How India-Israel created Bangladesh
Written by (Author ) Politics Apr 29, 2010
Former head of counter-terrorism branch of India’s intelligence Research and Analysis Wing (RAW), B. Raman, in his book ‘The Kaoboys of R&AW: Down Memory Lane’ documents the major part played by India-Israel intelligence agencies in the dismemberment of Pakistan and creation of Bangladesh in the Eastern part of Pakistan in 1971.
The book give most credit to the first Chief of RAW, Rameshwar Nath Kao (died 2002) from 1969 to 1977, whose photo adorns the front-cover of the book. According to the book the breakup of East Pakistan was carried out by Indira Gandhi government in two phases. Phase one was coordinated by RN. Kao and phase two by Field Marshal Sam Manekshaw (a Parsi, died 2008) – both reporting directly to Indira Gandhi (died 1984).
According to Raman, in the late 1960s, Indira Gandhi, deployed RAW into action as the East Pakistan crisis deepened. RAW trained and supplied arms to the Bengali anti-Pakistan guerrillas and organized phsychological-warfare campaign against Islamabad-based central government. Almost every day Indira Gandhi had at her disposal bugged conversations of top Pakistani officials on Islamabad’s plaaning in East Wing of the country. She did not make a single decision concerning military action in East Pakistan without the advice of RAW’s Chief R.N. Kao.
The Illustrated Weekly of India (1923-93), had posted an article, titled “The Spymaster” in its December 23, 1984 edition, which stated:
“One of the most glorious chapters in the history of RAW, was the operation leading to the creation of Bangladesh. That country would never have been born but for the operation carried out by RAW for several years before the Indian Army action. The first meeting between IB operatives and Sheikh Mujib had taken place as early as 1963, and after RAW was set up in 1968, it anticipated virtually every major military and political development that took place in what was then East Pakistan during a meeting in India with Mrs. Gandhi, at which the master spy (Kao) was also present, Mujib’s successor, Zia-ur-Rahman is reported to have remarked: “This man (Kao) knows more about my country than I do.”
Soon after RAW’s establishment in 1968, Kao arranged a secret liaison with Israeli intelligence agency Mossad – to “learn from its counter-terrorism techniques”. Father Bush as director of CIA (1975-77) cultivated a close friendship Kao. As vice-president, Bush, turned off Washington’s support for the Sikh seperatists in Indian Punjab on the advice of Kao. Later, India’s Hindutva leader and Home Minister LK Advani visited the Zionist entity in June 2000, during which the two Muslim-hating governments agreed that the Israelis would make India and Israel partners in threatening the Muslim world with diabolic conspiracies to fragment and cripple it as a political force in the world. The details of his meetings with Zionist-regime, particularly the heads of the Israeli Home Ministry and its intelligence agencies, Mossad and Sabak, revealed that the arrangements he has made for joint Indo-Israel espionage operations in key areas of the Muslim world would make the Indian embassies in these Muslim countries the eyes and ears of the worldwide cloak-and-dagger of Israeli spy network.
Ed Blanche writes in Janes’ Security on 14 August 2001:“Israeli intelligence agencies have been intensifying their relations with India’s security apparatus and are now understood to be heavily involved in helping New Delhi combat Islamic militants in the disputed province of Kashmir, India’s only Muslim-majority state which lies at the core of the conflict with neighboring Pakistan. Israel has several teams now in Kashmir training Indian counter-insurgency forces to fight the dozen separatist guerrilla groups operating in the Indian-controlled sector of the disputed state. The exact extent of the involvement in Kashmir by Israel’s intelligence agencies is far from clear, but it fits into Israel’s increasing focus on events in Central Asia, and as far field as Indonesia, the world’s most populous Muslim state, to counteract Islamic fundamentalism, which it perceives as a major threat. We have been reading the name MOSSAD and its role in destroying Muslims around the world and especially in South East Asia with the help of India RAW wraps, in a fascinating plot, full of intrigue and betrayal. It is said that it is the joint venture of the trigone that is the core point of consideration. Mossad, RAW and Israeli Russian Ukrainian drug mafia have been performing these functions as coalition partner previously”.
Asoka Raina in book “Inside RAW: The Story of India’s Secret Service” wrote:
The involvement of RAW in East Pakistan is said to date from the 1960s, when RAW promoted dissatisfaction against Pakistan in East Pakistan, including funding Mujibur Rahmanh’s general election in 1970 and providing training and arming the Mukti Bahini. Indian intelligence agencies, were involved in East Pakistan now, Bangladesh, beginning, in the early 1960’s.
Its operatives were in touch with Sheikh Mujib for quite some time. Sheikh Mujib went to Agartala in 1965. The famous Agartala case was
unearthed in 1967. In fact, the main purpose of raising RAW in 1968 was to organize covert operations in East Pakistan. As early as 1968, RAW was given a green light to begin mobilizing all its resources for the impending surgical intervention in erstwhile East Pakistan. When in July 1971 General Manekshaw told Prime Minister Indira Gandhi that the army would not be ready until December to intervene in Bangladesh, she quickly turned to RAW for help. RAW was ready. Its officers used Bengali refugees to set up the guerilla force Mukti Bahini. Using, this outfit as a cover, the Indian military sneaked deep into Bangladesh. The story of Mukti Bahini and R.A.W.’s role in its creation and training is now well known. RAW never concealed its Bangladesh operations.
Mohammd Zianul Abedin in “RAW and Bangladesh” wrote: “RAW retained a keen interest in Bangladesh even after its independence. RAW was involved in training of Chakma tribes and Shanti Bahini, who carried out subversive activities in Bangladesh. It also unleashed a well-organized plan of psychological warfare, created polarization among the armed forces, propagated false allegations of the use of Bangladesh territory by Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence agency, created dissension among the political parties and religious sects, controlled the media, denied the use of river waters, and propped up a host of disputes in order to keep Bangladesh under constant political and socio-economic pressure.
Thursday, 29 April 2010
Wednesday, 21 April 2010
Surah 61 As-Saff
Monday, April 19, 2010
Video : Egypt, Syria/Lebanon and the end of Israel, Netanyahu lost the war and he is already wanted dead or alive by his masters in the West !
After five years, Hizbullah came to the conclusion, with the full evidence, that french zionist jewish networks were behind the assassination of Rafik Hariri because he was backing financially Chirac-DeVillepin for the 2007 french presidential election. Mossadnik Sarkozy needed the help of Israel to kill Hariri to take power in France and take down Syria. Now that Sarkozy is directly named in this affair, Israel is threatening Lebanon and Syria.
Ask yourself where did they get the information about North African guys involved in the operation ?
Sarkozy is also directly involved in the Madrid (2004) and London (2005) bombings, that helps him secure his place in France and then Europe, by supporting the Israeli plan to send more EU troops in Iraq. We were the only people in the place to confirm that Sarkozy and Israel were behind the Rafik Hariri assassination. Like the US embassy in Paris, under Paul Wolfowitz, killed one of the best friend of Saddam Hussein in the West, Jean Luc Lagardere, another Sarkozy 'enemy'. Promote Sarkozy to make sure France will take part in the Syria, Iran wars....
Mubarak is now dying, and strangely Sarkozy was in charge of his security during the last 18 months, bizarre ? ! Netanyahu fears a soft coup d'etat in Egypt that will force him, to ask NATO and Obama to seize the Sinai and probably take control of the Nile river and the Litani river in South Lebanon. In fact, this is the plan and we warned you long time before it happen. Egypt built a wall, but also huge tunnels in the desert to help Israel invade Gaza by the south. According to our sources Mubarak has only few weeks, until he is transformed like Sharon as a living-mummy. Palestinians face a total extermination, a programmed final-solution genocide and Jordan may disappear as a state, that's why his english-jewish king is barking about 'an imminent war' in the Middle East.
Netanyahu disappeared during the last days, the reason is that he is now been too far, like Rabin went too far but on the other side of the way. Netanyahu, like Sharon, fears to be assassinated by his masters, because he thought he was in full power, and unlike Sharon, he forgot that he was just a puppet, like Sarkozy in France. Strauss Kahn, head of the IMF, will take power in France, in 2012 and he will work under the table like the CIA front man Obama is trying to do, without tangible success. Iran is still Iran, Syria is still Syria, Pakistan is still Pakistan, Afghanistan is still Afghanistan and Iraq is still Iraq... Where did you see any change ?
Time is on our side Obama, not yours !
Wa Allah swt 'alam,
Saturday, 10 April 2010
CIA Official Confirms Duke Was Right
— @ 6:40 pm
Email This Post Print This Post
CIA Official Confirms Duke Was Right
By David Duke
Broadcast of 6-29-2004
The media never tires of telling you what a bad guy I am, in fact it seems these days that they use my name pejoratively for everything that is wrong in America. Any Google news search will show that hardly a day goes by when a media hack doesn’t take my name in vain.
But, it is interesting when a government insider offers evidence that this guy who everybody loves to hate was clearly right on a major issue.
Most Americans and just about 99 percent of the rest of the world now realize that the Iraq War was a huge mistake, one that has not only cost America an enormous price in money and blood, but one that will only fuel more hatred and terrorism against our nation.
At this moment our brave young soldiers are enduring terrible personal sacrifices, danger, and sometimes even disfigurement and death in a contrived war not for America but for the state of Israel. To get us into this Jewish holy war against Israel’s long-time enemy, Saddam Hussein, Americans had to be lied to on a massive scale. We were told that Saddam Hussein was connected to the horrible 911 attacks, that he was an ally to Al Qaeda, and that he had huge stockpiles of weapons of mass destruction. We were told that he was an imminent danger to America. I could go on and on.
In reality, none of this was true. Even the 911 government commission formally stated that Saddam had no connection whatsoever with the 911 attacks. On June 27th a major article in the Washington Post by Walter Pincus reported on a new book by a prominent official, a 22-year veteran of the CIA who occupies a senior position in counterterrorism. He served as chief of the bin Laden station from 1996 to 1999. The article is:
FROM INSIDE THE CIA
Anonymous analyst blasts tactics in Iraq, Afghanistan
Let me quote a few lines.
WASHINGTON — A new book by a senior CIA analyst who headed the agency’s task force on Osama bin Laden sharply attacks the Bush administration’s approach to Islamic terrorists, sternly criticizes the decision to invade Iraq, and chides officials for trying to create a Western-style democracy in Afghanistan.
Senior US leaders, the book argues, mistakenly urge Americans to believe that the Islamic world is offended by the nation’s philosophical emphasis on personal rights and liberties and “that Muslims hate and attack us for what we are and think, rather than for what we do.”
