Sunday, 20 June 2010



Lieberman: Who’s the Enemy in the War on Terror?

June 20, 2010 · Leave a Comment

On June 15, 2010 – the Wall Street Journal (listed as an Israel Hasbara Committee member) published an Israeli propaganda crap,written by Zionist Jew Senator Joe Lieberman, chairman Senate Homeland Security Committee. In the ‘opinion’ Joe Lieberman claims that America’s real enemy is “violent Islamist extremism”. I am sure, ‘Mr. Israel’, cannot be so ignorant of the fact that since the creation of the UNcountry – most of terrorist acts against the US were carried out by the Jewish extremists and not the ‘Islamist extremists’. To name a few Jewish terrorism; Lavon Affair (1954), President John F. Kennedy’s assassination (1963), USS Liberty attack (1967), Operation Trojan (1986), Pan Am 103 bombing (1988), 9/11 (2001), AA Flight 587 (2001), Bali bombing (2002 & 2005), Madrid train bombing (2004), USS Cole bombing (2000), Nigerian underwear bomber (2009), Time Square hoax (2010) and unlimited other false-flage operations.
Sure, it were not Muslims who benefit from the  Wall Street financial scam, but the Jewish elites. Muslims, also, did not pull the plug on Iceland\’s financial disaster, but the Israeli Jews. The Icelandic heist was carried by the Jew bankers the same way as the plundering of US Treasury in 2008-2009, through an unregulated ‘economic bubble’ scheme very much like Jew Bernard Madoff Investment, which cashed US$60 billion including US$600 million Jewish charity funds.
Jewish historian Sebag Monifior in his book Stalin: Court of the Red Tsar, noted that when the communist killing machine worked in full force – Stalin was surrounded by beautiful young Jewish women. Stalin’s top mass murderers included Jews like Leonid Reichman,head of the dreaded NKVD and Lazar Kaganovich, member of Central Committee and Politburo. Niall Furguson, another historian in the book The War of the World and Professor Igal Halfin (Tel aviv University) also support that many of world greatest murderers were Jewish.
In 2008, Amir Oren wrote in Israel daily Haaretz that the CIA, State Department and Pentagon knew back in August 1974 that not only the Zionist entity had developed nuclear weapon but it was also providing nuclear materials, equipment or technology to Iran, South Africa and other then-friendly countries.
The Sunday Times reported on January 6, 2008 that US government whistleblower Sibel Edmond claims the Zionist Jew Lawrence Franklin, Pentagon analyst, was being investigated for transfering nuclear secrets to foreign countries. Franklin was convicted and jailed in 2006 for passing US defense information to Israel Lobby (AIPAC). The other notable American traitor is Jonathan Pollard, a US Navy Jew employee, who was convicted for supplying Israel with close to one million US secret documents. He is considered a ‘hero’ in Israel and every Israeli prime minister is known for asking his release from US prison. And let me remind Joe Lieberman that the only couple executed for spying for a foreign country happened to be Julius and Ethel Rosenberg, who were executed on June 19, 1953 – for supplying US nuclear secrets to Russia.
War hawks like Joe Lieberman, Joe Biden, Hillary Clinton and Robert Gates are preparing the ground for the radical Jews’ replay of their Nazi deception of “poor oppressed Jews are being slaughtered in millions by the Islamofacist Iranian” as result of Iran’s military response to Israel’s bombing of Iranian cities to kill as many civilians as possible as Israeli did during 34-day attack on Lebanon in 2006.  At that point the Jewish Lobby will call upon Barack Obama to fulfill his biblical promise to help save poor Israel. Zionist Jews have successfully played such deception in the past to push the US into WW II (1941), which resulted in the death of 292,000 Amercan soldiers. Ironically, the Nazi Army they coned the US Army to fight – had 150,000 German Jew soldiers.

