Thursday, 31 December 2015



Person of the 20th Century
Deconstructing the Fairy Tale of Saint Albert The Genius
* * *
When we do a Google image search for the word "genius", the first thing, and I do mean, thing, we see is the wretched mug of Albert Einstein. Plug in the word "scientist", and again, St. Albert is the first face to populate. You can scroll and scroll way down those pages and not even find a hint of folks like Tesla, von Braun, Shockley, and other great names. Why is that? Was St. Albert really such a "genius"? Or is this a case of the press pumping-up a fellow tribesman? Let's have a look.
* * *

Einstein was a serial, psychopathic plagiarist. Einstein's plagiarism has been conclusively proven beyond doubt. (here) Indeed, Einstein's "Theory of Relativity" as well as his famous equation (E=Mc2), were actually published before Einstein claimed credit for them.

This DEVASTATING expose totally debunks the myth of the great "genius".

Einstein's "discoveries", stolen as they were, are still disputed to this day. Einstein himself expressed some doubts about his "theories". Though it is beyond the scope of this author to evaluate theories of physics, the fact that a minority of physicists continue to passionately insist that Einstein's ideas are false, is very intriguing. We wonder, for every one outspoken critic of Einstein, how many more scientists hold the very same doubts but are too intimidated to express them. Of even greater interest is the fact that the scientific doubters are often childishly ridiculed, but never openly debated. Hmmm.

Einstein challenged critics to prove a negative, without him having to prove the theory!

Doubts persist! What if "Relativity" is wrong afterall?


"Einstein is a beggar dressed in purple clothes and made king using dazzling mathematics that obscure truth"...
"Relativity is a massive deception wrapped in a beautiful mathematical cloak.”
"The theory of relativity is a mass of error and deceptive ideas violently opposed to the teachings of great men of science of the past and even to common sense."
"The theory, wraps all these errors and fallacies and clothes them in magnificent mathematical garb which fascinates, dazzles and makes people blind to the underlying errors. The theory is like a beggar clothed in purple whom ignorant people take for a king. Its exponents are very brilliant men, but they are metaphysicists rather than scientists. Not a single one of the relativity propositions has been proved."
"Relativity is a beggar wrapped in purple whom ignorant people take for a King."
Tesla's most scathing condemnation of the Marxist charlatan was penned in a 1934 poem entitled 'Olympian Gossip', written to a friend. In the poem, Tesla sarcastically mocks Einstein and calls him a "long haired crank". An excerpt:
While listening on my cosmic phone
I caught words from the Olympus blown.
A newcomer was shown around;
That much I could guess, aided by sound.

"There's Archimedes with his lever
Still busy on problems as ever.
Says: matter and force are transmutable
And wrong the laws you thought immutable."
Too bad, Sir Isaac, they dimmed your renown
And turned your great science upside down.
Now a long haired crank, Einstein by name,
Puts on your high teaching all the blame.

Says: matter and force are transmutable
And wrong the laws you thought immutable."
"I am much too ignorant, my son,
For grasping schemes so finely spun.

My followers are of stronger mind
And I am content to stay behind.

Handsome Genius vs Ugly Charlatan

Einstein was very cruel to Mileva, his first wife and mother of their two sons. He not only cheated on her openly, but as the marriage unraveled, he laid out cruel conditions for staying with her as follows:
Under the heading: "Conditions."
 "You will make sure that: 1. that my clothes and laundry are kept in good order; 2. that I will receive my three meals regularly in my room; 3. that my bedroom and study are kept neat, and especially that my desk is left for my use only. You will renounce all personal relations with me insofar as they are not completely necessary for social will stop talking to me if I request it."
Mileva accepted the conditions.

Playboy Einstein grew estranged from Mileva, the mother of his sons. He then proposed a strange "contract"

Einstein eventually dumped Mileva to marry the woman with whom he was having an affair, his cousin Elsa. But the sex crazed serial adulterer still wasn't happy. He is now known to have cheated on the 2nd wife as well, having no fewer than SIX extra marital affairs during his second marriage! (here)

Einstein cheated on his 2nd wife even worse than he did on his 1st!

 Under the easy terms of Einstein's divorce agreement from Mileva, his 1921 Nobel Prize money was to have been deposited in a Swiss bank account. Mileva (betrayed and abandoned by Einstein) was to draw only upon the interest for herself and the couple’s sons, Hans Albert and Eduard. When the sons were grown, 100% of the principal would belong to Einstein! But the sleazy creep spent the money! Mileva had to constantly beg the affluent Einstein for child support. (here) She and her sons struggled while "the great scientist" lived the high life. Compounding her misery, Eduard would develop severe mental problems. Beaten down by life, Mileva died in 1955. She was only 60. (here)
Einstein became estranged from his adult sons. The boys had always been resentful over Einstein's abuse and abandonment of their mother.  Upon Einstein's death, the wealthy old bastard left an insulting pittance to Hans Albert, the other son that he had hurt so much.

Einstein's family struggled. Eduard became a schizo. Hans Albert wanted nothing to do with his dad.

A pure creation of Jewish media hype, Einstein was a pathological attention seeker. The mad scientist enjoyed shooting hot air out of his lying mouth on every subject imaginable. Though his sycophant worshippers eagerly ate up his bullshit, astute observors such as the great satirist H.L. Mencken saw right through the Marxist clown. Mencken once referred to Einstein as "that fiend for publicity."


Shut up already Albert! Just STFU!

