on Zionism. It disfigures them, then comments:
"Thierry Meyssan’s anti-Zionism bears no resemblance to the criticism of a situation, that of the governments that have been able to succeed each other at the head of the State of Israel. It does not arise from an anti-colonialism that would be resolved by Israel’s withdrawal from the territories occupied after the Six Day War and the creation of a Palestinian state. It also does not proceed from an internationalism that would hold in suspicion, in principle, any national movement wherever it comes from, precisely because it does not liken Zionism to a national movement. This paranoid anti-Zionism does not pretend to fight Zionism in the diversity of its historical expressions, but as a fantastic hydra that is the source of evil in the world. "
In wanting to conclude this debate by giving it considerable space in its analysis, the Jean Jaurès Foundation highlights its importance. I indeed defend a position thus far absent in the Western political debate [13]:
- The first head of state who stated his intention to bring together Jews from around the world in a state that would be theirs was Lord Cromwell in the seventeenth century. His project, clearly explained, was to use the Jewish diaspora to expand English hegemony. This project has been defended by all successive British governments and registered by Benjamin Disraeli in the agenda of the Berlin Conference.
- Theodor Herzl himself was a disciple of Cecil Rhodes, the theorist of the British Empire. Herzl originally proposed to create Israel in Uganda or Argentina, not in Palestine. When he succeeded in having Jewish activists adhere to the British project, he bought land in Palestine by creating the Jewish Agency whose articles are a carbon copy of the Rhodes society in Southern Africa.
- In 1916-17, the United Kingdom and the United States reconciled themselves by committing together to create the state of Israel through the Balfour Declaration in London and Wilson’s 14 points in Washington.
It is therefore perfectly absurd to claim that Herzl invented Zionism, to separate the Zionist project from British colonialism, and to deny that the State of Israel is a tool of the common imperial project in London and Washington.
The position of the Parti socialiste on this subject is not innocent. In 1936 it proposed with Léon Blum to create the state of Israel on the territory of the Lebanon mandate [14]. However the project was quickly dismissed because of the opposition of the French High Commissioner in Beirut, Damien de Martel de Janville.

Concluding remarks

In 2008, Professor Cass Sunstein, an adviser to President Barack Obama and husband of the US Ambassador to the UN, had written a similar note [15].
He wrote:
"We can easily imagine a series of possible answers.
- 1. The government can ban conspiracy theories.
- 2. The government could impose some kind of tax, financial or otherwise, on those who disseminate such theories.
- 3. The government could engage in a contrary discourse to discredit conspiracy theories.
- 4. The government could initiate credible private parties to engage in a discourse against conspiracy theories.
- 5. The government could engage in informal communication with third parties and encourage them.
Ultimately, the US government had decided to fund individuals, both at home and abroad, to disrupt the forum websites of conspiracy theorists and to create groups to contradict them.
This not having sufficed, France is called upon to take authoritarian measures. As in the past, the French elites, of which the Socialist Party forms the pseudo-left wing, have placed themselves under the orders of the main military power of the time, in this case, the US.
Let’s not be naive, we are approaching an inevitable showdown. It remains to be determined which instance, necessarily administrative, will be in charge of censorship and what will be its criteria.
Roger Lagassé

Attached documents

[1] « Discours de François Hollande au Mémorial de la Shoah », par François Hollande, Réseau Voltaire, 27 janvier 2015.
[2] « Conspirationnisme : un état des lieux », par Rudy Reichstadt, Observatoire des radicalités politiques, Fondation Jean-Jaurès, Parti socialiste, 24 février 2015.
[3] L’Effroyable Imposture suivi de Le Pentagate, par Thierry Meyssan, Nouvelle réédition, entièrement réactualisée et annotée, éditions Demi-Lune.
[4] Léon Bourgeois, sculpteur français (1851-1925). Théoricien du « solidarisme » (que les socialistes actuels confondent avec la Fraternité). Il fut président du Parti radical, président du Conseil des ministres, premier président de la Société des Nations et lauréat du prix Nobel de la paix en 1920. Avec l’aide du Tsar Nicolas II, il posa le principe des arbitrages entre États, dont la Cour internationale de Justice des Nations unies est l’aboutissement actuel.
[5] Georges Clemenceau (1841-1929). Il défendit les Communards face à la droite et combattit la gauche socialiste de Jules Ferry aussi bien contre son projet de colonisation que contre sa vision de la laïcité. Alors que, durant la Grande Guerre, le pays semblait vaincu, il devint président du Conseil et le conduisit jusqu’à la victoire.
[6] Alain, philosophe français (1868-1951), co-fondateur du Comité de vigilance des intellectuels antifascistes (CVIA). Il milita pour une république protectrice de la liberté, strictement contrôlée par le peuple.
[7] Jean Moulin, haut fonctionnaire (1899-1943). Il prit le parti des Républicains espagnols et organisa illégalement, malgré le gouvernement socialiste neutre, un trafic d’armes pour résister aux Franquistes. Durant l’Occupation de la France, il dirigea le Conseil national de la Résistance, y incluant toutes les sensibilités politiques à l’exception de celle qui s’était battue aux côtés des Franquistes. Arrêté par les nazis, il mourut sous la torture.
[8] “France According to François Hollande”, by Thierry Meyssan, Translation Michele Stoddard , Voltaire Network, 4 August 2012.
[9] La République veille à ce que le Pouvoir serve l’Intérêt général. La Démocratie exige que le Pouvoir soit exercé par tous les citoyens.
[10] «Analyse des réflexions de Monsieur Beitone sur la prétendue rumeur d’extrême droite à propos de la loi de 1973», par Étienne Chouard, 30 décembre 2011.
[11] Émission Mediapolis sur la radio Europe 1, le 22 décembre 2012, l’ancien Premier ministre socialiste Michel Rocard était l’invité de Michel Field et d’Olivier Duhamel.
[12] De nombreux responsables politiques se sont vainement opposés à cette loi, dont l’ancien président Jacques Chirac, et les anciens Premiers ministres Dominique de Villepin et François Fillon.
[13] “Who is the Enemy?”, by Thierry Meyssan, Translation Roger Lagassé, Voltaire Network, 4 August 2014.
[14] My Enemy’s Enemy: Lebanon in the Early Zionist Imagination, 1900-1948, Laura Zittrain Eisenberg, Wayne State University Press (1994). Thèse de doctorat vérifiée par Itamar Rabinovitch côté israélien et Kamal Salibi côté libanais.
[15] «Conspiracy Theories», Cass R. Sunstein & Adrian Vermeule, Harvard Law School, January 15, 2008.