Good Turks, Bad Turks

June 19, 2010 · Leave a Comment

“You Israeli should never become lenient if you would kill your enemies. You shall have no pity on them until you shall have destroyed all their so-called Arab culture, on the ruins of which we shall build our own civilization.” Menachin Begin, October 28, 1956.
Gone are those day – when Hillel Halkin, a NY-born Jew turned Israeli journalist boasted in New York’s FORWARD (January 28, 1994), the oldest Jewish newspaper, “When Kemal Ataturk Recited Shema Yisrael: It’s My Secret Prayer Too, He Confessed“. When General Kemal Attaturk died in 1938, another Crypto-Jew, Ismet Inonu came to power. Under his orders, the Turkish ambassador in Paris issued visas to save 100,000 European Jews – Read here and here.
Gone are those days when Abraham Foxman , national director Anti-Defamation League (ADL), an Israeli Hasbara organ – honored Recep Tayyip Erdogan with ADL’s highest award “Courage to Care” in 2004 in New York. In January 2010 – ADL welcomed Ankara’s appointment of Namik Tan (former ambassador in Tel Aviv) in Washington – calling him a friend of Jewish communities.
However, since Ankara has refused to act like Israeli poodle – like Washington, Bonn, London, Ottawa or Paris – who consider an honor to support the Zionist regime blindly for its neo-Nazi policies. Thus, suddenly, the ‘Good Turks have turned into Bad Turks’. Professor Stephen M. Walt in his latest article, titled The Critic of My Friend is My Enemy, explains the mindset of the ‘Israel-Firsters’.
Now we see the neoconservatives turning on Turkey, even though it is a well-functioning democracy, a member of NATO, and a strong ally of the United States. Of course,Turkey’s democracy isn’t perfect , but show me one that is. The neocons have turned from friends of Turkey to foes for one simple reason: Israel. Specifically, the Turkish government has been openly critical of Israel’s conduct toward the Palestinians, beginning with the blockade of Gaza, ramping up after the brutal bombardment of Gaza in 2008-2009, and culminating in the lethal IDF attack on the Gaza Freedom Flotilla. As Lobe shows, a flock of prominent neoconservatives are now busily demonizing Turkey, and in some cases calling for its expulsion from NATO.
Thus, whether a state is democratic or not matters little for the neocons; what matters for them is whether a state backs Israel or not.  So if you’re still wondering why so many neoconservatives worked overtime to get the U.S. to invade Iraq — even though Osama bin Laden was in Afghanistan or Pakistan — and why they are now pushing for war with Iran, well, there’s your answer.
As I’ve said repeatedly, there’s nothing wrong with any American feeling a deep attachment to a foreign country and expressing it in politics, provided that they are open and honest about it and provided that other people can raise the issue without being accused of some sort of bigotry. The neocons’ recent volte-face over Turkey is important because it reveals their policy priorities with particular clarity.
Neoconservatives usually portray American and Israeli interests as essentially identical: In their eyes, what is good for Israel is good for the United States and vice versa. This claim makes unconditional U.S. support seem like a good idea, and it also insulates them from the charge that they are promoting Israel’s interests over America’s.  After all, if the interests of the two states are really one and the same, then by definition there can be no conflict of interest, which means that the “dual loyalty” issue (a term I still don’t like ) doesn’t arise.

Jewish racism against Jews in Israel

June 18, 2010 · 1 Comment

On Thursday, over 100,000 Orthodox Israeli Jews gathered in Jerusalem to show the ugly side of Talmud – not to show their usual hatred toward Jesus, his mother Mary and Christians at large, but racism against their fellow non-European Israeli Jew citizens. These fanatic Zionist Jews were showing their religious contempt for the rest of humanity on Israel’s Supreme Court ruling – forcing the European and Arab Jewish girls to study together at a religious girl school.
The protesters told Benjamin Netanyahu and its Orthodox parties in the government that parents of European (Ashkenazi) don’t want their ‘White daughters’ to study with Arab (Sephardim) ‘brown girls’ at the girls’ school in the West Bank’s Jewish settlement of Emanuel (perhaps named after Obama’s White House Chief of Staff).
In 2007, Israel daily Ynet, exposed similar Jewish racism by both Ashkenazi and Sephardim communities against Ethiopian and other Black Jewish communities in Israel.
These facts shows that Israeli racism is not confined specifically toward the native Muslim and Christian Palestinians or Arabs at large, but rather represent a collective phenomenon within Israeli society as their past western racist upbringing.
In the US, the pro-Israel Evangelists are rewriting US history for Texas schools board – which promotes God and guns but denies African slavery and Palestinians’ right to recover their land stolen by the foreign Jews. The changes include Judeo-Christian African slave trade being renamed “Atlantic triangular trade” and recasts the Israeli-Palestinian conflict as driven by “Islamic fundamentalism”. Some of the other ‘attractions’ include denial of Thomas Jefferson’s “separation of Church from State” – and calling the right to keep and bear arms as “an important element of a democratic society” – and witch-hunting under MaCarthyism as “act of patriotism”.
Holy Qur’an is against all kind of racism – based on the color of ones’ skin, religion, gender and nationality. According to Mahatma Gandhi (d. 1948), European colonialists always “dread the advent of Islam as Muslims claim equality with the White race. They may well dread it. If brotherhood is a sin, if it’s the equality of colored races that they dread – then their dread of Islam is well founded”. One of the top female leaders of All India National Congress, Sarojini Naidu (d. 1949), a former governor of Indian held Jammu and Kashmir Valley, wrote: “I have been struck over again by this indivisible unity of Islam that makes a man instinctively a brother. When you meet an Egyptian, an Algerian, an Indian and a Turk in London, what matters is that Egypt is motherland of one and India the motherland of another, but both are brothers in Islam”.