The author calls the Iraq war “an avaricious, premeditated, unprovoked war…�?
The author, who writes under the name Anonymous, argues that it is not dislike of freedom, democracy, and Western culture that led bin Laden to wage war against America, but rather his disdain for US policies and actions in the Muslim world, particularly America’s relationship with Israel.
Now let me quote from what I said in the days following the attack. These writings can be found both on my website and in my book Jewish Supremacism.
Almost immediately after the attacks, the media began to parrot a huge lie about why the event happened so as to protect Israel’s image and maximize American hatred for Israeli’s enemies. There were two main parts to the lie. First, the media solemnly announced that the attacks had absolutely nothing to do with American support of the criminal and terrorist policies of Israel. It is vital to the Jewish supremacists that the American people do not fully realize the huge national and personal costs of our Israeli-controlled foreign policy. Americans might begin to ask why we have a policy that so hurts America and that even brings terrorism to our shores. The media cannot afford to let people ask those kinds of logical questions, so they had to manufacture an explanation for the attack that left out Israel.
Jewish ultra-supremacist Benjamin Netanyahu actually had the chutzpah to appear before a Congressional hearing on the incident and claim that the Arab world hates America so much that it is Israel that suffers from its association with the United States!
Thus, the soldiers of militant Islam do not hate the West because of Israel, they hate Israel because of the West…[i]
Netanyahu told America not to worry, however, because loyal little Israel would still stand behind the United States even though America has been ruining Israel’s sterling reputation with the Arabs by associating with Israel.
President Bush should have immediately responded by telling the Israelis that we are very sorry for hurting Israel’s image among the Arabs, so we will solve that problem for you by cutting off our support for Israel.
Secondly, the media repeatedly alleged that the attackers simply did it because they hate American “freedom.�? The hatred of freedom propaganda then was repeated incessantly by the media. Even President George Bush repeated that canard in his speech to the U.S. Congress. He said:
Americans are asking “Why do they hate us?”
They hate what they see right here in this chamber: a democratically elected government. Their leaders are self-appointed. They hate our freedoms: our freedom of religion, our freedom of speech, our freedom to vote and assemble and disagree with each other.
At the same time the media blamed bin Laden for being the mastermind behind the attack; they told us he did it because he “hates American freedom�?! The media knew such claptrap was a blatant lie. Every media outlet in the world has full access to his past interviews. Bin Laden has never said a word against democracy or freedom. In 1998, ABC news interviewed Mr. bin Laden and asked him about the first attack on the WorldTradeCenter. He praised the attackers and gave the reasons why he opposes America. Here are some excerpts of the broadcast by ABC:
“I say to them that they (Americans) have put themselves at the mercy of a disloyal government, and this is most evident in Clinton’s administration…We believe that it represents Israel inside America. Take the sensitive ministries such as the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Defense and the CIA, you will find that the Jews have the upper hand in them. They make use of America to further their plans for the world…�?
“For over half a century, Muslims in Palestine have been (by the Jews) slaughtered and assaulted and robbed of their honor and of their property. Their houses have been blasted, their crops destroyed…
The Jewish media knew why America was attacked from day one. They knew all along it was because of our Israel First foreign policy. The media bosses decided to air no more interviews with bin Laden, except for government-approved excerpts, so they could perpetuate their lies about his motivations. They knew that the attackers viewed America as under control of Zionists and that America has been used to support Israel’s terrorism against Israel’s enemies.
Saying the September 11 suicide bombers attacked America because they hate democracy is simply ridiculous. No plane bombs crashed into Switzerland or Iceland, two long-enduring democracies.
The absolutely absurd Big Lie about attacking democracy was promoted to cover up the obvious truth that the terrorist acts happened in retaliation for America’s unconditional support for the terrorist state of Israel and its leader: one of the world’s most blood-stained terrorists, Ariel Sharon.
The fact that the media could so unanimously cover up the real reason for the attack of September 11 is clear proof of the Jewish supremacy over it. Of course, the real truth is that America was attacked not because we have a truly free press, but because it is controlled by Jewish supremacists. We were attacked not because our government is free, but because our Israeli-controlled government, as Sen. William Fulbright said, is one that, quote: “has acted directly against the most important interests of the American people�?, unquote.
That’s what I wrote in the first few days after the 911 attacks, and everything I wrote then is now confirmed by a senior official of the CIA who was once in charge of the Osama bin Laden station.
In just a few days America will supposedly turn over the Iraq government to the Iraqis. That’s a lie just as big as saying the world trade center was attacked because the hijackers hated our freedom. It is a government handpicked by the Bush administration and Bush’s Zionist handlers, such as Paul Wolfowitz and Richard Perle. Our brave young American military men and women will still be in harm’s way, separated from their homes, families, businesses and careers. They will still be maimed and wounded by the score. Americans will still be required to foot the ungodly cost of this insane war.
All of this could have been avoided, if our leaders were not controlled by the powerful Israeli lobby and if the press were truly free. If the American press were really free and had honestly reported the 911 attacks, the immoral support of the United States for Zionist Israel, and the lies told to fight this war for Israel, we would not be facing the disaster we now face. Right on www.DavidDuke.com you can read my well-documented chapter on Jewish Supremacy over the American media in my book Jewish Supremacism.
Interestingly, the man the media loves to hate was right from the beginning about the motivations of the 911 attacks and the terrible impact of the Iraq War.
If I was right about the Iraq war you might find me right about some other issues as well.
You will find plenty of those issues in The David Duke Report, on my websites, and in my book Jewish Supremacism.
This is David Duke and these are a few of my latest thoughts.
Back To Radio Shows Page
[i] Statement of former Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu before the U.S. Government Reform Committee. (2001). Sept. 20.
0.073 ||Powered by Duke site
David Duke Video Catalog
Friday, 9 April 2010
SHOULD CHRISTIANS SUPPORT ISRAEL?
New Video 15th Most favored in the World!
Many Christians are now told that Christians must support Israel and even support Jewish power in America because “God has a covenant with the Jews.”
In fact, this goes against the fundamental teachings of the New Testament!
In the first place, the Covenant talked about in the Old Testament was always “Conditional.” That is, God said that he would honor it to the 1000th generation, BUT, that IF they did not keep the commandments of God, or rejected him, that God would requite them and “destroy” them.
The traditional and correct Christian view is that by hating and rejecting Jesus, the Son of God, they have rejected God and broken the Covenant. The New Testament says that very clearly! The New Testament gives us the very words of God himself in the clearest of language.
‘Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers, in the day when I took them by the hand out of the land of Egypt; because they continued not in my covenant, and I regarded them not, saith the Lord.’ (Hebrews 8:67, 910)
Christianity from its founding has always held that Jews hated Christ, caused his crucifixion, rejected God’s son and have rejected Jesus every since. Therefore, they broke God’s Covenant. God made a NEW Covenant for those who accept Jesus Christ.
Jewish extremist power has been this biggest enemy of Jesus Christ and Christians for the last 2,000 years. They lead the destruction of our Christian values with Hollywood, and lead every kind of degeneracy from Porn to Abortion, to destruction of every Christian value. Jewish extremists led the legal fight to ban prayers in school, even ban Christmas carols.
It is not every Jew, of course, but the Jewish power structure has led the fight for abortion, for homosexual degeneracy and marriage and for the de-Christianization of America.
It is a tragedy that some Christians have been deluded into thinking that they are being good Christians by supporting these anti-Christian Jewish enemies of Christ himself.
When you see this film, you will understand why Billy Graham said what he said about them, and you will understand why he too, in his own words, crawl to them. That’s how much power they really have in America. He can’t say publicly what he says privately. He is afraid they will destroy his ministry.
It breaks my heart to see Christians deluded into supporting the worst enemies of Jesus Christ and, really, themselves.
Christ may have said “turn the other cheek”, but he never said to support evil deeds.
This video is dedicated to my Christian friends, who deserve to hear the traditional Christian view and not the brand new view of Judaism and Jewish extremists promoted by the same establishment which, in Graham’s words, is causing America to “go down the drain.”
We must inform our fellow Christians and wake up our brethren before it is too late.
Read my article SHOULD CHRISTIANS SUPPORT ISRAEL on www.davidduke.com
The New Preface for Jewish Supremacism – latest edition
— @ 5:40 am
Email This Post Print This Post
David Duke’s Preface to Jewish Supremacism — latest editionobama and chabad leader levi Shemtov
Left: President Obama in the White House with Chabad Lubavitch leader Levi Shemtov. As documented below, Chabad is a Jewish extremist organization that literally believes that the purpose of all Gentiles is to “serve Jews” and that Gentiles are inferior and have in fact “satanic souls.” Do a Google Search and read about one of Chabad’s leading rabbis, Yitzhak Ginsburgh who recently endorsed a book in Israel calling for the murder of Gentile babies who hold a “potential threat for Israel.” Also documented below is a statement by Ginsburgh in Jewish Week where he says it is moral for a Jew to kill a Gentile and steal his liver because Jewish life has “infinite value” as compared to “inferior” Gentiles. All this is well documented and proven, so why no outrage at the close relationship of the President of the United States to this extremist Jewish hate group, and why does the national and international media cover up what should be a scandal of huge proportions? This embargo of truth about Jewish extremism shows you who really is in control of politics and media — doesn’t it? Why is Dr. Duke called an anti-Semite for exposing this Jewish extremist influence in the highest levels of government, yet no major media will dare to expose the most powerful and influential hate group in the world and its close relationship with governments across the world? –Staff
Here is my updated Author’s Preface to Jewish Supremacism. Notice the powerful new references and exposure of Chabad Lubavitch. The fact that this Jewish extremist, hate organization can not only escape mainstream criticism, but in fact be praised and commended by almost every major political leader of the West reveals the radical Jewish influence on both our media and government. In America and the whole world, no book is doing more to awaken people about the danger of Jewish extremism than this book. It is now back in print, and I will be happy to autograph all orders, and remember that we offer a discount and discounted airmail shipping to America and most of the world! — Thanks, David Duke
David Duke’s Preface to Jewish Supremacism — latest edition
I promise that this book will challenge you. Its amazing documentary evidence will confront some of your most cherished beliefs.
If you can put aside, as best you can, the prejudices you may have on this subject and even preconceptions you might have about me personally, you can more fairly evaluate the ideas and evidence in this book. That is all an author can ask of his reader, and I ask it of you. It is my earnest belief that if you endeavor to keep an open mind, what you read will surprise you.