Einstein fled Hitler's Germany in 1933 not because he was Jewish, but because he was a politically active Marxist! Einstein held membership in more Communist front groups than one could shake a hammer and sickle at.
These activities continued upon his arrival to America, where he would later defend the traitorous Rosenbergs (executed in 1952 for having passed A-Bomb secrets to the Soviets). Einstein defended other Communist traitors as well (Oppenheimer, Robeson, Fuchs, DuBois etc). In 1947, Stalin's Pravda Newspaper named Einstein to its list of ‘Top-Ten Friends of the Soviet Union.’ 

Stalin's propaganda sheet praised Einstein!

Einstein was buddies with the Communist traitor Robert Oppenheimer.

The traitors Rosenberg were executed, but not before Einstein pleaded their case!

Einstein the fraud was a self described "pacifist". However, during the 1930's, the "pacifist" suddenly became an fierce advocate for total war against Germany! The famous Einstein-Szilard letter, in which the two Jewish scientists urge the Jew owned President Roosevelt to develop an atomic weapon, was actually written during peacetime in August of 1939!  The letter falsely accuses Germany of developing an atomic bomb (the original WMD's Lie!) and urges FDR to beat Hitler to the punch.
The genocidal Einstein was looking forward to the day when Berlin, one of his former homes, could be nuked! Ironically, Einstein was never invited to participate in the Communist infested Manahattan Project (which grew out of Einstein's letter) because the FBI deemed him a security risk. After the war ended, the USA and Stalin's USSR become bitter adversaries. Red Albert conveniently reverted back to "pacifism".

Cartoon depicts the "pacifist" Einstein shedding his angel wings to become an anti German warrior!

Einstein and Szilard plot GENOCIDE against German civilians!

The EVIL letter to FDR.

Einstein was an America basher. Not content with bad mouthing and betraying his former German host, Einstein had insults for his adopted American country as well. For example, this sarcastic gem: “Too many of us look upon Americans as dollar chasers. This is a cruel libel, even if it is reiterated thoughtlessly by the Americans themselves.”
While ignoring the racial basis for the "State of Israel", hypocrite Einstein constantly denounced American racism. (see 'Einstein The Racial Agitator' section below). The Red scientist also had harsh words for American anti-Communist patriots, denouncing the great Senator Joseph McCarthy among others.

Einstein's citizenship oath was meaningless to the self professed "Citizen of the World".

Einstein hated McCarthy and urged Communists not to testify for any hearings.

Einstein condemned Nationalism (except for Israeli nationalism) and was very open in his support for a One World Government. He wrote, "There is no salvation for civilization, or even the human race, other than the creation of a world government."
Of course, it will be St. Albert's synagogue buddies who will be running this World Federation, presumably from Israel.

'Nationalism is an infantile disease"....(except for Israel of course)

With World War II coming to a close, vindictive Jews worldwide openly called for the genocide of the German people. Indeed, this policy was partially implemented. Among the demonic voices demanding more blood was the "pacifist" Einstein.
He wrote:  "The Germans can be killed or constrained after the war, but they cannot be re-educated to a democratic way of thinking and acting.” is hoped that by war's end, they will largely have been killed off."

The German dead of Dresden. Einstein celebrated scenes such as this.

In spite of segregation, American Blacks were making great economic progress in America during the 1940's & 50's. This didn't stop the ungrateful foreigner Einstein from routinely trashing America for it's "racism". He wrote, "Race prejudice has unfortunately become an American tradition which is uncritically handed down from one generation to the next."
The trouble making Einstein also joined the anti-White, Jewish funded NAACP, and became close friends with two of America's most notorious Black "race hustlers" - W.E. DuBois and Paul Robeson, both Communists.

Jewish Marxists always promote anti White (anti Gentile) sentiment.

Einstein's friend DuBois was a Communist who served as figurehead of the NAACP

Einstein with his Black Communist buddy Paul Robeson (right)

 Though not a religious Jew, Einstein was indeed an ethnocentric Jew who saw the world through a "Jews vs Gentiles" lens. In 1952, soon after Jewish terror gangs had ethnically cleansed Arab villages, Einstein was offered the presidency of the illegitimate State of Israel. He politely declined the offer: “I am deeply moved by the offer from our State of Israel, and at once saddened and ashamed that I cannot accept it.”

Einstein with Israeli Prime Minister and butcher of Palestinians, David Ben Gurion


Facebook Google+ Google Bookmark Gmail Compact 128

Follow our FREE updates on Twitter and/or Friend us at Facebook
* If you haven't already done so, be sure to sign up for our FREE Report & FREE Updates List at bottom of page.

Wednesday, 30 December 2015

MARK DANKOF - Frankfurt School's Jewish financed subversion and destruction of Western Civilization

The Sting Beats the Beast at the End of History:

A Reply to Katie Zavadski
By Mark Dankof

Al-Jazeerah, CCUN, December 30, 2015

The Frankfurt School’s Institute for Social Research: Jewish financed subversion and destruction of Western Civilization and Christianity via Sexual Perversion, Abortion, the Destruction of the Family, and the Deification of the State.   

Mark Dankof’s speech at the American Free Press conference in Austin, Texas on Nov 9th, 2013 is entitled, “FDR and Pearl Harbor: The Primer for the Zionist Assault on the American Republic and the Nation of Iran.”

Mark Dankof on Katie Zavadski of The Daily Beast: The Sting Beats The Beast at the End of History 
And they worshipped the dragon which gave power unto the beast: and they worshipped the beast, saying, Who is like unto the beast? who is able to make war with him?