Palestine – The Third Option

June 18, 2010 · Leave a Comment

The other day, I came across two interesting articles. One written by an American Jew and the other by an Israeli-born Jew. Roger Tucker, an American and founder of One Democratic State, had featured this blog once and Israeli-born Brit Gilad Atzmon who has been quoted several times on this blog. Both writers dismiss the western ‘option’ of the two-state solution – in order to make the modern Jews-only (demographically) colonial experiment, everlasting. These two Jew writers are not blinded by their Jewishness, like columinist Charles Krauthammer of the Washington Post or Daniel Pipes, who claim that the world is against Israel and Jews to please Muslims.
Personally, I believe in the ‘option’ of a democratic one-state Palestine, based on ‘one-vote- one person’ with equal rights for all its citizen, dismatling of racist Zionist political parties and Israel Occupation Force (IOF), right of return for the natives and suitable compensations for their loss of properties to the Jew settlers – and of course the dismantling of country’s nuclear arsenal. All those racist Jews, who don’t want to live in peace with the natives – they should be allowed to migrate back to their ancestral lands – Germany, Russia, Poland, France, the UK, the US, etc. – as many White settlers did in South Africa, Algeria and India. In fact, Professor Edward Said had predicted long time ago that the great majority of Israeli Jews would rather prefer to live under Muslim rule in Palestine than going back to their ancestral western homeland where they know anti-Semitism would be waiting for them.
Roger Tucker in his recent article The One State Solution sounds like a good idea, but.. , which is closer to my ‘option’ – pointed out the past history of Islamic tolerance toward Jews and Christians and how both Israelis and Palestinians could benefit from it: “Zionism, prior to the ascendance of Jabotinskian fanaticism and terrorism in Palestine about 80 years ago, envisioned a cooperative, binational state. It was not that long ago. The ridiculous notion that “they’ve always hated and fought one another,” another objection that one often hears, is just one of many facile inventions of Zionist propaganda. Barring relatively brief eruptions of tribal and religious strife, like the Crusades, the siblings of the Abrahamic tradition (outside of Europe at least) have gotten along rather swimmingly for the last 1,500 years, i.e., since the birth of Islam, which has traditionally respected and been hospitable to both Christians and Jews.
Roger Tucker believes Israeli Jews, after eventually becoming a minority, would retain economic clout as well as dominance in politics and other field, as the White Afrikan have in South Africa. “And a Jewish culture, with its multifarious institutions, customs and traditions would coexist with its Palestinian counterpart, enriching both but threatening neither. Why he is sure of that, because: “ Fortunately for the Israelis, the Palestinians have proven themselves to be an extremely decent, tolerant and amazingly patient people. In general, they show remarkably little animosity towards Jewish people, and the remaining hotheads, on both sides, could be dealt with”.
And what is there for the Americans to gain by supporting the “One State Option”? Here are some of the obvious benefits:
1. “With the Jewish state dissolved and the problem solved, Zionism, a combination of ethnocentric, religious and nationalist fascism dedicated to the continued existence of Israel, would no longer have a raison d’être and would consequently die a quiet, unlamented demise, to the great relief of billions of people. In one stroke, its iron grip on the political life of the West would relax and perhaps the ideals and hopes that gave rise to the great democracies could somehow be salvaged. The U.S., foremost among these, might once again be viewed with respect instead of with a mixture of fear and contempt. Perhaps we could begin to deal with the real problems that face humanity, without being distracted by the wars, hypocrisy, treason, crimes, terrorism, distortions, double standards, lies, confusion and scheming that Zionism has until now plagued us with,” wrote Roger Tucker.
2. American taxpayers would not have to waste US$6-14 billion each year on the deceptive regime which, mostly, has worked counter to America’s interests. Washington can use this money to provide education and medical facilities to 45-52 million American citizens who cannot afford it. Also, with some of that money – Washington can improve its inhumane prison facilities for over six million prisoners.
However, Gilad Atzmon prefer the Third Option (see video below): “It is an obvious fact that the Israelis do not belong to the region. The Jewish claim for Zion i.e. Palestine is beyond pathetic. It is in fact as ridiculous as a bunch of  Italian settlers invading London’s Piccadilly Circus claiming their right to return to a land once occupied by their Roman forefathers. Obviously Italians would not get away with it, Zionists, on the other hand, have managed to fool the nations for more than a while.
Most humanists seem to support the One State Solution, they are convinced that such a solution is fair and ethical. Again, I am rather perplexed here. As much as we accept that sharing the land is reasonable and ethical, it is completely foreign to Jewish ideology and Zionism in particular. Early Zionist immigrants were more than welcome to share the land with the Palestinian indigenous population. But they had a completely different plan in mind, they wanted a ‘Jews only State’. They eventually ethnically cleansed the Palestinians (1948), Those who managed to cling  to the land were eventually  locked behind walls and barbed wire. The One State Solution dismisses the Jewish ideology. As much as I myself tend to support the One State Solution, I am fully aware of the fact that such a solution may become  possible only when the Israeli Jewish population gives up its supremacist ideology. Needless to say that when this happens,  the Jews in Palestine  would become Palestinian Jews:  ordinary people of Jewish ethnic origin  who happen to live on Palestinian land.
Considering the latest Israeli barbarian military operations, bearing in mind the disastrous starvation in Gaza, learning about  the serious threat to world peace imposed by repeated nuclear threats made by Israel against its neighboring States and Iran in particular, we should move the discourse one step further. We better look at the Helen Thomas’ solution.”