The real power of this book comes from its documentation from major sources. In fact, you will quickly discover that most of my documents about Jewish supremacism and international Zionism are from Jewish sources. They argue more convincingly for my point of view than anything I could write. I encourage you to go to the sources that I quote and check them out for yourself. In this book, I take you with me on a fascinating journey of discovery in a forbidden subject. I urge you: courageously keep an open mind while you explore the topics ahead. That is the only way any of us can find the truth.
Some will defame this book by calling it anti-Semitic. Yet, it is not considered anti-American to examine historical mistreatment of American Indians. No one calls it anti-Christian to talk about the excesses of the Inquisition. Is one considered anti-White for documenting the history of Jim Crow in the South? The mass media are filled with stories about the dangers of Muslim extremism. No one says that it is anti-Muslim to examine extreme elements of Muslim fundamentalism. This book dares to examine a forbidden topic: Jewish extremism.
This book is not anti-Semitic; it simply examines and documents the powerful extremist elements of ethnic supremacism that have existed in the Jewish community from historical to modern times. This book will prove, and it will do so by mostly Jewish sources, the existence of Jewish supremacist elements in many of the highest echelons of government, media and financial power. Because anyone who addresses this subject is slandered as an “anti-Semite” it is vital that I repeat emphatically that this book has is not against all Jews; it pertains only to Jewish extremists. I have much respect for individual Jews; this volume is in fact dedicated to a Jew: the late Israel Shahak.
As an introductory glimpse into Jewish supremacism, I can point to the close relationship of the White House of the United States with a very powerful, extremist Jewish organization, Chabad Lubavitch.
What is Chabad Lubavitch? It is worldwide, ultra-orthodox Jewish extremist organization with members in every leading nation of the world. If you are not familiar with the organization, its racial supremacism will shock you.
Chabad Lubavitch teaches that Gentiles are unclean, inferior creatures whose sole purpose on the earth is to serve Jews. Various Chabad rabbis maintain that Jews are literally the DNA of God, while Gentiles are the “supernal refuse of creation.” They often teach that it is no sin, and is in fact righteous, to kill or cheat a Gentile. Some readers may not want to believe this, but any quick research on the Internet to official Chabad sites and the writings of numerous Chabad rabbis will bear out every word that I say. You will find that everything in Jewish Supremacism is thoroughly documented and referenced.
Chabad and other extremist orthodox rabbis frequently author columns in the largest Jewish newspaper in the United States, Jewish Week. In this paper you will find supremacist attitudes that any decent human being would call horrific. Examine the following quote:
As for the goyim…Zalman’s attitude (was): “Gentile souls are of a completely different and inferior order. They are totally evil, with no redeeming qualities whatsoever.” …If every simple cell in a Jewish body entails divinity, is a part of God, then every strand of DNA is a part of God. Therefore, something is special about Jewish DNA. …
If a Jew needs a liver, can you take the liver of an innocent non-Jew passing by to save him? The Torah would probably permit that. Jewish life has an infinite value,” he explained. “There is something infinitely more holy and unique about Jewish life than non-Jewish life. – Chabad Lubavitch Rabbi Yitzhak Ginsburgh in Jewish Week, the largest Jewish publication in the United States.
This Statement was made by a leading Lubavitch Rabbi named Yitshak Ginsburgh and it can be found in the April 26, 1996 Jewish Week. Many Christians would doubt the authenticity of the quote simply because they could not believe any religious leader would actually say that it would be moral for a Jew President Bush with Chabadto kill a Gentile and take his liver. In many of my lectures, I bring home the horror of what Rabbi Ginsburgh said by pointing out to the non-Jews in the audience that he argues that Jews have the moral right to murder your mother or father, son or daughter, husband or wife to provide a liver for a Jew. The evil of such a statement is simply beyond the comprehension of most of us, but again, this statement was made in largest, most popular Jewish publication in the United States.
For simply quoting Ginsburgh and exposing Jewish supremacism in my writings and lectures I have been condemned as a hater, anti-Semite and a bigot. I must endure this treatment by the media while Ginsburgh himself has received hardly a whiff of criticism. His statement was not one of a lone extremist Jew off somewhere in a remote desert of Israel, but was made by one of the honored leaders of a sect that actually has parties and conferences in the White House.
The New Republic in a May 4, 1992 article revealed the hateful anti-Gentile nature of Chabad Lubavitch.
…there are some powerful ironies in Chabad’s new messianic universalism, in its mission to the gentiles; and surely the most unpleasant of them concerns Chabad’s otherwise undisguised and even racial contempt for the goyim.
…Moreover, this characterization of gentiles as being inherently evil, as being spiritually as well as biologically inferior to Jews, has not in any way been revised in later Chabad writing. (The New Republic)
The “Great Rebbe” is the spiritual leader of Chabad. He was late Rabbi Menachem Schneerson many Jews worship like a Messiah. Chabad claims that Rabbi Schneerson never committed a sin in his entire life, and they gathered by the thousands at his gravesite expecting him to rise from the dead. What did Rabbi Schneerson say about Gentiles?
chabadleaders3x.jpgThe following quotes are taken from a book of his recorded messages to followers in Israel, titled Gatherings of Conversations and published in Israel in 1965. During the subsequent three decades of his life until his death, Rabbi Schneerson remained consistent; he did not change any of the opinions. What Rabbi Schneerson taught became official, Lubavitch-Hassidic doctrine. Regarding the non-Jew the Lubovitcher Rebbe’s views were clear:
The difference between a Jewish and a non-Jewish person stems from the common expression: “Let us differentiate.” Thus, we do not have a case of profound change in which a person is merely on a superior level. Rather, we have a case of “let us differentiate” between totally different species. This is what needs to be said about the body: the body of a Jewish person is of a totally different quality from the body of [members] of all nations of the world …
…An even greater difference exists in regard to the soul. Two contrary types of soul exist, a non-Jewish soul comes from three satanic spheres, while the Jewish soul stems from holiness.
We therefore ask: Why should a non-Jew be punished if he kills even a non-Jewish embryo while a Jew should not be punished even if he kills a Jewish embryo? The answer can be understood by [considering] the general difference between Jews and non-Jews: A Jew was not created as a means for some [other] purpose; he himself is the purpose, since the substance of all [divine] emanations was created only to serve the Jews.”
Only a few courageous Jews have fought against the Jewish supremacism and anti-Gentile racial hatred of Chabad Lubavitch. One is Dr. Michael Samuel, a former professor of Judaic studies. Here is an excerpt of a letter he sent about Government funding of a Chabad center in Montreal, Canada:
My name is Michael Samuel. I am a former professor in the Judaic studies department of Concordia University, Montreal, and I have a question for you:
What would you do if a racist cult tried to build its headquarters in your neighborhood? What if the cult targeted specifically young people, teaching them that all Christians and Muslims are:
1. evil, satanic creatures from birth (making all Gentile babies “little demons”)
2. no better than worms
3. not really living beings at all, but already “dead”
4. all to be forcibly converted or subjugated by the “Messiah”
5. and that it is their sacred duty to hasten the arrival of this “Messiah” in order to accomplish the forcible conversion or subjugation of non-Jews as soon as possible.
These are just some of the racist teachings of the fanatical messianic cult named “Chabad Lubavitch.” This cult, masquerading as “authentic Judaism,” has been promised nearly one million dollars in funding by the government of Premier Lucien Bouchard of Quebec in order to build its new religious and “outreach” (missionary) complex in Cote St. Luc, Montreal.
Why should you care? Because Chabad Lubavitch is not just our problem, it may be yours as well. It is an extremely powerful, worldwide organization. Its power has until now intimidated the media, who are afraid to expose the evidence of racism produced here to the public, lest they be accused of anti-Semitism. We desperately need your help in breaking this media blackout. …
chabad leaders Dr. Samuel failed in his efforts to stop the funding of the Chabad Lubavitch center in Montreal. Canada has imprisoned citizens for the “hate crime” of simply criticizing Jewish extremism, but gave this Jewish extremist sect that spouts vicious anti-Gentile hate $800,000 of Canadian tax money. Chabad’s influence goes much further than simply getting tax money; they have an inside track to the most powerful political leaders in the world.
The photos show the head of White House policy, Joshua Bolten, as well as President Bush, with rabbis of this extreme Jewish organization, Chabad Lubavitch. The White House regularly invites Chabad rabbis for its celebrations, and even allows them in to teach the many Jewish activists who work there. Chabad Lubavitch rabbis often give the prayer at formal White House Cabinet meetings.
You will look in vain in the popular mass media or in political circles for any serious condemnation of Jewish supremacism. In fact, George Bush actually issued a statement on June 27, 2006 honoring the memory of the Great Rebbe, Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson. Every U.S. President since Rabbi Schneerson’s death has honored this extreme Jewish supremacist. Here is a direct quote from the Jewish Telegraph Agency (JTA) reporting on the honoring of Rabbi Schneerson and showing their influence on American policy.
White House to Chabad: Bush won’t press Israel
The Bush administration will not force Israel into unilateral concessions, top White House officials told representatives of the Lubavitch movement.
Chabad Lubavitch culminated a two-day commemoration of the 12th anniversary of Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson’s death with meetings Wednesday with Michael Chertoff, the Homeland Security secretary, and Joshua Bolten, the White House chief of staff. Both men are Jewish.
Bolten and other White House officials assured Chabad representatives that President Bush would never force Israel to concede territory to the Palestinians without a quid pro quo, participants said. Bolten said Bush would follow Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert’s lead in deciding what concessions to support
If space permitted, I could show pictures of Chabad leaders with every president since Richard Nixon. I could show pictures of Chabad leaders with President Mitterrand of France, Prime Minister Tony Blair of Britain, Chancellor Angela Merkel of Germany, President Victor Yushchenko of Ukraine and even President Putin of Russia.
chabadleaders2ax.jpgIt is not just the bearded extremists of Chabad that have such supremacist sentiments, many of the publicly acknowledged, most influential Jews of the United States. A perfect example is Stephen Steinlight. He served for five years as the Director of National Affairs for the largest and most powerful Jewish organization in the United States, the American Jewish Committee. He made the following remarks in an article on immigration in a national Jewish magazine in October of 2001:
I’ll confess it, at least, like thousands of other typical Jewish kids of my generation, I was reared as a Jewish nationalist, even a quasi-separatist. Every summer for two months for 10 formative years during my childhood and adolescence I attended Jewish summer camp. There, each morning, I saluted a foreign flag, dressed in a uniform reflecting its colors, sang a foreign national anthem, learned a foreign language, learned foreign folk songs and dances, and was taught that Israel was the true homeland. Emigration to Israel was considered the highest virtue, and, like many other Jewish teens of my generation, I spent two summers working in Israel on a collective farm while I contemplated that possibility. More tacitly and subconsciously, I was taught the superiority of my people to the gentiles who had oppressed us. We were taught to view non-Jews as untrustworthy outsiders, people from whom sudden gusts of hatred might be anticipated, people less sensitive, intelligent, and moral than ourselves. We were also taught that the lesson of our dark history is that we could rely on no one. …
If any Gentile politician dared to say that “typical Jewish kids” are deliberately taught that their real loyalty is not to America but to Israel; and that Jews say they are superior to Gentiles in intelligence and morals, he would be mercilessly condemned by the media and hounded out of politics as an anti-Semite. Yet, this stark admission is by the former head of National Affairs for the American Jewish Committee. It should be emphasized that Steinlight’s words are not from an off-handed or careless conversation, but are his carefully chosen words from a major article he wrote for Jewish consumption, called “The Jewish Stake in America’s Changing Demographics.”
