Friday, 27 August 2010

911 MOSSAD NAUDET BROTHERS AND BAFS

9-11: Jim Fetzer, False Flag Terror and The Rise of the Global Police State




Dr Judy Wood : Evidence of breakthrough energy technology on 9/11




  THE NAUDET SCAM!
I am more French and more of a chef than those 2 Naudet MOSSAD idiots!

I had analysed scene by scene the staged "documentary" of the Naudet Brothers and showed all their lies and posted them on a couple of websites, but nobody was really interested!  If I find my notes, I'll post them here.  (BAFS)

The incredible vanishing Naudet brothers

Oct 29, 2005 at 14:58 o\clock
by: socialdemocracynow

At last, thanks to a new website 9-11 Foreknowledge.com, the film 9-11 (usually referred to as 'the Fireman's Video') by the Naudet brothers, Jules and Gédéon, is beginning to receive the critical scrutiny it deserves. This film purports to be the story of a probationary New York firefighter, 21yo Tony Benetatos, but turns out to be about 9-11 after that event suddenly 'changes everything.' It is best known for containing the only decent footage of the first 'plane' striking the North Tower.

BELOW: A frame from the film 9-11, purportedly taken by Jules Naudet during the course of making a film about a probationary firefighter Tony Benetatos.*

http://img.stern.de/_content/51/27/512729/WTC1_400.jpg

I have long been suspicious of this film, and when I borrowed it from my local DVD store in 2002, I found myself watching numerous scenes over and over in slow motion that struck me as somehow odd - particularly one in which a strange object resembling a bird, but much too large to be a real bird, flutters across the foreground. Now this excellent website-in-progress analyses numerous details in what seems to be a kind of propaganda film posing as real life documentary. This website establishes that at least some of the footage which is presented as having been filmed before 9-11 has to have been filmed afterwards. What's more, this website invites us to ponder the fact that one of the firefighters shown in the film - James Hanlon - is actually a professional actor. You can't work your way through the content on this website without wondering whether the entire film is a hoax, whether perhaps it was created after 9-11 as a vehicle for fabricated footage of the first 'plane' crashing into the North Tower.

What this website does not address, and what I think no one has commented on so far, is that the Naudet brothers are rather mysterious. They would seem to be Jewish - certainly, Gédéon would seem to be a Jewish name. I wonder whether they are really French, as we have been told, or whether they are perhaps Israelis posing as Frenchmen. Although we are told that they are French, we are never told anything about their background in France. 


Biographical information is virtually non-existent, even on a French 9-11 website (11 septembre - Les attentats du 11 septembre 2001 et Al-Qaïda). The only reported facts are that they 1) moved from Paris to New York in 1989 (when Jules and Gédéon would have been aged 16 and 19 respectively) and 2) graduated from the (NYU) Tisch School of the Arts film school in 1995. (SOURCE 1 and SOURCE 2) I am curious about their move from Paris to New York (did they go with or without their parents?) and when and how they came to study at the Tisch school, which is one of the most competitive such institutions in the world. Entry is, reportedly, more competitive than to any of the Ivy League universities. (SOURCE) So who arranged it?

The brothers' parallel lives and identical biographies seem a little unlikely considering that there is apparently a three-year age gap between them. (Twins might go everywhere together and do exactly the same things, but brothers born several years apart?) Given their role in making films about American subjects - their first and only other film, Hope, Gloves, and Redemption: The Story of Mickey and Negra Rosario (1999), is concerned with events in Spanish Harlem - it is intriguing that I can find no profiles for these brothers prior to 9-11, and very little by way of publicity for Hope, Gloves, and Redemption. In fact, on the latter subject all I can find is a listing for the not particularly illustrious Northampton Film Festival, which apparently showed the film in 2000. According to the Northampton Film Festival website, 'Both [Jules and Gedeon] have worked for the Sundance Channel and for the French Television station Canal+.' (SOURCE) How could filmmakers at one of the world's most elite film schools fail to make any impact on the media, even the New York media (e.g., the Village Voice), prior to their breakthrough with 9-11? The Tisch School of the Arts website offers not a single reference to the Naudet brothers, even though its graduates are, by at least one account, responsible for the 'greatest documentary ever filmed.' (SOURCE) You'd think the School would like to crow about its association with the Naudets. Also odd, perhaps, is that these allegedly French brothers have no profile in France whatsoever. I can find no Naudet interviews with French media, at least so far as Google shows. Perhaps avoiding the French media is a must if you are not really French?