Sarajevo – Ars Aevi and the Grand Mufti

June 17, 2010 · Leave a Comment

“Serb forces targeted for the extinction of 40,000 Bosnian Muslims living in Srebrenic,” Justice Theodor Meron, a Polish-American Jew in Krstic Appeal Judgement.
In July 1992 – When the the city of Sarajevo was bombed by the Serbian forces and hundreds of thousands of Muslim men, women and children were butchered to death and tens of thousands of Muslim women and young girls were raped by the Serbian and Croatian Christians all over Bosnia-Herzegovina – a group of concerned intellectuals decided to create a Museum of Contemporary Art (sort of Israel’s Holocaust Museums) to remember the city as the hub of religious and ethnic diversity and tolerance under Muslim rule for several centuries in the past.
Muslim world was in shock by the brutal ethnic-cleansing of Muslims in Bosnia-Herzegovina by the Christian Yugoslav People Army, its militant Bosnian Serb collaborators and the West’s arm embargo against the Bosnia’s Muslim-dominated army while letting Serbs to recieve all kind of military arms and financial help from Russia, the US, Greece and several other Western countries, who could not digest the idea of an independent Muslim entity in the middle of Judeo-Christian Europe.
In a recent interview - Canadian MP Brain Masse (Windsor West, NDP) has asked pro-Israel government of Stephen Harper to recognize the worst mass killing on European soil since WW II as ‘Genocide’.
On February 26, 2007, the International Court of Justice declared that the forces of Serb Republic in Bosnia (SRPSKA) carried out ‘act of genocide’ in Srebrenica in July 1995. Every year, the survivors and family members of the Srebrenica genocide commemorate July 11 as Rememberance Day. On this day, the remains of those that have been found in the previous year are buried after formal funeral prayers (Janazah). The ceremony is held to act as a healing process for those that lost loved ones in one of the most gruesome acts of genocide in modern history of Europe since the Nazi era. However, this year the event has turned to the worst. Some war documents have shown that the Grand Mufti of Bosnia-Herzegovina, Mustafa Ceric, collaborated with the secret service of the Yugoslav National Security Agency (UDB), controlled by Serbia. Hakija Meholjic, a survivor of the Srebrenic genocide, has demannded on May 13 that the organizing committee of the event that Grand Mufti should not be allowed to lead the Namaz-e-Janaza. Representatives of the Association of Mothers of Srebrenica and Podrinje have also given their support to Meholjic’s demand and have extended their boycott of all imams associated with the Islamic Association of Bosnia-Herzegovina.

Tehran gains from Washington’s wars for Israel

June 17, 2010 · Leave a Comment

The con-journalists at Foreign Policy Journal (FPJ) always get upset whenever something happens which is not in the interest of the US-Israel-EU axis of evil. On June 15, 2010 – the FPJ published an article by some Afghan-Australian ‘Middle East expert, Dr. Ehsan Azari, who is very upset that Iran Gains From American Strategic Errors. I agree with the end result of his reported American “errors”, which he should have called “blunders”, because when someone keeps repeating the same mistakes under the pressure of hostile pro-Israel lobby groups, those should be called “blunders’ and not “errors”.
As the Afghan war proceeds in an uncertain path, Iran, Afghanistan’s western neighbor, seems to have been reaping all the benefits.
Past history tells us that Persian influence in Afghanistan goes back many many centuries even before the arrival of Islam in that part of the world. Now, if Bush’s Zionist-controlled administration was stupid enough not to study the past historical resistance of Afghan people against Greeks, Russians, British and Russians, for invaded the country for greed of the Caspian Sea oil and heroin supply – why Iran is being blamed for the Afghan’s hatred toward their homicidal foreign invaders? While the US, India and Israel is using the occupation to destablize its neighboring only Muslim nuclear power (Pakistan) – Tehran has provided US$500 million in aid for the reconstruction work in Afghanistan since 2002.
The post-Taliban era produced a huge power vacuum in Afghanistan that was filled with Iran’s long-time protégé.
It seem very much an ‘anti-Semite’ comment to me. Calling ten years of occupation “a vacuum” – is a slap on the faces of the ‘brave’ soldiers from the US, Germany, France, Canada, Poland, NATO and dozens of other countries plus the locally trained GIs who have been fighting Taliban fighters and are supported by F16s, drones, helicopter, bombs, missiles, etc. for the last ten years. I wonder, if the good Doc. ever thought why most of American friends usually turned against Washington after finding the truth – Saddam Hussein, Osama Bin Laden, Chavez, etc.? Maybe same is happening to Hamid Karzai and Nothern Alliance. After all, Karzai, a US citizen and former employee of UNOCAL. He was installed as US Viceroy in Afghanistan by Bush and not by some Iranian “mullah”.
And don’t think the Taliban won’t be prepared to contest the areas where riches are under the ground.
Isn’t that what the US, Britain, Russia, France and Israel are doing in foreign countries?
Iranian mullahs once again found their Afghan constituency back in power in Kabul, ironically with the help of their greatest adversary.  By using the powerful warlords of the Northern Alliance, Iran remains a major political architect in making a minefield in Afghanistan against Western strategic interests.
Iranian President Dr. Ahmadinejad is not a “mullah (cleric)” – he has a PhD  and taught Engineering at the University of Tehran before joining politic. None of the 21 Iranian cabinet ministers is a “mullah”. However, it does have three women cabinet ministers, Dr. Marzieh Vahid Dastjerdi PhD, Fatemeh Ajolou PhD, Sussan Keshavarz and Vice-president Fatemeh Javadi PhD. Talk of women persecution under Islamic regime, eh!(Ooops! I forgot these ladies like the wives of Turkey’s President, Prime Minister and Foreign Minister, doesn’t count because they all adorn the primitive dress - the Hijab).
Any further Pashtun military and political weakness in Afghanistan will make the Iranian clerical ruling class stronger.
YES – Barack Obama, if you’re planning to nuke Islamic Republic in the near future for Israel – you better stop killing Pashtun in Wazristan (Pakistan) so that they along with Baloch rebels, RAW and Mossad can destablize Iranian Balochistan.
If, God forbid, Iran ever did join the nuclear club, its repressive theocracy would perpetuate its survival.
Moshe Benjamin Netanyahu, I hear you loud and clear.
Gordon Duff’s article Israel leaves trail of lies in Afghanistan is worth reading.