If this leading American Jew is accurate, a real threat exists to the United States. For if “typical Jews of his generation” are indeed loyal to Israel over the nations in which they live, is there not a danger that they could use their influence in media and government to serve the Zionist agenda? This book will show how powerful Jewish supremacists have used their influence to steer America into a Mideast policy catastrophic to American interests. Israeli-centric Middle East policies have led America to suffer the horrific terrorism of 9/11.
This volume will show that they have led us to the carnage and disaster of the Iraq War — a war that has led to 500,000 Iraqi dead, and has cost tens of thousands of American wounded or dead, untold billions of dollars, and hurt American interests all over the world. Does anyone still not know that this war was a war for Israel not America?
Any Gentile politician who would claim that some powerful Jews are disloyal to the nation in which they dwell; and that they are more loyal to Israel and the Jewish agenda, would clearly face career suicide. And what would be the reaction to George Bush or any White leader who said that he believed the White race to be superior? Yet, for some reason Steinlight’s account of naked Jewish supremacism received not a word of attention in the media or political establishment.
Any criticism of Jewish extremism is immediately condemned as “anti-Semitism.” The chronic media recital of the horrors of the Holocaust has made the term “anti-Semitic” morally equivalent to the endorsement of mass murder. The word itself shuts down reason and evokes heat rather than light. The word is flagrantly overused; it is even used against those who simply protest Israeli human rights violations against Palestinians.
I am reluctant to begin my book by saying what it is not. The media climate, however, forces me to do so.
Due to the overwhelming power of the media to distort what I say and write, I state emphatically here and now that I do not oppose all Jews, any more than an author examining the excesses of the Inquisition opposes all Christians. Specifically, Jewish Supremacism examines a long record of Jewish supremacist ideology and history that has had a powerful and damaging effect on both the Jewish and Gentile world.
I will be the first to acknowledge that not all Jews support or share in this supremacism. In fact, a number of courageous Jews have suffered greatly for opposing it. One of them: an Israeli professor, Dr. Israel Shahak, was a professor at Hebrew University. He offered strong evidence that Jewish radicals have waged an unrelenting ethnic war against Gentiles since the days of their sojourn in Egypt. Dr. Shahak believed that this extreme chauvinism has helped bring about centuries of repeated anti-Semitic reactions, ranging from the pogroms of Pharaoh to the horrors of what is now called the Holocaust. He persuasively argued that unless both Jews and Gentiles courageously stand up against this supremacist agenda and its power, it will continue to pose a severe danger to Jews and Gentiles alike.
Not only will this book show the existence a Jewish supremacist ideology, it will demonstrate that those who embrace this ideology wield immense power in media, government and world finance. They are powerful enough in the early years of the twentieth century to have sent American servicemen to be maimed or die by the tens of thousands in the Iraq War, a war based on the “weapons of mass destruction lie and other lies that they promoted practically unchallenged in their media. The war was certainly against every true interest of the United States of America. Now, they plan new wars and new catastrophes for America and for the world.
This book is ultimately about lessening both the dangers and the hatreds between our peoples. This cannot happen until both Jews and Gentiles hear the other side of the Jewish Question, a point of view currently forbidden in the modern world.
As I write the lines of this preface, I sit on a mountain in the Colorado Rockies named after the aspen tree, whose shade I now enjoy. Its cylindrical leaves turn easily in the cool breeze, reflecting the sunlight and affording me a magical image. Through those glittering leaves I can see snow capped peaks on the horizon. The sight pleases both my eyes and my soul. From this mystic place, I cannot see a single human being; only the magnificence of Nature fills my eyes. Questions of politics, culture, religion, nationalities, ethnicity and race seem far away from here. From this vantage point, the world and even Nature herself appear serene. Yet, when I look closely at the scenic beauty of Nature, I can see conflict and war that far eclipses even the worst turmoil found in mankind.
Here on this mountain a never-ending struggle rages of element against element and species against species. The wind, rain and snow will someday level these great mountains of rock. Even the flowing stream, the ultimate symbol of serenity for many people, violently fights for its life of movement against the mountain. Indeed, in time this great mountain will eventually succumb to even the tiniest rivulets of water and the other erosions of Nature.
As I write in my notebook, two ants approach a peach pit on the rock beside me. One ant is larger and very differently equipped than the other. He has his way over the smaller one, but the vanquished creature runs back to his kingdom to report the great store of sweet food. His relatives will seek to return to the treasure before their competitors. The two tiny breeds might even go to war over the morsel. My eyes open to the war waged all around me.
On this mountain, the trees, bushes and grasses compete for the sunlight and life itself. Smaller birds keep wary eyes out for hawks. The flora and fauna face the danger of death from the insects and parasites seeking to consume them. Even within every life form, a microscopic war rages. The more closely one looks, the more intense the battle. In one cubic meter of rich soil there are more living creatures injured, killed, eaten or even exploited and enslaved than all the numbers of human beings on earth who have faced a similar fate. Biologists could offer endless examples of the never-ending battle for life and dominance between life forms, enough to fill a million books the size of this one.
Yet, oddly, it is this brutal struggle of survival waged over a billion years that produced the serene beauty that so touches my heart as I look out from this high place. So, perhaps this mountain is not so unlike the eternal battles among humankind. The historical struggle among human races has played a powerful role in our human evolution just as it has for all life forms throughout the natural world. Its result for humanity is no less breathtaking than the view from this mountain. It produced a higher humanity that has given us the art of DaVinci’s Madonna and Child, the ultimate expressions of sublime love found in Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet or Keats’ Ode on a Grecian Urn.
The eternal struggle created the evolutionary advances that enabled our kind to put our footprints on the moon. It is still hard to grasp that human beings have walked on another world and actually traveled to the golden orb of light that mankind has gazed up at with wonder for millennia. Could these things have been achieved without the evolutionary struggle for life and dominance that has driven us upward? An argument can surely be made that it is this life and death struggle for evolutionary fitness that produced the beautiful and ultimate forms of love and achievement that in turn give us meaning. This struggle created the beauty in mankind and the glory of its creations, just as a seemingly cruel Nature created the stark splendor seen on this mountain I love.
So perhaps, up here surrounded by a magnificent portrait of Nature, I am not in a world very far removed from the human conflicts down below. Most people see the seemingly serene vistas of Nature and never guess the war that rages underneath its aesthetic canopy. There are also those who are unaware of the racial and ethnic wars boiling both on and under the surface of humanity.
I seek to lessen the hatreds between mankind and offer a vision of every people having the right to preserve their heritage and their freedom. You cannot work to end a war, if you don’t even acknowledge that it exists. This book is about an ethnic war being raged for 3,000 years being waged by one extremist group against the rest of humanity.
Although we fantasize about the peace-loving nature of human beings, most of human history is a record of tribal, ethnic or racial war of one kind or another. For instance, the most read book on earth, the Bible, records the bloody history of the conflict between the Israelites and the other peoples of the Middle Eastern region. It tells glorious stories of war and shocking accounts of genocide. Anyone who reads the Old Testament with unbiased eyes will readily discern its dominant theme of racial and ethnic supremacism. There are many blatant expressions of ethnic supremacism:
Israelites are a “chosen people,” chosen by God above all the other peoples of the world.
Israelites have a right to rule over all other people and are promised that they will someday own and rule over the whole world.
Israelites boast of genocide against whole peoples and kingdoms.
Israelites are commanded to murder all the people of the lands where they intend to live, and to kill all the people of foreign nations that do not submit themselves in slavery.
Israelites are forbidden to make slaves of their own people, but are encouraged to enslave non-Israelites whom they may pass down as slaves to their descendants forever.
Israelites are forbidden to intermarry or “mix their seed” with other peoples.
Few people dare to even acknowledge the blatant racial supremacism of the Bible. And those who become aware of the extreme Jewish supremacism in the Old Testament tend to believe that such sentiments are relegated to ancient times and have no influence on the present. Jewish Supremacism, however, shows that the powerful ethnocentrism of ancient Judaism has continued to thrive to the modern day. I will offer compelling evidence that Jewish supremacism is alive and well in the 21st Century. It has a dramatic and increasing effect on world events.
It can be said that I as a Christian also revere the same Old Testament books of supremacy. The difference, of course, is that the Christian New Testament represents a profound shift from the Old. In place of an “eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth,” Jesus Christ taught “turn the other cheek.” In contrast to Jewish supremacism, Christianity offers universal salvation.
Judaism bitterly rejected Jesus Christ and has never enjoyed his teachings of love and tolerance. In fact, not only did the Jewish high priests, the Pharisees, pursue the crucifixion of Jesus Christ, these leaders guided their faith in the opposite ideological direction. It can be said that in addition to the crucifixion of Christ’s body, they killed his spirit in their own hearts.
It would be wrong to hate or persecute present-day Jews because of the role of Jewish leaders in the crucifixion of Jesus Christ, but it is important to understand the ideological, religious and ethnic war born during those times.
From the earliest days of Christianity, Jewry became its chief persecutor, for the Pharisees saw the Christian salvation of both “Jew and Greek” as a threat to their ethnic purity and supremacism. It should be said that Judaism is also diametrically opposed to the Muslim faith, which like Christianity also has been interpreted as a universal message. Not only did Jewish supremacists oppose Jesus himself, they mercilessly persecuted his followers, the early Christians.
