Saturday, 18 January 2014

PHALLUS-WORSHIPING AMERICA, EUROPE, ISRAEL AND THE UN.


PHALLUS-WORSHIPING AMERICA, EUROPE, ISRAEL AND THE UNO CAME, SAW AND F…..UP BIG TIME!

WE WILL NOT GO DOWN IN THE NIGHT WITHOUT A FIGHT!
Adalberto Erazo


Today Sunday 19 January 2014 at 4:09 AM
 
"America is the land of the freaks and home of the depraved. This is American terrorism.I remember many years ago these cowardly savages in uniform burned the bodies of Afghans facing in the direction of Mecca. Despite the denials from the military this is the norm and they condone these Satanic acts because this country is Satanic. It's a true reflection of American values. Stupid Americans, you need to understand that they don't hate you for your freedom. They hate you for occupying their countries and murdering their families and friends."

WESTERN SATANIC PHALLIC WORSHIP


 "Holy" Satanic Bible used by Freemason George Washington when he was sworn in as President of the Freemasonic State known as the united State Corporation of America!
Inside that same Satanic Bible!

 

  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VEa0AzhqqNI

 Palestine Symphony - From Turkey with Love
The aristocratic West and Israel (High Supremacist Caste) drink the blood of Muslims and offer their lives in sacrifice and as holocausts to their Satanic Gods while listening to or watching performances of Chopin, Mozart, Haydn, Tchaikovsky, Beethoven, Vivaldi, Bach, Schubert, Maria Callas, and other classic composers.  (On purpose I did not include Wagner!)     
Great civilisation, that of the Devils and of the Great Satans!
Long Live Israel and Long Live the Satanic West
BAFS

HOW MUCH DOES IT TAKE TO HATE SATANIC AMERICA, CANADA, EUROPE, AUSTRALIA, ISRAEL AND THEIR ALLIES?

 

 

AS SURYA (SYRIA)

'Shocking' photos emerge showing U.S. Marines burning bodies of Iraqi insurgents, posing for pictures with skeletons and even an enemy soldier's remains being eaten by a dog as Pentagon launches probe

  • The explosive photographs, reportedly taken in Fallujah in 2004, have sparked a Marine Corps investigation
  • However, many of the 41 shots, obtained by TMZ, are just too grisly to publish
  • Two pictures show a Marine pouring gasoline on the enemy remains, another two images show the Iraqi soldiers going up in flames while a fifth picture captures the charred bodies
  • U.S. Central Command, which oversees military operations in the Middle East, determined the photos had not been brought to their attention before
By Helen Pow
|



The explosive photographs, reportedly taken in Fallujah in 2004, have already sparked a Marine Corps investigation, but many of the 41 gag-inducing shots are just too grisly to publish.


Two pictures show a Marine pouring what looks like gasoline on the remains of enemy soldiers and another two images appear to show the remains go up in flames. Two more capture the horrifically charred bodies.

WARNING: EXTREMELY GRAPHIC CONTENT
Horrific: Shocking images depicting U.S. soldiers burning the bodies of what appear to be Iraqi insurgents, have emerged today
Horrific: Shocking images depicting U.S. soldiers burning the bodies of what appear to be Iraqi insurgents, have emerged today

Burning: The explosive photographs, reportedly taken in Fallujah in 2004, appear to show U.S. soldier pouring gasoline on the bodies of Iraqi insurgents
Burning: The explosive photographs, reportedly taken in Fallujah in 2004, appear to show U.S. soldier pouring gasoline on the bodies of Iraqi insurgents
The sick snaps were exclusively obtained by TMZ, who turned them over to the Pentagon last week, triggering the probe.
According to the website, U.S. Central Command, which is in charge of military operations in the Middle East, reviewed the photos to determine if they had been brought to their attention before.

They determined they had not.

Other horrific pictures show a Marine squatting next to a skull to pose for the camera. His U.S. military uniform is clear, on his face he wears a wide grin and he is pointing his gun at the skeleton.
Another picture shows a soldier rifling through the pockets of the scant remains of an Iraqi soldier. 
TMZ said it has withheld the bulk of the images - including one showing a body being eaten by a dog - because they are just too graphic.