John’s Apocalypse (Revelation 13:4)
In that night was Belshazzar the king of the Chaldeans slain. (Daniel 5:30)
It seems like it was only yesterday.  The phone rang in my Philadelphia apartment in January of 2000, shortly after the New Year.
When I answered, a familiar voice was at the other end of the line.  It was Howard Phillips, the chairman of the Conservative Caucus in Washington and the Presidential standard-bearer of the Constitution Party.  He was brief and to the point:  “Mark, I need for you to come down here to talk to me.  I want to speak to you about running for the U. S. Senate for us in Delaware in the fall.”  My response was something like, “You’ve really got to be kidding.” His counter response was, “I’m not kidding.  Come down here on (date) at (time).  Don’t come to my office.  Park your car anywhere down here and take the Orange Line to Vienna.  Walk to (secluded restaurant).  I’ll be in the back alone.“
I showed as instructed.  In our shadowy culinary solitude in suburban Vienna, Phillips unfurled a special map of the United States.  It was color-coded.  It was entitled, “U. S. Senate 2000 Projections and Strategies.”
He began to brief me:”Mark, I know  your personal situation in graduate school and with the family illness.  But I need you.  We need you.  The country needs you. Now.” My incredulous reaction to this seemingly melodramatic ploy must have shown on my face.  The rotund denizen of the Conservative Caucus and the Council for National Policy (CNP) quickly came to the point. “Mark, we need to hit the GOP hard and Bush hard in the elections.  All of our research indicates we can cost them the Senate in the fall.  We’re going to make them pay for shafting us time and again. It will come down to one race:  Delaware.  It will boil down to beating Bill Roth.  You’re just the guy to do it.  Your political savvy, speaking ability, and guerrilla warfare capabilities will cost Roth just enough votes to elect Thomas Carper [then Democratic Governor of Delaware] to the U. S. Senate.”
Lee Atwater and Mark Dankof in Seattle 1988: Decapitating Michael Dukakis is Achieved. But for What and for Whom?
I’ll cut to the chase of The Sting in an abbreviated synopsis. I subsequently answered an ad in a newspaper in Clayton, Delaware, just across the border from Philadelphia.  I rented a room from an older widow who had other lodgers in her home. She had no idea who I really was.  Then I went to the Drivers License bureau and exchanged my license for a Delaware issue with the Clayton address, while maintaining the suburban apartment I had in Philadelphia that was proximate to my graduate school.  Then Howard Phillips showed up at the Nominating Convention of the State Chapter of the Constitution Party of Delaware.  He insured I got the nomination.  His personal secretary filed my registration papers with the Delaware Secretary of State.  It was Democracy in Action.
From then on it was a blur until the Election Night coverage in the first Tuesday of November.  Between the beginning of The Sting to its successful conclusion, my speech to the Constitution Party National Convention in Baltimore was covered by CNN and C-SPAN.  Christopher Ruddy of NewsMax and Larry Klayman of Judicial Watch were among the attendees. I was on the front page of the State newspapers more than once.  They described me with amusement as the “Minister Plenipotentiary of the Texas Gun Lobby in the Delaware U. S. Senate race.” I was in the League of Women Voters debate in Dover, and was going around the State with Governor Carper and two other minor party candidates to a series of radio stations for on-the-air debates.  Bill Roth had said he wasn’t coming to any forum involving Mark Dankof. I was scoring big time.  My professional broadcasting background and forensic debate skills were showing.
The final debate between Carper and Dankof on the John Rago Show on WDEL radio in Wilmington was terrific.  By that time, Carper and Dankof had a most effective Laurel and Hardy act going out on the airwaves.  Every time a listener would call and ask, “What does Senator Roth say on this issue?“, Governor Carper would say, “You’ll have to ask him.  If he were only here with the rest of us. Mark [Dankof], do you know where Bill Roth is tonight?” Then I would use the stock line we had developed in a unique studio repartee and act familiar to all the groupies and junkies who tuned in each time we appeared in these Political Pro Wrestling Media Events: “I have no idea, Governor, you’re the one with his phone number.  Call him.”  Carper would follow with, “I have.  It always rings busy, or rings without any outgoing message for voicemail.”  Dankof would then end the Laurel and Hardy routine with my infamous broadcasting voice now in the service of The Sting:  “That’s really too bad.  I don’t want to hit the guy [Roth] out-of-bounds, but he really seems disinterested, Governor.  Downright out-of-touch. I don’t know about anyone else, but I’m disappointed. Again. I imagine at least some of the voters are, too.”
At the conclusion of our media finale, I was stopped by the Governor’s Press Secretary in the darkness of the WDEL parking lot.  He clearly wanted to talk.  What he said was, “Jesus, you’ve been terrific throughout this whole thing.  Our numbers tell us we’re going to win.  I want you to know something.  There has been an 11 point swing from Roth to Carper in these last two weeks.  Your radio shows are smoking him, I mean for us.  It’s incredible.  We think we’re going to get a one vote margin of control of the U. S. Senate.  This is bigger than you can imagine.”
I certainly wasn’t going to betray The Sting and my handlers in the race.  I wish I could have said to the Press Secretary, “This was the Plan All Along, Pal.” For those of you in Cyberspace really interested in the real news about Campaign 2000 and the U. S. Senate shakeup in the aftermath, see the map at Wikipedia. You’ve not been told before, but it all began in a dark restaurant in Vienna, Virginia in January of 2000.
Howard Phillips presented me with an official letter under his signature at the Constitution Party National Election Night Party in Baltimore.  It said,”To the Special Man With No Money and Five Minutes as a Delaware Resident, Who Changed the Composition of the United States Senate, and Beat Bush and Wall Street in the Process. Mission Accomplished.” [My final vote total was exactly the mathematical addition of Pat Buchanan [Reform Party] and Howard Phillips [Constitution Party] Presidential vote totals in Delaware.]
Bill Roth wasn’t as complimentary.  There was a second call to my Philadelphia apartment.  To this day, I don’t know how he got my unlisted number.  He was furious, and obscene.  I said only one thing in response:  “I’ll be certain to tell WDEL, Howard Phillips, and Senator-Elect Carper you finally returned one of our calls.” The line went dead.
Which brings me to Katie Zavadski and her breathtakingly malicious and ignorant broadside against me in The Daily Beast today, in an essay entitled, “From GOP Operative to Anti-Semitic Iranian Stooge.” I will simply say this to Katie and The Daily Beast.
Thank you for your post.  I mean this.  It has exposed my writings to your entire audience for their own independent evaluation. These include my interview on the Second Letter of the Supreme Leader of Iran to Western Youth; my conversation with Kourosh Ziabari of the Fars News Agency on Israel and 9-11;  my presentation on FDR and Pearl Harbor for the American Free Press National Conference in Austin in 2013; and one of my theological articles on The Hands of Time and the Appearance of Logos. As a point of clarification, I am not a “self-proclaimed” minister as you state.  I am a legally ordained Lutheran pastor of 31 years whose Synod is a full fledged member of the International Lutheran Council.
Secondly, discerning readers globally are being reminded of the Zionist agents who own your publication, including Jane Harman, Barry Diller, and the IAC company. The latter has a most illustrative and telling Board of Directors, which includes not only Mr. Diller, but Edgar Bronfman, Jr., Chelsea Clinton, and ex-Disney CEO Michael Eisner. From the  2015 10K of IAC filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), I learn much about who and what is behind The Daily Beast.  I have also learned how much money the publication is losing in its portfolio.  Finally, it seems noteworthy that the current editor in chief of The Daily Beast is a guy named John Phillips Avlon who comes from CNN and was a speechwriter for Rudy Giuliani’s 2008 presidential campaign run.
Third, I hope everyone in The Daily Beast organization and all their readers peruse this response.  Among many other things, it may be noted that The Sting this time doesn’t involve the U. S. Senate 2000 race in Delaware, but the fact that once again, a Mainstream Media outlet has absolutely miscalculated and been exposed.  You folks are Running Naked Down the Freeway.  Ask Kenneth R. Timmerman what a mistake it was to attack me in his broadside of Ron Paul during the 2012 Presidential election for Accuracy in Media, entitled “Tehran TV Loves Ron Paul” .  The late Howard Phillips was also drawn into that Israeli agitation-propaganda effort, sadly. He never responded to my clarification and public response. And for the record, plenty of political pros remember my U. S. Senate run in Delaware in 2000. That doesn’t apparently include Katie Zavadski and her colleagues at The Daily Beast, who are the real “Stooges” of a Foreign 5th Column operating in the United States of America.
Finally, a more reasonable look at the facts will reinforce the public perception around the world that it is the agents and organs of the Israeli Lobby who are the pernicious purveyors of venom and hate, both in the United States and around the world. What is striking is that despite all of the money, influence, technological capabilities, and virtually monolithic control of American elections and media, the air of frustration and panic evidenced in the Kosher Yellow Journalism of Katie Zavadski and The Daily Beast in their attack upon me is paradoxically reassuring and reenergizing. It tells the world who is really winning in a 21st Century War where Guerrilla Warfare and Asymmetrical Warfare with the Word Processor, the Internet, Alternative Media, Foreign Media, and Social Media have created an entirely new world that has the New World Order increasingly confounded.
The legendary Dr. E. Michael Jones of Culture Wars put it best to me today with his usual wit and self deprecating humor:  “Mark, I would take this article as a tribute to the effectiveness of what you are doing. In case you haven’t noticed, I am still in the realm of ‘dynamic silence.’“
And for me The Sting in 2015 leading into the Presidential Election Cycle of 2016 began in Vienna, Virginia, so long ago, in The Sting of 2000.  The Biblical narrative tells us who will win this fight at the end of history.  The Beast will lose in the final analysis.  And so will those who follow him to his bitter and eternal end, including his well-paid presstitutes at The Daily Beast.