I also find myself wondering why the brothers, given that they are now world famous, haven't sought to capitalize on their amazing celebrity. Despite extensive googling, I have failed to dredge up a single interview or mention of anything the brothers have said or done since they did a round of media interviews on the occasion of the first 9-11 anniversary on September 11, 2002, with the exception of two firefighter-related functions they attended in the first half of 2003. (Jules Naudet attended the New York Fire Commissioner’s Humanitarian awards dinner at the New York Hilton Grand Ballroom on January 28, 2003, while both brothers appeared, together with James Hanlon, at the New York City Uniformed Firefighters Association Celebrity Golf Benefit at Lake Success on June 23, 2003.) They have not been trotted out on any succeeding 9-11 anniversary, nor have they made any more films. Why would legitimate filmmakers vanish into thin air for more than three years? Could it be that their entire purpose in pursuing film studies in the U.S. (if indeed they really ever attended the Tisch school) and in making Hope, Gloves, and Redemption was to establish their credentials as film makers in time for 9-11? And that having made and publicized 9-11, they have now discarded their phony identities? In short, could the Naudet brothers and their celebrated documentary have been just another Ziohoax? This webpage here casts doubt on whether they are even brothers - a question I now consider perfectly reasonable to ask.

*Leslie Raphael argues persuasively that the perspective from which Naudet filmed the strike was so perfect that it cannot have been a coincidence. The only reasonable conclusion to draw is that the location was chosen in advance, with all that implies by way of foreknowledge.


Source:

The incredible vanishing Naudet brothers | Social Democracy Now


Related Links on 9/11:

Forbidden Truth - America - The Military KNOWS Israel did 911

Forbidden Truth - The Basics - 9/11 Missing Links

9/11 Missing Links

Global National Intelligence Services Confirm Israel Did 9/11 Says Former UN Diplomat and - Forbidden Truth


Related Links on Al Qaeda Hoax:

Forbidden Truth - Reaching Out - Al Qaeda Hoax

Dazed and Confused: Why Young Jews are Joining Al Qaeda - Forbidden Truth

CIA Hints, Bin Laden Dead Since “Early 2000′s” - Forbidden Truth


Related Links on Jewish control over media:

Six Jewish Companies Own 96% of the World’s Media - Forbidden Truth

Forbidden Truth - Media Monopoly - "Our" Media

The Jewish Hand Behind the Internet - Forbidden Truth

Jewish Media Control - Forbidden Truth

Stop all wars for Israel! Military officials are 100% certain that Israel did 9/11!
http://theforbiddentruth.net/vbtube_show.php?do=tube&tubeid=1470

 

 Mini-Nukes Were Used on 9-11

August 17, 2010
wtc1mush1.jpgBy Dr. Ed Ward, MD
8-15-10



Two recent articles regarding the use of mini-nukes were examined very briefly.

Beware Bogus 9-11 Mini Nuke Theory

and

Was WTC Demolished by Mini Nukes?

Interesting how what has been described by Bill Deagle MD and Jeff Rense as the best presentation/comprehension of information on the WTC on the web is NEVER ADDRESSED. Nope, seems they only want to deal with 'others' articles, all of which somehow seem to have easily seen, ludicrous, easily disproven Bogus Science - a ready made poison pill to discredit micro nukes.

Virtually all of the WTC residue has been accounted for in my articles and it is classic, textbook, nuclear reaction residue. In over 2 years, only one reference has been scientifically refuted - Thermite and that was by me.



 The US Government's Usage of Atomic Bombs - Domestic - WTC

 Update: The US Government's Usage of Atomic Bombs - Domestic - WTC

  (not an endorsement of the site)

 The 'Traces Of Tritium' WTC 9-11 Lie Is Obstruction Of Justice By Accessories To Murder



 Recently Declassified Video of Testing of the First Micro Nuke - The Davey Crockett - 0.018 kiloton Youtube

 YouTube- Declassified U.S. Nuclear Test Film #32


This .018 kiloton micro nuke video shows that a .018 kiloton micro nuke could easily have been basically contained with the    WTCs.

The data presented is an above ground detonation. Its crude design would have been unfocused and would have been no where near as clean as a 3rd (neutron) or fourth generation nuke. Based on this referenced proven data, the size of an underground, focused, Minimum Residual Radiation -

http://www.serendipity.li/wot/ed_ward/use_of_abombs.htm

 - micro nuke explosion could have been 2 or 3 times as powerful and still been basically contained by the WTC buildings, possibly as large a 1 kiloton, but believe that would be about the maximum that could be used and still be effectively hidden.