From Washington to Baku, with Love

June 16, 2010 · Leave a Comment

On June 6, US Secretary of Defense, Robert Gates, went to Azerbaijan to personally deliver a letter from Barack Obama to Azeri President Ilham Aliyev. Recently, he has shown his displeasure over Obama administration’s criticism of America’s strategic ally which has allowed tens of thousands of war-related flights over its territory to maintain the US occupation of Afghanistan since US invaded the country in October 2001 on lame excuse of Taliban’s refusal to handover Osama Bin Laden to Dubya Bush. Azerbaijan’s strategic position has further increased since Obama announced his 30,000 -troop ‘surge’.
Hillary Clinton also showered Ilham Aliyev with her Zionist charm on phone. However, Illham Aliyev have not forgotten for being ignored by Obama by not inviting him at  Obama’s Nuclear Security Summit charade in Washington. The only other regional leader not invited was Iranian President Dr. Ahmadinejad. In a show of rubbing Obama’s Zionist nose, the Azeri President did not bother to invite Robert Gates for the diplomatic dinner at the Presidential Palace and left the job to Azeri Defense Minister, which the Bush’s cowboy declined.
President Ilham Aliyev inherited the Presidency in 2003 from his father, Heidar Aliyev, a hard-core communist leader under USSR. His major bone of content with Washington is that he is not being paid enough (as compared to Israel) for his services in the region which also include letting Mossad run its espionage racket against Islamic Republic from Baku.
How close relation the Jewish Lobby has with Azeri elites can be judged by the fact that the Chairman of the Azerbaijan Reform Party, Asim Mollazade, will be attending a conference to be sponsored by the Washington-based powerful pro-Israel think tank Centre for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) on June 25, 2010. Dr. Ariel Cohen, member CFR and an ‘expert’ on Russian and the Middle East affairs will speak on Development of US strategy in the South Caucasus and the Caspian Basin. CSIS, practically runs White House’ s foreinery policy in that region.
Other Washington-Baku  ’strategic interests’ also include - Baku in 2009 provided “nearly one quarter of all crude oil supplies to Israel and is considered a leading potential natural gas provider for the US supported Nabocco pipeline”. Israel is also a beneficiary of the Ceyhan-Tblisi-Baku (BTC) oil pipeline which links the Caspian Sea to the Eastern Mediterranean. That’s why Israel wants to weaken Lebanon and Yemen with the help of US military – in order to protect the BTC pipeline and the transporation corridor. Furthermore, Israel hopes a future link between BTC and Trans-Israel Eilat-Ashkelon pipeline.
Heydar Jamal, a welknown Russian political commentator and Chairman of Russia’s Islamic Committee, in an interview told Today.AZ that the latest sanctions against the Islamic Republic is “a vivid evidence of an outright US hostility towards Iran. “Had it not been for Israel’s erroneous action against Freedom Flotilla, there would be all necessary conditions for military action against Iran. But current situation does not allow launching a military action against Iran since Israel faced international condemnation and moral and psychological isolation for its actions.
Baku showed great wisdom and made a very correct and timely statement, which brought it even closer with Ankara. It is already apparent that Israel is doomed state devoid of global support which was an essential tool for a large number of steps openly cynical and disrespectful of international law.
World now supports Iran and Palestine as well as Turkey. Azerbaijan gained huge dividends, declaring that its stands in solidarity with its Turkish brothers over the attack on humanitarian cargo ship in the Mediterranean which resulted in the deaths of innocent civilians. This step makes Azerbaijan one of the independent players on the world political arena”.
Ali Ahmadov, the executive secretary of the ruling New Azerbaijan Party told journalists on June 12: “‘As a peace-loving nation, Azerbaijan supports the resolution of problematic and contentious issues peacefully through negotiation. A solution to the Iranian problem by any other means is unacceptable to Azerbaijan. Iran and Azerbaijan are not just neighbouring countries, but share historical roots. I hope common sense will prevail in further decisions on Iran”. As if that was not enough salt on Benjamin Netanyahu’s wounds – Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan is scheduled to visit Baku on June 16, where he would discuss gas price deal, visa deal and Nagorno-Karabakh and of course the Tehran’s nuclear program and US-Israel new sanctions against it.
Interestingly, two-third of world Azeri population is in Islamic Iran (18% of Iran’s total population). Washington’s favorite Iranian ‘Reformist’ Mir Hossein Mousavi (defeated by Dr. Ahmadinejad in June 2009) is also an Azeri from Tabriz. The head of Mountain Jews of Azerbaijan, Semen Ikhiilov visited Israel in May to lay of the first stone of the Heydar Aliyev Avenue in Hadera. Baku hosted Benjamin Netanyahu in 2003 and Shimon Peres in 2009 – even though Baku has not opened its embassy in Tel Aviv. There are close to 50,000 Azeri Jews in Israel, while 3,000 remain in Azerbaijan. On January 10, 2008 – the Jewish Journal quoted Jewish member of Azerbaijan Parliament, Yevda Abramov: “Our Rabbi, butcher, mohel, chazan – all are educated in Israel”.
Two of the aid workers on Gaza Freedom Flotialla detained by Zionazi forces were Azeri citizen.
Over 95 percent of population (9 million) of Azerbaijan is Muslim (Shias being in majority) - but Islam is not the official state religion, a legacy from the former Soviet Union.