Share this article with your facebook friends

Monday, 28 December 2015



Published on 23 Apr 2015
 This is the BBC Radio investigation in to the Hampstead hoax.

After the Fall: The Ripple Effect from Accusations Against Bikram and Friend

The scandals that beset gurus John Friend and Bikram Choudhury continue to ripple through the yoga community, socially, financially, and ethically. Yoga Journal takes a look at how deep the damage goes and how wrongdoing changes — or doesn’t — yogis, the practice, and the business of yoga.

Paula Carrasquillo took her first yoga class in the fall 
of 2011. A Washington, DC–area website-content developer, wife, and mother, she had decided to try Bikram Choudhury’s wildly popular brand because she thought 
it could help her right knee, which had been injured 
in a car crash and never healed. She read testimonials online of how Bikram Yoga in particular had fixed broken bodies in ways that scalpels sometimes can’t.
Within three classes her knee felt better, and within three months of practicing the 26 asanas and breathing exercises that comprise every 9o-minute, high-heat Bikram Yoga class, Carrasquillo says her blood pressure went down and she lost unwanted weight. The transformation didn’t stop there. Another month in, yoga along with therapy and writing helped Carrasquillo realize that she was suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder. The domestic abuse Carrasquillo says she experienced years prior with former partners still haunted her. “Yoga allowed the deep pain that was interfering with my whole life to surface, so I could confront it,” she says. Carrasquillo believes yoga helped wean her off anti-depressants and alcohol, too.