 Ed Ward, MD

Mini-Nukes Prove US Government Involvement

 

 Recently Declassified Video of Testing of the First Micro Nuke - The Davey Crockett - 0.018 kiloton

 YouTube- Declassified U.S. Nuclear Test Film #32


 This .018 kiloton micro nuke video shows that a .018 kiloton micro nuke could easily have been basically contained with the WTCs.

 The data presented is an above ground detonation. Its crude design would have been unfocused and would have been no where near as clean as a 3rd (neutron) or fourth generation nuke. Based on this referenced proven data, the size of an underground, focused, Minimum Residual Radiation - http://www.thepriceo.../09/25/ward.htm - micro nuke explosion could have been 2 or 3 times as powerful and still been basically contained by the WTC buildings, possibly as large a 1 kiloton, but believe that would be about the maximum that could be used and still be effectively hidden.


 Ed Ward, MD

The Bogus Science (BS)
 Of 'Explosive SuperThermite' Versus The Facts Of A 'Deflagration Compound'



 Thermite?

  'Understanding The Scam of Thermite on 911' by 'Dick' Eastman/'Dr.' Jones
 A simple rebuttal to the lunacy of http://www.rense.com/general86/therm.htm


Dr Judy Wood : Evidence of breakthrough energy technology on 9/11

Published on 21 Aug 2013
http://globalbem.com/
http://www.globalbemvoices.com/
http://www.indiegogo.com/projects/glo...

Dr Judy Wood at the Breakthrough energy Movement conference,2012 Holland

Title: The dawn of a new age, evidence of breakthrough energy technology on 9/11

Run time : 2.24.57
Speaker : Dr Judy Wood
Price : Free

If you enjoyed this presentation and want to support GlobalBEM please visit our donate page here http://globalbem.com/info/donate/ and subscribe to our newsletter to get informed about our next conference.

For many years, we have heard that a "free-energy1 device is just around the corner," but it never seems to come to fruition. Nikola Tesla wanted to give free energy to the world nearly 100 years ago but was afraid it would fall into the wrong hands and be used for destructive purposes. Well, that is no longer just a risk; it has already happened. However, until we understand just how powerful this technology is as well as how powerful the interests are that control it, we won't see it in general use. We first need to respect what this technology can do, otherwise it would be like leaving a gun cabinet unlocked around children who do not know what guns can do. We also need the world to see what this technology has done. This technology was used to destroy the World Trade Center complex on 9/11/01 and was a demonstration of a new kind of free-energy technology in front of the entire world. As more people around the world recognize this, the less power the controlling interests will have. And if the entire world knows that free-energy technology exists, individuals can openly build their own devices and share their designs with others. It won't be a secret!

BIO
Dr. Judy D. Wood is a former professor of mechanical engineering with research interests in experimental stress analysis, structural mechanics, optical methods, deformation analysis, and the materials characterization of biomaterials and composite materials. She is a member of the Society for Experimental Mechanics (SEM), co-founded SEM's Biological Systems and Materials Division, and has served on the SEM Composite Materials Technical Division. Dr. Wood received her B.S. (Civil Engineering, 1981) (Structural Engineering), M.S. Engineering Mechanics (Applied Physics, 1983), and Ph.D. (Materials Engineering Science, 1992).

http://www.drjudywood.com/
http://wheredidthetowersgo.com/

Our information

globalbem.com
globalbemvoices.com
facebook.com/GlobalBEM
twitter.com/GlobalBEM
youtube.com/user/GlobalBEM
soundcloud.com/globalbem

If you have any questions about the videos, please contact us at voices@globalbem.com

The Global Breakthrough Energy Movement (GlobalBEM) is a non-profit volunteer-powered organization dedicated to educating & activating the public about breakthrough energy technologies which are clean, sustainable and world changing.

Disclaimer : We are all, in a sense, investigators of our world. And while we, as individuals or as Globalbem, may not agree with everything presented on this video, we fully support freedom of thought and speech as well as the Quest for truth.
We are a non-profit organization of volunteers and thus each member or any other person involved in any way, has to take responsibility for their own statements, acts and beliefs.

all rights reserved © GlobalBEM 2012






5 comments:

  1. http://theuglytruth.wordpress.com/2011/09/26/israels-threat-from-within/#comments

    The Ugly Truth
    Zionism, Jewish extremism and a few other nasty items making our world uninhabitable today
    Israel’s threat from within
    Posted: September 26, 2011 by crescentandcross in Uncategorized


    13. B.A.Frémaux-Soormally says:
    September 28, 2011 at 7:00 am
    Dr.nur says:
    September 27, 2011 at 9:23 pm

    “The problem is not with their last holocaust which was largely proven to be a “hollow hoax””
    Can you ever trust a nation that refuses to accept that the HOLO was a hoax? Or a Church that preaches and commemorates that HOLO myth?
    Just watch the NAUDET Brothers’ film on the fire fighters (The Naudets were less interested in the victims!) 9/11 where they show you only a few seconds of the first “plane” hitting the Tower in the distance.