‘Museum of Tolerance’ over graves of Jew Liberators

June 15, 2010 · Leave a Comment

The Simon Wiesenthal Centre in Los Ageles (named after Austrian Nazi hunter Simon Wiesenthal, whom British author Guy Walters in his book Hunting Evil called a “liar – and bad one at that”),  is planning to build another propaganda center for the Jewish sufferings at the hands of Christian and Jew Nazis. The part is that it’s to be named ‘Museum of Tolerance’ without any mention to Palestinian genocide at the hands of the same European Jews, who claim victims of Nazis. Against Muslim protests, the Israeli Supreme Court gave its kosher blessing for the project to go ahead in October 2008. Ironically, Israel Antiquities Authority’s chief excavator for the site, Gideon Suliemani, found out that the municipal car parking lot to be used for the new ‘Museum of Tolerance’ was originally built on a portion of an ancient Muslim cemetery in West Jerusalem, known as “Ma’man Allah”, housing thousands of Muslim graves going back to 638 CE, when Arab Muslims liberated Jew Serfs (slaves) from the Christian rulers of Jerusalem.
“When Caliph Umar, one of Muhammad’s successors, conquered the Jerusalem of the Christian Byzantines in 638, he insisted that the three faiths of Abraham coexist. He refused to pray in the Church of the Holy Sepulcher when he was escorted around the city by the Greek Orthodox Patriarch. Had he done so, he explained, the Muslims would have wanted to build a mosque there to commemorate the first Islamic prayer in Jerusalem. The Jews found their new Muslim rulers far more congenial than the Byzantines. The Christians had never allowed the Jews to reside permanently in the city, whereas Umar invited 70 Jewish families back. The Byzantines had left the Jewish Temple in ruins and had even begun to use the Temple Mount as a garbage dump. Umar, according to a variety of accounts, was horrified to see this desecration. He helped clear it with his own hands, reconsecrated the platform and built a simple wooden mosque on the southern end, site of al-Aqsa Mosque today. Jerusalem’s Dome of the Rock, built by Caliph Abd al-Malik in 691, was the first great building to be constructed in the Islamic world. It symbolizes the ascent that all Muslims must make to God, whose perfection and eternity are represented by the circle of the great golden dome. Other Islamic shrines on the Temple Mount, which Muslims call al-Haram al-Sharif, the Most Noble Sanctuary, were devoted to David, Solomon and Jesus….” Professor Karen Armstrong, Time magazine, April 16, 2001.
Many of the Kurd and Arab soldiers who fought under the command of Sultan Salahuddin Ayubi and liberated Jerusalem from Crusaders in 1187 CE, were also burried in the same cemetery. Sultan Salahuddin Ayubi allowed Jews to return to Jerusalem though they did not take part in the battle.
During Nazi era – Turkish ambassador in Paris helped 100,000 Eeeuropean Jews to escape persecution from Christian Nazis and their Jewish collaborators. And how the Israeli Jews returned this Muslim tolerance? They expelled or killed the 700,000 native Muslims and Christians after declaring Occupation of Muslim-majority British mandated Palestine in 1948. Shortly after East Jerusalem was occupied by the Zionazi thugs in 1967 – Rabbi Shlomo Goren, the chief chaplian of the Israel Occupation Force (IOF) lead a Jewish prayer on the Temple Mount on August 15, 1967 and vowed to rebuild the 3rd. Temple Mount for the redemption of the Jewish race. On May 30, 2010 – they shot six Turk aid workers in cold blood aboard Turkish vessel Mavi Marmara.
In March 2005, Israel’s famous columnist, Amira Hass, wrote that Zionist regime and its jumping-jacks use Holocaust to shut criticism of Israeli  policies.