But by spring 2013, Carrasquillo had learned that several Bikram students had accused Choudhury of sexual harassment and rape. At first she kept practicing, refusing to associate Choudhury’s potential wrongdoings with her beloved yoga. But ultimately the allegations became too much. One day in the fall of 2013, while standing at the front of her mat, 
Carrasquillo became nauseous. She realized the practice she’d come to crave for helping her heal was hurting her instead.
Carrasquillo’s story of emotional turmoil isn’t unique. Scores 
of people who have found a practice, teacher, community, and sometimes a career through yoga have been thrown for a loop when a revered leader is accused of sexual harassment, emotional and economic fraud, and even breaking the law. Sadly, in Western yoga, there have been many such assertions.
More recently, reports of Choudhury’s alleged missteps 
alternated in the mainstream news with stories of the suspected improprieties of John Friend, the founder of Anusara Yoga, which integrates yoga therapeutics, philosophy, and alignment. In February 2o12, an Anusara employee claimed that Friend was having sexual relations with employees, leading an all-female Wiccan coven that practiced rituals of a sexual nature, freezing Anusara employee-benefit plans on the sly, and asking employees to accept shipments of marijuana. Nearly two months later, The Washington Post reported that Friend was having sex with students. In such high-profile scandals, the people directly involved—the “gurus” and their accusers—grab the public’s attention. And while we would never downplay the gravity of their experiences, those newsmakers represent only a fraction of a far bigger story. It’s the rest of the yoga community, the millions of students, teachers, and studio owners who come to the practice regularly for health, healing, and a sense of belonging, who make up the vast majority of the impacted.
See also Will Bikram Yoga Survive?
Within the community, members are left to sort through the wreckage after the polarized voices around fallen leaders finally quiet, deciding where to turn after their tribes splinter. They must maintain their identities and possibly livelihoods after some practices are abandoned, and some studios close. They have to learn from the past and better prepare—emotionally, socially, and financially—for the next upset, which unfortunately seems all but inevitable. In fact, this February, The New York Times reported a sixth civil lawsuit filed against Choudhury. (The first case is scheduled to go to trial this August.) In a world where even iconic gurus can apparently come and go, everyday yogis and teachers are the ones who need to minimize the damage, and protect the practice that they love.

A personal hit

When rumors started to surface in 2013 about Choudhury, Carrasquillo felt what many felt during the recent scandals: conflicted. She wanted to support Choudhury’s accusers, but Carrasquillo had also become attached to Bikram Yoga’s apparent healing powers. “I just didn’t want to believe it, simply because I enjoyed the yoga so much,” she says.
Carrasquillo spent nearly a year trying to convince herself 
that she could continue to practice despite her anger around the allegations. Then one day in November 2013, her yoga teacher was reading the standard Bikram teaching script in class, like usual. But this time Carrasquillo had a strong visceral reaction. “I wanted to vomit. I couldn’t do it anymore,” she says. “The healing that I had experienced up to that point was in danger.” After that class, she vowed never to go back to Bikram Yoga.
While Carrasquillo’s personal history may not mirror everyone’s, many people come to yoga for physical reasons—either to work out an injury or get in shape—and are quickly swept up in the holistic healing that yoga can provide. Research has linked the practice with improvements in stress, depression, anxiety, and even post-traumatic stress disorder. One explanation is that mindfulness methods such as yoga and meditation help us become aware of the emotional baggage we carry and teach us how to use our breath to de-stress, suggests psychiatrist Bessel van der Kolk, MD, in his new book, The Body Keeps the Score.
See also 17 Poses for Mindful Meditation 

Paradoxically, while unearthing deep-seated emotions can empower us to confront sadness, anger, or pain, such work 
can also make us more vulnerable to emotional injury when 
a trusted leader falls, explains Dave Emerson, author of Trauma-Sensitive Yoga in Therapy and director of Yoga Services at van der Kolk’s Trauma Center at the Justice Resource Institute in Brookline, Massachusetts. Witnessing a yoga leader fall may be especially painful for someone who has experienced past relationship trauma, Emerson says. “Yoga teachers often promise happiness and health, and students therefore expect them to be safe and trustworthy,” he explains. “So it can be devastating when a teacher betrays or disappoints you, throwing you back to feeling unsafe within relationships that you thought you could rely on.”
The betrayal can also make us question our sense of judgment, the validity of a healing modality, and any progress we’ve made, explains Rachel Allyn, PhD, a clinical psychologist and yoga teacher in Minneapolis, and the creator of YogaPsych psychotherapy, which uses asana and breath exercises to help stored emotions come to the surface. Initially, denial is common; it’s 
a way to minimize the discomfort that comes from believing strongly in something that becomes corrupt or disingenuous, 
but that we still want to engage in, she explains.
While Carrasquillo struggled to come to terms with how her loyalty to Bikram Yoga conflicted with her desire to empathize with those accusing the founder of rape, the resulting emotional stress and feelings of guilt and hypocrisy—something psychologists call cognitive dissonance—ate away at her. She knew that leaving her practice was the best way to show her allegiance to those claiming abuse, and yet she was scared to abandoned that which she had given so much credit for her healing. 
So Carrasquillo justified staying longer, telling herself, “[Choudhury] is not my boss, and the teachers I had were not him; I am loyal to those teachers. He created a great sequence; lots of bad people create good things.”
Cognitive dissonance is certainly part of being human, says Allyn. But when we continue to engage in behaviors that go against our morals and ethics, it can threaten our sense of identity. This can lead to feelings of shame, and from there, depression and anxiety. But here, again, yoga and meditation can help. “Yoga helps you confront yourself, both the light and dark, in a kindhearted way,” Allyn says. “It allows you to see yourself clearly, still love yourself, and want to learn.” You can learn, for example, what Carrasquillo would someday deduce: The power of one’s practice is not exclusively tied to one teacher or method.
See also How to Lead by Example