    EVERY SINGLE SCENE SHOWN WAS MANIPULATED, STAGED, AND YOU CAN EASILY SEE THE “FIREFIGHTERS” WERE JUST ACTING INCLUDING THE CHIEF PFEIFFER AND NOT REALLY ON ANY “GAS LEAK” JOB! THEY WERE THERE INCLUDING JULES NAUDET COWBOY CAMERAMAN JUST TO WAIT FOR THE EVENT TO HAPPEN.

    Yet, the Gospel on 9/11 according to Bush, Media and Academia, has been canonised by the highest authorities in the land as well as in the West. Today, even the Churches swear on that HOLO BOOK OF LIES.

    BAFS

    ReplyDelete
  2. 15. B.A.Frémaux-Soormally says:
    September 28, 2011 at 7:50 am

    Dr.nur says:
    September 27, 2011 at 9:23 pm
    “… (can anybody to this day show or draw a “gas chamber” except out of the fantasies of hallucinating zionkeys?)”

    NOBODY CAN! Yet it has been passed into law in “16″ European countries that there were such Judeotropic gas chambers!

    If you check ZAPRUDER, the “innocent” passer-by who shot the JFK assassination, you will find out that he was JEWISH!

    Check the innocent NAUDET Brothers and see for yourself! THEY WERE PLANTED!

    When did they apply for permission to stay with that particular fire department?
    Why did they apply? For doing what?
    Who checked their credentials?
    Who gave them permission to join a seemingly all white team?
    Why grant such a permission to a TRAINEE (AMATEUR) like JULES NAUDET?
    Why grant a permission to document fire fighting by a department that had not fought any fires in the past 6 months preceding 9/11?
    Do you call for the Fire Department when you have a GAS LEAK?
    Do you send out a whole team with a Fire Engine to check for a “GAS LEAK”?
    How come the Fireman interviewed did not remember who called for the “gas leak”?
    DO you send out a team with a cowboy cameraman when the caller is ANONYMOUS?
    Do you come on the scene of a GAS LEAK, park your engine and pass by the LEAK SITE in front of the Restaurant (sea food) carrying a GAS METRE in your hand without getting on with the job IMMEDIATELY?
    Do you wait for the Chief to arrive in his white van 6503536 with the cameraman?
    Do you wait for instruction from the Chief to start checking for the leak?
    Why does the Chief have to DOUBLE CHECK the leak in the ONE AND ONLY SPOT shown in the film when the Fireman had already checked (apparently twice) and seen that THERE WAS NO GAS LEAK?
    Was Jules Naudet not filming the MYTHICAL GAS LEAK on a tripod?
    Why did he so quickly quit filming the leak and start filming the sky when he “heard the noise of a plane” in the distance?
    Why did the noise appear so SUDDENLY and not as coming from a distance?
    How could Jules Naudet SO CLEARLY IDENTIFY the plane by saying he saw and could read the inscriptions on it?
    Check how many milliseconds elapsed between the moment he moved his camera to follow the trajectory of the now INVISIBLE plane and then focus on the Twin Tower itself BEFORE “the plane” hit!
    Why did his shooting suddenly become unstable as if the explosion occurred right in front of him or that he perceived an immediate risk to his own safety when he was filming the exploding Tower?
    Why was the scene immediately cut?
    Why did he not shoot the reactions of people right from where he was?
    Or was it because there was NO REACTION and NO PLANE at all?
    When he was in the van, why was Jules Naudet filming the Chief talking on the telephone rather than shooting OUTSIDE the van?
    When he was filming at the Trade Centre why did he stayed glued to the Chief and not film the victims and debris or even feel if the plane engine part shown in the film was BURNING HOT or just a rusted and cold piece of junk coming from a scrapyard?
    WHY WAS THE NAUDETS’ FILM NOT CONFISCATED LIKE ALL THE OTHERS?

    Now, if you find out that the NAUDET BROTHERS ARE JEWISH…?

    Salut, mon ami!