US inciting conflict to trigger war with Iran

June 14, 2010 · Leave a Comment

Professor Virginia Tilley, almost four years ago wrote that US generals are rightly alarmed that bombing Iran’s nuclear facilities would unleash unprecedented attacks on US occupation forces in Iraq, as well as American military bases in in the Gulf. “Iran could block the Straits of Hormuz, which carries 40 percent of world’s oil. Spin-off terrorist (resistance) militancy would skyrocket. The potential damage to international security and world economy would be unfathomably dangerous. The Bush administration’s neocons (mostly Jews) seem capable of any insanity, so none of this matter to them. But even the neocons must be taking pause since Israel failed to knock out Hizbullah (during 34-day war in 2006) using the same onslaught from air planned for Iran. But Israel can attack Iran, and this may be the plan. Teaming up, the two countries could compensate for each others’ strategic limitations. The US has been contributing its superpower clout in the Security Council, setting the stage for sanctions, knowing Iran will not yield on its enrichment program. Having cultivated a (mistaken) international belief that Iran is threatening a direct attack on Israel, the Israeli government could then claim the right of self-defense in taking unilateral pre-emptive action to destroy the nuclear capacity of a state declared in breach of UN directives. Direct retaliations against Israel are impossible because Israel is a nuclear power (an Iran is not) and because of the US security umbrella would protect Israel…..”
After four years, Barack Obama is running on the same track – let the US interests in the Middle East go to hell and who cares for the tens of thousands of Americans sacrificed in that process for Israel.
Addressing the fifth Turkish-Arab Economic Forum (June 10-11), Turkish Prime Minister, Tayyip Erdogan said that Turkey’s NO vote at UNSC against new sanctions on Islamic Republic was a matter of honor for the Turkish people: “If we had not said NO, it would have been self denial. It would have been a lack of self respect”.
Former Senator from Alaska, Maurice Robert (Mike) Gravel (1969-81) in an interview he gave to the Philadelphia Jewish Voice in 2007, during his bid for Democrat nomination for the 2008 presidential election – said that “he will use whatever political capital he need to disburse to bring peace about”. His plan, as he explained, was to draft a peace agreement based on 1967 borders with the help of Russia, China, EU and other regional powers with interests in that part of the world. The leaders of Israel and PA would not be asked to accept this proposal but it would be put to plebiscite among the Israelis and Palestinian and let them decide their future. Answeing the question: “You criticized Senator Obama for not taking military option off the table regarding Iran. what should Israel do if Iran looks like it has or will acquire a nuclear weapon?” – Mike Gravel replied: “Should do nothing. Should do nothing. My God, it’s none of their business if Iran has a nuclear weapon….Scientists tell us that they would not have it for five to ten years. But they’re so affraid of us, with our stupid statements about axis of evil”. For such ‘political wrong’ views, Mike was never invited by AIPAC and did not receive support from Jewish groups.
In May, 2010 – Mike Gravel lauded Russian President Dmitry Medvedev’s statement in Damascus that Hamas must be included in the peace process. He said that “the US cannot play the role of an honest broker because of the Jewish influence in America”.
After the UNSC passed the Israeli crippling sanction against Islamic Republic last week – Mike Gravel in interview with Press TV, said that the US inciting conflict to trigger war. “The Security Council is the mouth piece of the United States of America and it is being misled and it is an embarrassment to what they are doing to the United Nations which offer so much potential for peace in the world.  Article 4 of the NPT; any country who is signatory to this has the right to enriched uranium and that is all that Iran is doing right now; enriching uranium. Now, there is no evidence that they are going for a bomb. Nobody has put forth any evidence other than irresponsible statements by Israel and some American military leaders. But there is no proof and they say they are not going for a bomb, so they are doing no more than they have a right to do under Article 4 of the Non Proliferation agreement. And we are not living up that agreement by inciting conflict and by using the UN and the Security Council to try to push Iran to make some silly mistake that could trigger our response. This is very serious because in fact I think it is irresponsible on the part of the United States to go ahead and agree to something and then pull away from it when the clenched fist of Iran is unclenched and we clench our fist….. Iran is a natural ally of the United States because Iran has not gone to war in 250 years or attacked anybody. They are not a threat to anybody, they are concerned about their own self defense, and they should be. For example, what we did in Iraq, with out provocation and now with the threats that we make with Iran, and now with the sanctions manipulating the world community, not all of it, but a portion of it, at least in the Security Council to go against Iran. Well, Iran may feel a bite from the sanctions but let me tell you, this is a world of economics involved and there are a lot of other sources, particularly China and Russia, and regardless of what they said in the Security Council, they will continue to trade with Iran”.
According to an American defense source - the Saudi ‘royals’ have agreed to jam their raddar system (operated by Americans) in order to let the Israeli bombers use Saudi space to bomb military and civilian targets inside Iran. Recently, Saudis conducted a test to make sure that their own F16s don’t intercept Israeli bombers and once the Zionazis has turned some Iranian cities look like 2006 Lebanon – the Saudi air defense system will return to full alert.
The Wall Street Journal (Israel Hasbara Committee organ), on April 21, 2010, published 5-illustrations, showing ‘plus and minis’ of Israel’s solo attack on the Islamic Republic: “Israel needs to target Iran’s four nuclear facilities – Qom, Arak, Natanz and Bushehr. Israel’s medium range missile Jericho II cannot reach those targets if it uses Iraqi airspace. However, with Washington donated F15 and F16 aircraft, Israel could strike far-away targets and penetrate some underground facilities with ‘bunker busters’. For this Israeli pilots need “raddar-jamming” to save their Jewish skins. Pity, Jew settlers living on Arab stolen lands are within the range of missiles “Jew-hater” Hamas, Hizbullah and Syrian. However, the good news is – The 357th Air Defense Brigade, based in Germany, has detachment of some 200 US soldiers permanently deployed in Southern Israel to man an advanced raddar system, the TPY-2, expected to increase the range at which Israel can detect and ultimately intercept Iranian missiles”. MISSION ACCOMPLISHED!