A community, fractured

William “Doc” Savage practiced various styles of yoga for four years, trying to improve his performance as an ultramarathon runner, before stumbling upon an Anusara “Grand Gathering” 
at a Yoga Journal conference in 2008. Savage was blown away by the sense of belonging he experienced there. “I looked around and thought, ‘Wow, these are my people,’” Savage says. “It was 
a community of extroverts,” he adds, describing people chatting and spending time on each other’s mats.
A retired senior noncommissioned officer in the United States Air Force, Savage is gregarious, but also admits to a longtime isolating fear of showing raw emotion. One of the tenets of Anusara, which means “flowing with grace,” is opening your heart to connect with the divine within you, and in everyone. “With Anusara, I learned how to share my emotions,” says Savage. “It was scary, but I was empowered knowing I had teachers and a community who were going to help and support me.”
When Friend’s alleged transgressions were exposed in 2012, Savage felt disappointed and frustrated—equally by Friend’s behavior and the community response and infighting. He witnessed Anusara splinter as practitioners and teachers found smaller groups they could confide in and vent to. Savage did what he found necessary to hide his deep disappointment and sadness and to retain his composure. “I was my students’ teacher, and 
I just tried to continue,” says Savage. “I compartmentalized.”
Decades of social-science research show that community, along with faith and work, is the secret to emotional well-being. At the Harvard School of Public Health, researchers have found that the keys to happiness include a supportive network 
of family and friends, and knowing how to bounce back from stressful situations. Basically, community gives us identity and 
a sense of purpose, which in turn keep us happy and healthy.
See also Yogi’s Guide to Evaluating Teacher Training Programs
Which helps explain why, as the Friend scandal broke, Savage didn’t want to reinvent his identity. He had already invested in 
an entry-level Anusara teacher training and had just entered 
into the full teacher-certification program. “Every time I tried 
to teach something other than Anusara, it didn’t feel right,” 
he says. So he continued teaching Friend’s method, even as the business was failing. Back at the Anusara headquarters in Woodlands, Texas, the administrative staff had significantly downsized, and many of the senior teachers who helped organize events and trainings had departed. Savage’s community—
and the ground beneath him—was crumbling.
In July of 2012, Savage and two other Anusara devotees started damage control. They signed a licensing agreement with Friend to use his intellectual property, and in October incorporated as First Principle, Inc., calling themselves the Anusara School of Hatha Yoga and listing themselves as the only three teachers. That number has since jumped to just over 550 today, with up to 55,000 
students—a huge decline from the nearly 1,500 teachers and 
estimated 600,000 students pre-scandal. But Savage and his colleagues are more intent on ensuring history doesn’t repeat itself. They’ve installed a board of directors, elected by teachers and global representatives, who continue to develop the Anusara curriculum. “We want to avoid a single point of failure,” a criticism many teachers had about Anusara under John Friend, Savage says. “I reformed Anusara to help people have community again.”
Of course, not everyone has returned, including former 
top Anusara teachers Elena Brower, Amy Ippoliti, and Desirée Rumbaugh, who have moved on to pursue new businesses and host non-Anusara trainings and retreats. One senior Anusara teacher who wished to remain anonymous says that she is now happy to be a part of the bigger yoga community, but also laments the loss of the tight-knit group of people she came together with to practice Anusara. “The saddest part was that the community used to be a real asset,” she says. “It was scarring and disillusioning how everyone scattered.”