Grim: Many of the 41 gag-inducing shots are just too grisly to publish
Grim: Many of the 41 gag-inducing shots are just too grisly to publish

probe: The gruesome images have already sparked a Marine Corps investigation
probe: The gruesome images have already sparked a Marine Corps investigation


Charred: Two more pictures capture the horrifically charred bodies
Charred: Two more pictures capture the horrifically charred bodies

It reported seeing well over a dozen dead insurgents in total in the heinous pictures, in various states, including some covered in flies.

The Department of Defense said the pictures appear to show U.S. soldiers in violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice. The code outlines that it is a crime to mishandle remains.
There is no statute of limitations on the crime, which means the Marines can be prosecuted even if they're no longer active in the military. If convicted, the soldiers could go to prison.
'We are aware of photos appearing on TMZ.com that depict individuals in U.S. Marine uniforms burning what appear to be human remains,' Cmdr Bill Speaks, from the Secretary of Defense's office, told MailOnline Wednesday.
Pentagon: The sick snaps were exclusively obtained by TMZ, who turned them over to the Pentagon last week, triggering the probe
Pentagon: The sick snaps were exclusively obtained by TMZ, who turned them over to the Pentagon last week, triggering the probe
Posing: Other horrific pictures show a Marine squatting next to a skull to pose for the camera. His U.S. military uniform is clear, on his face he wears a wide grin and he is pointing his gun at the skeleton
Posing: Other horrific pictures show a Marine squatting next to a skull to pose for the camera. His U.S. military uniform is clear, on his face he wears a wide grin and he is pointing his gun at the skeleton

Pickpocket: The Department of Defense said the pictures appear to show U.S. soldiers in violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice. The code outlines that it is a crime to mishandle remains
Pickpocket: The Department of Defense said the pictures appear to show U.S. soldiers in violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice. The code outlines that it is a crime to mishandle remains


'The Marine Corps is currently investigating the veracity of these photos, circumstances involved, and if possible, the identities of the service members involved. 
'The findings from this investigation will determine whether we are able to move forward with any investigation into possible wrongdoing.'
Some have suggested the Marines may have been burning the remains as a sanitary measure.
However, Pentagon spokesman Army Col. Steven Warren said the proper handling of war remains is set by U.S. military regulation and that the actions depicted in the photos 'are not what we expect from our service members.'
Cmdr Speaks said the deplorable acts depicted in the images are not representative of the millions of hardworking men and women who have served in the Middle East.
'The actions depicted in these photos are not what we expect from our service members, nor do they represent the honorable and professional service of the more than 2.5 million Americans who have served in Iraq and Afghanistan,' he told MailOnline.
In 2005 report, U.S. soldiers in Gumbad, Afghanistan were investigated for burning the bodies of two enemy fighters.
The men argued they set alight the corpses for hygienic reasons, after local citizens had not retrieved the bodies after 24 hours.
A report concluded that the action indicated poor judgement but was not a war crime.
It stated: 'Based on the criminal investigation, there was no evidence to substantiate the allegation of desecration or any violation of the Law of War. However, there was evidence of poor decision-making and judgment, poor reporting and lack of knowledge and respect for local Afghan customs and tradition.'

 

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2539906/Shocking-photos-emerge-showing-U-S-Marines-burning-bodies-Iraqi-insurgents-posing-pictures-skeletons-enemy-soldiers-remains-eaten-dog-Pentagon-launches-probe.html#ixzz2qkotrCpQ
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Freemasonry: 'The firm within the firm'

Beginning his working life in the aviation industry and trained by the BBC, Tony Gosling is a British land rights activist, historian & investigative radio journalist.
Published time: January 23, 2014 14:12 
 
Former Freemason Senior Grand Deacon John Hamill poses for photographs
inside the Grand Temple in London June 26, 2002. 
(Reuters / Peter Macdiarmid)
Former Freemason Senior Grand Deacon John Hamill poses for photographs inside the Grand Temple in London June 26, 2002. (Reuters / Peter Macdiarmid)

Is there a vaster chasm than that between 'worthy charitable giving' and 'swindlers at the top of society'? This is par for the course though when you do an internet search for the Freemasons.

