Tuesday, 2 October 2012



America has been orgasmic whenever their hired assassins were mass murdering the Muslims, persecuting, hunting down, torturing and raping their women, bombing the elderly and pregnant women, raping young girls and babies!  They will not get away with their crimes unpunished!

France calls this Western civilisation, democracy, freedom of speech,  Laïcité (French 'secularism'), human rights, enlightenment,...!

codex magica mysterious monuments
Intelligence Examiner
Texe Marrs

82-page Intelligence Report on Israel NOT a
Mossad Psyops False Flag Project

Bibi Netanyahu with Barack Obama

Almost two years ago, I disclosed that Barack Obama had shocked Washington, D.C. insiders by firing his White House Chief of Staff, Rahm Emanuel*, and sending him packing back to Chicago. It was, after all, billionaire Jews that were the mentors and money men for Obama. Yet, here he was asserting his independence from the Zionists.*
Since that time, it has become clear that President Obama has refused to be a lackey for the Zionists* and has flatly told Prime Minister Netanyahu that America will not do Israel’s dirty work and attack Iran*. Obama’s surprisingly courageous smackdown of the militant Jewish overseers of America finally has resulted in an 82-page intelligence report that defines a new approach by America towards Zionist belligerence. Some simply cannot believe that Obama would be so bold*. A few websites are even suggesting that the new intelligence report is a Mossad psyops false flag project. Not so!

Sources reveal that the draft report entitled Preparing for a Post-Israel Middle East,” currently in form as a “talking paper,” formulated by the US Intelligence Community, is in fact making the rounds in Washington. The Neocons and Israel are crazed in anger because of the negative implications of this report for the Zionist Middle East and global agendas. What is in the report reveals what many of the loyal, pro-American Intel specialists in D.C., in the academic community, and among the Pentagon’s military brass privately think and are saying.

President Obama’s actions in refusing to attack Iran and in snubbing Netanyahu, and those of the Chairman of the JCS, General Martin Dempsey, in putting Netanyahu and the IDF in their place*, give credence to the fact that America’s attitude and foreign policy strategy regarding Israel is rapidly changing.

Israel’s sayanim (spies and agents) in the USA, in Congress and elsewhere, have been instructed to deny this draft report exists. It is suggested they attempt to portray the report as a “Mossad psyops False Flag” project or, if that attempt fails, as simply another effort by anti-Semites to smear Israel. In reality, it would be suicide for Israel’s Mossad to have made this report up as a psyop. The fact is that the report’s anti-Zionist, pro-truth doctrinal philosophy is extremely damaging to Israel and to Israel’s militant leadership. Israel would not “out” Israel nor declare itself a “rogue state” antithetical to US national interests. The draft report does exactly that. Anyone who thinks that the Zionists would inflict such terrific wounds to their own image is naive.*

What is happening is that Israel and its agents of influence are desperately working to minimize the findings of this report; their intent is to either derail it permanently or to water it down and dilute its impact. They may well succeed.* But the proverbial cat is already out of the bag.

Even if this “talking paper” draft were eventually derailed and discarded as a result of the Zionists’ ongoing frantic efforts to kill it,* its draft form would still bear legitimacy because it was originated by respected professionals in the US Intelligence Community, among which are pro-American elements vociferously opposed to Netanyahu and the Israeli crazies. In any event, the findings of the report are critical in that Israel is characterized as both a liability and as a drain on American resources and credibility in the Middle East region and across the globe.

In fact, the report, as drafted, is, in essence, a powerful document which clearly furthers the goal of the US intelligence Community to encourage a dramatic shift in national policy and to promote a more healthy foreign policy. The preferred new policy takes into account the growing influence of the Moslem world, Russian and Chinese concerns, and the overriding interests of US national security.

The Pentagon and America’s Intel leadership represent a knowledgeable counterforce to the Zionist lobby and its burrowed-down sayanim. President Obama is also fully briefed and aware of the dangerous agenda and duplicitous conduct of the Israelis. The insane, costly pro-Zionist Neocon policies and Israel’s terrorist activities are dangerous to our security and unwise in the extreme. Therefore, this carefully reasoned report* tells it like it is. Israel is accurately seen to be a radical outcast in the world and a criminal state.* For such an unstable nation as Israel to possess hundreds of nuclear bombs as it does now is simply unthinkable.

Whether the draft intelligence assessment ever sees the light of day as a final, definitive statement is irrelevant.* Perception is reality, and the draft report itself is, at this very moment, dramatically changing the public perception of Israel and is significantly undermining the flawed foundation upon which the whole house of Zionism rests. Again, this fact negates the possibility that the report is a Mossad project.