A new business model

Years after the Bikram and Anusara shakeups first came to light, the founder of each yoga style continues to make the news. Choudhury—who did not respond to Yoga Journal’s requests to be interviewed—was still teaching as of April, according to his website, and he appeared on CNN in April saying that he is innocent. Friend, who admitted to at least one affair, dismissed Anusara and returned in early 2013 with a new yoga form called Sridaiva, or “divine destiny,” which he developed with a former Anusara student. “I feel good about where I am and where I’m going,” says Friend. “I will remember my faults and mistakes and try not to replicate what patterns led to pain and disharmony.”
See also Find Your Teacher:  What to Look for + Avoid in Choosing a YTT
In the wake of the scandals, many teachers and studio owners are actively trying to create a different, less rigid, more diversified way both to teach and do business, and in the process redefining the role of a “guru.” Noah Mazé, who taught Anusara from 2002 until the Friend scandal broke, is one such pioneer. Mazé resigned from Anusara because he didn’t align with Friend’s choices after the scandal. He had also expressed concern over how obstinate he felt Friend was becoming. When Friend debuted Anusara in 1997, 
it was a hybrid of alignment, therapeutics, and Tantric philosophy, but toward the end he stopped incorporating other teachings and evolving the practice. Mazé was frustrated with Friend’s inability 
to hear criticism or suggestions for improving Anusara (a critique many teachers share of both Friend and Choudhury). Mazé, who now owns YogaMazé in Hollywood, California, has developed his own style, but says it is consistently informed by other types of yoga as well as the study of biomechanics and physical therapy.
Diversification and independence seem to be paying off for 
former Bikram studio owners, too, thanks in part to Mark Drost, once a high-ranking Bikram instructor. In 2oo4, Drost owned seven Bikram studios, but by 2oo8 he says he was so put off by 
what he saw as the guru’s questionable business methods and connections with female students that he purged himself of all Bikram affiliation and converted one of his former Bikram studios, in Buffalo, New York, into Evolation Yoga (in 2oo9). Evolation offers 
hot yoga classes similar to the 26-pose Bikram sequence. In 2o11, Choudhury sued Drost for copyright infringement, but Drost refused to settle out of court, and in December 2012, a judge ruled against Choudhury having exclusive claim to a yoga sequence. Suddenly, yoga-studio doors swung wide open for anyone to offer the Bikram Yoga sequence, or any other sequence of poses. More and more onetime Bikram Yoga studio owners have quietly migrated away from Bikram affiliations and are instead offering the same 
or a similar sequence under a different name.
Still, the question remains: How did Choudhury and Friend obtain so much power in the first place? “They presented their systems as salvation paths, and people bought into the idea that their way was the best way,” explains Lola Williamson, PhD, an associate professor of religious studies at Millsaps College in Jackson, Mississippi, and co-editor of Homegrown Gurus.
Understandably, many teachers seem highly aware of the potential slippery slope between instruction and adulation. Some worry that the authority they need to deliver a profoundly deep, enduring knowledge of yoga has become off-limits. “We’re fearful of being seen as manipulative,” says the Anusara teacher who wanted to remain nameless. “I’m more wary to suggest a mentor relationship.”
See also 10-Item To-Do List for New Yoga Teachers
Mazé, too, remains sensitive about his relationship with 
students. He’ll sometimes practice at the back of the room, 
and says that a guru’s role is to stimulate dialogue and debate instead of to suppress them. “Don’t surrender your critical thinking to anyone,” he tells practitioners. “I want my students and community to be comfortable questioning any of my teachings.”
Carol Horton, PhD, a yoga teacher and former political-
science professor who writes about student-teacher relationships, suggests that teacher trainings should prepare instructors for dealing with the complex emotions that yoga can unearth. “When a student comes to class, he or she should have the assurance that the teacher is doing the work necessary to create a safe space, where students can explore how to empower themselves through yoga,” she says. Teachers also have to be grounded enough to withstand students’ projections, she adds.

A full recovery

But the responsibility of making yoga a safe place for everyone can’t lie in the hands of teachers alone. Students need to be empowered to heal themselves, instead of looking to someone 
else for salvation, says Allyn, and that requires being aware of and trusting their feelings and thoughts. Receive knowledge and wisdom from gifted instructors, says Allyn, but never credit a teacher with healing you. She suggests asking yourself, “Am I turning to my teacher, like I would a partner, to heal old wounds?” If the answer is yes, consider trying new yoga styles and communities 
to see if the healing properties of the practice carry with you. 
Or, revisit the yogic principle of aparigraha, or nonclinging. Most importantly, embrace who you are: “A strong community can only exist when the people who make up that community are strong within themselves, affirming that they are perfect in their imperfection, just as their teacher or guru is,” says Williamson.
Carrasquillo is on board. “We each have an inner guru to be discovered,” says the former Bikram devotee, who eventually developed a regular home practice, completed a non-Bikram teacher training, and, last year, started teaching vinyasa classes 
in corporate settings. “I don’t want students to look up to me. 
I want them to look within to find the answers.