Last week brought more hard evidence of the latter (and darker), with the second leaked report from UK criminal justice authorities in as many years to conclude that mobsters use Freemasonry to freely recruit corrupt detectives, being one of 'the most difficult aspects of organized crime corruption to proof against.'
Scotland Yard's Operation Tiberius report was written over a decade ago but has only this week been made public by The Independent's investigations editor, Tom Harper. It follows on from Project Riverside, revealed by Channel 4 News' Andy Davies in March 2012 from the Serious Organized Crime Agency (SOCA), which also describes Freemasonry in round terms as 'a firm within a firm'. Incredible though it may seem, although paid for with public money, both these reports have taken nearly a decade to surface, and then only as partial press leaks.
 
So why did the authors of Scotland Yard's Operation Tiberius' find Freemasons so difficult to winkle out? Most know Freemasonry sits somewhere between a religious cult and a pyramid selling scheme but have no idea where 'The Craft' came from, or what makes Masons tick. It's the oath of secrecy, similar to the Mafia's Omertà, on pain of death, which, in theory, makes any revelation about ‘The Craft’ a slip of the tongue you can die for.

Behind the lodge door

Masons have a pyramid of initiation through 33 ranks, or 'degrees' and belong to geographic 'Provinces' overseen by London's United Grand Lodge of England (UGLE). They follow civic county boundaries and each produce an annual yearbook with a tally of lodges followed by members names in each lodge. One would have thought it would be a relatively simple job, therefore, for Scotland Yard detectives to figure out who of their colleagues are in and who are out.
 
The trouble is those yearbooks are jealously guarded. Masonic Bristol MP, Jack Lopresti, for example, promised me a copy of the latest Bristol Yearbook live on the radio in April 2012 but his provincial secretary, Steve Rawlings, refused to send it. This begs the question: when a senior public figure is low to middling in the secret Masonic hierarchy, who's really in charge in the world of the 'profane', as Masons call the public?
 
As a secret establishment club, Freemasonry rightly rings alarm bells. By seizing only a handful of key positions in the criminal justice system, like any unscrupulous interest, it could corrupt the entire caboodle. The other nerve-jangling concern is that Freemasonry's 'Don' just happens to be a little too close to one the top figures in Britain's military and judicial chain-of-command; UGLE's Grand Master, Prince Michael of Kent, is Queen Elizabeth II's cousin.
 

The Freemason book of reference is displayed in the Museum of Freemasonry in Paris February 9, 2010, two days before it reopens to the public. (Reuters / Charles Platiau)
The Freemason book of reference is displayed in the Museum of Freemasonry in Paris February 9, 2010, two days before it reopens to the public. (Reuters / Charles Platiau)

Historians trace Masonic scandals back to a few decades after 'The Craft' was founded in the eighteenth century as a society of 'free thinkers'. The occasion was the 1798 publication of John Robison's 'Proofs of a Conspiracy Against all the Religions and Governments of Europe'. When he said proofs, proofs he meant. Quoting verified leaked documents, he detailed methods of political infiltration and deception to be used by a coterie of senior German masons, sponsored by a wealthy ancestor of the present British royal family, Duke Ernest II of Saxe-Gotha-Altenburg.
 
Quoting links to the perpetrators of the bloody French Revolution, Robison's scandal flew like a whirlwind round the high society of Europe. This exposé might have been roundly discredited by Masonic loyalists as 'Conspiracy Theory' had the author not been one of the most respected men of his day, his brilliant scientific mind nurturing the white heat of scientific innovation driving the industrial revolution.
 
Secretary of the Royal Society in Edinburgh, Robison was a close friend of the inventor of the steam engine, James Watt, and above all, from the point of view of credibility, a Freemason himself. He saw the secrecy which had protected free-thinking innovators beginning to take on a new self-serving character absolutely contemptuous of outsiders. Along with the 1798 'Memoirs Illustrating the History of Jacobinism' by Abbé Augustin Barruel in France, Robison's forensic critique of Freemasonry caused a bitter public schism in ‘The Craft’ which lasted a decade or more, before being 'buried alive' with the passing of Robison's generation.
 