Yet for fear of the Jews no one spoke openly of him (John 7:13)
. . .for you suffered like things of your own countrymen as they did from the Jews, who killed both the Lord Jesus and the prophets, and drove us out and displease God, and oppose all men (1 Thessalonians 2:14-16)
Over the next few centuries, they codified Jewish oral tradition and adopted the Babylonian Talmud as their most important religious text. According to the Universal Jewish Encyclopedia, it even supersedes the Torah in authority. As Jesus Christ represents an evolution of greater love and tolerance, the Talmud only intensified the Torah’s chauvinism. I will thoroughly document this fact from Jewish texts themselves and through quotes from major Jewish scholars who discuss the Talmud’s meaning. The Talmud’s unashamed and frequent references to non-Jews as animals and “supernal refuse,” as well as accounts of boiling their enemies in semen and excrement are expressions of racial hatred that would have made Hitler blush.
I will prove this controversial statement in this book and even show how mainstream Judaic authorities, such as uncensored editions of another major Jewish resource, The Jewish Encyclopedia, confirm the Talmud’s hateful anti-Gentile teachings. I will also show that rabid anti-Gentile teachings are still promoted in modern times by many of the largest Jewish publications, such as the most popular Jewish newspaper in the United States, The Jewish Press. More than any other newspaper, it sets the tone of Jewish religious and cultural attitudes.
One of its primary religious authorities is Rabbi Simcha Cohen, who has an instructional Dear Abby-type column called Halachic Questions. Not long ago, Rabbi Cohen instructed his readers that the Talmud denotes Gentiles as “animals” (as outlined by Talmudic writings from Gemara Kiddushin 68a and Metzia 114b). In another section he discusses how a Jewish woman is not designated as a prostitute if she has premarital sex with a Jew, but she is a whore if she has any sexual relations with a Gentile, even if she is married.
Marriage to a Gentile can never be sanctified or condoned, such a liaison classifies the woman as a zona…common parlance interprets the term zona to refer to a prostitute…. 
Another major Jewish publication, The Jewish Chronicle, in an article called “Some Carefully and Carelessly Chosen Words,“ reveals that the Jewish word for Gentile woman is the offensive Yiddish word shiksa — meaning “whore,” from the Hebrew root, sheigetz (“abomination”). It also pointed out that a little Gentile girl is called shikselke, meaning “little female abomination.”
Shiksa – the Jewish term for a Gentile woman, from the root word sheigetz meaning “abomination” or “whore.”
Shikselke – a Gentile little girl, meaning “little female abomination.”
How would Jews and the media react if Gentiles casually referred to Jewish women and little girls as “Jewish whores” and “little Jewish whores”? What would happen to any politician or entertainer in the world who referred to Jewish women and little girls as Jewish whores? Am I now supposed to be called an anti-Semite because I simply dare to expose such hateful anti-Gentilism proven in the two most influential Jewish newspapers in America?
The Talmud’s extreme supremacist teachings have certainly been a powerful factor in preventing assimilation of the Jewish people with Christian and Muslim communities. Even though Jews have lived as only a small minority in Gentile nations for more than 3000 years, major Jewish geneticists and anthropologists proudly assert that Jews have preserved their distinctive genetic identity. I will show how supremacist doctrines of fear and hatred of Gentiles, along with notions of Jewish superiority, are carefully instilled in every generation. Every young Jew learns of the perfidious nature of the Gentiles from Pharaoh to Hitler. They are taught that they are “chosen” above all people on earth: perhaps the ultimate expression of ethnic superiority.
This volume will show that the official policies of modern Israel and many of the leading elements of World Jewry still embody radically supremacist sentiments and policies. Organized Jewish elements around the world doggedly pursue their own supremacist agendas. Those agendas frequently conflict with the interests of the host nations in which they live.
My assertion that there exists a powerful, cohesive, worldwide Jewish supremacism finds confirmation in evidence mostly provided by the Jewish supremacists themselves. Their supremacist ideology finds clear enunciation in the foundation, structure and conduct of Israel, a nation unabashedly based on an ethnic supremacism. It is a state that has dispossessed, terrorized and grossly violated the human and civil rights of the Palestinian people.
What is Jewish Supremacism?
The definition of White supremacism from the Random House unabridged Webster’s Dictionary denotes it as “belief in superiority over other races and retaining of control in all relationships.” Let’s take the definition and apply it specifically to the term Jewish supremacism.
Jewish supremacism – The belief, theory or doctrine that the Jewish people are superior to all others and should retain control in all relationships.
As to the first part of the definition, this book assembles powerful evidence that many of the leading Jews of the world have a belief, theory or doctrine that they are superior to all other peoples. I will also clearly show that they seek control in all relationships with other peoples. David Ben-Gurion, Israel’s first Prime Minister, often called the “George Washington of Israel” said specifically that he believed in the “moral and intellectual superiority” of the Jewish people. That sentiment is frequent in the writings of Jewish leaders throughout the world. Imagine the outcry if the President of the United States pronounced that he believes in the moral and intellectual superiority of the White race! The Jewish dominated world media have so shielded Jewish supremacists from criticism that their most famous leaders can say such things without fear of any repercussion.
There was no outrage expressed by the world press when Ben-Gurion made his remark, nor did any protest ensue from his supremacist prophecy quoted in Look magazine in 1962; a prediction that Israel would one day sit atop a one world government.
“In Jerusalem, the United Nations (a truly United Nations) will build a Shrine of the Prophets to serve the federated union of all continents; this will be the seat of the Supreme Court of Mankind.”
It also seemed cruelly ironic to his Palestinian victims that there was little outcry when the boastful terrorist Menachem Begin was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize. Begin brags in his book, The Revolt, about the massacre of over two hundred men, women and children at Deir Yassin.  The world hunts down suspected Nazi war criminals, but gives a blood-stained Jewish one…the Nobel Peace Prize! That one event should tell us who is really supreme in the modern world.
The other necessary part of the definition of supremacism denotes having control over other races. I will argue that Jewish supremacists seek to control the nations in which they dwell. They make concerted efforts to dominate the two most critical factors of power in the modern world, mass media and government. This book provides documented evidence of their incredible supremacy in these sectors. This extreme concentration of power exists not only in America, but in most of the major nations of the world including Canada, Britain, Russia, France, Brazil and many more. It is a universal pattern suggesting design rather than accident.
Israel: A Jewish Supremacist State
Israel came into being by massive ethnic cleansing and displacement of Palestine’s indigenous population. At the time of the Balfour Declaration in 1917, Jews made up only 10 percent of the population of what today is Israel. After the Zionist terrorists drove out the British and expelled most of the Palestinian population in 1947 and 1948, Jewish supremacists established Israel. It still scrupulously preserves the cultural and genetic identity of the Jewish people.
Israel protects its Jewish control over its ethnic enclave by carefully guarding its ethnic makeup. It bases its immigration on a genetic standard and limits immigration almost exclusively to those of biological Jewish descent. An atheist Jew from New York City who has never stepped foot inside Israel is financially helped to immigrate, while hundreds of thousands of Palestinians whose families lived there thousands of years cannot return to their birthplace.
Israel is not a “multicultural nation.” It is unashamedly a Jewish state devoted exclusively to the interests, heritage and religion of the Jewish people. A nation with a sizable Palestinian minority, it is certainly the most rigidly segregated society in the world. Separate schools exist for Jews and Arabs, separate apartment complexes, separate neighborhoods and separate settlements. Many policies adversely affect Palestinians as compared to Jews. For instance, Palestinians are forbidden from joining normal units of the military. A former member of Israel’s Supreme Court, Haim Cohen, described the system that applies to Jews and Palestinians in Israel as similar to “Nuremberg laws” of Nazi Germany:
…the bitter irony of fate which has led the same biological and racist laws propagated by the Nazis and which inspired the infamous Nuremberg laws, to serve as a basis for the definition of Judaism within the State of Israel.
I go deeply into the subject of Israel in the body of this book, but I should not leave the subject now without pointing out that the Jewish supremacism that dominates Israel receives little negative press around the world. Consider the positive press that Israel receives as compared to the unanimous and universal media condemnation that was heaped upon the former apartheid regime in South Africa. Condemnation of South Africa was hypocritically led by an American media thoroughly dominated by Israeli partisans.
I slowly became aware of a dual morality permeating Jewish-Gentile relations. Jews preach one morality for themselves and another for the non-Jewish world. Their highest morality is one of racial pride, solidarity, tradition and self-interest. But they preached diversity and liberalism for their perceived competitors. If such dualism did not exist, how could the Jewish-dominated American media:
Support the nation of Israel, which promotes Judaism in its schools, while opposing even the singing of Christmas carols in American public schools?
Support the nation of Israel, which has strictly segregated schools, communities and facilities for Jews and Arabs, while condemning segregated schools and housing in America and South Africa?
Support the nation of Israel, with its restrictive “Jews Only” immigration laws, while subverting American attempts to curtail even illegal immigration?
Support the nation of Israel, which allows every Jewish citizen to carry a machine gun if desired, while advocating gun control for American citizens?
Support the nation of Israel, which openly states its mission to preserve the Jewish people and heritage, while condemning Palestinians who desire their own state, and scourging European-Americans who dare to advocate the preservation of the Western heritage and culture in America?
Always depict the historical relations between Jews and Gentiles with the Gentiles as evildoers and the Jews as innocent victims, while condemning Gentiles as “anti-Semites” if they dare defend themselves from such ethnic slanders?
Such double standards in the mass media raise other questions. Why is the world press so myopic in regard to Israel’s ethnic suppression? Is it reasonable to suspect that the bias in the press could be a result of a preponderance of Jewish power? Regarding subjects such as Jewish supremacism, this domination certainly affords a reason why the term Jewish supremacism, unlike White supremacism, is never used by the press. Nor is the concept even explored. Even when Meir Kahane called Palestinians “dogs” and advocated forcibly expelling all Palestinians from Israeli occupied territory, he was never referred to as a Jewish supremacist.
On February 25, 1994, an American Jew, Baruch Goldstein, entered a mosque in Hebron and machine-gunned Palestinians at prayer, killing 29 of them. Some Jewish groups in both America and Israel have since made Goldstein a saint, building shrines for him both in America and in Israel. Neither Goldstein nor those who have built shrines to him are ever referred to as Jewish supremacists or even as “anti-Gentiles.” On the opposite hand, if a Gentile even dares to quote the statement by Haim Cohen comparing Israel’s laws to Nazi Nuremberg Laws, he will certainly find himself labeled an “anti-Semite” by the media.
The double standard of world governments and the press is often quite amazing. President George W. Bush, in the aftermath of the World Trade Center bombings of September 11, 2001, announced that any nation that harbors terrorists will feel the wrath of American bombs.