It should be noted that Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu has become a laughable cartoon character with his over-the-top, Nazi-like UN and AIPAC speeches and his comical exaggerations of Iran’s nuclear capability.* Consequently, American foreign policy is viewed by the 120 unaligned nations as regressive. Both the USA and Israel are global pariahs, and America is viewed as a foreign policy dinosaur for its bloody support of the Zionist agenda. Eventually, things had to change, and they are changing.*

It is also significant that PBS recently aired a powerful documentary which exposed the house of cards of the 9/11 monstrosity. This was no accident, and if the American public does begin to recognize the heinous role played by Israel’s Mossad in the 9/11 crime*, the Intel Community draft report will quickly become cemented and confirmed as accepted public policy.

Finally, the joint action and concurrence of all sixteen US intelligence agencies has precedent in an intelligence report published during the final months of the George W. Bush White House. That report, signed by all 16 intel agencies, essentially branded Israel’s leaders, the Mossad. and the Neocon think tanks as liars and fakers. The report stated definitively that, in contrast to Israel’s oft-repeated propaganda, Iran has no nuclear weapons and is not developing any.

Israel and Netanyahu were enraged, and the Bush-Cheney administration vigorously attempted to kill the draft report. To no avail—it was eventually released to the public and to the mainstream media, which sought, of course, to minimize its damning (to Israel) findings.

Texe Marrs
Power of Prophecy

*  Either my great friend Pr Pastor Texe Marrs has seen all this in a dream or getting too old for the job or I am having a nightmare!  

The "Holy Ghost" and his "Jesus-God" must be playing tricks on him!

We are on the battle field and at war.  A good General never talks like this right in the middle of a genocidal war!

America has no solution, but to bomb Iran by hook or by crook or it is the end of America!


I wrote that RAHM THE CRUEL was not fired, but that Satan Obama's backers had a diabolical plan, but, I may be wrong! 

After what America, the West and Israel did to the Muslim world, to Libya recently, to Iraq, to Afghanistan, to Palestine, to Lebanon, to Pakistan, to Sudan, and to other Muslim lands, they have no solution except the total destruction of all Muslim military might and the extermination of all fighting Muslims!


The solution may come from a Coalition of non-aligned countries and or a Coalition of Muslim countries, but not from America itself!

America can keep its 82-page "Intelligence Shit" for itself!



Mitt Romney says he would indict Ahmadinejad for genocide incitement – video

Speaking to press onboard his campaign plane, the Republican presidential nominee, Mitt Romney, says that he would press for an indictment of Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad on charges of inciting genocide. Romney speaks to the press moments after a phone conversation with Israeli prime minister Binyamin Netanyahu, where the two discussed Iran's nuclear capabilities ???
 Source: Reuters
  • Length: 4min 05sec
  • Saturday 29 September 2012

The true reason US fears Iranian nukes: they can deter US attacks

1 Vote

GOP Senator Lindsey Graham echoes a long line of US policymakers: Iran must not be allowed to deter US aggression

By Glenn Greenwald

October 02, 2012 “Information Clearing House” – In the Washington Post today, Richard Cohen expresses surprise that Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is “starting to make some sense” and “wax rationally”. Cohen specifically cites this statement from the Iranian president last week:

“Let’s even imagine that we have an atomic weapon, a nuclear weapon. What would we do with it? What intelligent person would fight 5,000 American bombs with one bomb?”

Cohen’s surprise notwithstanding, numerous Iranian leaders, including Ahmadinejad, have long made the same point. And it’s a point so obvious it should not even need to be made. No rational person takes seriously the claim that Iran, even if it did obtain a nuclear weapon, would commit instant and guaranteed national suicide by using it to attack a nation that has a huge nuclear stockpile, which happens to include both the US and Israel. One can locate nothing in the actions of Iran’s regime that even suggests irrationality on that level, let alone suicidal impulses.

That Iran will use its nuclear weapons against the US and Israel is rather obviously the centerpiece of the fear-mongering campaign against Tehran, to build popular support for threats to launch an aggressive attack in order to prevent them from acquiring that weapon. So what, then, is the real reason that so many people in both the US and Israeli governments are so desperate to stop Iranian proliferation?

Every now and then, they reveal the real reason: Iranian nuclear weapons would prevent the US from attacking Iran at will, and that is what is intolerable. The latest person to unwittingly reveal the real reason for viewing an Iranian nuclear capacity as unacceptable was GOP Senator Lindsey Graham, one of the US’s most reliable and bloodthirsty warmongers.

