Why the Holocaust Denial?
All over Europe "Holocaust Denial" (their Orwellian pigeon-hole term for questioning "official" history) is ILLEGAL and has resulted in many lengthy imprisonments! Authors, professors, and researchers like Sylvia Stolz, David Irving, Germar Rudolf, Dr. Frederick Toben and many others have all spent years behind bars for simply speaking out about this taboo subject. One man, Ernst Zundel, has spent over 7 years behind bars simply for re-publishing a small, fascinating book called "Did Six Million Really Die?"
So what are some of the arguments made by these "criminal" Holocaust "deniers?" To begin with multiple Jew and Gentile sources alike confirm that there were no more than 3 million Jews in Germany during the Holocaust anyway. At the time, the entire Jewish population of Europe was only 6.5 million, and over half of them can be accounted for as living outside of Nazi Germany. The "official" story says that millions of Jews were put to death in gas chambers, but the chambers at Aushwitz, Dachau, and Mauthausen supposedly responsible for millions of deaths do not have the necessary sealed doors, frames, or tall chimneys required and forensic examinations of the sites have revealed no residue of anything toxic ever being used there. Establishment historians claim that Treblinka and Belzec are the sites of mass graves where hundreds of thousands of Jews were buried, yet scientists have shown using ground penetrating radar and core samples with 100% certainty that there are no mass graves and the ground has never even been disturbed.
Of course, atrocity propaganda is nothing new. It has accompanied every conflict of the 20th century and doubtless will continue to do so. During the First World War, the Germans were actually accused of eating Belgian babies, as well as delighting to throw them in the air and transfix them on bayonets. The British also alleged that the German forces were operating a “Corpse Factory”, in which they boiled down the bodies of their own dead in order to obtain glycerin and other commodities, a calculated insult to the honour of an Imperial army. After the war, however, came the retractions; indeed, a public statement was made by the Foreign Secretary in the House of Commons apologizing for the insults to German honour, which were admitted to be war-time propaganda.
No such statements have been made after the Second World War. In fact, rather than diminish with the passage of years, the atrocity propaganda concerning the German occupation, and in particular their treatment of the Jews, has done nothing but increase its virulence, and elaborate its catalogue of horrors. Gruesome paperback books with lurid covers continue to roll from the presses, adding continuously to a growing mythology of the concentration camps and especially to the story that no less than Six Million Jews were exterminated in them. The ensuing pages will reveal this claim to be the most colossal piece of fiction and the most successful of deceptions; but here an attempt may be made to answer an important question: What has rendered the atrocity stories of the Second World War so uniquely different from those of the First? Why were the latter retracted while the former are reiterated louder than ever? Is it possible that the story of the Six Million Jews is serving a political purpose, even that it is a form of political blackmail?
So far as the Jewish people themselves are concerned, the deception has been an incalculable benefit. Every conceivable race and nationality had its share of suffering in the Second World War, but none has so successfully elaborated it and turned it to such great advantage. The alleged extent of their persecution quickly aroused sympathy for the Jewish national homeland they had sought for so long; after the War the British Government did little to prevent Jewish emigration to Palestine which they had declared illegal, and it was not long afterwards that the Zionists wrested from the Government the land of Palestine and created their haven from persecution, the State of Israel. Indeed, it is a remarkable fact that the Jewish people emerged from the Second World War as nothing less than a triumphant minority. Dr. Max Nussbaum, the former chief rabbi of the Jewish community in Berlin, stated on April 11, 1953: “The position the Jewish people occupy today in the world—despite the enormous losses—is ten times stronger than what it was twenty years ago.” It should be added, if one is to be honest, that this strength has been much consolidated financially by the supposed massacre of the Six Million, undoubtedly the most profitable atrocity allegation of all time. To date, the staggering figure of six thousand million pounds has been paid out in compensation by the Federal Government of West Germany, mostly to the State of Israel (which did not even exist during the Second World War), as well as to individual Jewish claimants.
In terms of political blackmail, however, the allegation that Six Million Jews died during the Second World War has much more far-reaching implications for the people of Britain and Europe than simply the advantages it has gained for the Jewish nation. And here one comes to the crux of the question: Why the Big Lie? What is its purpose? In the first place, it has been used quite unscrupulously to discourage any form of nationalism. Should the people of Britain or any other European country attempt to assert their patriotism and preserve their national integrity in an age when the very existence of nation-states is threatened, they are immediately branded as “neo-Nazis”. Because, of course, Nazism was nationalism, and we all know what happened then—Six Million Jews were exterminated! So long as the myth is perpetuated, peoples everywhere will remain in bondage to it; the need for international tolerance and understanding will be hammered home by the United Nations until nationhood itself, the very guarantee of freedom, is abolished. -Excerpt from Did Six Million Really Die?