So Masonic scandal is nothing new. Every time, whether the 'powers that be' hit Masonic accountability into the long grass or not, the true remedy is the same: declare your secret society membership as an interest like any other or face prosecution for misconduct, particularly in public office. One would expect to find those principles as the nucleus of all probity and good governance for associations and corporations round the world, both public and private, yet they are eerily absent.

Is Freemasonry a fundamentalist religious cult?


Britain's Prince Michael of Kent, Provincial Grand Master for Middlesex and Grand Master for The Mark Mason (an additional order of masonry) arrives at St Paul's Cathedral in central London, June 18, 2002 (Reuters)
Britain's Prince Michael of Kent, Provincial Grand Master for Middlesex and Grand Master for The Mark Mason (an additional order of masonry) arrives at St Paul's Cathedral in central London, June 18, 2002 (Reuters)

Though many accuse 'The Craft' of being a religious cult, Freemasonry may not fit the definition of a 'religion' in the usual sense. However, Masons certainly hold strong beliefs about Western influences in the Holy Land. Those of the higher degrees privately profess a 'fundamentalist' fervor for Zionism. Israel's own Grand Lodge was founded in 1953, now numbering between 50 and 60 lodges with thousands of members. Indeed even in Bristol's windowless 'Royal Arch' Masonic Temple, the furnishings are embossed throughout with golden Israeli 'Star of David' emblems.
 
Where you can find them, former Freemasons give dazzling insights into the favors ‘The Craft’ affords as well as the evils of what is essentially a 'gang for grown ups' strewn through with a toxic mix of mumbo-jumbo and bullying. Both Stephen Knight's 1984 book 'The Brotherhood' and former 'World In Action' journalist Martin Short's 1989 follow up 'Inside The Brotherhood' do an ample job documenting the testimony of those brave enough to reject the threats and leave ‘The Craft’. The latter, as a six-part Granada TV documentary, found its way to an incredulous national audience the same year.
 
TV examinations are notoriously few and far between, but in his 1999 HTV Documentary 'Rites and Wrongs' journalist James Garrett discovered a human skull and two femur cross bones hidden away in a chequered cabinet. He asked Gloucestershire's top Mason on camera, "What part do the skull and cross bones play in your ritual?" Provincial Grand Master Peter Marsh's voice quavered as he replied "Well, yes there are some skulls and cross bones which are part of the regalia of the lodge and they represent mortality." Perfect for emphasizing that threat of death then, Peter?

The Church of England and House of Commons deliberate

In 1987, the General Synod of the Church of England considered the question 'Freemasonry and Christianity: Are they compatible?' Failing to come down on one side or the other of the fence they concluded, "The reflections of the working group itself reveal understandable differences of opinion between those who are Freemasons and those who are not." So despite a clear instruction from Jesus Christ in Matthew 5:37 "Never swear an oath, simply let your 'yes' be 'yes' and your 'no' be 'no', anything else comes from the devil," they Church of England couldn't make their minds up.
 
In 1998 Labour MP, Chris Mullin, chaired the second House of Commons Home Affairs Select Committee Enquiry into Freemasonry in as many years. The report's penultimate paragraph "requires public servants who are members of a secret society ... to disclose their membership." The result was non-compliance by many of Britain's police forces. The Standards Board for England which, for several years required all elected local councilors to declare membership of secret societies was conveniently abolished by the Lib/Con coalition government in 2012 as part of their deregulation policy.
 
Even if Freemasonry does not control some of the key positions of state in its own self-interest, its involvement in promoting its own to positions of power and privilege is a likely candidate to explain why Britain is increasingly being controlled by individuals who seem entirely unsuited to positions of public trust.
If ‘The Craft’ has not yet become a kind of secret government, as a 1981-84 Italian parliamentary enquiry proved Propaganda Due (P2) Masonic Lodge to be, it is almost certainly why Britain is paralyzed by what's known in drinking dens across the land as the 'Tyranny of the Mediocre'.
 
So as thin old London police and newsroom files on Freemasonry start to fill up with cold hard truths, at the very least it should concentrate the minds of those thinking of using Freemasonry as a convenient cover for crookedness. It is only a matter of time now before their secret number is up.
 
The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RT.

No comments:

Post a Comment