On Monday, Graham spoke in North Augusta, South Carolina, and was asked about the way in which sanctions were harming ordinary Iranians. Ayman Hossam Fadel was present and recorded the exchange. Answering that question, Graham praised President Obama for threatening Iran with war over nuclear weapons, decreed that “the Iranian people should be willing to suffer now for a better future,” and then – invoking the trite neocon script that is hauled out whenever new wars are being justified – analogized Iranian nukes to Hitler in the 1930s. But in the middle of his answer, he explained the real reason Iranian nuclear weapons should be feared:

“They have two goals: one, regime survival. The best way for the regime surviving, in their mind, is having a nuclear weapon, because when you have a nuclear weapon, nobody attacks you.”

Graham added that the second regime goal is “influence”, that “people listen to you” when you have a nuclear weapon. In other words, we cannot let Iran acquire nuclear weapons because if they get them, we can no longer attack them when we want to and can no longer bully them in their own region.

Graham’s answer is consistent with what various American policy elites have said over the years about America’s enemies generally and Iran specifically: the true threat of nuclear proliferation is that it can deter American aggression. Thomas Donnelly of the American Enterprise Institute and the New American Century Project has long been crystal clear that this is the real reason for opposing Iranian nuclear capability [my emphasis]:

“When their missiles are tipped with warheads carrying nuclear, biological, or chemical weapons, even weak regional powers have a credible deterrent regardless of the balance of conventional forces … In the post cold war era, America and its allies, rather than the Soviet Union, have become the primary objects of deterrence and it is states like Iraq, Iran and North Korea who most wish to develop deterrent capabilities.”

He added:
“The surest deterrent to American action is a functioning nuclear arsenal …

“To be sure, the prospect of a nuclear Iran is a nightmare. But it is less a nightmare because of the high likelihood that Tehran would employ its weapons or pass them on to terrorist groups – although that is not beyond the realm of possibility – and more because of the constraining effect it threatens to impose upon US strategy for the greater Middle East. The danger is that Iran will ‘extend’ its deterrence, either directly or de facto, to a variety of states and other actors throughout the region. This would be an ironic echo of the extended deterrence thought to apply to US allies during the cold war.”

As Jonathan Schwarz has extensively documented, this is what US policy elites have said over and over. In 2001, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld warned:

“Several of these [small enemy nations] are intensely hostile to the United States and are arming to deter us from bringing our conventional or nuclear power to bear in a regional crisis.”

In 2002, State Department official Philip Zelikow said that if Iraq were permitted to keep its WMDs, “they now can deter us from attacking them, because they really can retaliate against us.” In 2008, Democratic Senator Chuck Robb and GOP Senator Dan Coates wrote an incredibly hawkish Washington Post op-ed all but demanding an attack on Iran, and wrote:

“[A]n Islamic Republic of Iran with nuclear weapons capability would be strategically untenable. It would threaten U.S. national security … While a nuclear attack is the worst-case scenario, Iran would not need to employ a nuclear arsenal to threaten US interests. Simply obtaining the ability to quickly assemble a nuclear weapon would effectively give Iran a nuclear deterrent.”

The No 1 concern of American national security planners appears to be that countries may be able to prevent the US from attacking them at will, whether to change their regimes or achieve other objectives. In other words, Iranian nuclear weapons could be used to prevent wars – ones started by the US – and that, above all, is what we must fear.

(Graham’s questioner said that she believed Iran was not committed to developing a nuclear weapon, and Graham responded that Israeli leaders had reached the opposite conclusion. That is simply false.)

Whatever one thinks of Iran, the signal the US has sent to the world is unmistakable: any rational government should acquire nuclear weapons. The Iranians undoubtedly watched the US treatment of two dictators who gave up their quest for nuclear weapons – Iraq’s Saddam Hussein and Libya’s Muammar Gaddafi – and drew the only reasoned lesson: the only way a country can protect itself from US attack, other than full-scale obeisance, is to acquire nuclear weapons. That is precisely why the US and Israel are so eager to ensure they do not.

 Dick Shaver and the Hollow Earth Insiders

Wednesday, 24 March 2010

 Tuesday, 27 July 2010

Holly Greig

Paedos run Scotand

And here, given the Scottish Raj.