By Andrew Tilin  |  

John Friend Opens Up About The Sex Scandal That Shook The Yoga World

Although the financial situation was resolved, Friend was asked to resign from Anusara. Left to his own devices, the fallen guru spent his time in solitude with his mat, until fate led him to a small studio in Denver called Vital Yoga.
The owners (and sisters) Desi and Micah Springer, invited Friend to their studio to practice, heal and own up to his mistakes — by encouraging him to take accountability for his actions.
The new alliance proved effective, and Sridaiva — a new form of alignment-based yoga — was born. As Friend, 55, gears up for the official launch of Sridava, MindBodyGreen asked him to open up about what he's learned since the scandal, and life after Anusara.
MBG: After the fall of Anusara in early 2012, did you take any downtime for yourself?
JF: I chose not to work or do any kind of revenue-generating job in the yoga world until that October. I was just practicing, studying, taking care of myself and trying to learn from what happened.
Do you have regrets about the choices you made?
I feel the pain in my heart of the mistakes I made. It was never my intention to hurt anyone or myself. When those things occur, it’s important to feel it and remember it, and that’s how we change. I’m using the pain I feel to step forward into the future in a positive way. I’m certainly not going to repeat that path.
I take accountability for my own karma — I don’t know how regret really helps. I want to remember what happened, and then do things differently.
Did you feel like you had to go into hiding?
That time to self-reflect was critical. There was a response by the [Anusara] community to ostracize, instead of work together — I didn’t have much of a choice. They didn’t want me to have any function in the organization, so I was isolated for some time. That’s why I came to Denver, where I was welcomed. I could practice and just take care of myself.
Do you want to share anything about what happened with Anusara that we might not know?
A lot that was put out there came through the Internet — through people with their own projections. I want everybody to recognize that not everything they read is true. I smoked pot and was in a Wiccan coven. My biggest mistake was having a sexual affair, and being dishonest with my girlfriend.
The Anusara scandal to me, was focused on my sex life. My sexual relationships with women were private and consensual in my eyes, but the community considered my private life as something that they should judge. So it was like a 21st century social media witch trial, which judged me as being unfit to teach yoga.
It was my personal business, but some thought that I should be ostracized forever for this transgression. I am responsible for my mistakes, and my clear intention is to be utterly transparent and have integrity in my private relationships.
If people could be open to giving me a new chance, I would appreciate that. We have to have hope in each other that we can get better and make a positive shift.
Are you still in touch with anybody in the Anusara community?
At this point I am disassociated from the Anusara organization by our mutual choice. There have been a few Anusara students and ex-Anusara students that have come to study with me at Vital.
People make mistakes; so let’s try to help each other — that’s my big focus. It’s not useful to continue to blame each other or have malicious intent, especially in a public forum.
As a yoga community, we haven’t had the best behavior in the last couple of years. I believe that we can all improve, and that’s what I’m trying to do with myself.
If you don’t forgive, there is no change.
Were you surprised that Desi and her sister Micah reached out to you?
It was amazing how Desi reached out to me — I was skeptical because I was wondering what her motives were. Very few people asked if I needed help or support. I had first met Desi when she was a student of Anusara in 2005.
Desi said that nobody would bother me if I came in and practiced. I could go there, eat properly, get sunshine and clean air, and take time to reflect, study and turn things around.
How did you start to take care of yourself?
In the past, I thought I was being somewhat moderate with my habits. I had a beer on the weekends and used marijuana, but I never felt like I was partying every day. I would eat bread and sugar, but now I recognize it’s not healthy to eat that garbage on a regular basis. I was 50 pounds heavier than I am today.
I was also working way too much, sometimes 100 hours a week, staying up past midnight on most nights on my computer. The imbalance in my life was more due to overworking than partying.
And when everything collapsed, I realized it wasn’t sustainable. I had to take full ownership of the fact I had created that situation — it was my own doing.
When you’re not feeling well it definitely affects your behavior — you’re not going to make good choices. I look back at my mistakes and see where I can improve and change. If you asked me back then, I thought I was healthy and making good decisions.
Do you have any larger takeaways from what you’ve learned?
I understand that I’m the one accountable for my own health, happiness and lifestyle I lead — there’s no one else to blame.
I can see now that I had set up a dysfunctional organization. I also considered everybody an open-friend, but I realize now that people don’t always have the same openness that I might have. I’m a lot more discerning with my associations, and I focus on my own accountability in my behavior. That was a giant wake-up call for me. My relationships are a lot happier and healthier now.
I just stick more to myself. Before, I let people into my private life and many of them — maybe because of my public image — never really said that they disagreed with anything they saw in my life or behavior.
I realized the hard way that I can’t just bring anybody into my private affairs without a long testing period first. I’ve become more skeptical about people’s motives, so I keep my affairs more private than ever. I just have association with very few people.

Aside from self-reflection, what have you been up to?
After the scandal I began studying a routine (of postures) that Desi wrote called, “The Roots.” It had so much power for transformation and health — so I started to practice it and wanted to study with Desi more closely. My ideas about alignment were totally revolutionized.
I built the Anusara system on the Universal Principles of Alignment, but I started to rethink all of these ideas and am doing the opposite of what I’ve done for years. This new alignment system has become Sridaiva.
In Sridaiva, the tailbone doesn't draw downward. You don't lengthen you spine by pulling the two ends of the spine apart. You line the spine up so that your connective tissue can pull the spine apart.
There's a rooting through the pelvis down the legs and a rising in the spine to have the maximum opening of the body. That's not to say poses in modern postural yoga are wrong. We just focus more of the engagement on the back body. After 42 years of teaching yoga, that's a big change in my view.
Are you only teaching Sridaiva at Vital, or have you begun introducing it to other studios?
We only teach Sridaiva classes at Vital — it made it much easier on the studio if we only teach one method. It’s confusing if one method says, “melt the heart” and the other, “expand the heart.”
We’re also teaching Sridaiva nationwide and worldwide. We just got back from the Netherlands, Germany, and Spain. It's making a solid expansion.
When is the official launch of Sridaiva?
Theoretically, we cofounded Sridaiva in January 2013. It’s been evolving — right now, we really have it solidified to the point where next month we’re putting up the website that shows the whole method. It’s much more open-sourced than what I’ve done in the past.
But aren’t you concerned about anyone trying to copy you?
I’m sure that’s going to happen. But if people want to learn this practice through us, they’ll come. And if they don’t give us credit, that’s their karma. With the politics of what I went through for 15 years with Anusara, I really want to avoid that situation in the future.
Where does the name, Sridaiva, which means “divine destiny” in Sanskrit, come from?
For Desi and I, divine destiny refers to fate. Like when you run into someone on the street and that person happens to have a special gift or knowledge that’s valuable for you. It seems like coincidence, but there is something really powerful in that.
It was an unbelievable, fated meeting with Desi. What were the chances at that time in my life after the fall of Anusara, when I’m open to a new path — this opportunity with Desi would just appear?
Would you say all of this happened for a reason?
The path I’m on now only happened because of a terrible scandal where I lost so much — my associations, my friendships, my lifestyle. All of it was gone. It was almost a near-death experience and I finally woke up and realized I needed to be different.
Do you consider this your comeback?
I don’t have any big vision for this — but if I can do the best I can every day and see myself making progress as a person, then that’s my comeback. I’m not judging my success on financial gain or the size of my following. My comeback is to see my mistakes and have a higher level of integrity.
I’m excited about Sridaiva — it’s the most effective work I’ve ever done. I think it’s going to spread everywhere, and that’s a blessing. I feel like this is bigger than me —people are going to use this all over the world, and a lot of them won’t even know where it came from. But that doesn’t matter… I just want to help.
This conversation has been edited and condensed.
Photo Credit: Courtesy of Vital Yoga