Not long after this pronouncement, Mr. Bush dined with one of the world’s worst terrorists, the Prime Minister of Israel, Ariel Sharon. As the world knows, Sharon has a long record of terrorism and murder, including responsibility for the massacre of 1,500 men, women and women children in the Sabra and Chatila refugee camps in Lebanon. During dinner, Mr. Bush did not so much as drop an olive on Mr. Sharon. Unlike hapless Afghanistan, no American bombs have fallen on Tel Aviv for harboring terrorists. In fact, Israel not only harbors terrorists, it has elevated many to be their supreme leaders. Sharon is not the first terrorist who made it to Prime Minister; some of the worst terrorists who achieved that position are Begin, Shamir and Barak.
One might argue that the existence of a supremacist Israeli state does not necessarily mean that the Diaspora (Jews outside of Israel) has the same supremacist agenda. However, one should consider the fact that organized Jewry all over the world devotedly supports the supremacist state of Israel. Secondly, there is ample evidence that policies of Jewish supremacy extend far beyond the boundaries of Israel. Powerful Jews in media and government around the world frequently act to exert control over the peoples among whom they live.
A Worldwide Agenda
Organized Jewry can be clearly shown to have had worldwide strategic objectives since the beginning of the last century. For instance, an early 20th Century goal of Russian and World Jewry was the overthrow of what they considered to be the anti-Semitic, Czarist government of Imperial Russia. Jewish communities around the world supported the establishment of a proto-Jewish, Communist regime in Russia. They provided most of the leadership and financing for the “Russian Revolution,” a revolution that was actually more Jewish led than Russian led. Its chief financier was in fact the New York Jewish capitalist and extreme Jewish supremacist, Jacob Schiff. 
One of the many startling documents I cite comes from the National Archives of the United States. It reveals that in the first government of Communist Russia there were only 13 ethnic Russians and more than 300 Jews out of a total of 384 Commissars. Let that startling fact sink in: there were only 13 ethnic Russians in the first Bolshevik government of the “Russian Revolution.” The chief correspondent of the London Times in Russia at the time described it as nothing short of an “alien invasion” and takeover of Russia by Jews. The same was said by our American ambassador to Russia, David Francis, and by American intelligence officers in Russia. Even Winston Churchill described the Russian Revolution as a takeover by Bolshevik Jews that had “…seized the Russian people by the hair of their heads and become the masters of this enormous empire.”  This is just a small preview of the startling documents found in this book.
The successful overthrow of a major national government (and murder of its ruling family) as part of a world Jewish agenda shows that even in the early days of the 20th Century they had considerable worldwide economic, political and media power. In the years since, their power has grown exponentially. Most people are still completely unaware of the paramount role of Jewry in the origins of Bolshevism in Russia and the spreading of Communism throughout the world.
The public’s lack of knowledge in this area illustrates Jewry’s influential role in academia and media. Otherwise, how could such important and easily verifiable facts of history be kept from common knowledge?
It also reveals the incredible cohesion and coordination of Jewish power around the world that can be mobilized for specific Jewish objectives. Another example of the power they wield in the highest councils of major nations was their successful effort for the establishment of Israel. From the issuance of the Balfour Declaration (only very recently did the world learn that the author of it was actually a secret Jew) to the founding and continuing support for Israel, to the Iraq War, they have shown the ability to get what they want.
Jewish supremacy has a hypocritical and a jealous nature. If the people among whom the Jewish supremacists reside would adopt programs of ethnic loyalty and solidarity similar to the Jewish supremacists, extremist Jews could obviously not exercise power and control, for they are only a small percentage of the population. Only when the ethnic and nationalist feelings of the host people are diminished can Jewish supremacists accumulate enough power to achieve their agenda. A clear pattern of Jewish influence in academia, government and media aims at weakening all ethnic solidarity and loyalty among their host peoples while purposely encouraging ethnic pride and solidarity among Jews. There is a concerted effort to weaken the group solidarity of Palestinians, Britons, Frenchmen, European-Americans, African-Americans and among Muslims in the Arab world. They seek any method to divide and weaken their enemies, as they are achieving their goal in the division of Iraq today. This pattern is also present within all nations wherever there are significant numbers of extremist Jews.
Divide and Conquer
Supremacist Jews fear and oppose all ethnic solidarity other than their own. In the Western nations they consistently oppose all organizations seeking to preserve the interests and heritage of Europeans. Likewise, in non-European nations, they consistently work to break down the solidarity and homogeneity of the prominent ethnic group. It is part of the Jewish supremacist modus operandi to foment diverse immigration and multiculturalism in every nation they reside in (except, of course, for Israel), as they see a squabbling, disunited society as easy prey to their intense and well-organized efforts at control. Dr. Stephen Steinlight, the former officer of the American Jewish Committee whom I quoted earlier, puts it in amazingly blunt terms:
For perhaps another generation, an optimistic forecast, the Jewish community is thus in a position where it will be able to divide and conquer and enter into selective coalitions that support our agenda.
In America, not only have they worked to weaken the solidarity of European-Americans, they actively opposed African American nationalist movements such as Marcus Garvey’s movement and the Nation of Islam. Those Black organizations simply desired to preserve their own heritage rather than assimilate into a multicultural society. Jewish supremacists hypocritically want no one other than themselves to be conscious of their own heritage and special interests. They try to make other groups feel guilty for even having pride in their own culture. They paint ethnic pride and cohesion in other peoples as supremacist or hateful.
A pertinent example of this divide and conquer method can be seen in Palestine and Lebanon. Most Palestinians and Lebanese are Muslim, but significant numbers are Christian. Israel has actively promoted hatred and civil war between Christians and Muslims in the Middle East. One of the reasons that Ariel Sharon arranged for the slaughter of Muslim refugees by the Lebanese Phalangist militia forces in 1982 was to promote bitter hatred and war among Israel’s Arab enemies. The diaries of one of Israel’s former Prime Ministers, Moshe Sharett, exposed the fact that this was one of Israel’s main tactics. The destabilization of nations by encouraging massive multiracial and multi-religious immigration, as well as promotion of existing ethnic and religious divisions within nations, has been a long-practiced strategy of Jewish supremacists.
This attempt to break down their enemy’s ethnic solidarity can be explained in the context of the Palestinian people. If Israel’s displaced Palestinians fully assimilate in foreign lands with their host populations and thus lose their identity as Palestinians, they and their assimilated descendants are certainly not as likely to support the Palestinian cause. If Jewish populations do not assimilate, they are more likely to support the Jewish state.
While they attempt to break down other peoples’ ethnic loyalty, Jewish supremacist forces in the media sponsor a chronic recital of historical anti-Semitism. Such a focus has two objectives. First, it heightens Jewish solidarity and worldwide support for Israel, and secondly, it stimulates collective Jewish hatred for the Gentile world and thus lessens Jewish assimilation. The recital of Gentile perfidy against Jews also protects them from Gentile criticism, for if anyone dares to criticize Jewish supremacism, he is painted as morally equivalent to the perpetrators of the Holocaust. The official Holocaust story has assumed a religious stature, and if anyone questions a single line of the Holocaust scripture he becomes a modern heretic now referred to as a “denier.”
Another example of the hypocrisy of the Jewish supremacists can be seen in the intermarriage issue. During his campaign for President, George Bush found himself excoriated by the press for speaking at Bob Jones University, an institution that opposes interracial dating and marriage. Of course, during the campaign both George Bush and Al Gore made many obligatory speeches for many Jewish organizations. The irony is that every synagogue in America and every major Jewish organization vigorously opposes intermarriage of Jews with non-Jews. In Israel itself the marriage of a Jew or non-Jew is outlawed. Of course, this blatant double standard finds no mention in America’s supposedly fair and free press. Such exposure would not be good for Jewish public relations.
Of course, not all Jews are supremacist any more than all Germans were Nazis during the Hitler era, but the fact remains that organized Jewry has pursued a successful agenda that has amassed incredible power in modern times. With the creation of Israel, they have established the most ethnically supremacist nation on earth. Even more importantly, they have managed to acquire enormous power in many of the major governments of the world (especially the United States) and today they thoroughly dominate the world news and entertainment media. My well-documented chapter about the media will prove that their power is far greater than you might suspect.
Silencing Their Critics
The extent of Jewish power is precisely why the general public is unaware of it, for those who know it also know the high price they would pay for openly discussing it. In America, doing so can result in damage of one’s reputation, or even the loss of business or employment. Such truth telling can result in threats, intimidation and even physical attacks by groups such as the Jewish Defense League. The Anti-Defamation League is always busy accusing their critics of racial, religious or ethnic intolerance, while they defend and deny Israel’s blatant racism and supremacism. This Jewish supremacist group can ruin the business or the political career of almost anyone they choose.
Even more dangerously, Jewish supremacists have now been successful in imprisoning their critics in many European nations. They cannot as of yet freely assassinate their critics in Western countries as they have hundreds of Palestinian writers, poets and clerics across the Arab world. In today’s Europe, however, simply quoting the supremacist statements of Jewish leaders can land one in prison.
There are hundreds of dissidents in prison at this moment who dared to simply speak or write openly about Jewish ethnic intolerance. Although the media constantly allege that, unlike the Nazis, we have free speech, there are citizens of European nations right now in prison for simply questioning some Jewish versions of the Holocaust.
Jewish supremacists have made an intense effort to weaken the sense of ethnic awareness and loyalty among Europeans. In our modern media’s political correctness, it is considered “hate speech” for Europeans to speak about their love for their heritage and express their desire to preserve it. As a European-American, I do believe that my people have a right to preserve their way of life. At the same time I recognize that natural right for all the different peoples and nationalities of the Earth. For instance, how odd it is that the Palestinians, who have been ethnically cleansed from their own nation and denied their most basic human rights, are so often characterized as “anti-Semites” and “terrorists,” while the “anti-Gentile,” Jewish supremacists who have terrorized them and stolen their country are little criticized by the world press.
Palestinians and those in the Arab world need to understand that the source of their own plight comes from the fact that European-Americans have been prevented from defending their own national interests and heritage just as Palestinians have been so prevented. Palestinians will never find liberation in their nation until European-Americans find liberation in America from Jewish supremacism.
Although I am certainly an activist for European Americans, I respect and applaud every people who desire to preserve their own way of life and even more vitally, their very existence as an ethnic entity. To me, ethnic survival is the most basic of human rights. It also is a fundamental human right for people to live under a government and also a news and entertainment media that reflect their own basic values, traditions, social and economic interests. A nation under the power of an alien and destructive mass media is equally oppressed as one under the power of a foreign, occupying government.