Also from a post at RI:

Join this site
Members (2)

Lord Graville Jenner(Labour Peer)
Jenner was accused of raping a 15 year old boy at the holiday in in Glasgow, the night before the boy was due to give evidence, the judge was taken out to dinner by the defense team for Jenner, and it was arranged that the boy was not allowed to Jenner in court as his rapist, or he would be in contempt of court. Jenner won his case and he walked in to the house of commons to a standing ovation by MP's. I stand by what i have said for many years, the house of commons and Lords are filled with perverts and rapists, and the police and the courts will defend them all the way, as they are all in the same private club.

Lord Kaufman (Labour Peer)

He is well known to police in London for sexually abusing young boys, he likes them under 12 when he can get them.

Lord Britton (Leon, former home sec when Maggie was in power)

He is very well known for raping young boys. The police raided his house when a young boy staggered in to the street half naked, and when police asked what happened he told them about Britton and his friends and took them to the house. When they called in to report what happened , they were ordered to take everyone in, and when they got there there were 2 officers from the security service waiting. The boys were paid off, and a short time later, Leon Britton was summoned to meet his fellow MP, William Hague on the beach in Brighton at 5.45 in the morning, where he was told that he was to be made commissioner for the UK, and he would not be allowed to be in politics again in the UK. That was how he became commissioner and he stayed there for many years, until the corruption inquiry went ahead, which saw a large number of people from different countries being made to resign.

Brown is known for sexually abusing numerous boys, as well as girls. He is known for a particularly vile rape in Aberdeen in the 70's, when he and 2 others paid a prostitute for access to her 9 year old daughter. They all raped her several times, and some years later the girl went to court to get custody of her little brother because of her mother's abuse, and drug use. She won the case and has had custody of him ever since. The records have vanished from court, but the victim still remembers what happened, and who did it.

Anthony Charles Lynton Blair (Tony Blair, former PM of the UK)

He was charged and appeared in court at Bow Street magistrates court for importunity in a public toilet with another male. He tried to get sexual favour from the other man, little did he know that the toilet was being watched by police. Blair was fined £500, and walked away with nobody knowing who he really was as he used his middle names to cover who he was. Charles Lynton is the name used, and his friends in court got him off with a fine, because he is one of them.

Edward Heath (former PM of the UK)

He is very well known for his perverted abuse of young boys. I spoke to one of his victims and he told me about others who were present, and more important, who was supplying the children to him. The person bringing children for him to abuse is Sir Jimmy Saville. He was seen by the witness, victim, taking young boys onboard Heaths yacht the morning cloud when they were at party conference. Saville is known for supplying a number of high profile MP's with children for them to sexually abuse.

This is the first part, i will reveal more tonight and tomorrow.

6:12 PM

Anonymous said...
This is the next part of MP's who abuse children.

Lord Robertson (Former head of NATO)

He is very well known to police in the UK. He was removed by the US government because they found out about his perverted taste for boys. They were going to expose him if he did not resign, so we got the"I'm resigning for family reasons bull shit)Robertson is a dangerous predatory paedophile, but as bad as the one i am about to name next.

Lord Hardie,
The former Lord Advocate for Scotland,
is a known paedophile, who some years ago had his BMW stolen by 2 victims, when they were caught, Hardie told the police to let them go, and he did not bring charges against them. Why would a judge not charge them with theft, unless they had information which would destroy him.

Lord McAlpine,
Former treasurer of the conservative party.

He is known to the police in the UK and abroad, for sexually abusing young boys, including using a coffin to put the boy in, then they simulate burying him by sprinkling gravel on the top of the coffin, the child is screaming with terror and will do whatever he is told due to being so scared of being put in the coffin again. This person is alleged to have murdered at least 2 boys and buried their bodies on his estate. I got this information from a police officer who was involved in investigating McAlpine, and he is certain that he has committed murder several times, but he is to well protected to get him.

6:18 PM

Anonymous said...
Micheal Portilo (former MP Kensington & Chelsea.

Portilo is well known within the conservative party, as are others for his perverse abuse of children. He also likes adults now and again, particularly his friend and fellow MP Peter Lilley. He was giving portilo a good time in the DTI building on the day of the 92 election, he was on his knees, (I'm sure i don't have to paint a picture for you.
He also like Morocco Del sol, where he delights in having young boys for sexual abuse. He used to go to the same hotel and on one visit, he left top secret documents behind in connection with the UK's defense systems, was it an accident, or was he being blackmailed? He also goes to the Isle of White regularly with Lilley and other friends where they have access to children. He is disgusting and i want him in prison where he belongs.


  1. There are some more allegations naming McAlpine in the link below. If any of this is true then the guy's dangerous and needs to be brought to justice. He could also still be committing crimes and getting away with them.

  2. what are the sources for these allegations?

No comments:

Post a Comment