Halleluiah – Israel eases Gaza blockade

June 13, 2010 · 1 Comment

“If I were a Muslim in the Middle East, I would probably be a Jihadist,” – Lt. Col. David Kilcullen, senior adviser to Gen. David Petraeus, Washington’s Iraq War hero and Professor James Petras’ Israeli poodle.
In order to divert some of world’s condemnation of its Nazi-style attack on Gaza Freedom Flotilla on May 31 – the zionist entity has announced to ease its over three-year-old blockade on 1.5 million Gaza residents on the import of the basic necessity items. The blockade was an act of punishment of radical Jews upon native Palestinians for electing Islamic Resistance group Hamas to lead their resistance against the illegal European Jewish occupation of Palestine. The item which Jewish forces may let pass, now, to Gaza are mostly ‘snack’ items such as potato chips, cookies, jam, soda, juice, candy, shaving cream and spices. The items which the Gaza people are in desperate need, such as medicines, cement, steel and other building material to rebuild their homes and infrastructure destroyed by Israeli bombs, missiles and bulldozers – remain banned. The human right groups including UN official, Maxwel Gaylard have described the Israeli “ease” insignificant and just cosmetic surgery. Barack Obama has begged his masters in Tel Aviv for “a new approach on the blockade”.
Both Israel and Washington’s puppet Hosni Mubarak have been enforcing a “crippling” embargo on Gaza for years – banning all exports and allowing marginal imports. The Israelis through their mass-media propaganda have convinced many fools that the blockade was part of Israeli “self-defence”, just like “The Wall” against Palestinian terrorism. However, according to an Israeli government document, the blockade had nothing to do with Israel’s security – but an act of economic warfare against Islamic Resistance Hamas which rules the Palestinian territory.
“As Israel ordered a slight easing of its blockade of the Gaza Strip Wednesday, McClatchy obtained an Israeli government document that describes the blockade not as a security measure but as “economic warfare” against the Islamist group Hamas, which rules the Palestinian territory.
Israel imposed severe restrictions on Gaza in June 2007, after Hamas won elections and took control of the coastal enclave after winning elections there the previous year, and the government has long said that the aim of the blockade is to stem the flow of weapons to militants in Gaza.
Last week, after Israeli commandos killed nine volunteers on a Turkish-organized Gaza aid flotilla, Israel again said its aim was to stop the flow of terrorist arms into Gaza.
However, in response to a lawsuit by Gisha, an Israeli human rights group, the Israeli government explained the blockade as an exercise of the right of economic warfare.
“A country has the right to decide that it chooses not to engage in economic relations or to give economic assistance to the other party to the conflict, or that it wishes to operate using ‘economic warfare,’” the government said.
McClatchy obtained the government’s written statement from Gisha, the Legal Center for Freedom of Movement, which sued the government for information about the blockade. The Israeli high court upheld the suit, and the government delivered its statement earlier this year.
Sari Bashi, the director of Gisha, said the documents prove that Israel isn’t imposing its blockade for its stated reasons, but rather as collective punishment for the Palestinian population of Gaza. Gisha focuses on Palestinian rights.”

No comments:

Post a Comment