By Rebel of Oz
The other day, Alan Hart sent me an article titled ‘Understanding the real significance TODAY of the Nazi holocaust.’ In his article, he quoted himself in his book Holocaust – Jewish Death, Zionist Life, Chapter 9 of Volume 1 saying,
“Holocaust denial (and most aspects of holocaust revisionism) is something I cannot get my Gentile mind around. It strikes me as evil on a par with the commissioning of the slaughter and the slaughtering itself.”
Wow, I thought to myself when reading it, this sounds pretty Jewish to me, in spite of the reference to his “Gentile mind”, which seems to indicate that Alan is at least part Gentile, if you know what I mean. Of course, this could all have to do with his many Jewish friends, Alan likes to mention in his articles, such as “Auschwitz survivor” Dr. Hajo Meyer.
“He told me, and I believed him without reservation, that some of his Jewish “comrades” in Auschwitz were assigned the task of removing the corpses from the gas chambers and transferring them to incinerators for burning. He added that the smoke and fumes from the chimneys of the incinerators could be seen and smelled all over the camp.”
Alan is obviously one of those people who believe their friends whatever they tell them, regardless of common sense, pesky scientific and legal technicalities or forensic evidence. Here just a few examples:
- The Leuchter Report and later again Germar Rudolf’s scholarly examinations have proven beyond reasonable doubt that no Zyklon B has been used as alleged in the shower rooms of the Auschwitz, Majdanek or any other Nazi concentration camp for that matter.
- The outstanding documentary “One third of the holocaust” did an equally excellent job at debunking allegations that the concentration camps in Treblinka, Sobibor, and Belzec had been death camps, in which supposedly one third of the Holocaust victims had been murdered.
- The allegations that the Germans were using in Treblinka the exhaust fumes from a captured Russian tank to gas over a million prisoners are obviously nonsense since diesel exhaust fumes do not contain poisonous levels of carbon monoxide, which is why diesel vehicles are widely used in underground mining.
- The confessions made by Nazi leaders in the Nuremberg and other war crime tribunals have been proven to be the result of rampant torture and coercion, such as crushed testicles and threats to hand over wife and daughters to the Russians for gang rape purposes.
Since Alan is a longstanding contributing author to the Rebel site and I value freedom of expression, I posted it in spite of my reservations. However, I added some of my objections and also sent him an email saying:
“Alan, the most disturbing thing for me about the official holocaust story is when seemingly intelligent people like yourself don’t get that something that you cannot question without being systematically and viciously destroyed, even imprisoned, must be a lie, irrespective of the country, not just Communist China or North Korea.”
Alan’s reply to me was:
“Perhaps I am more intelligent than you think I am and you are less intelligent than you think you are. The fact that by its blackmail Zionism has made questioning the holocaust a crime in some places etcetera is not evidence of any kind that the holocaust is a lie. It’s all part of Zionism’s process of using and abusing the holocaust as a blackmail card.”
Since Alan has such a high opinion of his intelligence and is convinced that he’s right, I decided to have a closer look at the evidence he is providing for this claims that the Nazi holocaust narrative actually happened, other than the hearsay statements made by his Jewish friends.
Alan claims that the Nazis decided to mass-murder the Jews because the Brits reneged on the Balfour declaration and the Transfer Agreement they had with Hitler about forcedly resettling the European Jews in Palestine. In other words, since the Palestinians didn’t want them and the Brits were unwilling or unable to force the Palestinians to accept them, Hitler decided to exterminate the Jews instead. Plausible, I admit, but that doesn’t get rid of the problem that the alleged methods of mass murder are nonsense, as demonstrated by the revisionists.
Alan then quotes from speeches held on the Wannsee conference and from Goebbel’s diary. It would appear that Alan – in spite of writing books on the topic – is completely oblivious not only to the work of the above mentioned leading revisionists, but also to the most eminent historian on the era of World War II, David Irving.  If he wasn’t, he wouldn’t have come to his libelous interpretations, unless, of course, he’s consciously peddling a false narrative to please his Jewish friends and publishers. Crime pays, after all. There is an even more awkward explanation possible though. Maybe, it’s the other way round, and it’s Alan Hart who is not as intelligent as he thinks.
 Fred Leuchter, Robert Faurisson, Germar Rudolf: The Leuchter Report, Critical Edition, http://therebel.org/books/475030-the-leuchter-reports-critical-edition
 One Third of the Holocaust (2006) and related documentaries can be found in the online video section of the Rebel site (http://therebel.org/videos).
 You can find PDF versions of many of the books of above mentioned authors in the online books section of the Rebel site (http://therebel.org/books)
 e.g. David Irving, Revelations from Goebbels’ Diary (http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v15/v15n1p-2_Irving.html