    Basheer

    ReplyDelete
  3. JOE CORTINA WEBSITE
    9-11 – LEST WE FORGET

    P.S. My analysis is original and was carried out in 2002 and again in 2006. At least 32 damning questions and THE RIGHT ANSWER! I had more questions AND ANSWERS. Yet, I saw far too many Americans spending a decade asking questions and never finding any answers at all. But, I found nobody interested as most are mainly interested in what the corporate mainstream media is printing. Before Thierry Meyssan wrote his famous PENTAGATE I had already proved there was no plane and identified a missile attack (even rightly or wrongly I had then identified a TOMAHAWK missile like the one used in Iraq). Later, I learned about Dimitri Khalezov’s argument about a nuclear device launched from the sea that did not explode and by others of planted explosives inside the Pentagon and another Building outside, but nearby the Pentagon. It was the repetition of the Magic Bullet of the AZC (AIPAC) sponsored JFK assassination.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Check the innocent NAUDET Brothers and see for yourself! THEY WERE PLANTED!

    1. When did they apply for permission to stay with that particular fire department?
    2. Why did they apply and for doing what?
    3. Who checked their credentials?
    4. Who gave them permission to join a seemingly all white team?
    5. Why grant such permission to a TRAINEE (AMATEUR) like JULES NAUDET?
    6. Why grant permission to document fire fighting by a department that had not fought any fires in the past 6 months preceding 9/11?
    7. Do you call for the Fire Department when you have a GAS LEAK?
    8. Do you send out a whole team including the Chief himself with a Fire Engine to check, double check and trouble check for a non existent “GAS LEAK”?
    9. How come the Fireman interviewed did not remember who called for the “gas leak”?
    10. Do you send out a team with a cowboy cameraman?
    11. Do you respond to anonymous calls?
    12. Do you head to an unidentified destination (both caller and destination were not revealed in the film)?
    13. Do you come on the scene of a GAS LEAK, park your engine just a few yards away from the “gas leak”?
    14. Do you pass by the LEAK SITE in front of the Restaurant (sea food) carrying a GAS METRE in your hand ignoring it and without getting on IMMEDIATELY with the job for which you were called?
    15. Do you wait for the Chief to arrive in his white van 6503536 with the cowboy cameraman?
    16. Do you wait for instructions from the Chief to start checking for the leak?
    17. Why does the Chief have to DOUBLE/TREBLE CHECK the leak in the ONE AND ONLY SPOT shown in the film when the Fireman had already checked (apparently twice) and seen that THERE WAS NO GAS LEAK?
    18. Was Jules Naudet not filming the MYTHICAL GAS LEAK on a tripod?
    19. Why did he so quickly quit filming the leak and start filming the sky when he “heard the noise of a plane” in the distance?
    20. Why did the noise appear so SUDDENLY and did not come from a distance?
    21. Why did both one fireman and the Chief look in the wrong direction of the noise?
    22. How could Jules Naudet SO CLEARLY IDENTIFY the plane by saying he saw and could clearly read the inscriptions on it?
    23. Check how many milliseconds elapsed between the moment he moved his camera to follow the trajectory of the now INVISIBLE plane and then focus on the Twin Tower itself BEFORE “the plane” hit?
    24. How did he know that the plane was going to hit the Tower?
    Why did his shooting suddenly become unstable as if the explosion had occurred right in front of him?
    25. Did Jules Naudet perceive an immediate risk to his own safety when he was filming the exploding Tower?
    26. Why the scene was immediately cut?
    27. Why did he not shoot the reactions of people right from where he was?
    28. Or was it because there was NO REACTION and NO PLANE at all?
    29. When he was in the van, why was Jules Naudet filming the Chief talking on the telephone rather than shooting OUTSIDE the van?
    30. When he was filming at the Trade Centre why did he stayed glued to the Chief and did he not film the victims and debris?
    31. Why did he not feel if the plane engine part shown in the film was BURNING HOT or just a rusted and cold piece of junk coming from a scrap yard?
    32. WHY WAS THE NAUDETS’ FILM NOT CONFISCATED LIKE ALL THE OTHERS?

    Now, if you find out that the NAUDET BROTHERS ARE JEWISH…?

    ReplyDelete
  5. I wouldn't so much try to explore the Jewish element of the Naudet "brothers" as I would try to explore the sexuality element. These guys are clearly homosexual lovers and the "brothers" moniker is a convenient cover to hide their gay cohabitation practices. Its not like this facade hasn't been used before amongst the homosexual community. My suspicions are that the real power behind the 9/11 conspiracy is homosexual in nature. In this regard, it brings to question whether homosexuality as an orientation just stops at homosexuality. My theory is that it goes much deeper than that. There very well could be a telepathic element to those who are homosexual and that they are singular in consciousness. An alien conspiracy would apply as a definition of their origin. This is why it could be we are not dealing with an entirely material entity. The inferences all point towards manipulation behind the 9/11 story but the primary evidence to support the inference is completely absent.

    ReplyDelete