The increasing globalism of the 21st Century, driven on by Jewish supremacists, will continue to decrease the choices and freedoms of all people. Moreover, it will endanger the preservation of individual cultures, traditions, values, religious beliefs and ethnic identities. The end result of globalism will be an enormous world government, one that will crush freedom and diversity as a steamroller would a flower.
The idea that government should represent its own people and not any foreign power is the driving principle of the Declaration of Independence and America’s nationhood: the right of a people to have a government of their own and for their own interests. The preamble to the Constitution of the United States puts it succinctly when it talks of a government “for ourselves and our posterity.”
In America, the Jewish domination of key United States government positions is amazing. During President Clinton’s administration, the leading Israeli newspaper, Maariv, described “warm Jews,” meaning Jews loyal to the interests of Israel, as holding critically important positions on the United States’ National Security Council. Maariv stated that 7 of its 11 members are “warm Jews.” 
Jewish Supremacism was primarily researched and written during the Clinton Administration, and as such offers a sliver of historical time. But, do not imagine that the inordinate Jewish power diminished under the administration of President George Bush. His presidency began with fewer Jews in the most visible positions, but the underlying government bureaucracy that spans different administrations is as Jewish as ever. A good example is Alan Greenspan who has served as chairman of the powerful Federal Reserve for many administrations of both parties. His replacement, probably the most powerful economic position in the entire world, was Ben Shalom Bernanke, a man who each day has privileged information that could easily enrich his extremist brethren by billions of dollars.
In the National Security Council there has been increasing Jewish consolidation from the first days of the Bush presidency. Richard Sale of UPI on February 28, 2003 wrote about Zionist Elliott Abrams: “A staff shake-up at the National Security Council is likely to mean the United States will take a harder pro-Israel stance in the Middle East…Elliott Abrams, the controversial former Reagan administration official who President Bush last December appointed to the NSC to take charge of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, has removed several staff members who were regarded as even-handed on the issue.”
There are thousands of books and movies, many written, produced and marketed by supremacist Jews that condemn doctrines and movements of racial or ethnic supremacy among non-Jews. Few books, however, dare to examine the world’s oldest, most powerful and virulent form of ethnic supremacism: Jewish supremacism. The Jewish dominated mass media are filled with stories about the dangers of Muslim extremism. It seems that if these supremacist Jews were honest, they could better write about the supremacism they know the most about: their own. And my contention of course is that Jewish extremists are far more dangerous than Muslim extremists, in that they virtually have their fingers on the unimaginably horrific weapons of the world’s only superpower. In fact, they have used these weapons to support massive terror against a nation that did not attack us and did us absolutely no harm: the nation of Iraq.
Jewish Supremacism will show specifically how Jewish supremacists have used their political and media power to impose their will on American and other nations although their agenda clearly opposes the true interests of those nations. An excellent example is the Iraq War.
The Iraq War
It is no accident that the two nations most under the influence of Jewish supremacists, the United States and Britain, launched a military invasion against Iraq in March 2003. In going to war against Iraq, America fought against itself. It launched a war certain to cause more hatred and terrorism against the United States, cost hundreds of billions of dollars, and will inflict terrible damage to American economic and diplomatic interests at home and abroad. Even more importantly, it was a callous betrayal the brave fighting men of the American military who should never be put in harm’s way other than for the true security and freedom of the American people.
The most famous influential and long-time proponents of the war are the ardent Zionist extremists Richard Perle, chairman of the Pentagon’s Defense Policy Board, and Paul Wolfowitz. Perle and his wife were also founders of JINSA, the Jewish Institute for National Security. Perle and a well-networked cabal of Jewish Neocons (neo-conservatives) became the primary propagandists for the war. They included many former prominent Marxists, such as Norman Podhoretz, who opposed the Vietnam War, but morphed into a conservative hawk for Israel. Podhoretz has served as editor of Commentary, the magazine of American Jewish Committee. Among the other Jewish Neocons were Scooter Libby, Elliot Cohen, Douglas Feith, Bill Kristol, David Wurmser, Elliott Abrams, Michael Ledeen, Michael Kagan, Daniel Blumenthal Michael Rubin, Paul Frum, Henry Kissinger and even the former Marxist and Black Panther supporter David Horowitz.
Back in 1996, Perle, Feith and Wurmser were behind a report entitled A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm. It called for war on Iraq not for the United States, but for securing Israel’s realm. It was written for the incoming Israeli Likud Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Once the Israelis decided to create an American war against Iraq, they then had to manufacture the rationale for the war, so they said Iraq had weapons of mass destruction and that Iraq had threatened America. The mass media collaborated. Of course, Israel was far guiltier of every alleged transgression than was Iraq. But, the Jewish supremacists in the media never would draw the obvious comparisons:
Why Go to War Against Iraq?
Iraq has weapons of mass destruction
Yet, Israel has one of the largest and most deadly arsenals of biological, chemical and nuclear weapons in the world.
Iraq tried to forestall UN inspectors.
Yet, Israel has never even allowed any inspections of its huge stockpile of chemical, biological and nuclear weapons. Israel blocked UN investigations of Israeli war crimes such as Sharon’s Sabra and Chatila massacre and the mass murder at Jenin.
Iraq had invaded and occupied its neighbor Kuwait.
Yet, Israel invaded and brutally occupied Lebanon for 18 years, killing over 20,000 civilians and destroying 100,000 homes.
Iraq had brutally occupied the Kurdish areas of Iraq.
Yet, Israel has militarily occupied the three million people of the West Bank and Gaza for 35 years, a brutal occupation that has killed and maimed tens of thousands of Palestinians, forced many into squalid concentration (refugee) camps, tortured hundreds of thousands in its prisons, and denied Palestinians of even the most elementary human rights.
Iraq was danger to the United States.
Yet, Iraq had never raised a finger against the United States, while Israel had a long record of terrorism and treachery against the United States such as in the Lavon Affair, attack on the U.S.S. Liberty and the Pollard spy case.
Iraq had violated UN resolutions such as UN Resolution 1441.
Yet, Israel had violated more than three times as many UN resolutions as Iraq, including many supported by the United States. For 35 years, Israel has violated UN Resolution 242 demanding a complete Israeli withdrawal from the West Bank and Gaza.
If a case could be made for war against Iraq for the offenses claimed by the Jewish Neocons and the media, a far stronger case could be made for a war against Israel! The war against Iraq was an immoral, hypocritical war — a war fought for Israel and against every vital interest of the United States of America. It was a war that simply could not have been possible without the Jewish-supremacist domination of both the government and the media.
For simply mentioning the obvious role of the organized Jewish community behind the Iraq War, U.S. Congressman Jim Moran was actually forced to resign his Democratic leadership post. Associated Press on March 14, 2003, reports: “Rep. Jim Moran, D-Va., was forced out of his party leadership post Friday after a furor over his remarks about the role of American Jews in a possible war with Iraq.” It is fascinating to see Jewish supremacists exercise their power at the very same moment they deny such power exists.
Defending the Rights of All People
I see the value of all people preserving their cultural, national and even genetic heritage. All peoples have the right to preserve their unique identities, including Jews. This book shows that much of the organized Jewish leadership pursues goals of self-preservation and self-advancement tenaciously, while consistently demonizing other nationalities and races who dare to act similarly in their own interests.
Their ultimate victory would cause not only the loss of freedom, but also the destruction of the diverse heritage and culture of all peoples on the earth. It is my hope that all of us, all nations and every people, while acknowledging our respective differences of religion, race, culture and nationality —will work together to defend ourselves from the one incredibly powerful supremacism that threatens us all.
Hypocritically, the same forces that support Jewish supremacism have accused me of being a “White supremacist.” I reject that epithet, for unlike Jewish supremacists, I don’t seek to rule over or control any other race; I simply want to preserve my own heritage. Recognizing that there are intrinsic differences in culture, behavior, tradition, and even genetics among the different races does not make one a supremacist. The belief that every people has the right to preserve its heritage and be free of control of others is not supremacism. It is the opposite of supremacism. Supremacism is when one group tries to control or be supreme over another. Jewish supremacists seek not only control over the Palestinian people and the Arab world, they seek supremacy in almost every nation in which they dwell.
One of the tactics that the Jewish supremacists have used against me and against this book is to claim that I am a White supremacist and a racist. They do this by constantly referring to my Ku Klux Klan membership as a young man. It is important to state here that I have not been involved with any Klan group for almost 30 years. Also, the organization I led was entirely legal and nonviolent. No member of my group as ever charged or even accused of violence against anyone.
When I left the organization almost thirty years ago, I stated clearly and publicly that I left because I did not want to be associated with an organization that had a media image of hatred or violence. Then as now, I say clearly that I condemn any person or any group that truly supports violence, terrorism or hatred, whether they be White, Black, Jewish or of any ethnic, racial or religious group.
Contrast my treatment in the media for my politically incorrect thoughts of thirty years ago to the treatment of those who committed great crimes against humanity such as Ariel Sharon of Israel, or media treatment of the many officials of murderous communist regimes who have returned to power in reformed communist states.
Even though journalists write about and interview former communists in the politics in both Western and Eastern Europe, seldom is one of them introduced as “former Communist.” Although men such as Nelson Mandela engaged in terrorist bombings as a young man, he is never introduced to the TV audience as Nelson Mandela, “former terrorist.” Although Ariel Sharon was found responsible even by an Israeli commission for the massacre of over 1200 Palestinian men, woman and children at Sabra and Chatila, he is not introduced as “War Criminal” Ariel Sharon.
Even though the media cannot say that I have ever harmed a single human being, the press often headlines, and almost always begins current news articles about me as David Duke, former KKK leader, and says nothing about my distinguished career in the 30 years since that time. I am not introduced with my proper title of Representative, as is normal for past Representatives, Senators and Presidents. They would choke rather than use my legitimate and hard-earned title of Dr. David Duke. They certainly don’t say bestselling author David Duke. It is as if former Klansman David Duke is on my birth certificate. Senator Robert Byrd is a former Klan leader who went on to vote for Israel hundreds of times in the Senate, is Senator Robert Byrd is not introduced as former Klansman Robert Byrd. George Bush is a former drug user. He is not introduced as George Bush, “former coke-head.”
Divulging this fact about my long ago past is legitimate, as it would be about any public person, but notice that when one is a friend of Zionism his controversial past becomes a footnote, but when one opposes Zionism his past becomes a headline. I truly believe that if in my political career I would have gone on to sell out America to the Jewish extremists and to Israel, the Jewish media condemnations would have been transformed to praise. I can see their accolades. Isn’t it great David Duke could overcome his past, they would say.