Affaire Bourarach : mandat d’arrêt international lancé contre l’un des accusés en fuite

dieudo bourarach
Dieudonné, présent cet après-midi au procès pour soutenir la veuve de Saïd Bourarach, Nathalie
Le 17 mars 2015, le procès de l’affaire concernant l’assassinat du vigile Saïd Bourarach s’est ouvert devant la cour d’assise de la Seine-Saint-Denis, à Bobigny.
Dans cette affaire, quatre personnes ont été renvoyées devant la cour d’assise pour violences volontaires ayant entraîné la mort, sans intention de la donner.
Ils risquent 15 ans de prison ferme.
Dan Lampel
Ces quatre personnes sont : Dan Lampel, Michaël Lampel, Dan Sellam et Lucien Dadoun.
Lucien Dadoun ne s’est pas présenté à ce procès à l’ouverture, le 17 mars 2015 : il est en fuite.
La présidente de la cour d’assise a donc délivré à l’encontre de Lucien Dadoun un mandat d’arrêt international.
Lucien Dadoun est donc activement recherché par toutes les polices du monde.
Il sera jugé par défaut.
On en est certain, il ne se cache pas à Jérusalem-Ouest.
Lors de son audition par la police nationale, Lucien Dadoun a fait des déclarations. Il a écrit en bas de son procès verbal que ce qu’il a déclaré n’est pas forcément vrai : pressions, chantage…
Lucien Dadoun vendait des matraques électriques. Or, l’un des témoins a indiqué à la cour d’assise que l’un des agresseurs avait une matraque télescopique.
Une affaire louche, très louche.
Qui a bien pu exercer des pressions et des menaces contre Lucien Dadoun ?
Bref, le procès pourra difficilement établir la réalité de ce qui s’est passé, compte tenu du fait que Lucien Dadoun n’est pas présent puisqu’il a pris la fuite.
L’absence de Lucien Dadoun peut-elle être considérée comme un aveux de culpabilité ?
La seule certitude dans cette affaire, c’est que Saïd Bourarach est bien mort.
Les accusés s’imaginent qu’ils seront acquittés.
La suite au prochain épisode.
Afin d’apporter un soutien concret à la femme et aux enfants de Saïd Bourarach actuellement en extrême précarité, Dieudonné organise une représentation de son spectacle La Bête immonde le jeudi 26 mars à 22h00 au tarif exceptionnel de 19 €.
L’intégralité des recettes de cette soirée sera reversée à la famille.


 Marion Sigaut sur le rapport Kinsey à l'origine de la révolution sexuelle
wilfrid delnord


1 comment:

  1. Muhammad Ali Ben Marcus Le Président John Fitzgerald Kennedy: "Ich bin ein Berliner" - Je suis un Berlinois! 26 juin 1963
    JFK pronconça ces paroles dans le but de souligner le soutien des USA aux Allemands de l'Ouest contre les Allemands de l'Est.
    "Lass' sie nach Berlin kommen" - Laissez-les venir à Berlin, parlant des Allemands de l'Est qui désiraient venir à Berlin Ouest afin de démontrer que les Capitalistes et les Communistes pouvaient travailler ensemble.
    Sur les marches de Rathaus Schöneberg, il rappela à une audience de 450,000 personnes présentes, la célèbre formule: civis romanus sum - je suis un citoyen romain! Faisait-il ainsi
    À l'époque de JFK, le monde occidental sous contrôle judéo-maçonnique était fier de dire tout haut: Today "Ich bin ein Berliner!" Tous les hommes (pas les femmes!) libres, peu importe où ils habitaient, furent des citoyens de Berlin, et, comme un homme libre (croyait-il), JFK prononça avec une grande fierté ces mots: "Ich bin ein Berliner!" alors que les habitants de Berlin ne se disaient jamais Berlinois. Berliner dans le jargon local voulait tout simplement dire beignet!
    Theodore Chaikin "Ted" Sorensen (May 8, 1928 – October 31, 2010), de mère juive de Russie (Annis (Chaikin) Sorensen, écrivit la plupart des discours de JFK, y compris le plagiat du poète mystique chrétien Khalil Gibran qui avait écrit: "Ne demandez pas ce que peut faire le pays pour vous; demandez ce que vous pouvez faire pour votre pays!"
    Il est d'usage de dire "Nous sommes tous Palestiniens", et cela ne veut pas dire pour autant que ceux et celles qui disent ces mots font "l'apologie du terrorisme palestinien" ou qu'ils soient des voyous, des brigands, des gangsters, des enfoirés (Jacques Weber) comme veulent nous le faire croire les criminels et 'philosophes' juifs, et les sionistes de France et d'ailleurs!
    Samedi 4 janvier 2015

    Pour vivre ensemble il faut savoir aimer 1971


    Je suis Shoarlie