The press also does not mention the fact I actually won the 1988 Democratic Vice-Presidential Primary election in the State of New Hampshire with over 60 percent of the vote. In 1989 I ran as a Republican to win election to the House of Representatives in Louisiana. In a state of roughly the size and population of Austria, in races for Governor and for U.S. Senator I won over 60 percent of the European American vote in each election. In the race for President in 1992, I received more votes in some Republican primaries than a number of far better-financed sitting Republican senators. In 1996 I won election as a member of the Parish Executive Committee of the largest Republican district in Louisiana. The other 13 elected members later unanimously elected me as chairman where I served to 2000. I then spent some years in Eastern Europe and entered in the graduate program at the largest university in Ukraine, MAUP, where I received a full doctorate in History.
I have been invited to lecture at over 100 major universities and I have traveled the world speaking against the crimes of Zionism against the Palestinian and Mideast peoples, and the terrible damage done to the United States by the Zionist control of our foreign policy. I exposed the Israeli terrorist attacks against the United States in the Lavon Affair and in their the attack on the U.S.S. Liberty. I warned that that the treachery of Israeli agent Jonathan Pollard would be repeated, and long before 9/11, I said that America’s Israeli-dictated policies would lead to terrorism and great harm to the American people.
After 9/11 and before the start of the Iraq War, I exposed the obvious truth that Saddam had no weapons of mass destruction and that the Iraq War was being orchestrated by powerful Jewish extremists in the United States media and government.
In November 2002, just a few months before the start of the war, Newsweek magazine, Periscope Section, revealed that the United States State Department threatened to yank the media credentials of the Al Jazeera satellite news TV network if they dared to interview on a prime-time program. Al Jazeera courageously had me on anyway, but within a month I was informed that Zionist-extremist Michael Chertoff had authorized federal tax and financial charges against me. I spent 13 months in the American gulag (for more on this see chapter 11).
Far from breaking my spirit, imprisonment only rededicated me to my work, my education, and my writing and speaking out against the greatest threat to freedom and peace, International Zionism. Upon my release I finished my Doctorate and have since lectured at universities across Europe, America and the Middle East, and built on my controversial reputation as the best known anti-Zionist in the world.
At Harvard University, the respected J. F. Kennedy School of Government published a paper in 2006 by professors Stephen Walt and John Mearsheimer titled “Israel and U.S. Foreign Policy.” Zionists such as Alan Dershowitz condemned it saying it was simply copied from my website and “could have been written by David Duke. “ Far from invalidating Walt and Mearsheimer, Dershowitz’s comments have only really confirmed the scholarship of my own work, for he shows that professors at the most prestigious university in the United States have now adopted my positions. You will see why in this book.
In 2006, I was invited to speak at the Holocaust Conference in Tehran, Iran. My speech centered on the vital need for freedom of speech on all issues, and the disgrace of the European laws that put people in prison for speaking their opinion and conscience. I met with Iran’s outspoken President, Dr. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and saw first hand how the Zionist influenced media and government officials have raised passions for a catastrophic war against Iran by blatant lies in constant use of the “wipe Israel off the map” mistranslation.
I am committed to world peace, to freedom and independence for my own and indeed, all nations. All peoples have the right to preserve their unique heritages. Jewish supremacism remains the greatest threat to those ideals and to all peoples.
Much of this book is taken from my autobiography, My Awakening. It is an account of my personal journey of awakening to the reality of Jewish supremacism. You will find its real power in the many direct quotations from important Jewish sources, all of which I carefully document with hundreds of source notes for your reference.
Jewish Supremacism is a thesis in autobiographical form. It is the story of my awakening on the Jewish Question that began when I was a young man beginning in the late 1960s. Most of my fundamental understanding was in place by the end of that decade, but my knowledge has grown much deeper over the last 30 years. Since the 1960s, much new scientific and political material has become available. In recounting my awakening, I am not trying to give the reader the impression that all the materials or studies I cite were available in the 1960s. I weave into this narrative contemporary data and documentation so the reader has the benefit of the latest information. Also, for reasons of coherence and organization, I focus on one primary area of discovery at a time, while in life the acquisition of knowledge is not so neatly compartmentalized. The reader will find some repetition in Jewish quotes that I find particularly revealing. They are repeated when especially pertinent to more than one topic.
Also, I would be remiss not to add that when I write “I learned” or “I discovered,” I take no credit for original research, for my education on these subjects came from innumerable authors and their books and articles. I am in debt to them as well as to my many supporters and friends who have educated me with the insights and knowledge acquired in their own awakening. I assemble, organize, analyze and comment on materials collected by scholars and writers from ancient times to the present.
My preface finished, I must close my notebook and come down from Aspen Mountain. In doing so, I realize that I am not leaving the Natural World, for its laws continue in the world of human conflict below. The struggle for life and freedom exists among the different varieties of mankind as certainly as it does for every form of life and energy on this mountain.
Taking part in the struggle for my own people’s life and freedom is as natural as the flow of the crystal stream running down the mountain beside me. It is my hope that the European people, the Palestinian people and indeed, all peoples of the world, are permitted the most basic human right of all: to live — to preserve their own unique cultures, freedom and identity. To do so, they must resist the earth’s ultimate supremacism: Jewish supremacism.
I would be a fool not to realize the danger to my own life, reputation and freedom that I face by exposing Jewish supremacism. But, as a loyal European-American; as a patriotic citizen of the United States and also, as one who sincerely wishes for justice for all people of the world — my duty is clear.
So, coming down from Aspen Mountain, I see the stream next to me. It follows its course. So will I.
Former Member of the House of Representatives
State of Louisiana, United States of America
 New Republic. (1992). May 4.
 Israel Shahak and Norton Mezvinsky. (1999). Jewish Fundamentalism in Israel. Pluto Press, p.B8-62
 Samuel, Michael. (1999) email sent to major organizations opposing government funding of Chabad Lubavitch religious center in Montreal. Oct. 23.
5 Jewish Telegraph Agency (JTA) (2006) White House to Chabad: Bush won’t press Israel. June 27, 2006,
 Steinlight, Stephen. (2001). The Jewish Stake in America’s Changing Demography: Reconsidering a Misguided Immigration Policy. Washington DC: Center for Immigration Studies. October.
 Shahak, I. (1994). Jewish History, Jewish Religion. Boulder, Colorado. Pluto Press.
 KJV Deuteronomy 7:6
 Jub. 32:18 19
 KJV Joshua 6:21; KJV Joshua 10:37; RSV Deuteronomy 20:16
 RSV Deuteronomy 20:10-18
 KJV Leviticus 25:44-46.
 KJV Deuteronomy 7:2-3; Ezra 9:12
 RSV John 7:13.
 RSV 1 Thessalonians 2:14-16.
 Universal Jewish Encyclopedia, “Authority” p.637.
 New Republic. (1992). May.
 Simon, M. Trans. (1936). 57a Gittin. London. Soncino Press. p.261
 The Jewish Press. (1988). Feb. 19. 10A.
 The Jewish Press. (1988). Feb. 19. 8C.
 Bermant, C. (1991). Some Carefully and Carelessly Chosen Words, Jewish Chronicle. May 17.
 Frank, Geyla (1997).
 Hertzberg, A. & Hirt-Manheimer, A. (1998). Relax. It’s Okay to be the Chosen People. Reform Judaism. May.
 Look Magazine. (1962). January 16.
 Begin, M. (1964). The Revolt: The Story of the Irgun. Tel-Aviv: Hadar Pub. p.162.
 Badi, J. (1960). Fundamental Laws of the State of Israel. New York. p.156.
 Reuters News Service (1998). Israelis Now Hold Worship Services
at Grave of Their Hero, Baruch Goldstein June 17
 New York Journal American (1949). February 3.
 Andelman, M.S. (1974). To Eliminate the Opiate. New York-Tel Aviv: Zahavia. Ltd. 26
 U.S. National Archives. (1919). Record Group 120: Records of the American Expeditionary Forces, June 9.
 U.S. National Archives. (1919). Record Group 120: Records of the American Expeditionary Forces, June 9.
 Francis, D. R. (1921). Russia From the American Embassy. New York: C. Scribner’s & Sons. p.214.
 Churchill, W. (1920). Zionism versus Bolshevism: A Struggle for the Soul of the Jewish People. Illustrated Sunday Herald. February 8.
 Associated Press Online. (1999). Balfour Author Was a Jew.
 Steinlight, Stephen. (2001). Backgrounder. Center for Immigration Studies. October.
 Rokach, L. (1980). Israel’s Sacred Terrorism. Bellmont, Mass: Assoc. Arab American University Grads.
 Bar-Yosef, Avinoam. (1994). The Jews Who Run Clinton’s Court. Maariv. September 2.
 Sale, Richard. (2003). Staff Change Means Mideast Policy Shift. UPI article in Washington Times. February 28.
 Associated Press. (2003). Moran Forced to Quit Democratic Post. March 14.
0.351 ||Powered by Duke site
David Duke Video Catalog
Leaked video shows US helicopter killing journalist in Iraq
Ads by Google
London Cooking Classes
A Fabulous Cooking Experience With Professional Chefs From Just £15
Carte Noire Readers
Indulge With A Rich Mug Of Coffee For A More Seductive Coffee Break
Giant Aquarium in France
France's Nausicaa in Boulogne is one of Europe's largest aquariums
Postcode lookup from £19
Add address lookup for your website.
Video released by a whistleblower group shows a US army helicopter ordering an air strike that kills 12 people then laughing at the dead.
"Look at all the dead bastards. Nice," a voice on the radio says after Army AH-64 Apache Longbow helicopters attacked on a group of men with rapid-fire cannons in July 2007.
Among the dead were Reuters photographer Namir Noor-Eldeen, 22, and his driver Saeed Chmagh, 40.
One American claims to have spotted six people with AK-47s and one with a rocket-propelled grenade. It is unclear if some of the men are armed but Noor-Eldeen can be seen with a camera. Chmagh is talking on his mobile phone.
WikiLeaks, a website that posts classified government documents, put the 17-minute video on YouTube. Pentagon officials confirmed its authenticity.
WikiLeaks said that it had acquired the video from whistleblowers in the military and was able to view it after breaking the encryption code.
The helicopters also attacked a van arriving to pick up the dead and wounded. Two young girls in were hurt and later carried from the scene by American soldiers. A voice on the radio said: "Well, it's their fault bringing their kids into the battle."
David Schlesinger, Reuters' editor in chief, said the videotaped killings of his staff were "tragic and emblematic of the extreme dangers that exist in covering war zones".